|
starcade
Paladin


Registered: 06/28/10
Posts: 495
Last seen: 5 years, 4 months
|
Cameras in mail packages...?
#17386595 - 12/13/12 04:05 PM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
A friend of a friend knows some people from another area of the country than us, and these people have prices that would make jaws drop around here, so this friend of a friend wants to accept a package, they are ready to send it when my friend of a friend is ready, on a front, even. My friends friend wanted to think up a way to not get caught, as he heard if you do not accept the package then you can not be charged.
Well, he wants to put a camera, or a sound device of some sort that he can listen to/watch, as this package will be sent overnight, he can just chill and listen/watch to see if everything goes smoothly, before he goes and accepts a package.
Thoughts? Could this backfire on him?
|
Alan Rockefeller
Mycologist

Registered: 03/10/07
Posts: 48,392
Last seen: 2 days, 23 hours
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: starcade]
#17386667 - 12/13/12 04:17 PM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
That's a pretty good idea. I guess a smart phone could be programmed to do that. Something that starts recording and sends out text messages when it sees any light. Maybe Motion would be good software to run on it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_(surveillance_software)
|
Anonymous #1
|
|
Usually if its overnight they are too busy to open up ur package and check it. They have to make that deadline.
|
starcade
Paladin


Registered: 06/28/10
Posts: 495
Last seen: 5 years, 4 months
|
|
I'm not very tech-savvy at all, how would one go about getting this motion program on their smartphone? Well, a dummy smartphone, just as the other phone recieving the text would be a dummy phone, naturally.
Yeah, I thought it was a pretty damn good idea myself, I told him I'd ask around and see if this has ever been done (and found..), I didn't look very thouroughly, but I didn't find anything about it on google after a quick scan.
|
starcade
Paladin


Registered: 06/28/10
Posts: 495
Last seen: 5 years, 4 months
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: Anonymous #1]
#17386737 - 12/13/12 04:33 PM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
To ANON: Sometimes you have to take every precaution. Especially when everyone involved is out on bail and felons.
Edited by starcade (12/13/12 04:33 PM)
|
PlantEntity
AllTheCacti



Registered: 10/15/12
Posts: 344
Loc: FL
Last seen: 8 years, 4 months
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: starcade]
#17386747 - 12/13/12 04:34 PM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Sometimes you have to just know when to draw the line. Is your freedome worth whatever is making it in the mail? its something you have to ask yourself.
It has been for me 80% of the time. The other 20% i shouldn't have taken the risks but Hey.. Im still here ey?
-------------------- I hope life isn't a big joke, because I don't get it. Be yourself; everyone else is already taken. Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass, but rather learning to dance in the rain.
|
Anonymous #1
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: starcade]
#17386751 - 12/13/12 04:36 PM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Yah im not saying it aint a good idea. I actually thought it was an awesome idea.
|
starcade
Paladin


Registered: 06/28/10
Posts: 495
Last seen: 5 years, 4 months
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: Anonymous #1]
#17386813 - 12/13/12 04:47 PM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
The particular goods he is purchasing he is getting for 200 dollars each, and around here people would be more than happy to get the same good for 1200 dollars. For him, and alot of other people, yes, it is worth the risk, but if he's going to do it, he wants to do it right.
|
Stonehenge
Alt Center


Registered: 06/20/04
Posts: 14,850
Loc: S.E.
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: starcade]
#17387171 - 12/13/12 05:53 PM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
That is an awesome idea. Have it set so that if the box is opened it sends a call which would be recorded. Turn the tables on the cops and video tape and record them.
Eventually they will have setups that will use a cheap burner phone that sends continuously and even if they put it in a metal box that prevented transmissions, you would know something was wrong. You could set it up so that it would give a warning some time later if queried. And if all goes well, use it over and over again.
-------------------- “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.” (attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville political philosopher Circa 1835) Trade list http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/18047755
|
starcade
Paladin


