Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Myyco.com Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale   North Spore Injection Grain Bag   MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck   PhytoExtractum Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder   Left Coast Kratom Buy Kratom Extract   Mushroom-Hut Liquid Cultures

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Offlineevileye001
Stranger then you
Male User Gallery


Registered: 02/23/13
Posts: 2,341
Last seen: 1 year, 3 months
shroom tek physics question
    #18874250 - 09/21/13 11:19 PM (10 years, 5 months ago)

ok so theres a tek on here, we will call it the spore jar tek.

in a nutshell u take a jar with a self healing injection porn, sterilize, place in cap, let print take place, remove, fill with water and boom! instant spore jar. just shake and fill syringe for for sterile spore syringe any time u need!

makes sense and seems like a great idea!

but after thinking a little i thought how can it a perfectly air tight and sterile jar?

at first yes, but once u draw a syringe u would be pulling a vacuum. (the other way around would be pressurizing so air would go out not in and no chance of contams.) but if it was perfectly air tight you would be lucky to get one maybe two syringe b4 you couldn't pull the plunger back or the plunger would fail due to the force needed to keep making the vacuum stronger.

therefore there must be air getting into the jar from outside and it wouldn't be invulnerable to contams...

what do u think

ps. this tek is on one of the official shroomery guides, on of the pf tek ones if im not mistaken.

:hmm:


--------------------
we are the universe contemplating its self.



Edited by evileye001 (09/21/13 11:26 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblefee
Im he who is the
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/16/03
Posts: 18,238
Loc: amsterdam
Re: shroom tek physics question [Re: evileye001]
    #18874255 - 09/21/13 11:22 PM (10 years, 5 months ago)

Put in a small filter patch.

And wrong forum.


--------------------

blankk said to fee:
btw you're a total fucking psychedelic pimp
Turtletotem said:
I want to become a sun worshipper, so next time an atheist smugly asks me where god is, I can point smugly at the sun and laugh my ass off.

Then I drive away in my solar powered piece of shit car, cool stuff man.

And then I go kill a bitch because the flaming orb in the sky told me to do so, and I don't know, oppress a few minorities here and there in the name of nuclear fusion?

Religion is fun.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineevileye001
Stranger then you
Male User Gallery


Registered: 02/23/13
Posts: 2,341
Last seen: 1 year, 3 months
Re: shroom tek physics question [Re: fee]
    #18874260 - 09/21/13 11:24 PM (10 years, 5 months ago)

pub is for ANY intelligent discussion...

plus it was a drunken thought. still valid thow


--------------------
we are the universe contemplating its self.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleCaine
lab rat
Male User Gallery


Registered: 01/25/10
Posts: 3,920
Loc: NE
Re: shroom tek physics question [Re: evileye001]
    #18874277 - 09/21/13 11:28 PM (10 years, 5 months ago)

Good question! Bacteria and other shroomy pathogens are not technically airborne. They ride on the dust! The jar sterilization tek is a veritable method for preventing dust and other fine, bacteria ridden particles from entering the jar. It's totally fine (and necessary) for the jar to be accessible to gases, because the mycelium depends on a steady rate of gas exchange to grow properly! Once you let particles >20um into your jars, you're asking for trouble! Hope I could be of assistance.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineevileye001
Stranger then you
Male User Gallery


Registered: 02/23/13
Posts: 2,341
Last seen: 1 year, 3 months
Re: shroom tek physics question [Re: Caine]
    #18874285 - 09/21/13 11:32 PM (10 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

Caine said:
It's totally fine (and necessary) for the jar to be accessible to gases, because the mycelium depends on a steady rate of gas exchange to grow properly! Once you let particles >20um into your jars, you're asking for trouble! Hope I could be of assistance.




very fair answer but were not talking about mycelium were talking about spores.

still full answer was very intelligent.


--------------------
we are the universe contemplating its self.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblefee
Im he who is the
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/16/03
Posts: 18,238
Loc: amsterdam
Re: shroom tek physics question [Re: Caine]
    #18874286 - 09/21/13 11:32 PM (10 years, 5 months ago)

For starters he ain't growing shit. Its for spore solution.

And secondly double layer of tyvek for a filtration hole


--------------------

blankk said to fee:
btw you're a total fucking psychedelic pimp
Turtletotem said:
I want to become a sun worshipper, so next time an atheist smugly asks me where god is, I can point smugly at the sun and laugh my ass off.

Then I drive away in my solar powered piece of shit car, cool stuff man.

And then I go kill a bitch because the flaming orb in the sky told me to do so, and I don't know, oppress a few minorities here and there in the name of nuclear fusion?

Religion is fun.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleCaine
lab rat
Male User Gallery


Registered: 01/25/10
Posts: 3,920
Loc: NE
Re: shroom tek physics question [Re: fee]
    #18874290 - 09/21/13 11:34 PM (10 years, 5 months ago)

Yeh, forgive me, I'm a little drunk. The concept is still the same. Sterile does not mean airtight! Louis Pasteur was the pioneer of proving that statement.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineevileye001
Stranger then you
Male User Gallery


Registered: 02/23/13
Posts: 2,341
Last seen: 1 year, 3 months
Re: shroom tek physics question [Re: Caine]
    #18874300 - 09/21/13 11:36 PM (10 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

Caine said:
Yeh, forgive me, I'm a little drunk. The concept is still the same. Sterile does not mean airtight! Louis Pasteur was the pioneer of proving that statement.




wouldn't fuck with him he seems to know his shit but previous poster has a good point. a good filter would solve the problem all together

they should put that in there tek but they dont so it was a good question.

maybe i should make my own spore jar tek...

