|
Anonymous
|
Saddam Hussein
#1736051 - 07/21/03 06:27 PM (20 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
whatever expensive, complicated, violent mess they've gotten us into, isn't it a good thing that he's no longer in power?
|
Crobih
rap-cord
Registered: 11/03/98
Posts: 2,015
Loc: cave
Last seen: 11 years, 6 months
|
Re: Saddam Hussein [Re: ]
#1736065 - 07/21/03 06:36 PM (20 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
No. It is not good thing for Iraq. Cause, saddam was loosing his power steadily. This incident make much more mess in Iraq. Cause, any government that is made by USA and GB bless, can nto retrireve desired ligimacy.
Now, in Iraq, you have the new izrael, great shit. No good for anybody, but for world to understand much more easily this democratic paradox.
|
Anonymous
|
Re: Saddam Hussein [Re: Crobih]
#1736083 - 07/21/03 06:40 PM (20 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
are you drunk?
and this:
"saddam was loosing his power steadily"
?
|
Innvertigo
Vote Libertarian!!
Registered: 02/08/01
Posts: 16,296
Loc: Crackerville, Michigan U...
|
Re: Saddam Hussein [Re: Crobih]
#1736094 - 07/21/03 06:47 PM (20 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
eh?
-------------------- America....FUCK YEAH!!! Words of Wisdom: Individual Rights BEFORE Collective Rights "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." -- Thomas Jefferson
|
Crobih
rap-cord
Registered: 11/03/98
Posts: 2,015
Loc: cave
Last seen: 11 years, 6 months
|
Re: Saddam Hussein [Re: ]
#1736111 - 07/21/03 06:52 PM (20 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
mushmaster said: "saddam was loosing his power steadily" ?
The political power of saddam was going down steadily in this decade. That is what I have hear from Iraq emigrants.
|
Baby_Hitler
Errorist
Registered: 03/06/02
Posts: 27,634
Loc: To the limit!
Last seen: 8 hours, 8 minutes
|
Re: Saddam Hussein [Re: Crobih]
#1736208 - 07/21/03 07:43 PM (20 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Maybe with 20 more years of sanctions he would have been replaced.
-------------------- "America: Fuck yeah!" -- Alexthegreat “Nothing can now be believed which is seen in a newspaper. Truth itself becomes suspicious by being put into that polluted vehicle. The real extent of this state of misinformation is known only to those who are in situations to confront facts within their knowledge with the lies of the day.” -- Thomas Jefferson The greatest sin of mankind is ignorance. The press takes [Trump] literally, but not seriously; his supporters take him seriously, but not literally. --Salena Zeto (9/23/16)
|
Anonymous
|
Re: Saddam Hussein [Re: ]
#1736214 - 07/21/03 07:46 PM (20 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
maybe time will tell
and isnt he still alive screaming for his people to attack?
|
wingnutx
Registered: 09/24/00
Posts: 2,287
|
|
In 20 year he probably wouldn't have killed more than a couple million people.
|
1stimer
Religion=Rape
Registered: 11/18/01
Posts: 1,280
Loc: Amerika
|
Re: Saddam Hussein [Re: wingnutx]
#1736542 - 07/21/03 09:46 PM (20 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
how many children would have been killed by the U.S.?
-------------------- ash dingy donker mo gollyhopper patty popiton rockstop bueno mayo riggedy jig bobber johnathan pattywhacker gogboob t-shirt monkey. There is such emotion in the distortion.
|
falcon
Registered: 04/01/02
Posts: 8,035
Last seen: 2 minutes, 11 seconds
|
Re: Saddam Hussein [Re: ]
#1736548 - 07/21/03 09:48 PM (20 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Nope Saddam was a secular leader that dreamed of pan arabic unification. He acted as check to fundamentalist muslim unification. He was a threat to Saudis and Isreal. He was the finger in the dike keeping back a shit flood in the middle east. Now we have our finger in the dike.
|
Cornholio
A liberal guy(on hiatus)
Registered: 01/13/03
Posts: 845
Loc: Austin, TX
Last seen: 20 years, 4 months
|
Re: Saddam Hussein [Re: ]
#1736701 - 07/21/03 10:46 PM (20 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Morrowind said: and isnt he still alive screaming for his people to attack?
Whether Saddam is alive or not is unknown, but the captured Iraqi people accused of attacking US forces say they are not Saddam loyalists, but are against US occupation of their country.
--------------------
|
Cornholio
A liberal guy(on hiatus)
Registered: 01/13/03
Posts: 845
Loc: Austin, TX
Last seen: 20 years, 4 months
|
Re: Saddam Hussein [Re: wingnutx]
#1736712 - 07/21/03 10:48 PM (20 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
wingnutx said: In 20 year he probably wouldn't have killed more than a couple million people.
Who is responsible for the US backed UN sanctions of Iraq which has caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis?
