|
infidelGOD
illusion
Registered: 04/18/02
Posts: 3,040
Loc: there
|
Election 2004 =
#1828577 - 08/19/03 01:46 AM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Operation American Freedom
|
Cornholio
A liberal guy(on hiatus)
Registered: 01/13/03
Posts: 845
Loc: Austin, TX
Last seen: 20 years, 4 months
|
Re: Election 2004 = [Re: infidelGOD]
#1828664 - 08/19/03 02:33 AM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
I can only hope so.
--------------------
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?
Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Election 2004 = [Re: infidelGOD]
#1828736 - 08/19/03 03:29 AM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Dream on.
It'll be Bush.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
Cornholio
A liberal guy(on hiatus)
Registered: 01/13/03
Posts: 845
Loc: Austin, TX
Last seen: 20 years, 4 months
|
|
Quote:
luvdemshrooms said: Dream on. It'll be Bush.
OH MY GOD THAT'S FUNNY!!! No names were ever mentioned in this thread, yet you said "dream on" to "American Freedom"; "It'll be Bush"! Edit: Sorry lds, I gotta take advantage of any opportunity like that.
--------------------
Edited by Cornholio (08/19/03 04:17 AM)
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?
Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Election 2004 = [Re: Cornholio]
#1828803 - 08/19/03 04:55 AM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
You've really been off your game the last few days. I've seen enough of IG's posts and yours to at least have a good idea where the two of you are going with that. Before attempting to take any opportunity, you should be sure it really is one. EDIT: Add to that the subject of the thread.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
Edited by luvdemshrooms (08/19/03 07:10 AM)
|
Innvertigo
Vote Libertarian!!
Registered: 02/08/01
Posts: 16,296
Loc: Crackerville, Michigan U...
|
Re: Election 2004 = [Re: infidelGOD]
#1828813 - 08/19/03 05:11 AM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Doesn't matter who wins, the result will be the same: Inefficiency
Sharpton in '04!!
-------------------- America....FUCK YEAH!!! Words of Wisdom: Individual Rights BEFORE Collective Rights "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -- Thomas Jefferson
|
Anonymous
|
|
Wow that reply was incredibly ironic.
|
Azmodeus
Seeker
Registered: 11/27/02
Posts: 3,392
Loc: Lotus Land!! B.C.
Last seen: 19 years, 2 months
|
Re: Election 2004 = [Re: infidelGOD]
#1829277 - 08/19/03 10:46 AM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
The corporations run america....teh president is a figurehead!
-------------------- "Know your Body - Know your Mind - Know your Substance - Know your Source. Lest we forget. "
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?
Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Election 2004 = [Re: ]
#1829290 - 08/19/03 10:51 AM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Max Headroom said: Wow that reply was incredibly ironic.
Ironic? Perhaps I'm having a slow day as well. Please elaborate.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
Anonymous
|
|
OK let me spell it out. I was thinking the same thing Cornholio was. Infidel says, 2004 for American freedom, and you say, no it'll be Bush, as if Bush's policies do not = freedom.
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?
Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Election 2004 = [Re: ]
#1829359 - 08/19/03 11:17 AM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Fair enough, now here's how it came across to me.
InfidelGod & Corny are not Bush fans (to put it mildly). Title of post = Election 2004. Initial Post = Operation American Freedom. 2nd post = I can only hope so.
Add it up..... Not fans + election 2004 + op freedom + hope = ?
A desire to see a different pres in 2004.
Hence... my response. Now, unless there's a different way to add this up, was my conclusion (and thus the response) wrong in any way?
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
Anonymous
|
|
Nothing wrong with your interpretation. We all see things from a different perspective, that's what makes the world a more interesting place.
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?
Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Election 2004 = [Re: ]
#1829379 - 08/19/03 11:25 AM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
It is indeed.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
infidelGOD
illusion
Registered: 04/18/02
Posts: 3,040
Loc: there
|
|
Dream on.
It'll be Bush.
haha, regardless of your interpretation. that was really funny. classic.
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?
Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Election 2004 = [Re: infidelGOD]
#1829770 - 08/19/03 01:01 PM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
infidelGOD said: Dream on.
It'll be Bush.
haha, regardless of your interpretation. that was really funny. classic.
Perhaps you'd care to share the "true" meaning of your post then?
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
infidelGOD
illusion
Registered: 04/18/02
Posts: 3,040
Loc: there
|
|
no. you had it right. I just thought your response was funny.
I don't think our country can endure four more years of Bush. I actually supported him earlier but now I think it's time to fire him. and if people decide to re-elect him, it won't be based on his job performance, it will be based on emotion. lets not forget he presided over two of the worst intelligence failures in American history. how can we ever trust him again if he wants to lead us to another war? we've had time to recover. it's time to judge his performance objectively.
|
Azmodeus
Seeker
Registered: 11/27/02
Posts: 3,392
Loc: Lotus Land!! B.C.
Last seen: 19 years, 2 months
|
Re: Election 2004 = [Re: infidelGOD]
#1829845 - 08/19/03 01:22 PM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Spoken like a true ANTI-AMERICAN!!!!
"your either with me or against me"
-------------------- "Know your Body - Know your Mind - Know your Substance - Know your Source. Lest we forget. "
|
luvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?
Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 34,247
Loc: Lost In Space
|
Re: Election 2004 = [Re: infidelGOD]
#1829855 - 08/19/03 01:24 PM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
it's time to judge his performance objectively.
Fair enough.
As a conservative, he sucks.
As an alternative to a dem president, I believe he's far better than those 9 goofballs from the other side.
-------------------- You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers
|
infidelGOD
illusion
Registered: 04/18/02
Posts: 3,040
Loc: there
|
|
it sounds like to you the only qualification for being president is not being a democrat.
|
shakta
Infidel
Registered: 06/03/03
Posts: 2,633
Last seen: 19 years, 10 months
|
Re: Election 2004 = [Re: infidelGOD]
#1829882 - 08/19/03 01:33 PM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
I would vote for Lieberman.
|
|