|
The24HourMC
Master Of Ceremonies



Registered: 10/16/09
Posts: 7,704
Loc: Gone
Last seen: 8 years, 11 months
|
Survival Of The Fittest
#18970369 - 10/12/13 11:03 PM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Humans always focus on saving the sick , prolonging their life , curing their illnesses , fixing their broken bodies , feeding the poorest weakest etc. I'm sure there are other species that do this but none to the extent we do. This has to have a negative Impact on the planet as a whole . There is no way this can be good to have so many , essentially worthless people , still taking up space , producing garbage , consuming , polluting etc. The population is insane. Basically , I'm just wondering now , how would we all be naturally , without the help and assistance? What if we just let out weak die out? How would we have evolve differently? Is it a better thing to eliminate the weakest members of our race and let humans take the natural route and let us be the way we were intended , without our own interference? What if we just stopped leaving people on life support , chemotherapy , counseling , sympathy , all of it , just as every other species does? I have no answers , this is a difficult question for me and there are many many different ways it could go. I want your views and opinions. What do you think? All morals aside. How would we benefit and how would we not?
--------------------
My Baby In MCLA Fuckin Shit Fuck that stay high
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 30 days
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: The24HourMC] 1
#18970380 - 10/12/13 11:05 PM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
whoever cares about this shit, is a fucking sociopath.
|
The24HourMC
Master Of Ceremonies



Registered: 10/16/09
Posts: 7,704
Loc: Gone
Last seen: 8 years, 11 months
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: akira_akuma]
#18970443 - 10/12/13 11:22 PM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Looking at the possibilities if humanity takes different paths is sociopathic?
--------------------
My Baby In MCLA Fuckin Shit Fuck that stay high
|
azur
God of Fuck


Registered: 04/21/12
Posts: 28,103
Loc: Daid
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: The24HourMC]
#18970447 - 10/12/13 11:24 PM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 30 days
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: The24HourMC]
#18970465 - 10/12/13 11:28 PM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
The24HourMC said: Looking at the possibilities if humanity takes different paths is sociopathic?
humanity taking different paths, is stupid too.
|
Mescalean
Burke is love, burke is life.


Registered: 01/18/12
Posts: 6,755
Last seen: 6 years, 10 months
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: akira_akuma]
#18970489 - 10/12/13 11:33 PM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Honestly I think its interesting to think about. I wonder what the world population would be if we didn't preserve.
-------------------- FREE BURKE
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 30 days
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: Mescalean]
#18970499 - 10/12/13 11:35 PM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
people preserve themselves, what the *horn* are you talking, b?
|
The24HourMC
Master Of Ceremonies



Registered: 10/16/09
Posts: 7,704
Loc: Gone
Last seen: 8 years, 11 months
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: akira_akuma]
#18970530 - 10/12/13 11:45 PM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Self preservation is natural and instinct though.
--------------------
My Baby In MCLA Fuckin Shit Fuck that stay high
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 30 days
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: The24HourMC]
#18970540 - 10/12/13 11:47 PM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
yeah, well, no one is going to do anything about it. people can't care about every other douchebag on the planet. we're instinctively incapable.
|
The24HourMC
Master Of Ceremonies



Registered: 10/16/09
Posts: 7,704
Loc: Gone
Last seen: 8 years, 11 months
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: The24HourMC]
#18970549 - 10/12/13 11:50 PM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I'm talking about preserving others. Letting granny go when she gets too old to care for herself. Just walking past that guy starving to death instead of giving him food or money to help. Not bothering with Advil and flu shots and heart surgeries and blood transplants.All that kind of stuff. It sounds mean I guess and I'm not saying that's how it should be , but just how would we be? Would our governments even exist or the technology be more advanced or would we have even survived this long at all etc
--------------------
My Baby In MCLA Fuckin Shit Fuck that stay high
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 30 days
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: The24HourMC]
#18970567 - 10/12/13 11:53 PM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
oh you mean giving people aid. yeah, that should happen.
|
The24HourMC
Master Of Ceremonies



Registered: 10/16/09
Posts: 7,704
Loc: Gone
Last seen: 8 years, 11 months
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: akira_akuma]
#18970584 - 10/12/13 11:56 PM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Why would you want to give people aids? That's terrible
--------------------
My Baby In MCLA Fuckin Shit Fuck that stay high
|
geazerpleaser
No one



