|
SneezingPenis
ACHOOOOOOOOO!!!!!111!

Registered: 01/15/05
Posts: 15,427
Last seen: 6 years, 9 months
|
how is Ghost?
#19092560 - 11/05/13 09:12 PM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I am waiting for the PS4 before i get it and I am still on the fence between ghost and BF4. always been a COD guy, but BF4 looked pretty good (played BF3 and wasn't thrilled with it).
I read a few reviews and a few of them blasted the MP of Ghost, rating it like 6.5 out of 10, but those same reviewers thought MW2 was the worst game in the series and thought Bops 2 was the best (couldn't be more wrong). So i take their reviews with a grain of salt.
I really want to know how much the leaning fucks things up. that is the one thing that bothered me the most about Ghost news.
also, do they still have hardcore and HQ and domination?
|
Psilosopherr
A psilly goose



Registered: 02/15/12
Posts: 12,278
Last seen: 2 months, 4 days
|
|
how can you be on the fence?
battlefield is better than COD in every way shape and form. SOOO much better
|
SneezingPenis
ACHOOOOOOOOO!!!!!111!

Registered: 01/15/05
Posts: 15,427
Last seen: 6 years, 9 months
|
|
until BF4, BF has never held any interest for me. BF had rigid movement, no fluidity to it and camping seemed to be rewarded rather than punished. Plus vehicle spamming gets kind of old after a while.
have you played ghost and BF4? if not, then you are just a fanboy who is angry that a fraction of people play BF compared to COD.
if you have, then please, explain why BF4 is better than Ghost.
|
Psilosopherr
A psilly goose



Registered: 02/15/12
Posts: 12,278
Last seen: 2 months, 4 days
|
|
Quote:
SneezingPenis said: until BF4, BF has never held any interest for me. BF had rigid movement, no fluidity to it and camping seemed to be rewarded rather than punished. Plus vehicle spamming gets kind of old after a while.
have you played ghost and BF4? if not, then you are just a fanboy who is angry that a fraction of people play BF compared to COD.
if you have, then please, explain why BF4 is better than Ghost.
:SOangry: 
Well, I haven't played ghost, BUT call of duty has been releasing IDENTICAL games with new names for many years now. If it is actually improved I would be SHOCKED. (I am aware they make tiny little changes)
Rigid movement? I cannot explain the genius that is BF3. If you don't see it, you just don't see it. The main advantage is that teamwork is highly encouraged/rewarded more so than in other games.
AND the engine and psychics are the best I have ever seen in a FPS. and the vehicles are veryyy well done. Everything about the game is well done except the servers are down sometimes
|
SneezingPenis
ACHOOOOOOOOO!!!!!111!

Registered: 01/15/05
Posts: 15,427
Last seen: 6 years, 9 months
|
|
I doubt you even know what you are talking about. seems to me you have never even played COD, or if you did you broke a controller because you got your ass kicked trying to camp in a corner.
COD has two developers that release a COD title every other year. everything Treyarch has put out is unbalanced and then nerfed every month, but they did listen to fans and implement great game modes and killstreaks (probably correlated to accepting suggestions). IW always made extremely balanced games and unlike treyarch, punished campers rather than placating the lowest common denominator.
you ever wonder why they didn't make a sequel to the rubix cube or really change tetris (dr mario is basically the same thing)? because you can't improve on perfection.
I gave BF3 a chance, but it has slow gameplay compared to COD... hopefully BF4 improves on the CQC and speed of the game.
|
SneezingPenis
ACHOOOOOOOOO!!!!!111!

Registered: 01/15/05
Posts: 15,427
Last seen: 6 years, 9 months
|
|
also, EA is a miserable developer. They come out with a good madden about every 5 years, yet release one every year, same goes for Tiger Woods golf. They are half ass developers that sacrifice certain things in order to capture all demographics, rather than acknowledging that the gamer demographic is the people who were born in the late 70's to the late 80's.
that is what the Wii is for: women and children. go develop games on that system and stop shitting on bread and butter titles.
|
Psilosopherr
A psilly goose



Registered: 02/15/12
Posts: 12,278
Last seen: 2 months, 4 days
|
|
Quote:
SneezingPenis said: I doubt you even know what you are talking about. seems to me you have never even played COD, or if you did you broke a controller because you got your ass kicked trying to camp in a corner.
COD has two developers that release a COD title every other year. everything Treyarch has put out is unbalanced and then nerfed every month, but they did listen to fans and implement great game modes and killstreaks (probably correlated to accepting suggestions). IW always made extremely balanced games and unlike treyarch, punished campers rather than placating the lowest common denominator.
you ever wonder why they didn't make a sequel to the rubix cube or really change tetris (dr mario is basically the same thing)? because you can't improve on perfection.
I gave BF3 a chance, but it has slow gameplay compared to COD... hopefully BF4 improves on the CQC and speed of the game.
You can't improve upon perfection: thats a phrase you use to describe COD? I'm not trying to bicker here, but that says it all for who 'knows what they're talking about.' Thats both hilarious and fucking sad 
I know a lot about COD, used to follow the series for years. Yes EA is usually a shitty developer, but they have this one gem.
Sounds like you barely gave BF3 a chance. You're awfully quick to start talking shit too, which is laughable.
|
Psilosopherr
A psilly goose



Registered: 02/15/12
Posts: 12,278
Last seen: 2 months, 4 days
|
|
Your "they don't change COD because you can't improve on perfection" quote is getting a fair amount of LOL's on my twitter
|
SneezingPenis
ACHOOOOOOOOO!!!!!111!