--------------------
|
Xlea321
Stranger
Registered: 02/25/01
Posts: 9,134
|
Re: Saddam Hussein [Re: Cornholio]
#1736878 - 07/21/03 11:43 PM (20 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
That was all Saddams fault because he refused to stop making weapons of mass destruction....er...the weapons that he never actually made. 750,000 chidren under 5 died thanks to the sanctions. Someone needs holding to account for that genocide.
-------------------- Don't worry, B. Caapi
|
Skikid16
fungus fan
Registered: 06/27/02
Posts: 5,666
Loc: In the middle of the nort...
Last seen: 18 years, 11 months
|
Re: Saddam Hussein [Re: Cornholio]
#1737250 - 07/22/03 02:26 AM (20 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Cornholio said:
Quote:
wingnutx said: In 20 year he probably wouldn't have killed more than a couple million people.
Who is responsible for the US backed UN sanctions of Iraq which has caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis?
Saddam was.
He invaded a country.
The US decided to banish him from said country.
The US did banish him from said country
He surrendered to the US to save his ass.
As part of the surrender, he signed a peace treaty, which had specific guidelines.
He met none of these guidelines.
The UN imposed sanctions to try to force him to comply with said guidelines.
He did not.
Sanctions stayed in place.
He got richer.
Many Iraqis suffered.
Bush got mad.
Bush dropped bombs.
Saddam dissapeared.
To be continued........................
-------------------- Re-Defeat Bush in '04
|
GazzBut
Refraction
Registered: 10/15/02
Posts: 4,773
Loc: London UK
Last seen: 2 months, 24 days
|
Re: Saddam Hussein [Re: Skikid16]
#1737389 - 07/22/03 03:58 AM (20 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
I cant believe you are still spouting rubbish like this: "As part of the surrender, he signed a peace treaty, which had specific guidelines. He met none of these guidelines." Havent you realised you have been lied to yet? One more time, weapons inpsectors reported that Iraq complied with around 95% of all requests made of them up until 1998. Others have claimed that any information which showed this cooperation in a favourable light was basically covered up and a false image of Iraq as a threat was carefully built up over a period of time, until enough suckers like yourself believed the web of lies justified a war and excused genocide through sanctions. Even if everything the US claimed about Saddam during the 90's was true (and in light of current developments I think we can all agree that is highly unlikely) two wrongs do not make a right. Saddam did not put the sanctions that killed hundreds of thousands of children in place. We did. Another point, the sanctions were supposed to stop Saddam becoming a miitary threat so how did children end up dying?
-------------------- Always Smi2le
|
Anonymous
|
Re: Saddam Hussein [Re: Xlea321]
#1737408 - 07/22/03 04:26 AM (20 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
the weapons that he never actually made.
never actually made? excuse me?
|
GazzBut
Refraction
Registered: 10/15/02
Posts: 4,773
Loc: London UK
Last seen: 2 months, 24 days
|
Re: Saddam Hussein [Re: ]
#1737415 - 07/22/03 04:31 AM (20 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Is there real proof that Saddam did indeed manufacture weapons of mass destruction after the first Gulf War?
-------------------- Always Smi2le
|
Anonymous
|
Re: Saddam Hussein [Re: GazzBut]
#1737424 - 07/22/03 04:41 AM (20 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
yes, there is. there's also proof that he (and his wicked sons, especially uday) murdered thousands of people. you people won't even stand up to those facts because they don't jive with the way you'd like to percieve things.
instead, you'll say ridiculous things that sound something like *the deaths under saddam... they weren't caused directly by him; they were caused by the sanctions... all those shii'as and kurds everybody's saying hussein massacred... never happened. all those times hussein intimidated, arrested, or deported weapons inspectors... they didn't really matter. also, the sanctions (which were responsible for the hundreds of thousands of civilian deaths under saddam, none we actually directly caused by him) were not hussein's fault at all, but were in place for no reason other than mean old uncle sam wanting to kill some arab children. all you people that disagree watch too much fox news and are brainwashed and don't know what's going on. i'm special and have the inside scoop and you're all out of the loop. fools!*
|
GazzBut
Refraction
Registered: 10/15/02
Posts: 4,773
Loc: London UK
Last seen: 2 months, 24 days
|
Re: Saddam Hussein [Re: ]
#1737438 - 07/22/03 04:52 AM (20 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
I asked a simple question and you replied with emotion, generalisation and little content. In fact you didnt even respond to the question I asked. Perhaps you need more sleep?
-------------------- Always Smi2le
|
Anonymous
|
Re: Saddam Hussein [Re: GazzBut]
#1737445 - 07/22/03 05:02 AM (20 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
you nailed it. it's 7:00 AM here and i got in at 1 last night. i'm off to work now... i'll try to post something more substancial when i get back.
|
|