|
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
|
Stopwhispering
The voodoo peoples



Registered: 05/01/10
Posts: 4,390
Loc: Melbourne
|
Re: SE GA walkabout [Re: Gravija]
#17484911 - 01/02/13 06:47 AM (11 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
I had always assumed only omphalinoid mushrooms placed within Lychenomphalia were categorised by growing where lichen/moss are present.
I can only find the description listed on the link I posted (I didn't look to hard to be honest) which seems a bit wishy washy, but from first hand experience I have had several finds of small omphalinoid mushrooms with no sign of lichen anywhere near the vacinity.
A clearer pic of the overall shape of the mushroom would help but having such decurrent gills, and the stature of the mushroom led me towards Arrhenia to begin with.
Edited by Stopwhispering (01/02/13 07:01 AM)
|
Stopwhispering
The voodoo peoples



Registered: 05/01/10
Posts: 4,390
Loc: Melbourne
|
|
You are definitely right about them appearing chubby though, the only other thing that would seem to fit would be wee little Entoloma and appearances would probably stick them in Leptonia I suppose.
They seem too small and the gills too decurrent for that based off of what I know of the genus though.
Edited by Stopwhispering (01/02/13 07:25 AM)
|
Gravija
Make way for the cavalcade


Registered: 06/28/11
Posts: 9,063
Loc: Chicago, Illinois, USA
|
|
I think they are Clitocyboid myself, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't look at the omphalinoid fungi first. I'd be interested in swing them get to species, hopefully swampy can take some more pics when he goes back out. Maybe a spore print.
-------------------- Listen to my music Here
|
Alan Rockefeller
Mycologist

Registered: 03/10/07
Posts: 48,312
Last seen: 3 days, 10 hours
|
|
9 is really cool, try to get more pics of that one.
|
wintersbefore
Trust me I'm a mycologist


Registered: 11/30/11
Posts: 3,010
Loc: Vonore, TN
Last seen: 10 years, 3 months
|
|
Did you collect number 9? I have to agree that it's not Arrhenia also.
|
bloodworm
cube con·nois·seur


Registered: 05/22/10
Posts: 10,926
Loc: 352
|
|
the Gymnopilus are not G. luteoviridis. the pileus of Gymnopilus luteoviridis is not colored like that. it is more yellow.
see here...
www.mushroomobserver.org/103874
nice find. they most likely aren't active though.

 peace and love bloodworm
|
Celes247



Registered: 11/06/11
Posts: 162
Last seen: 7 years, 4 months
|
|
Hey, if you do decide to go back for #3, I would really like to see some more pictures of it! (as well as its spore print)
I've been trying to learn more about Gymnopilus (and other similar looking genera) lately. (I'm so bad at telling them apart!)
Edit: Nevermind. I see Bloodworm's latest post, and.. if they aren't active I don't imagine you're going back. Oh well!
Edited by Celes247 (01/02/13 03:13 PM)
|
Gravija
Make way for the cavalcade


Registered: 06/28/11
Posts: 9,063
Loc: Chicago, Illinois, USA
|
Re: SE GA walkabout [Re: Celes247]
#17487233 - 01/02/13 04:21 PM (11 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
Quote:
bloodworm said: the Gymnopilus are not G. luteoviridis. the pileus of Gymnopilus luteoviridis is not colored like that.
Good point! The squamules present more like loosely bundled fibrils as well.
-------------------- Listen to my music Here
|
|
|
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: ToxicMan, inski, Alan Rockefeller, Duggstar, TimmiT, Anglerfish, Tmethyl, Lucis, Doc9151, Land Trout 1,210 topic views. 1 members, 23 guests and 10 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ] |
|