Registered: 02/13/12
Posts: 274
Loc: Ny
Last seen: 2 months, 7 days
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: akira_akuma]
#18970592 - 10/12/13 11:58 PM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
With eugenics humanity could exceed and improve greatly (physically, mentally, and even improve our resistance to certain disease), but with out gene diversity we could end up easily wiped out by some rare unknown disease
|
akira_akuma
Φύσις κρύπτεσθαι ὕψιστος φιλεῖ


Registered: 08/28/09
Posts: 82,455
Loc: Onypeirophóros
Last seen: 4 years, 30 days
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: The24HourMC]
#18970594 - 10/12/13 11:58 PM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
|
The24HourMC
Master Of Ceremonies



Registered: 10/16/09
Posts: 7,704
Loc: Gone
Last seen: 8 years, 11 months
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: akira_akuma]
#18970660 - 10/13/13 12:16 AM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Oh I read that wrong sorry. Wouldn't there still be gene diversity though from all the races from different parts of the world?
--------------------
My Baby In MCLA Fuckin Shit Fuck that stay high
|
NWlight
Just look


Registered: 01/12/10
Posts: 18,686
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: The24HourMC]
#18970699 - 10/13/13 12:32 AM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
as someone who has devoted their life to healing the sick, I pose this question to you:
Even if you were right, who is to be the judge of who we save and who we do not?
therein lies the "problem", if you could call it that.
--------------------

|
zZZz
jesus


Registered: 12/28/07
Posts: 33,478
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: The24HourMC]
#18970748 - 10/13/13 12:52 AM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
we would pretty much turn into animals.
|
geazerpleaser
No one



Registered: 02/13/12
Posts: 274
Loc: Ny
Last seen: 2 months, 7 days
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: zZZz]
#18970750 - 10/13/13 12:53 AM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
zZZz said: we would pretty much turn into animals.
we already are animals, we'd just be more cold hearted
|
geazerpleaser
No one



Registered: 02/13/12
Posts: 274
Loc: Ny
Last seen: 2 months, 7 days
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: The24HourMC]
#18970760 - 10/13/13 12:57 AM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
The24HourMC said: Oh I read that wrong sorry. Wouldn't there still be gene diversity though from all the races from different parts of the world?
the diversity wouldnt be as great as it is now, and also depending on who decides what people are diserable and which arent we could end up with another Hitler (major Eugenius believer).
|
zZZz
jesus


Registered: 12/28/07
Posts: 33,478
|
|
we are not animals. we are human!
we can be animals, but we are capable of much more. an animal has to survive by all means. i don;t think it can necessarily grow beyond that in its current stage. we can settle, we can create and manipulate the earth to fit our needs. we have hands with incredibly flexible fingers. that is what separates us and it is what makes us 'special', not necessarily more important, but the responsibility we carry is much greater because as uncle ben put its "with great power comes great responsibility".
|
Dr. P. Silocybin
Would you like fries with that?



Registered: 09/09/08
Posts: 2,620
Loc: The Great Divide
Last seen: 3 years, 11 months
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: NWlight]
#18970785 - 10/13/13 01:04 AM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
NWlight said: as someone who has devoted their life to healing the sick, I pose this question to you:
Even if you were right, who is to be the judge of who we save and who we do not?
therein lies the "problem", if you could call it that.
Very true. Some people will be saved, maybe someone perfectly healthy and intelligent young woman is chocking in public.. she's probably deserving of the Heimlich, right? but, where do you draw the line diving those worth saving and those who aren't? I can't draw that line.
I prefer giving people easy and affordable access to contraception and abortion. If population growth doesn't slow dramatically we will have a serious problem within our lifetimes. We need to make it as easy as possible to empower people who don't want to procreate. Who makes the worst parents? people who don't want, and or can't afford to raise children.
Governments around the world should subsidize contraception and abortions for the poor. The investment will pay back exponentially.
|
Dr. P. Silocybin
Would you like fries with that?



