|
Mush4Brains
LOOL HACKED!!!

Registered: 07/31/13
Posts: 4,419
Last seen: 9 years, 2 months
|
Re: Republicans love our veterans. [Re: Simplicitry]
#19129607 - 11/13/13 12:56 AM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
I will defend my position tooth and nail once you admit you used the term "nanny-state" incorrectly.
|
Simplicitry
Just another mushroom lover



Registered: 05/23/09
Posts: 1,070
|
Re: Republicans love our veterans. [Re: Simplicitry]
#19129610 - 11/13/13 12:59 AM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Simplicitry said: How is cutting aid to losers of all walks of life discriminatory to veterans who are not an oppressed class?
I can see why anything but addressing this simple point is preferable to you unless you were to agree your original post is bullshit. Which of course it is
--------------------
  "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." I think we should cut all the social parasites from their welfare checks. Then they will either find a means to support themselves or starve to death, either of wich is good for the economy and society. I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal." "Islam in a man is worse then rabies in a dog"
|
Kiya_Star427
Live FREE or be a SLAVE!


Registered: 10/14/13
Posts: 355
Loc: New York
Last seen: 5 years, 1 month
|
Re: Republicans love our veterans. [Re: Mush4Brains] 1
#19130105 - 11/13/13 05:56 AM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Mush4Brains said:
Quote:
Kiya_Star427 said: V/A = death care.
Yeah Republicans are so pro-life but want soldiers to go die in wars for profit gains and Democrats also want soldiers to go off at corporate wars, but at least they don't pretend to love the troops and veterans while putting them on DHS domestic terrorist lists.
Source: Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/16/napolitano-stands-rightwing-extremism/#ixzz2kR3NVHwU Napolitano: "stands be report labeling returning Veterans as domestic terrorists"
If you look at the issue veterans are labeled domestic terrorists, b/c they are the only people that can protect the American civilians during something like a total collapse of society through debt, taxes...
The Washington Times is owned by the Moonie Cult. I will never give them a single page view.
Lol wow you don't have to believe me or Washington Times.
Hear it straight from the horses mouth, here is Janet Napolitano saying all returning Veterans are domestic terrorists. Man you must be a big time sheep or something lol.
|
Kiya_Star427
Live FREE or be a SLAVE!


Registered: 10/14/13
Posts: 355
Loc: New York
Last seen: 5 years, 1 month
|
Re: Republicans love our veterans. [Re: Mush4Brains]
#19130126 - 11/13/13 06:08 AM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Mush4Brains said: I will defend my position tooth and nail once you admit you used the term "nanny-state" incorrectly.
Nanny state a country that would pass legislation like the Patriot Acts, NDAA, FAA legalizing the authorization of military drones to be used on the American citizens.. This is no longer a nanny-state it's a police state.
|
Simplicitry
Just another mushroom lover



Registered: 05/23/09
Posts: 1,070
|
Re: Republicans love our veterans. [Re: Mush4Brains]
#19133905 - 11/13/13 11:12 PM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
I'll assume by the silence that you can't answer the question above because you can't intelligently defend your original position
--------------------
  "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." I think we should cut all the social parasites from their welfare checks. Then they will either find a means to support themselves or starve to death, either of wich is good for the economy and society. I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal." "Islam in a man is worse then rabies in a dog"
|
Therian
Stranger