Registered: 06/28/10
Posts: 495
Last seen: 5 years, 4 months
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: Stonehenge]
#17387584 - 12/13/12 07:07 PM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Most likely the 5-0 wouldn't realize what was going on, if a smartphone was chillin' in there. They may, depending on how the app looks while active on the phone. I guess this phone would have to have no contact in any homes associated, not even charged..I don't trust the damn things.
|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 67,521
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: starcade] 1
#17390007 - 12/14/12 06:06 AM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
This is making it far more complicated and failure-prone than it should be....
Just use custom tamper-evident tape with your own logo on it...that way, if the box is opened, you can see it at the door before you accept the package. If you see that it has been tampered with, you simply say "I don't know the sender, and I'm not accepting the package"...easy enough.
You can get custom tamper tape from http://www.tamper-evident-tape.com/ or other places.
Of course, I assume that whatever you're shipping is not in violation of any local, state, or federal law.
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
Cyclohexylamine
Turn on, Tune in, Drop out



Registered: 09/08/10
Posts: 14,327
|
|
Quote:
Alan Rockefeller said: That's a pretty good idea. I guess a smart phone could be programmed to do that. Something that starts recording and sends out text messages when it sees any light. Maybe Motion would be good software to run on it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion_(surveillance_software)
Yeah that actually is a pretty cool idea. Two phones linked, one programmed, one a cheap shitty phone. Both on no plan so no info associated with them. The one phone would be really easy to program, especially something like android. Sure if the box was confiscated you would lose the smartphone, but they aren't THAT expensive, and if you are transporting an amount of items you would be that worried about the cost would be worth it.
Quote:
Of course, I assume that whatever you're shipping is not in violation of any local, state, or federal law.

Enlil - a question you can answer. Suppose I developed the above code and released it into the open source world for anyone to use. Could I be held responsible as aiding in the transportation of drugs or similar since that is kind of what it would be intended for, to let those transporting drugs evade capture?
-------------------- Yes this is tymo - I just changed my name Have you ever had a dream that you were so sure was real? What if you were unable to awake from that dream? How would you know the difference between that dream world and the real world? There is NOTHING better than feeling that warm dissociative fuzz creeping up your body from IM K Something abut that anaesthetic rush... Qualitative Research Chemical Effects and Experiences The Wonderful World of Methoxetamine The 3-Meo-PCP Chapters, Part One
Edited by Cyclohexylamine (12/14/12 09:58 AM)
|
Stonehenge
Alt Center


Registered: 06/20/04
Posts: 14,850
Loc: S.E.
|
|
Custom tamper evident tape, now that is an idea worthy of looking into. However, wouldn't that in itself be a red flag for authorities? It seems like there would be ways around it, simply cut into the box under the label and replace with a newly printed label. Even if they couldn't do that i can imagine every postal worker on the line saying "take a look at this one!"
I doubt they could get a warrant on that alone but they could do the old dog trick just on suspicion. The handler gives the pooch the cue to bark or sit at the special box and thats all folks.
The advantage of the camera deal is that nothing on the outside looks out of place or unusual.
Tamper evident tape with your special logo would give them a place to start looking. I doubt there are 1000 places that make the stuff so they just go around and lean on them a little and find who made it and they might be able to track it from that end. I know you could use a false name, pay cash and so on and its doubtful the tape maker uses hidden cameras on his customers. But there might be a fingerprint on the order form or something. The advantage is that its cheap, i would assume, cheaper than even a burner phone but it attracts attention.
A used semi smart phone might be picked up for $50 or so. The phone might be able to use an ap where it sends the message when light is detected. If it gets through you send it back and reuse. If you are making $1000 profit per package, spending $100 one time to make sure you never get caught is a smart investment.
Once they open a few of these and catch on to the trick, they may then open them in the dark using infrared cameras to see whats inside. But as slow moving as the govt is, it may be years before they get to that point. Since they would not know which packages have the phone in them its unlikely they would use all that special procedure on every package
-------------------- “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.” (attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville political philosopher Circa 1835) Trade list http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/18047755
|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 67,521
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: Stonehenge]
#17391199 - 12/14/12 11:24 AM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Stonehenge said: Custom tamper evident tape, now that is an idea worthy of looking into. However, wouldn't that in itself be a red flag for authorities?
I'd assume that if you got custom tape made, you wouldn't have it say "tamper evident" on it...Quote:
The advantage of the camera deal is that nothing on the outside looks out of place or unusual.
The disadvantage is that signal is notoriously unreliable, and there's no guarantee that it's gonna work wherever they open itQuote:
Tamper evident tape with your special logo would give them a place to start looking. I doubt there are 1000 places that make the stuff so they just go around and lean on them a little and find who made it and they might be able to track it from that end. I know you could use a false name, pay cash and so on and its doubtful the tape maker uses hidden cameras on his customers. But there might be a fingerprint on the order form or something. The advantage is that its cheap, i would assume, cheaper than even a burner phone but it attracts attention.
Doesn't matter. A package gets seized, and you're out of business for awhile anyway....they know where it is being mailed to. Tying a person to that particular tape isn't enough to convict, and it's far more work to follow something like that than it's worth.
Bottom line, if they find the drugs, you're going to be watched...
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
Memories



