seemslikeasymbol said: well, the way i see it, the reason that nobody has been able to answer this question is the fact that life in general has no meaning.
This is my philosophy. Everything, I believe, is completely random at first. We define our own meaning, there is NO predefined meaning (I haven't found one, unless it is to make meaning). The way this thought is shaped in my mind, it seems to be the most perfect belief (I can't describe it anymore than what I am trying now). If you take away any meaning that we find on our own, and any meaning found by others (even the ones that have been continously reinforced throughout time), there is nothing. This is beautiful to me, because it allows us to create whatever meaning we desire. Its almost like a rebirth, except we aren't left completely helpless as a baby; we still hold onto our beliefs and ideas that work, are effective, and please us, the negative, unnecessary ones are cleared, freeing up a lot of energy. I've used this to remodel my life for my definition of the better (it is all really subjective, from what are the right and wrong ideas, what has a true meaning and what doesn't), and I have felt the positive effects from this. However, my results, what I've changed and what I've kept, aren't necessarily the same as what someone else would choose. But, even if me and the other person hold different ideas and find completely contradictory meanings, that doesn't mean one is right or wrong. We both are correct. Ever read anything about superstring theory? I began digging into one of the most comrehensive and clear books on the subject at a friends (can't remember the title, possibly the word universe in the title, it was a black book...). To help one understand the new ideas they were presenting, so people could be on the same level necessary to understand what they were getting across, they caught everyone reading up to speed with the current paradigm on quantam physics and etc (I'm not too educated in the whole world myself). Off topic a bit, this seems like the most effective way of getting a point across, teaching a math exercise to a Chinese kid is not possible if he cannot understand English, or if you cannot speak Chinese (simple, simple example). Anyways, I'm hoping most of you have already heard of this, since I will probably not do a good job of recalling all the details(it was quite a while ago); however, the book was talking about traveling at different speeds, and the effects it has on our perception of time. They used an example like this: Two countries were at war, and they decided to finally sign a truce. Neither country wanted to sign first, and one did not want to sign it on the others land, so they were on a traveling train whose tracks rode the border between the two countries. The compromise was that they would both sign the treaty at the same time, at a certain minute, they both would sign. People from both countries were at the train station, watching the train go by as they started to sign the treaty, and they had binoculars to watch them sign, to make sure they signed at the same time. On the train, both signed at the same time; however, because the train was moving, and the people standing outside were not, it created just a slight, slight difference in the perception of time, it appeared to them that one of them had signed it just a little bit earlier (it seems i missed one of the most important details, but just go with me here....if anyone has read this, please reinforce what I am saying). Anyways, although it was just a slight slight difference in time (the book pointed out that in space, with objects travelling near the speed of light, the difference becomes magnificent), it DOES exist... On the train, they both signed the treaty at the exact same time, however, outside, one had signed it slightly before (I'm guessing the one sitting closer to the front of the train). The point I am trying to make is that there was ONE given scenario that seems as only one answer can exist (what time did both sign the paper?), and from different perspectives, two different, but both correct, answers existed. (I realize my example basically is ineffective, since I couldn't recall some of the vitals, but find the book, and it will be a lot more clear). Superstring theory seems to tie in chaos theory, quantam physics, etc. But anyways, I believe that the universe is truly subjective (while both sides had different times for when the paper was signed, it was only signed ONCE). Who has the ultimate view of what was correct and what wasn't, what time was the correct one? The Ultimate Creator? He might have created the universe and everything in it... but that doesn't make his truth any more valid than my truth (even if he is of infinite wisdom, etc.). Anyways, sorry for the long post, and the shitty example, but I think I may have sorta got my point across...maybe. Peace, and thanks for reading.
--------------------
If I should die this very moment
I wouldn't fear
For I've never known completeness
Like being here
Wrapped in the warmth of you
Loving every breath of you
|