Registered: 03/04/09
Posts: 684
|
Re: Republicans love our veterans. [Re: Simplicitry] 1
#19134329 - 11/14/13 01:23 AM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
I would have to say that one of the many actions by Obama that thoroughly cemented my opinion of him being a worthless negro cocksucking little bitch was when he wanted to force veterans to pay for their own healthcare for injuries INCURRED DURING BATTLE.
Honestly, I can't think of any way possible for a president to be perceived as an un American, uncaring hypocritical asshole than thorough this action alone.
Vets that lost limbs during combat, fuck 'em let them pay for their own prosthetics.
Illegal mexican scum that violate our laws to illegally gain financial reward at the taxpayers expense? Free health care for them, and their anchor babies. Yes, lets reward illegal behavior from parasitic fucks, all the while punish those that were willing to die for this country, and were injured/maimed/permanently physically impaired while doing so.
"Obama VA: Let’s charge vets for care on service-related injuries posted at 10:57 am on March 12, 2009 by Ed Morrissey
If the Obama administration wanted to come up with the most politically offensive policy it could imagine, within the bounds of reason and reality, what elements would it have to include? Insulting veterans and looking like cheapskates in a time when massive government outlays to private industry would certainly help it along. Comes now Hero of the Anti-War Left, retired General Eric Shinseki, who wants to save a few bucks at the Veterans Administration by making men and women injured in the service of our country pay for their care:
Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki confirmed Tuesday that the Obama administration is considering a controversial plan to make veterans pay for treatment of service-related injuries with private insurance. …
No official proposal to create such a program has been announced publicly, but veterans groups wrote a pre-emptive letter last week to President Obama voicing their opposition to the idea after hearing the plan was under consideration.
The groups also cited an increase in “third-party collections” estimated in the 2010 budget proposal — something they said could be achieved only if the Veterans Administration started billing for service-related injuries.
Asked about the proposal, Shinseki said it was under “consideration.”
“A final decision hasn’t been made yet,” he said.
Let’s see. The same administration that wants to give tens of billions of dollars to GM, Citigroup, AIG, and a host of other banks and manufacturers wants men and women injured in service to their country to pay for the medical care that arises from these injuries? In what universe does Shinseki and the Obama administration live, anyway?
And people used to complain that Bush didn’t care enough about veteran care – even though he increased the VA budget by 56% from 2001 to 2008. Bush never offered the notion that the nation should shirk its duty to those who gave their health for the defense of America, especially not in the same week in which his administration signed a record omnibus bill with 8,000 pork items in it. In fact, I don’t think any administration has ever signaled such a policy, mostly because previous administrations weren’t dumb enough to try it, let alone crass enough to consider it an area to save a little cash.
Obama said he wanted to bring bipartisanship to Washington, and he may succeed here — by annoying both Democrats and Republicans. Patty Murray (D-WA) declared that any such suggestion would be “dead on arrival” in the Senate. Richard Burr (R-NC) told Shinseki not to count on that revenue stream. If Hope and Change means dunning wounded warriors, Capitol Hill will say thanks, but no thanks, in as united a voice as one can imagine these days.
It’s just another incompetent moment in an administration trying to set a record for them."
http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/12/obama-va-lets-charge-vets-for-care-on-service-related-injuries/
|
Mush4Brains
LOOL HACKED!!!

Registered: 07/31/13
Posts: 4,419
Last seen: 9 years, 2 months
|
Re: Republicans love our veterans. [Re: Therian]
#19134346 - 11/14/13 01:29 AM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
I'm glad to see Therian and his shitty, rambling posts unbanned.
I will decline to comment any further.
|
Therian
Stranger

Registered: 03/04/09
Posts: 684
|
Re: Republicans love our veterans. [Re: Mush4Brains]
#19134495 - 11/14/13 02:12 AM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
I'm glad to see Therian and his shitty, rambling posts unbanned.
I will decline to comment any further.
When you cried to the mods did you tell them I hurt your feelings? Shall I provide a band aid for your fragile, yet over inflated ego?
Speaking of shitty posts, why not answer the question that has been asked of you several times?
Quote:
I'll assume by the silence that you can't answer the question above because you can't intelligently defend your original position
I do believe he can attempt to defend his position in some convoluted manner, most likely by blaming Bush, the system, "the man", extra terrestrials, his cognitive defects brought on by his desire to classify lead paint chips as "snacks", but doing so intelligently, is beyond his limited capabilities.
|
myc_check1212
Through Brass



Registered: 05/18/09
Posts: 4,545
Loc: Rio Lobo
|
Re: Republicans love our veterans. [Re: Therian]
#19140165 - 11/15/13 09:16 AM (10 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Republicans have a better track record when it comes to defense and military, but just barely.
-------------------- Lord_Senate: Pedophiles, rapists and everything in between. pastywhyte said: I'm not going to rush, I believe crow is best served cold. AhabMcBathsalts said: This is why democracy doesn't work. Because idiots like this get a fucking vote.
|
|