Registered: 09/09/08
Posts: 2,620
Loc: The Great Divide
Last seen: 3 years, 11 months
|
|
Quote:
geazerpleaser said:
Quote:
The24HourMC said: Oh I read that wrong sorry. Wouldn't there still be gene diversity though from all the races from different parts of the world?
the diversity wouldnt be as great as it is now, and also depending on who decides what people are diserable and which arent we could end up with another Hitler (major Eugenius believer).
or we could end up with planned parenthood! (major eugenics supporters) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger#Eugenics Eugenics was pretty popular in the USA too
|
geazerpleaser
No one



Registered: 02/13/12
Posts: 274
Loc: Ny
Last seen: 2 months, 7 days
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: zZZz]
#18970800 - 10/13/13 01:09 AM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
zZZz said: we are not animals. we are human!
we can be animals, but we are capable of much more. an animal has to survive by all means. i don;t think it can necessarily grow beyond that in its current stage. we can settle, we can create and manipulate the earth to fit our needs. we have hands with incredibly flexible fingers. that is what separates us and it is what makes us 'special', not necessarily more important, but the responsibility we carry is much greater because as uncle ben put its "with great power comes great responsibility".
Is a dolphin less of an animal then a gold fish since it's alot smarter?
animals don't have certain characteristics so you can't really say humans can be animals and you have the right to believe in what you want, but most people I know believe we're just highly evolved animals.
|
Dr. P. Silocybin
Would you like fries with that?



Registered: 09/09/08
Posts: 2,620
Loc: The Great Divide
Last seen: 3 years, 11 months
|
|
|
zZZz
jesus


Registered: 12/28/07
Posts: 33,478
|
|
ok, maybe we are highly evolved animals, but what we are talking about here is un-evolved animals, and what would happen if we were as such. as you put it that we are highly evolved animals, i agree with that, and that is why i am saying we are capable of much more and thus have a greater responsibility. we have the power to help. we can heal pretty much anything if we tried. this is our great gift. an animal for example a lion is all he can be, he is his highest self. they have great strength and use every bit of it. as should we use every bit of our strength. to act like un-evolved animals would to be like throwing away who we really are and becoming something we are not.
|
Chowder963
954-867-5309



Registered: 01/31/10
Posts: 4,768
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: The24HourMC]
#18971031 - 10/13/13 03:46 AM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I dont think youre the best person to wonder why we do this.
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 26,672
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: The24HourMC]
#18971215 - 10/13/13 06:41 AM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
The24HourMC said: This has to have a negative Impact on the planet as a whole .
You started off with a sort of credible line of reasoning, and then jumped to a rather odd conclusion. Let me put it this way: there is no ideal state for the world to be in. Nature doesn't optimize for anything; nature doesn't care, period.
In addition, the impact we're having on the survival of non-fit members of the species is really recent from an evolutionary viewpoint. No real effect on the evolutionary path that we're on now can be expected from this recent development; this would only be the case if we kept this up for thousands of years, which is very questionable.
And another thought is this: survival of the fittest is really an inappropriate term of what happens in evolution. There's two main mechanisms at work here: sexual selection and survival of specimens fit enough to reproduce in their current environment. If the environment is beneficial to many specimens, including the ones you call ill or weak, it just means that more specimens survive. The fact that part of these environmental characteristics are made by mankind itself (society), really makes no difference, since we are simply part of our own environment.
So your argument, just like those you hear all the time these days, is based on some static, reactionary world view in which 'nature' is supposed to optimize for some state people suppose it used to be in 10,000 years ago. In reality, though, the ecosystem is in constant motion and can be seen as a punctuated equilibrium, with long periods of relative stable environments, alternated by phases in which the environment and the ecosystem changes relatively rapidly (usually marked by mass extinction). The tendency to strive for some (unnatural) static balance is a really human trait that only illustrates that human intelligence has not caught up yet with the reality of how ecosystems develop. Needless to say, deriving far-reaching society measures from such an essentially retarded worldview would be an incredibly stupid thing to do.
Now put that in your crack pipe and smoke it.
|
junkyardgod
A psychedelic mess.


Registered: 08/12/08
Posts: 443
Last seen: 1 year, 10 months
|
Re: Survival Of The Fittest [Re: koraks]
#18971362 - 10/13/13 08:22 AM (10 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I'm pretty sure community, society, empathy, compassion, understanding, communication all have VERY BIG roles in our evolution. So no, the basic notion of self-preservation and extending life expectancy doesn't have negative impacts (at first). But as with any ecosystem, balance is integral. And with a high population comes environmental factors that work to curb this high population. It's nature.
|
|