Home | Community | Message Board


High Mountain Compost
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Philosophy, Sociology & Psychology

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
OfflineCleverName
the cloudsshould know meby now...

Registered: 08/26/02
Posts: 1,121
Loc: red earth painted with mi...
Last seen: 11 years, 9 months
philosophy debate
    #1757353 - 07/28/03 09:55 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

my philosophy class is having a debate on "how does one gain knowledge" my group is pro-empiricism (david hume). the other groups are rationalists (descartes), mystics (abu hamid muhammad al-ghazali), and afrocentric feminist epistemology (dr. patricia hill collins). i have to come up with persuasions for my groups view, and two arguments each against the three views. any suggestions would be great. thanks


--------------------
if you can't find the truth right where you are, where else do you expect to find it?

this is the purpose


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinesocratesmind
old hand

Registered: 02/22/02
Posts: 1,193
Loc: in your house :)
Last seen: 11 years, 2 months
Re: philosophy debate [Re: CleverName]
    #1757408 - 07/28/03 10:15 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

david hume i believed thought knowledge could only believe that knowledge could be gained thru questioning, reason and logic. since experiences could be impaired or we could be tricked? (hallucinating) we could never tell the difference between when we are dreaming or actually awake. this is why we couldn't rely on experience. remember some other reasons too but i can't recall em all. why don't u just google their names that'd work too.


--------------------
Prohibition will work great injury to the cause of temperance. It is a species of intemperance within itself, for it goes beyond the bounds of reason in that it attempts to control a man's appetite by legislation, and makes a crime out of things that are not crimes. A Prohibition law strikes a blow at the very principles upon which our government was founded.
- Abraham Lincoln: Speech in the Illinois House of Representatives, Dec 18, 1840.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineDogomush
Barbless Aryan

Registered: 10/05/02
Posts: 1,286
Loc: The Canadian west coast
Last seen: 12 years, 6 months
Re: philosophy debate [Re: CleverName]
    #1757417 - 07/28/03 10:17 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

what a shitty class that would be.. actually no, it might be fun. Sure, you're all sitting around parrotting shit dead people have said, but if you got into it it would be fun. You could all dress up as your different philosophers and have a potluck where you all eat different foods from the time and ethnic background of your philosopher that your philosopher may have actually eaten. You could play philosophy games, like spin the bottle and go bobbing for apples, and I don't know what else, but it could be fun.

The truth is, you should just get naked.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlineatomikfunksoldier
T'was born oftrue in the yearof the cock!

Registered: 04/07/03
Posts: 1,500
Loc: a human-infested anthill
Last seen: 14 years, 4 days
Re: philosophy debate [Re: Dogomush]
    #1757426 - 07/28/03 10:19 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

well...seeing how so many philosophers are german, that potluck would really suck.



--------------------
enjoy the entertaining indentity i have constructed for you while you can.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineDogomush
Barbless Aryan

Registered: 10/05/02
Posts: 1,286
Loc: The Canadian west coast
Last seen: 12 years, 6 months
Re: philosophy debate [Re: atomikfunksoldier]
    #1757507 - 07/28/03 10:40 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

I'm trying to think of German foods..

sauer kraut? Is that it?


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlineatomikfunksoldier
T'was born oftrue in the yearof the cock!

Registered: 04/07/03
Posts: 1,500
Loc: a human-infested anthill
Last seen: 14 years, 4 days
Re: philosophy debate [Re: Dogomush]
    #1757523 - 07/28/03 10:44 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

sausages, jewish babies


(joke)


--------------------
enjoy the entertaining indentity i have constructed for you while you can.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineCleverName
the cloudsshould know meby now...

Registered: 08/26/02
Posts: 1,121
Loc: red earth painted with mi...
Last seen: 11 years, 9 months
Re: philosophy debate [Re: socratesmind]
    #1757579 - 07/28/03 11:00 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

Hume's analysis of human belief begins with a careful distinction among our mental contents: impressions are the direct, vivid, and forceful products of immediate experience; ideas are merely feeble copies of these original impressions. for example, the background color of the screen at which I am now looking is an impression, while my memory of the color of my mother's hair is merely an idea. Since every idea must be derived from an antecedent impression, Hume supposed, it always makes sense to inquire into the origins of our ideas by asking from which impressions they are derived.



--------------------
if you can't find the truth right where you are, where else do you expect to find it?

this is the purpose


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineCleverName
the cloudsshould know meby now...

Registered: 08/26/02
Posts: 1,121
Loc: red earth painted with mi...
Last seen: 11 years, 9 months
Re: philosophy debate [Re: CleverName]
    #1757591 - 07/28/03 11:06 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

really, i was hoping for some responses for the arguments against the three other views.


--------------------
if you can't find the truth right where you are, where else do you expect to find it?

this is the purpose


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinefireworks_godS
Sexy.Butt.McDanger
Male

Registered: 03/12/02
Posts: 24,851
Loc: Pandurn
Last seen: 1 month, 12 days
Re: philosophy debate [Re: atomikfunksoldier]
    #1757606 - 07/28/03 11:10 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

Quote:

atomikfunksoldier said:
sausages, jewish babies




Actually, man, they couldn't eat jewish babies, because they aren't kosher. hehe

(also a joke)
Peace.


