Home | Community | Message Board

Mycohaus
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Myyco.com Pan Cyan Liquid Culture For Sale   Mushroom-Hut Substrate Bags   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Left Coast Kratom Buy Kratom Extract   MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck   North Spore Bulk Substrate   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
InvisibleInterestInMycology
Researcher


Registered: 09/10/12
Posts: 18
Loc: Flag
P.Cinctulus ID *DELETED*
    #18740992 - 08/22/13 05:57 AM (10 years, 6 months ago)

Post deleted by InterestInMycology

Reason for deletion: paranoid



Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineshroomlowie
Male User Gallery


Registered: 07/12/13
Posts: 265
Last seen: 7 months, 21 days
Re: P.Cinctulus ID [Re: InterestInMycology]
    #18741051 - 08/22/13 06:50 AM (10 years, 6 months ago)

These could be panaeolus papilionaceus, explaining the black spore print.

Cinctulus isn't normally found on dung whereas papilionaceus is.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleGravija
Make way for the cavalcade
Male User Gallery

Registered: 06/28/11
Posts: 9,063
Loc: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Trusted Identifier
Re: P.Cinctulus ID [Re: shroomlowie]
    #18741056 - 08/22/13 06:55 AM (10 years, 6 months ago)

I don't think these are P. papilionaceus at all. P. cinctulus is possible, but I think another species is more likely. This collection won't get very far without microscopy.

Quote:

shroomlowie said:

Cinctulus isn't normally found on dung whereas papilionaceus is.




P. cinctulus is very commonly found on horse dung and stable muck.


--------------------
Listen to my music

Here


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineshroomlowie
Male User Gallery


Registered: 07/12/13
Posts: 265
Last seen: 7 months, 21 days
Re: P.Cinctulus ID [Re: Gravija]
    #18741095 - 08/22/13 07:20 AM (10 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

Gravija said:
I don't think these are P. papilionaceus at all. P. cinctulus is possible, but I think another species is more likely. This collection won't get very far without microscopy.

Quote:

shroomlowie said:

Cinctulus isn't normally found on dung whereas papilionaceus is.




P. cinctulus is very commonly found on horse dung and stable muck.



My bad, I read that on wikipedia
Quote:

Wikipedia:
Panaeolus cinctulus is a cosmopolitan species that grows solitary to gregarious to cespitose on compost piles, well-fertilized lawns and gardens, and rarely directly on horse dung
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panaeolus_cinctulus




Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinefry day
 User Gallery

Registered: 07/19/13
Posts: 1,010
Loc: PNW
Last seen: 2 years, 30 days
Re: P.Cinctulus ID [Re: shroomlowie]
    #18742936 - 08/22/13 03:13 PM (10 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

My bad, I read that on wikipedia




Hawhawhaw.

So this is where you learn never to fully believe or ever quote wikipedia.  It's a fine point to begin a search, but if you're interested in information that's fact instead of consensus based you might want to range further afield and compare multiple sources.


--------------------
"Shrub, 30-90 cm. Leaves 2.5-) 4-9 cm, sessile or amplexicaul, broadly ovate to ovate-oblong, obtuse or rounded to subapiculate or subacute, when crushed not smelling of goats."

"The initial quake was a 6.6 but fairly shallow. I felt it as a prolonged up and down vibration followed by a jolt forward and then to the left, like square dancing."


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinejpshroomer
hUnTsMaN
Male User Gallery


Registered: 05/09/11
Posts: 309
Last seen: 8 years, 10 months
Re: P.Cinctulus ID [Re: Gravija]
    #18742947 - 08/22/13 03:16 PM (10 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

Gravija said:
I don't think these are P. papilionaceus at all. P. cinctulus is possible, but I think another species is more likely. This collection won't get very far without microscopy.

Quote:

shroomlowie said:

Cinctulus isn't normally found on dung whereas papilionaceus is.




P. cinctulus is very commonly found on horse dung and stable muck.



I pick cincts out of cow dung alot around my area..They get ver tall thick stems with meaty caps and always bruise blue at bottom...those are nt cincts..The stype has no twisted lines it the dont even look like cincts..def pans tho not clue what kind..what about s
hinctrinus?