Registered: 05/09/12
Posts: 10,484
Loc: Suwannee River
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: Enlil]
#17391206 - 12/14/12 11:26 AM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Bottom line, if they find the drugs, you're going to be watched...
What makes you say that?
I know people who have had packages siezed, and they continue to import things with no problems.
|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 67,521
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: Memories]
#17391234 - 12/14/12 11:31 AM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
That's just foolish. There's never a guarantee that you'll get caught, but dodging one bullet just so that you can stand there while more are shot is the epitome of stupidity, IMO.
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
naum



Registered: 10/09/07
Posts: 4,069
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: Stonehenge]
#17391401 - 12/14/12 12:01 PM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Custom tamper evident tape, now that is an idea worthy of looking into. However, wouldn't that in itself be a red flag for authorities? It seems like there would be ways around it, simply cut into the box under the label and replace with a newly printed label. Even if they couldn't do that i can imagine every postal worker on the line saying "take a look at this one!"
It's not that hard to do. UV Pen with an irregular crosshatch across the tape all the way around the box. If the lines are visibly mismatched or broken or just straight up missing when viewed under UV light then someone opened your box.
-------------------- Let's upgrade our security practices and move toward client-side PGP for encrypted PMs. My Public PGP Key: hxxps://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/24002249#24002249
|
eyeohwa


Registered: 06/29/11
Posts: 90
Last seen: 2 years, 10 months
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: naum]
#17391431 - 12/14/12 12:08 PM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
naum said:
Quote:
Custom tamper evident tape, now that is an idea worthy of looking into. However, wouldn't that in itself be a red flag for authorities? It seems like there would be ways around it, simply cut into the box under the label and replace with a newly printed label. Even if they couldn't do that i can imagine every postal worker on the line saying "take a look at this one!"
It's not that hard to do. UV Pen with an irregular crosshatch across the tape all the way around the box. If the lines are visibly mismatched or broken or just straight up missing when viewed under UV light then someone opened your box.
Yeah but when the DEA shows up to make a controlled delivery you aren't going to have time to pull out your UV light and check if the lines are mismatched. Whereas, with your own (custom) tape it would be pretty obvious in the split second you have to make a decision about whether or not you should accept the package.
|
naum



Registered: 10/09/07
Posts: 4,069
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: eyeohwa]
#17391611 - 12/14/12 12:48 PM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Well you could just use a UV pen light to quickly check, but if the DEA shows up to make a controlled delivery you are probably already screwed.
Your own custom tape brings its own security risks. One it is not invisible like UV pen would be (so you could just use sharpie), and if it is indeed unique it is then uniquely identifiable. As some other people have pointed out it is also probably a red flag if the package or either the sender or receiver is already under suspicion.
edit: bolded statement for emphasis
-------------------- Let's upgrade our security practices and move toward client-side PGP for encrypted PMs. My Public PGP Key: hxxps://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/24002249#24002249
Edited by naum (12/14/12 12:52 PM)
|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 67,521
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: naum]
#17391627 - 12/14/12 12:50 PM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
People routinely ship packages with tamper evident tape. I can't imagine that it would attract that much attention. It doesn't really look all that different from normal tape unless you tamper with it.
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 67,521
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
|
Quote:
tymoteusz3 said: Enlil - a question you can answer. Suppose I developed the above code and released it into the open source world for anyone to use. Could I be held responsible as aiding in the transportation of drugs or similar since that is kind of what it would be intended for, to let those transporting drugs evade capture?
As long as you're not marketing it for that purpose, you should be fine....you could easily market it as a "tamper bot" that tells you if something has been opened...a closet...a drawer...a package, etc.
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
Stonehenge
Alt Center


