|
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
|
stinkynuts138
journeyman

Registered: 07/12/03
Posts: 52
Last seen: 20 years, 2 months
|
spores
#1717795 - 07/15/03 09:35 AM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
do you NEED spores to start growing? there arent really spores in the manure, are there? clearly im a newb to shrooms but, this forum is very informative. thankyou for that
|
houshroom
shroom cowboy

Registered: 05/07/03
Posts: 678
Loc: space city
|
|
yes you need spores to start growing. and no naturally there aren't spores in manure, but sometimes a cow eats a shroom or some grass with spores on it that's how they get in there. looks like you need to do a lot more reading before you grow...
|
Gumby
Fishnologist


Registered: 06/13/01
Posts: 26,656
|
|
Of course spores are needed for mushrooms to grow.
What did you think? They don't just magically appear. I'm anxious to hear this one...
|
Dank420
Shrooms...Mmm

Registered: 04/12/03
Posts: 548
Loc: 'burbs of philly
Last seen: 15 years, 11 months
|
Re: spores [Re: Gumby]
#1717931 - 07/15/03 11:18 AM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
This is really general knowledge, like something you would learn in High School biology.
-------------------- "I tried marijuana once. I did not inhale." -William Clinton.
|
Gumby
Fishnologist


Registered: 06/13/01
Posts: 26,656
|
Re: spores [Re: Dank420]
#1717970 - 07/15/03 11:39 AM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Or middle school science.
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 26,691
|
|
No, technically you don't NEED spores. You can clone an existing mushroom. But, guessing your level of experience with mushroom growing, I'd say starting from spores is the way to go for you. That is, after you've read some more about the subject... BTW, I'm not sure this post belongs in the Hunting section...
|
Gumby
Fishnologist


Registered: 06/13/01
Posts: 26,656
|
Re: spores [Re: koraks]
#1718447 - 07/15/03 02:17 PM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Good point, I'll move it.
|
Ekstaza
stranger than most


Registered: 04/10/03
Posts: 4,324
Loc: Around the corner
Last seen: 10 months, 25 days
|
Re: spores [Re: koraks]
#1718473 - 07/15/03 02:24 PM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koraks said: No, technically you don't NEED spores. You can clone an existing mushroom.
Which brings up the question: Who came first, the chicken or the egg?
Just kidding around. You bring up a valid point that I did not think of before. I don't think that anyone asking that question would have any clue as to how to go about cloning though.
-------------------- YOUR EXPERIENCE WITH ANY GIVEN DRUG ISN'T THE DEFINITIVE MEASURE OF THE DRUGS EFFECTS.
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 26,691
|
Re: spores [Re: Ekstaza]
#1718482 - 07/15/03 02:28 PM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
No, exactly, I only suggested it for completeness. But I agree with you, I don't think stinkynuts is very aware of the process of cloning shrooms.
About the chicken and the egg: obviously the egg came first. There have been many species around laying eggs before the chicken evolved
|
BatFly
captain obvious

Registered: 07/07/03
Posts: 375
Last seen: 7 years, 2 months
|
|
be nice peeps, like this... shroom wizrds grow, i like it!
or...
pf tek for simple minds .... lots of pics, very good!
that should answer alot of your questions.
for your first time, follow it to the word. and be sterile!
your welcome
|
Ekstaza
stranger than most


Registered: 04/10/03
Posts: 4,324
Loc: Around the corner
Last seen: 10 months, 25 days
|
Re: spores [Re: koraks]
#1718492 - 07/15/03 02:31 PM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koraks said: About the chicken and the egg: obviously the egg came first. There have been many species around laying eggs before the chicken evolved
Once again, a thought unthunk by me. I am humbled.
-------------------- YOUR EXPERIENCE WITH ANY GIVEN DRUG ISN'T THE DEFINITIVE MEASURE OF THE DRUGS EFFECTS.
|
BatFly
captain obvious

Registered: 07/07/03
Posts: 375
Last seen: 7 years, 2 months
|
Re: spores [Re: Ekstaza]
#1718500 - 07/15/03 02:32 PM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
but then what came first? the creatures that lay the eggs or the eggs?
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 26,691
|
Re: spores [Re: BatFly]
#1718517 - 07/15/03 02:39 PM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
but then what came first? the creatures that lay the eggs or the eggs?
Again, the answer is obvious: the creatures that laid the first eggs came before the eggs. It even says so in the bible: God created all them animals, not eggs! 
But I'm sorry for fucking up someone else's post. I will refrain from further joking in this thread, and only post when I have something on-topic to say. (Sure enjoyed a good laugh though... )
|
stara
addict

Registered: 05/14/03
Posts: 473
Last seen: 8 years, 2 months
|
Re: spores [Re: koraks]
#1718537 - 07/15/03 02:48 PM (20 years, 7 months ago) |
|
|
-I would like to have two amanita,one pan and a coco coir;my friend wants to have three amanitas he's too hungry as you see. -Yes sir,right away.
|
|