Edited by jpshroomer (08/22/13 03:22 PM)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineHashfinger
Nippy Wiffle
 User Gallery


Registered: 07/10/12
Posts: 4,775
Loc: Georgia
Last seen: 5 years, 8 months
Re: P.Cinctulus ID [Re: jpshroomer]
    #18743028 - 08/22/13 03:45 PM (10 years, 6 months ago)

Panaeolus fimicola/ater? I think they're kind of doing their "thing" right about now in N. GA.


--------------------
Species List (Georgia): Psilocybe caerulescens/weilii, Psilocybe atlantis/galindoi, Psilocybe cubensis, Psilocybe ovoideocystidiata, Psilocybe caerulipes, Psilocybe semilanceata, Psilocybe fagicola, Copelandia cyanescens, Panaeolus cinctulus, Panaeolus fimicola, Panaeolus olivaceus, Gymnopilus luteofolius, Gymnopilus aeruginosus, Gymnopilus junonius, Pluteus salicinus

(Ohio): Psilocybe ovoideocystidiata, Psilocybe caerulipes, Pluteus cyanopus, Pluteus salicinus sensu lato..., Panaeolus cinctulus, Gymnopilus luteus, Gymnopilus luteofolius, Gymnopilus junonius, Gymnopilus aeruginosus


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinewintersbefore
Trust me I'm a mycologist
Female User Gallery

Registered: 11/30/11
Posts: 3,010
Loc: Vonore, TN
Last seen: 10 years, 3 months
Trusted Identifier
Re: P.Cinctulus ID [Re: Hashfinger]
    #18743063 - 08/22/13 03:51 PM (10 years, 6 months ago)

My guess is that these are something closer to P. papilionaceus because the stem is thin and reddish, they were found on dung, and because in the third picture, even though these are pretty wet ad tattered, on the fourth cap down, I see near the rim, some veil remnants clinging there still (just above the rim, and whitish).


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineHashfinger
Nippy Wiffle
 User Gallery


Registered: 07/10/12
Posts: 4,775
Loc: Georgia
Last seen: 5 years, 8 months
Re: P.Cinctulus ID [Re: wintersbefore]
    #18743112 - 08/22/13 04:03 PM (10 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

wintersbefore said:
My guess is that these are something closer to P. papilionaceus because the stem is thin and reddish, they were found on dung, and because in the third picture, even though these are pretty wet ad tattered, on the fourth cap down, I see near the rim, some veil remnants clinging there still (just above the rim, and whitish).



:bow2:


--------------------
Species List (Georgia): Psilocybe caerulescens/weilii, Psilocybe atlantis/galindoi, Psilocybe cubensis, Psilocybe ovoideocystidiata, Psilocybe caerulipes, Psilocybe semilanceata, Psilocybe fagicola, Copelandia cyanescens, Panaeolus cinctulus, Panaeolus fimicola, Panaeolus olivaceus, Gymnopilus luteofolius, Gymnopilus aeruginosus, Gymnopilus junonius, Pluteus salicinus

(Ohio): Psilocybe ovoideocystidiata, Psilocybe caerulipes, Pluteus cyanopus, Pluteus salicinus sensu lato..., Panaeolus cinctulus, Gymnopilus luteus, Gymnopilus luteofolius, Gymnopilus junonius, Gymnopilus aeruginosus


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineshroomlowie
Male User Gallery


Registered: 07/12/13
Posts: 265
Last seen: 7 months, 21 days
Re: P.Cinctulus ID [Re: fry day]
    #18743318 - 08/22/13 04:48 PM (10 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

fry day said:
Quote:

My bad, I read that on wikipedia




Hawhawhaw.

So this is where you learn never to fully believe or ever quote wikipedia.  It's a fine point to begin a search, but if you're interested in information that's fact instead of consensus based you might want to range further afield and compare multiple sources.