Registered: 06/20/04
Posts: 14,850
Loc: S.E.
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: Enlil]
#17391776 - 12/14/12 01:27 PM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Naum, the uv thing sounds interesting and you could have the device in your hand when you go to the door but the delivery guy is going to be suspicious and may report it to a supervisor. Perhaps if you had a really good story like you were checking for germs, or... i dunno, but even then he may report it as an odd thing. Still better than being busted.
Enlil, your idea is worthy of consideration and as you say this tamper tape is used, i see a lot of places that sell it. The problem is this, if it looks just like normal tape until tampered with and they open it, they will see its tamper tape and have the option of replacing it with regular tape. From what i read the tape that looks like regular tape on the outside has to be lifted up to reveal the "opened" message underneath. Any logo you put on it might be replicated if they want to go to that amount of trouble. We are assuming this is a sizable shipment since for small amounts they don't bother.
Good point about the phone possibly not working when its opened. A large building with a lot of grounded metal in it might block the signal. Dumb cops might beat high tec by being lucky.
Apparently the tape is used often enough that it would not be enough to make them do the dog act but it would be a flag by itself. If your package has enough flags already like state of origin, a watched address, etc, then tamper tape might be enough to make them go further. The tape you have to lift might be a problem because the delivery person is not going to want to let you start opening the package which is what it would look like before signing for it.
The tamper tape has lines on it, the examples i saw and says "tamper evident tape" or words to that effect. If you could find some that had the lines but looked like normal tape, that could do the job, it would not attract attention and its not that expensive. Just take a few seconds to carefully look at the package before signing, if they don't line up you refuse it. Perhaps using the phone plus tape as a 2 pronged safety measure? The phone can be used over and over and if you send 20 packages before losing one, it averages out to not much money. The tape should cost less than a dollar a package.
-------------------- “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.” (attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville political philosopher Circa 1835) Trade list http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/18047755
|
Enlil
OTD God-King




Registered: 08/16/03
Posts: 67,521
Loc: Uncanny Valley
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: Stonehenge]
#17391796 - 12/14/12 01:31 PM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Your custom tape could be something as innocent as a plaid pattern or some cartoon characters...whatever...it doesn't have to say "SECURITY"
As far as them getting tape to replace it, that's not feasible. You get the package the next day or you don't...there's no time to order replacement tape....this is particularly true if you have several different patterns and switch it up a lot.
-------------------- Censoring opposing views since 2014. Ask an Attorney Fuck the Amish
|
Stonehenge
Alt Center


Registered: 06/20/04
Posts: 14,850
Loc: S.E.
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: Enlil]
#17392009 - 12/14/12 02:19 PM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
>Your custom tape could be something as innocent as a plaid pattern or some cartoon characters...whatever...it doesn't have to say "SECURITY"
Yeah, but if you could buy it otc you would get a lot of protection without having to custom order which is going to probably cost more than the phone. Granted, the custom order will be more secure.
>As far as them getting tape to replace it, that's not feasible. You get the package the next day or you don't...there's no time to order replacement tape....this is particularly true if you have several different patterns and switch it up a lot.
True, and cops are a lazy bunch. But if there are a lot of patterns on the market it would be almost as secure and cheaper. With custom orders they are used to dealing with big companies and you might have to buy 500 rolls plus a setup fee. And more records being kept of you. If you took an off the shelf tape and stamped it with your logo which might read "happy birthday" or something, that would make it unique and still be cheap and secure. A custom rubber stamp will be much cheaper than all that fancy special order business.
I can see it now, you got in a package a week for a year, then one week you get the dreaded signal from the phone and it shows cops going in and searching it. Then comes the package and you say "i wasn't expecting anything" you glance at it and see the tape has been tampered. You say "i don't want to end up having to pay for something i didn't order" and refuse. Or just don't come to the door or go down and pick it up.
The cops are furious and know they've been outwitted. They only go after low hanging fruit so they give up or try once again to deliver the same package. If discovered, you might want to switch up receiving addresses because they might just search every package after that.
-------------------- “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.” (attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville political philosopher Circa 1835) Trade list http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/18047755
|
Stonehenge
Alt Center


