Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
OfflineTeonanacatI
In a bubble of déjà vu
Male

Registered: 08/27/09
Posts: 31
Loc: So Cal
Last seen: 8 years, 9 months
Are these Bridgesii?
    #18828605 - 09/11/13 04:27 PM (10 years, 4 months ago)

Hello shroomerito/as! I recently ordered some bridgesii, and the postman walked up carrying a beautiful package today! They sort of looked like San Pedro to me at first, but after checking out a few posts on here, I realized the spines were too large, but they still don't look like any Bridgesii photos I've seen. What do you all think?





--------------------
Everybody goes insane
Whether or not you end up in the loony bin just depends on how elegantly you do it


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offline420milehigh
shaman


Registered: 08/19/12
Posts: 1,229
Loc: third eye
Last seen: 9 years, 5 months
Re: Are these Bridgesii? [Re: TeonanacatI]
    #18828664 - 09/11/13 04:39 PM (10 years, 4 months ago)

looks like bridge to me man, :rockon:


--------------------
All posts are entirely, 100%, conclusively false or complete works of fiction... but I can levitate lol

"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do." Benjamin Franklin

if I owe you seeds from a previous trade send me a PM, I will rectify my shortcomings and compensate you for your patience


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinefungus_tao
Hah Zah!
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/10/06
Posts: 1,856
Loc: Flag
Last seen: 6 years, 3 months
Re: Are these Bridgesii? [Re: 420milehigh]
    #18828872 - 09/11/13 05:17 PM (10 years, 4 months ago)

Looks like they cut the spines for shipping.
I can't offer any sort of ID tho


--------------------
Follow the light
The Light is your guide.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineintelligentlife
Noaidi
 User Gallery


Registered: 10/18/10
Posts: 2,627
Loc: EU
Last seen: 7 years, 4 months
Re: Are these Bridgesii? [Re: fungus_tao]
    #18828971 - 09/11/13 05:36 PM (10 years, 4 months ago)

Sometimes cactus like bridgesii or peruvian torch are despined when sending in mail..

It looks it has been ripped the spines off from it.

Also, if you have buy'd bridgesii, it should be bridgesii.. It looks like despined tricho tho.

Closer to t. bridgesii it is than t. pachanoi.


--------------------


Edited by intelligentlife (09/11/13 05:38 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* My new Trichocereus
( 1 2 all )
Magicman69 6,653 22 12/07/13 06:51 PM
by ohlone
* T. Bridgesii forma monstrose, consuming? Do anyone experience from this cactus as "achuma?"
( 1 2 all )
intelligentlife 16,171 20 06/22/16 03:28 AM
by lusifersofia
* Is this bridgesii??? botha 2,288 13 06/17/13 08:32 AM
by botha
* peruvian Bridgesii, new species?, weird lwheidt 1,911 8 11/20/16 02:32 AM
by bezevo
* echinopsis bridgesii atomicshaman 3,004 9 03/22/11 01:17 AM
by atomicshaman
* Peruvianus, Pachanoi and Bridgesii comparison Nostromo 2,008 4 07/08/09 09:45 AM
by Nostromo
* Bridgesii questions. Ambient Forest 1,984 6 03/15/10 09:59 AM
by Ambient Forest
* JI12 Bridgesii Trichocereus Achuma Cactus CuriousGG 6,620 16 11/24/13 05:45 PM
by karode13

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Mostly_Harmless, A.k.a
368 topic views. 1 members, 17 guests and 2 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.024 seconds spending 0.007 seconds on 14 queries.