I already know not to completely trust wikipedia, I don't. Hence why I put 'my bad'.
I also have never found cincts on dung but only around it, from my personal experience. Papilionaceus or other panaeolus seem to be much more common on dung. I was just shedding some light and giving OP an idea so he could search papilionaceus and compare. I wasn't giving a perfect identification.
Just thought I'd help considering I'm quite experienced with cincts.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinefry day
 User Gallery

Registered: 07/19/13
Posts: 1,010
Loc: PNW
Last seen: 2 years, 30 days
Re: P.Cinctulus ID [Re: shroomlowie]
    #18743424 - 08/22/13 05:12 PM (10 years, 6 months ago)

I'm not doggin' YOU, bro.  I was outraged when I discovered that the info that gets into wikipedia is "consensus based".  It's not well known.  I can't remember if it was vid or audio or the author (maybe Anton Wilson?), but there was a factual error in his wiki and he couldn't get it changed because he couldn't point to any "consensus" on the real story, even though the fact was about his work and, y'know, HIS WORK.  Years later he finally got it changed after he published the "fact" in an article.

So, as far as wiki is concerned, if 5 internet sites spew the same incorrect nonsense and none counter, it's fact.  ;-)


--------------------
"Shrub, 30-90 cm. Leaves 2.5-) 4-9 cm, sessile or amplexicaul, broadly ovate to ovate-oblong, obtuse or rounded to subapiculate or subacute, when crushed not smelling of goats."

"The initial quake was a 6.6 but fairly shallow. I felt it as a prolonged up and down vibration followed by a jolt forward and then to the left, like square dancing."


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineTas75
Taswegian
 User Gallery


Registered: 04/12/12
Posts: 1,418
Loc: Tasmania
Last seen: 3 months, 17 days
Re: P.Cinctulus ID [Re: fry day]
    #18743554 - 08/22/13 05:46 PM (10 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:


So, as far as wiki is concerned, if 5 internet sites spew the same incorrect nonsense and none counter, it's fact.  ;-)




No, as far as Wikipedia is concerned, if you can't support your statement with references, then it needs consensus. If you have no trouble adequately referencing your articles, then you won't a problem with stuff getting deleted. Just do it.


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineshroomlowie
Male User Gallery


Registered: 07/12/13
Posts: 265
Last seen: 7 months, 21 days
Re: P.Cinctulus ID [Re: fry day]
    #18743773 - 08/22/13 06:40 PM (10 years, 6 months ago)

Quote:

fry day said:
I'm not doggin' YOU, bro.  I was outraged when I discovered that the info that gets into wikipedia is "consensus based".  It's not well known.  I can't remember if it was vid or audio or the author (maybe Anton Wilson?), but there was a factual error in his wiki and he couldn't get it changed because he couldn't point to any "consensus" on the real story, even though the fact was about his work and, y'know, HIS WORK.  Years later he finally got it changed after he published the "fact" in an article.

So, as far as wiki is concerned, if 5 internet sites spew the same incorrect nonsense and none counter, it's fact.  ;-)



I know your not bro, all peaceful vibes :mushroom2:

I only used wikipedia as a reference to show where my misunderstanding on cinctulus growing on dung came from


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: Myyco.com Pan Cyan Liquid Culture For Sale   Mushroom-Hut Substrate Bags   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds   Left Coast Kratom Buy Kratom Extract   MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck   North Spore Bulk Substrate   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Post-storm backyard shrooms. Please help me ID. *DELETED* failbot999 2,262 15 06/16/03 09:10 AM
by MagmaManiac
* Some Reishi need ID hawk 1,676 14 11/16/03 03:43 PM
by falcon
* Needing an ID *DELETED* newAK 713 3 08/17/03 03:13 AM
by whole9
* Help ID *DELETED* What_Guy 682 1 09/12/01 11:39 PM
by What_Guy
* help identifing mushrooms
( 1 2 all )
codyrcollier14 7,237 24 09/28/14 09:02 AM
by ambc
* is it Panaeolus cinctulu? choomanfoo 5,414 11 05/26/13 08:20 PM
by choomanfoo
* Today's LBMs (ID please) *DELETED* caller11 2,792 15 11/15/03 11:56 PM
by floccopus
* ID Request: 27 photos in SE suburbs, Melbourne, Victoria, AU veritas_VIC_AU 19,963 10 04/25/03 09:05 AM
by Zen Peddler

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: ToxicMan, inski, Alan Rockefeller, Duggstar, TimmiT, Anglerfish, Tmethyl, Lucis, Doc9151, Land Trout
562 topic views. 2 members, 15 guests and 9 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.032 seconds spending 0.005 seconds on 12 queries.