Registered: 06/20/04
Posts: 14,850
Loc: S.E.
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: Stonehenge]
#17392228 - 12/14/12 03:07 PM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
I just did a quick look on ebay and they have something like 200 manufacturor refurbished phones for under $35 and a number of them were under $20. I looked at a few listings and they mentioned gps, camera and so on. Even if you need a fancier one for this to work, it should not cost too much. You could pick up a roll of tamper tape, get a custom rubber stamp and a phone for maybe $50 or so and be in business. You would have 2 way protection.
I don't get or send illegal stuff in the mail but i back the rights of others to do so. Drug laws are stupid.
-------------------- “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.” (attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville political philosopher Circa 1835) Trade list http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/18047755
|
goldenroad08
OwsleyWannabee



Registered: 11/11/12
Posts: 314
Last seen: 9 years, 9 months
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: Stonehenge]
#17403491 - 12/16/12 07:05 PM (11 years, 5 months ago) |
|
|
Never thought of custom tape or a phone for saftey, both of these ideas could be refined to a point where catching packages could be alot safer.
Goning to havta research this furthur.
-------------------- Trades
|
PanzerCubed




Registered: 11/22/12
Posts: 2,285
Loc: Nauru
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: goldenroad08]
#17435034 - 12/23/12 12:05 AM (11 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
|
ch1ck3n.s0up
Troubled Loner



Registered: 10/03/08
Posts: 2,573
Loc: Hunting Fungi
Last seen: 2 years, 9 months
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: Anonymous #1]
#17467121 - 12/29/12 04:47 PM (11 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Careful... this could backfire on you!  A live transmitting device inside a package would be a huge HUGE red flag. It might even trigger a bomb scare! I'd be willing to bet that in some sorting facilities, packages are now scanned for live electronic signals to protect against terrorist threats (insert crazy fundy here that wants to detonate his IED at the "perfect" time).
In addition, a cheap frequency scanning device mounted in the sort line would easily and automatically flag it and kick it out as a suspicious package.
Furthermore, what other type of package would possibly be transmitting a signal, other than contraband? When was the last time that you received a legit package from Amazon, Ebay, or your aunt Sally, that had a powered-on device inside that was broadcasting!!?

Way to make your package stand out like a White Boy in a new cherry-red Mustang GT drivin' around North St. Louis at 2am on a Friday night!
That being said, It might work a few times, but as soon as the powers at be catch on, you might as well just roll your package in the shape of a joint.
Jesus effing Christ what would you idiots do without me?
Edited by ch1ck3n.s0up (12/29/12 06:24 PM)
|
Stonehenge
Alt Center


Registered: 06/20/04
Posts: 14,850
Loc: S.E.
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: ch1ck3n.s0up]
#17467666 - 12/29/12 06:44 PM (11 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Barely possible that they monitor every package for transmissions but unlikely. I thought the deal was that the call was triggered by light? That will save on battery usage since the dealy panzer mentioned has only a 20 hour life. His type thing could be hooked to a simple photocell and voila, a phone that turns on and transmits video only when it sees light. If you get no call then all is well. Possible that the call would be blocked by a steel building so use the tamper proof tape along with it.
If someone made one of these gizmos to be combined with any phone, he could sell them i'm sure. Here is a money making idea for anyone with ambition. You could even sell them on ebay. Not just for packages but to monitor a room, building, etc. Any light and it starts transmitting. Or if its your grow room, have a sound trigger. You get a call and see pigs breaking in and going through your stuff and scratch one grow room. Better than free room and board for 10 years.
-------------------- “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.” (attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville political philosopher Circa 1835) Trade list http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/18047755
|
Anonymous #2
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: Stonehenge]
#17468924 - 12/29/12 10:49 PM (11 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Stonehenge said:
His type thing could be hooked to a simple photocell and voila, a phone that turns on and transmits video only when it sees light.
Could it though? Can you post some examples of the type of photocells you're talking about?
|
Alan Rockefeller
Mycologist

