|
tarzan92
Stranger



Registered: 04/21/13
Posts: 290
Last seen: 10 years, 4 months
|
Ancient Aliens Debunked
#18883084 - 09/23/13 11:55 PM (10 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
|
Brambolinie
Stranger



Registered: 04/01/13
Posts: 124
Loc: Netherlands
Last seen: 6 years, 3 months
|
Re: Ancient Aliens Debunked [Re: tarzan92]
#18884928 - 09/24/13 01:20 PM (10 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
I think it's a shame they put this fake stuff on National Geographic and the History channel. It seems like this stuff and those bullshit shows where it's almost completely faked and acted are growing more and more...
-------------------- "And so castles made of sand fall in the sea, eventually "
|
teknix
πβπ
’ππ
π°π‘ πΌπ⨻



Registered: 09/16/08
Posts: 11,953
|
Re: Ancient Aliens Debunked [Re: Brambolinie]
#18885072 - 09/24/13 01:50 PM (10 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
The thing with theories are that as long as there are many independent lines of evidence pointing to it, it is valid as a theory, so unless you eliminate most of the evidence (rather than a couple), it remains valid and is not "debunked", 
But I have yet to watch it, so I'll wait and see what I think after I watch it.
|
tarzan92
Stranger



Registered: 04/21/13
Posts: 290
Last seen: 10 years, 4 months
|
Re: Ancient Aliens Debunked [Re: teknix]
#18886281 - 09/24/13 07:09 PM (10 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Yeah you should watch it, its in this video
|
tarzan92
Stranger



Registered: 04/21/13
Posts: 290
Last seen: 10 years, 4 months
|
Re: Ancient Aliens Debunked [Re: Brambolinie]
#18886302 - 09/24/13 07:13 PM (10 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Its just another strategy out there used by the enemy to convince more humans that life is pointless and without purpose, it is a shame
|
teknix
πβπ
’ππ
π°π‘ πΌπ⨻



Registered: 09/16/08
Posts: 11,953
|
Re: Ancient Aliens Debunked [Re: tarzan92]
#18886755 - 09/24/13 09:05 PM (10 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
I will when I have time, I thought some of the evidence they presented was pretty solid, like the evident machining that went into some of the structures that would be feats by even today standards at Pumu Punku.



Can you tell me how they debunked that?
here is something another guy wrote debunking the debunk:
Quote:
I watched this DEBUNKING video all of it. I love ancient history and i only want the truth and try to imagine it from all these ideas and i care less who is right or wrong i only want the truth.
I am a fan of ancient aliens watch it all the time, and even before this debunking video i did notice a few small things like weight errors ect ect but nothing that changed it or made it less believable.
This video does point out a few good things but they play the same games to try to get you to believe a lie. like:
Ancient aliens say's puma punku rocks are red granite, diorite and andesite..
Debunker says Red sandstone and andesite..
Well fact is they are both are not being very detailed since puma punku is made up of red sandstone, red granite, gray diorite and andesite.
the groove cuts with holes were in the gray diorite wich debunker was calling red sandstone and with sandstone pictures.
debunker was right the largest rock is sandstone wich ancient aliens said was red granite
The Plataforma LΓtica contains the largest stone slab found in both the Pumapunku and Tiwanaku Site. This stone slab is 7.81 meters long, 5.17 meters wide and averages 1.07 meters thick. Based upon the specific gravity of the red sandstone from which it was carved, this stone slab has been estimated to weigh 131 metric tons.
but the debunker was very poor at how they carved it (fits nice for red sandstone) but not gray diorite and he showed tools used in eygpt as if puma punku had the same tools ,copper tools to do it....
debunker also said puma punku looks s bad because people stole the rock LOL the ground is warped, there was a earthquake or sink holes or something natural, even that huge polished floor slabe is tipped up on one end, that has nothing to with people taking blocks, i personaly think puma punku was built on a weak foundation and over time it fell/sunk alittle.
but he does at other sites ancient aliens mention do get debunked pretty good so i give the debunker credit but to claim he could debunk it ALL was wrong and he was a epic failure in that mannor.
http://www.disclose.tv/forum/ancient-aliens-debunked-09-28-12-t79004-40.html
If it is diorite, then the debunker has a lot more of explaining to do.
|
teknix
πβπ
’ππ
π°π‘ πΌπ⨻



Registered: 09/16/08
Posts: 11,953
|
Re: Ancient Aliens Debunked [Re: teknix]
#18886775 - 09/24/13 09:12 PM (10 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
|
tarzan92
Stranger



Registered: 04/21/13
Posts: 290
Last seen: 10 years, 4 months
|
Re: Ancient Aliens Debunked [Re: teknix]
#18886938 - 09/24/13 09:59 PM (10 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
just watch the video for yourself he points out numerous evidence why the ancient astronaut theory is false
|
|