:stirthepot:


--------------------
we are the universe contemplating its self.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineevileye001
Stranger then you
Male User Gallery


Registered: 02/23/13
Posts: 2,341
Last seen: 1 year, 3 months
Re: shroom tek physics question [Re: fee]
    #18874308 - 09/21/13 11:40 PM (10 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

fee said:
For starters he ain't growing shit. Its for spore solution.

And secondly double layer of tyvek for a filtration hole




just thought of it

shaking would get it soaked with water and spores. big time contam chance problem...


--------------------
we are the universe contemplating its self.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblefee
Im he who is the
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/16/03
Posts: 18,238
Loc: amsterdam
Re: shroom tek physics question [Re: evileye001]
    #18874321 - 09/21/13 11:43 PM (10 years, 5 months ago)

A filter on both sides of the lid.

Hense double layer.

It worked for me for the last 15 years


--------------------

blankk said to fee:
btw you're a total fucking psychedelic pimp
Turtletotem said:
I want to become a sun worshipper, so next time an atheist smugly asks me where god is, I can point smugly at the sun and laugh my ass off.

Then I drive away in my solar powered piece of shit car, cool stuff man.

And then I go kill a bitch because the flaming orb in the sky told me to do so, and I don't know, oppress a few minorities here and there in the name of nuclear fusion?

Religion is fun.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineevileye001
Stranger then you
Male User Gallery


Registered: 02/23/13
Posts: 2,341
Last seen: 1 year, 3 months
Re: shroom tek physics question [Re: fee]
    #18874328 - 09/21/13 11:45 PM (10 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

fee said:
A filter on both sides of the lid.

Hense double layer.

It worked for me for the last 15 years




would still get wet and spore covered...

but contam problem cuz of that im not sure.

do you not get water splashing/dripping out when u shake?


--------------------
we are the universe contemplating its self.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblefee
Im he who is the
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/16/03
Posts: 18,238
Loc: amsterdam
Re: shroom tek physics question [Re: evileye001]
    #18874332 - 09/21/13 11:46 PM (10 years, 5 months ago)

Nope


--------------------

blankk said to fee:
btw you're a total fucking psychedelic pimp
Turtletotem said:
I want to become a sun worshipper, so next time an atheist smugly asks me where god is, I can point smugly at the sun and laugh my ass off.

Then I drive away in my solar powered piece of shit car, cool stuff man.

And then I go kill a bitch because the flaming orb in the sky told me to do so, and I don't know, oppress a few minorities here and there in the name of nuclear fusion?

Religion is fun.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleCaine
lab rat
Male User Gallery


Registered: 01/25/10
Posts: 3,920
Loc: NE
Re: shroom tek physics question [Re: evileye001]
    #18874338 - 09/21/13 11:48 PM (10 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

evileye001 said:
Quote:

fee said:
A filter on both sides of the lid.

Hense double layer.

It worked for me for the last 15 years




would still get wet and spore covered...

but contam problem cuz of that im not sure.





If the filter pores are small enough, the contams are not going to get through no matter how wet and spore covered it is :shrug:


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineevileye001
Stranger then you
Male User Gallery


Registered: 02/23/13
Posts: 2,341
Last seen: 1 year, 3 months
Re: shroom tek physics question [Re: Caine]
    #18874385 - 09/22/13 12:06 AM (10 years, 5 months ago)

Quote:

Caine said:
Quote:

evileye001 said:
Quote:

fee said:
A filter on both sides of the lid.

Hense double layer.

It worked for me for the last 15 years




would still get wet and spore covered...

but contam problem cuz of that im not sure.





If the filter pores are small enough, the contams are not going to get through no matter how wet and spore covered it is :shrug:




good point..
:thumbup:


--------------------
we are the universe contemplating its self.



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Myyco.com Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale   North Spore Injection Grain Bag   MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck   PhytoExtractum Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder   Left Coast Kratom Buy Kratom Extract   Mushroom-Hut Liquid Cultures


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* physics help minusrestraint 1,671 14 01/30/03 06:31 AM
by Jackal
* Shrooms found in Afganistan
( 1 2 all )
T0aD 7,199 23 02/20/03 08:39 PM
by cybrbeast
* 5 Shrooms...
( 1 2 all )
PapaverS 2,182 22 01/22/03 11:33 AM
by Anonymous
* Shroom/ery/ Whatever Freestyle Cow Shit Collector 1,801 7 03/13/17 11:15 AM
by czech
* Damn shroom ratings Blue_JAY 1,522 4 11/28/02 11:25 PM
by Ripple
* Tripped on shrooms Weds. while snowboarding...fuckin crazy!! flanders53 6,510 7 01/31/03 07:07 PM
by Anonymous
* What kinda shrooms are these? Superunknown 2,406 14 12/03/02 01:27 AM
by felix
* Overgrow question superpimp 1,467 8 06/18/07 07:14 PM
by Banez

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
889 topic views. 6 members, 45 guests and 20 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.025 seconds spending 0.005 seconds on 12 queries.