Registered: 03/10/07
Posts: 48,392
Last seen: 2 days, 23 hours
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: ch1ck3n.s0up]
#17469020 - 12/29/12 11:20 PM (11 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
ch1ck3n.s0up said: A live transmitting device inside a package would be a huge HUGE red flag.
Why?
Quote:
It might even trigger a bomb scare! I'd be willing to bet that in some sorting facilities, packages are now scanned for live electronic signals to protect against terrorist threats (insert crazy fundy here that wants to detonate his IED at the "perfect" time).
Why would a bomb transmit anything? A bomb would be a passive receiver.
Or an on cell phone actually.....Cell phones can easily be rigged to detonate when anyone calls them.
Quote:
In addition, a cheap frequency scanning device mounted in the sort line would easily and automatically flag it and kick it out as a suspicious package.
So their device would be looking for cell phones?
That is an easy thing to do. But it seems very un-government-like to do that.
Quote:
Furthermore, what other type of package would possibly be transmitting a signal, other than contraband? When was the last time that you received a legit package from Amazon, Ebay, or your aunt Sally, that had a powered-on device inside that was broadcasting!!?
Good point, but it's just a cell phone, not really a big deal in this day and age. Or is it?
Quote:
you might as well just roll your package in the shape of a joint.
I doubt that they will start checking packages that have turned on cell phones in them.
Possible though. Easy to check. Send ten turned on cell phones and see how many get opened.
Perhaps a resourceful DEA / postal inspector agent is watching this forum and is writing a confidential paper about this. Congratulations DEA agent for staying on top of things. Make sure to include in your paper that the cell phone will be off the whole time, in sleep mode, and will transmit nothing until it sees light. At this point, you would be basically fucked.
Maybe you could counter this by opening any package that seems to have any electronic activity at all - even a cell phone which is asleep. If this is the case, you will have to open hundreds of thousands of packages in order to find my friends cell phone tracker.
|
LateForTheFuture
Old Hand



Registered: 02/24/03
Posts: 845
|
|
Quote:
I doubt that they will start checking packages that have turned on cell phones in them.
Possible though. Easy to check. Send ten turned on cell phones and see how many get opened.
Perhaps a resourceful DEA / postal inspector agent is watching this forum and is writing a confidential paper about this. Congratulations DEA agent for staying on top of things. Make sure to include in your paper that the cell phone will be off the whole time, in sleep mode, and will transmit nothing until it sees light. At this point, you would be basically fucked.
Maybe you could counter this by opening any package that seems to have any electronic activity at all - even a cell phone which is asleep. If this is the case, you will have to open hundreds of thousands of packages in order to find my friends cell phone tracker.
well said.
|
Stonehenge
Alt Center


Registered: 06/20/04
Posts: 14,850
Loc: S.E.
|
|
I wasn't able to find something off the shelf but it could easily be put together. A photocell produces a voltage when light hits the sensor. You couple that to a semiconductor switch. The basic form of the switch will be a transistor that conducts when a certain voltage level is present on the base which is the middle section of a transistor. Normally voltage can't flow from the emittor to the collector unless the proper voltage is present at the base which functions as a gate allowing current to flow or not to flow. A transistor can be used to amplify a weaker signal or be used as a switch.
OK, so a transistor acts like a switch and allows current to flow when the proper signal or voltage is present. This voltage is supplied by the photocell. When the box is closed there is no light to trigger the switch but when its opened it turns on. What the transistor turns on or leaves off is the camera itself. All you need is a phone that allows external switching. The phone could have a camera and mic so you could see the inspectors opening it and hear them talking about the big shipment they stopped. Then someone notices the camera is operating and finally shuts it off. The place where the shipment was headed gets cleaned out and no one is there when they try to deliver.
The phone is off the whole time until turned on so no signal is sent out. No current is used to run down the battery so the thing could sit for days or weeks in transit like for an international shipment and still have power when and if its opened.
The one other detail is how to get the phone to call a certain number as soon as its turned on and to transmit video and sound. That last part isn't as important, the phone call itself shows the box was opened. Anyone have an idea about setting the phone up to call a certain number automatically?
-------------------- “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.” (attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville political philosopher Circa 1835) Trade list http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/18047755
|
naum