Registered: 01/15/05
Posts: 15,427
Last seen: 6 years, 9 months
|
|
MW1 and 2 are hands down the best FPS's of all time currently. there isn't even any point in arguing this. MW3 was alright, but it got away from what made MW1 and 2 so great.
WaW was laughable, and the blackops seemed to be the precursor to MW1 rather than games that came after it.
just wait, in 10 or 20 years, when sony buys microsoft and there is only one console left and it is virtual immersion reality or whatnot and IGN makes a "top 10 greatest FPS of all time", MW1 and 2 will be #1 and #2 on any and every list with the BF's getting middled and probably put behind Goldeneye.
you just sold me on Ghost btw, because if faggots like you are on BF4 then it has to be the AAA bush league shit and a pretty good indication of why COD always will outsell it 2 to 1.
|
Psilosopherr
A psilly goose



Registered: 02/15/12
Posts: 12,278
Last seen: 2 months, 4 days
|
|
You know whats really great about BF. It's that all the vehicles are there to fly and drive (unlike COD) and they are all balanced.
Having 2 helicopters and 4 jets buzzing around, while tanks are charging objectives, and engineers are trying to take them all out with missles and mines the whole time. And a plethora of other shit going on, every single match.
It introduces a much greater possibility for EPIC moments than a game with only infantry.
|
Observatory



Registered: 09/27/12
Posts: 824
Last seen: 7 years, 10 months
|
|
Strongly agree, BF over COD always
Every COD game feels the same to me, Battlefield on the other hand is evolving
The new snipers are the shit: 40x scopes, scoping in distances and infrared spotting binoculars, motion sensor grenades
Sniping in cod feels so empty compared to battlefields version
I would type more but I gotta get back, the game is calling me
Sweet merciful addiction
-------------------- Look around you
|
SneezingPenis
ACHOOOOOOOOO!!!!!111!

Registered: 01/15/05
Posts: 15,427
Last seen: 6 years, 9 months
|
|
i think it is a little more epic when you kill 18 people without dying to fly a chopper gunner rather than just spawning next to a jet.
|
SneezingPenis
ACHOOOOOOOOO!!!!!111!

Registered: 01/15/05
Posts: 15,427
Last seen: 6 years, 9 months
|
|
i will admit the sniping is better, but that is basically what the game is designed around. any other shooting is way less fun. killstreaks and customizable loadouts (not just 4 basic classes) are restrictive.
In COD you can make a shit ton of classes designed for any number of situations.
|
Psilosopherr
A psilly goose



Registered: 02/15/12
Posts: 12,278
Last seen: 2 months, 4 days
|
|
Quote:
SneezingPenis said: i will admit the sniping is better, but that is basically what the game is designed around. any other shooting is way less fun. killstreaks and customizable loadouts (not just 4 basic classes) are restrictive.
In COD you can make a shit ton of classes designed for any number of situations.
I think maybe you don't know how to aim properly in that game. It is pretty different and takes some getting used to.
But once you get used to bullet drop, and NEEDING to fire in bursts at longer range for automatic weapons; it starts feeling beautiful.
|
SneezingPenis
ACHOOOOOOOOO!!!!!111!

Registered: 01/15/05
Posts: 15,427
Last seen: 6 years, 9 months
|
|
must be hard to do when they move so slow.
|
Psilosopherr
A psilly goose



Registered: 02/15/12
Posts: 12,278
Last seen: 2 months, 4 days
|
|
Quote:
SneezingPenis said: must be hard to do when they move so slow.

They move plenty fast, and you can use vehicles if you NEED to go faster
|
SneezingPenis
ACHOOOOOOOOO!!!!!111!

Registered: 01/15/05
Posts: 15,427
Last seen: 6 years, 9 months
|
|
ok, sure, BF is the same pace as COD...
|
Konyap

Registered: 06/30/07
Posts: 33,945
Loc: Planet Piss
Last seen: 4 years, 3 months
|
|
you can't go wrong with either
next gen call of duty has a 40gb install for 1080p graphics and 18player count on servers
while battlefield 4 has a 64 player count and probably looks good as well
I'm probably going to the store late november to see how the controllers feel, my friends are all xdorks
|
Psilosopherr
A psilly goose



Registered: 02/15/12
Posts: 12,278
Last seen: 2 months, 4 days
|
Re: how is Ghost? [Re: Konyap]
#19095131 - 11/06/13 12:26 PM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Illyabo said: you can't go wrong with either
next gen call of duty has a 40gb install for 1080p graphics and 18player count on servers
while battlefield 4 has a 64 player count and probably looks good as well
I'm probably going to the store late november to see how the controllers feel, my friends are all xdorks
there you have it right there. Just the number of players per server.
and BF is far more pretty than COD
|
SneezingPenis
ACHOOOOOOOOO!!!!!111!

Registered: 01/15/05
Posts: 15,427
Last seen: 6 years, 9 months
|
|
yeah because MAG worked out so well...
|
|