--------------------
:redpanda:
If I should die this very moment
I wouldn't fear
For I've never known completeness
Like being here
Wrapped in the warmth of you
Loving every breath of you

:heartpump: :bunnyhug: :yinyang:

:yinyang: :levitate: :earth: :levitate: :yinyang:


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineCleverName
the cloudsshould know meby now...

Registered: 08/26/02
Posts: 1,121
Loc: red earth painted with mi...
Last seen: 11 years, 9 months
Re: philosophy debate [Re: Dogomush]
    #1757609 - 07/28/03 11:10 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

you probably really would enjoy the class.  we sometimes do get naked and reinact greek orgies  :grin:


--------------------
if you can't find the truth right where you are, where else do you expect to find it?

this is the purpose


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinefireworks_godS
Sexy.Butt.McDanger
Male

Registered: 03/12/02
Posts: 24,851
Loc: Pandurn
Last seen: 1 month, 12 days
Re: philosophy debate [Re: CleverName]
    #1757612 - 07/28/03 11:11 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

Um, are the jewish babies naked, too? hehe
Peace.


--------------------
:redpanda:
If I should die this very moment
I wouldn't fear
For I've never known completeness
Like being here
Wrapped in the warmth of you
Loving every breath of you

:heartpump: :bunnyhug: :yinyang:

:yinyang: :levitate: :earth: :levitate: :yinyang:


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Anonymous

Re: philosophy debate [Re: CleverName]
    #1757613 - 07/28/03 11:12 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

A great question/argument for the mystics (abu hamid muhammad al-ghazali's Arch enemy was Averroes) would be the whether Truth could be held in logic-tight compartments.

Ask the mystics whether the laws of logic apply to their tenets. Because if they do then there is but one truth or none at all. This is because the prescriptive truths outlined in the orthopraxy cannot all be true but all can be false.

They exist as contraries.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineCleverName
the cloudsshould know meby now...

Registered: 08/26/02
Posts: 1,121
Loc: red earth painted with mi...
Last seen: 11 years, 9 months
Re: philosophy debate [Re: fireworks_god]
    #1757617 - 07/28/03 11:13 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

only on mondays and fridays


--------------------
if you can't find the truth right where you are, where else do you expect to find it?

this is the purpose


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Anonymous

Re: philosophy debate [Re: CleverName]
    #1757626 - 07/28/03 11:16 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

Hume was wrong of course, as was Locke behind him. Those are not ideas per se, they are sometimes percepts and concepts, neither of which are ideas.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineCleverName
the cloudsshould know meby now...

Registered: 08/26/02
Posts: 1,121
Loc: red earth painted with mi...
Last seen: 11 years, 9 months
Re: philosophy debate [Re: ]
    #1757640 - 07/28/03 11:20 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

whats the difference between concepts and ideas?


--------------------
if you can't find the truth right where you are, where else do you expect to find it?

this is the purpose


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Anonymous

Re: philosophy debate [Re: CleverName]
    #1757659 - 07/28/03 11:27 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

A concept is that by which you think. An idea is that which you think.

Note: These are very precise terms used when you are explaining how the mind thinks.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Anonymous

Re: philosophy debate [Re: CleverName]
    #1757678 - 07/28/03 11:31 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

Further, we are very aware of our ideas, but we are never aware of our concepts or percepts.
'
In the instance of seeing an object we apprehend the object using our senses but the tool in our mind, the percept,which we use to understand that which we have seen is never apprehended.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Anonymous

Re: philosophy debate [Re: CleverName]
    #1757692 - 07/28/03 11:34 PM (14 years, 1 month ago)

Also, it is this dichotomy that differentiates man from beast.

Beasts have percepts but no concepts. They are conceptually blind.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Philosophy, Sociology & Psychology

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* The Debate Thread
( 1 2 3 all )
deCypher 2,740 51 11/18/08 05:25 PM
by andrewss
* Human nature and philosophy ExplosiveMango 693 15 09/14/08 02:13 PM
by Icelander
* Eddie Tabash debates William Craig FrenchSocialist 1,726 7 04/11/07 08:12 PM
by Viveka
* Philosophy's Effect
( 1 2 all )
Quarryman 2,000 23 03/08/08 06:24 AM
by Neanderthal
* Philosophical Debate
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 all )
RoseM 9,311 136 07/25/08 04:28 PM
by deranger
* Philosophy and spirituality are dead.
( 1 2 all )
zannennagara 2,489 23 09/22/09 05:30 PM
by AlphaFalfa
* Philosophy 101 TODAY 1,819 19 07/08/06 08:11 AM
by Panoramix
* My Philosophy Paper mushiemountain 1,255 7 04/17/07 07:34 PM
by mushiemountain

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, CosmicJoke, Jokeshopbeard, DividedQuantum
491 topic views. 3 members, 10 guests and 7 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Crestline Sales - MycoPath
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2017 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.033 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 19 queries.