Registered: 10/09/07
Posts: 4,069
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: Stonehenge]
#17470686 - 12/30/12 12:04 PM (11 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
With a hacked linux based device it should be relatively easy to get the phone to send a text on wake.
-------------------- Let's upgrade our security practices and move toward client-side PGP for encrypted PMs. My Public PGP Key: hxxps://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/24002249#24002249
|
ch1ck3n.s0up
Troubled Loner



Registered: 10/03/08
Posts: 2,573
Loc: Hunting Fungi
Last seen: 2 years, 9 months
|
|
Quote:
Alan Rockefeller said: Perhaps a resourceful DEA / postal inspector agent is watching this forum and is writing a confidential paper about this. Congratulations DEA agent for staying on top of things. Make sure to include in your paper that the cell phone will be off the whole time, in sleep mode, and will transmit nothing until it sees light. At this point, you would be basically fucked.
Maybe you could counter this by opening any package that seems to have any electronic activity at all - even a cell phone which is asleep. If this is the case, you will have to open hundreds of thousands of packages in order to find my friends cell phone tracker.

Sometimes I think that I'm the most paranoid person on this forum.
-------------------- "Inspiration ~ Move me brightly ~ light the song with sense and color ~ hold away despair ~ more than this I will not ask ~ faced with mysteries dark and vast ~ statements just seem vain at last" --Jerry Garcia, Terrapin Station "Officer, I'm going to remain silent, and I would like to speak with a lawyer. I'm not resisting, but I don't consent to any searches.
|
CidneyIndole
www.shroomery.OG



Registered: 05/16/05
Posts: 4,762
Loc: Love's Secret Domain
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: ch1ck3n.s0up] 1
#17480883 - 01/01/13 01:00 PM (11 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
ch1ck3n.s0up said:
That being said, It might work a few times, but as soon as the powers at be catch on, you might as well just roll your package in the shape of a joint.
Jesus effing Christ what would you idiots do without me? 

Classic.
"Sir-- I've found a suspicious package."
"Okay... so the dogs alerted on it, then...."
"No sir."
"Alright, so was it leaking? Vibrating?"
"No sir... it was...er... rolled up like a joint."
-------------------- ------------------------ I am me. We are You.
|
PanzerCubed




Registered: 11/22/12
Posts: 2,285
Loc: Nauru
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: CidneyIndole]
#17500663 - 01/05/13 06:49 AM (11 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Get a audrino card, program it with a photocell and disposable cell phone guts.
And simply make it send a pre-programed message to the phone's contact directory. Then get it to wipe the phones contact's and sent messages so they cant see who received the text's.
Might cost more then $40 to make but i guess if you really want to know if your package has been tampered with, it would be worth the investment.
|
Stonehenge
Alt Center


Registered: 06/20/04
Posts: 14,850
Loc: S.E.
|
Re: Cameras in mail packages...? [Re: PanzerCubed]
#17500988 - 01/05/13 09:23 AM (11 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
The audrino card seems to be a programable card with a computer chip and some memory. Have you worked with those before? It would be beyond me to do all those things. But something like that would be very nifty. The only weak point is if its opened in a building that blocks cell phones either intentionally or because of its design then the call would never be received.
One way around it would be to have a phone capable of receiving as well as sending. Either the same one or another one. You could call the package to see if everything was alright just before it was delivered. If it didn't answer or showed tampering then you would know. I can just see someone waiting on a lb of good smoke and the package doesn't answer the phone. What to do? Tamper evident tape would be a back up
-------------------- “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship.” (attributed to Alexis de Tocqueville political philosopher Circa 1835) Trade list http://www.shroomery.org/forums/showflat.php/Number/18047755
|
|