Home | Community | Message Board

Lil Shop Of Spores
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Amazon Shop for: Scales

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
Registered: 02/26/01
Posts: 9,134
Is capitalism working?
    #1698102 - 07/09/03 01:43 AM (13 years, 3 months ago)

The lost decade

They were promised a brighter future, but in the 1990s the world's poor fell further behind

Larry Elliott, economics editor
Wednesday July 9, 2003
The Guardian

The widening gulf between the global haves and have-nots was starkly revealed last night when the United Nations announced that while the United States was booming in the 1990s more than 50 countries suffered falling living standards.

The UN's annual human development report charted increasing poverty for more than a quarter of the world's countries, where a lethal combination of famine, HIV/Aids, conflict and failed economic policies have turned the clock back.

Highlighting the setbacks endured by sub-Saharan Africa and the nations that emerged from the break-up of the Soviet Union at the end of the cold war, the UN called for urgent action to meet its millennium development goals for 2015. These include a halving of the number of people living on less than a dollar a day, a two-thirds drop in mortality for the under fives, universal primary education and a halving of those without access to safe drinking water and improved sanitation.

The report said the 1990s had seen a drop from 30% to 23% in the number of people globally living on less than a dollar a day, but the improvement had largely been the result of the progress in China and India, the world's two most populous countries.

Despite some sporadic successes such as Ghana and Senegal, there was little hope of Africa meeting the UN's 2015 development goals; on current trends it would be 2147 before the poorest countries in the poorest continent halved poverty and 2165 before child mortality was cut by two thirds. Thirty of the 34 countries classified by the UN as "low human development" are in sub-Saharan Africa.

Taking issue with those who have argued that the "tough love" policies of the past two decades have spawned the growth of a new global middle class, the report says the world became ever more divided between the super-rich and the desperately poor.

The richest 1% of the world's population (around 60 million) now receive as much income as the poorest 57%, while the income of the richest 25 million Americans is the equivalent of that of almost 2 billion of the world's poorest people. In 1820, western Europe's per capita income was three times that of Africa's; by the 1990s it was more than 13 times as high.

In Norway, top of the UN's league table for human development, life expectancy at birth is 78.7 years, there is 100% literacy and annual income is just under $30,000 (about ?18,200). At the other end of the scale, a newborn child in Sierra Leone will be lucky to reach its 35th birthday, has a two in three chance of growing up illiterate and would have an income of $470 a year.

Overall human development, measured by the UN as an amalgam of income, life expectancy and literacy, fell in 21 countries during the 1990s. By contrast, only four countries suffered falling human development in the 1980s.

"Though average incomes have risen and fallen over time, human development has historically shown sustained improvement, especially when measured by the human development index. But the 1990s saw unprecedented stagnation, with the HDI falling in 21 countries.

"Much of the decline in the 1990s can be traced to the spread of HIV/AIDS, which lowered life expectancies, and to a collapse in incomes, particularly in the commonwealth of independent states."

The UN said the events of September 11 had created a "genuine consensus" that poverty was the world's problem, but urged the west to abandon the one-size-fits-all liberalisation agenda foisted on poor nations.

Mark Malloch-Brown, administrator of the UN development programme, said many countries in Africa and Latin America held up as examples of how to kick-start development were among the stragglers in the global economy.

"The poster children of the 1990s are among those who didn't do terribly well. There are structural restraints on development. Market reforms are not enough. You can't just liberalise; you need an interventionist strategy."

The report added that: "Over the past 20 years too much development thinking and practice have confused market-based economic growth with laissez faire."

The west needed to tear down trade barriers, dismantle its lavish subsidy regimes, provide deeper debt relief and double aid from $50bn to $100bn a year. This would provide the resources for investment in the building blocks of development - health, education, clean water and rural roads.

"Poor countries cannot afford to wait until they are wealthy before they invest in their people", said Jeffrey Sachs, special adviser to Kofi Annan on the UN millennium development goals.

Economic growth alone would not rescue the world from poverty, the report said. "Without addressing issues like malnutrition and illiteracy that are both causes and symptoms of poverty, the goals will not be met. The statistics today are shaming: more than 13 million children have died through diarrhoeal disease in the past decade. Each year, over half a million women, one for every minute of the day, die in pregnancy and childbirth. More than 800 million suffer from malnutrition."

It added: "For many countries the 1990s were a decade of despair. Some 54 countries are poorer now than in 1990. In 21, a larger proportion is going hungry. In 14, more children are dying before age five. In 12, primary school enrolments are shrinking. In 34, life expectancy has fallen. Such reversals in survival were previously rare."

Matthew Lockwood, head of UK Advocacy Team, ActionAid, said: "The shocking truth is that the poor are getting poorer.

"Leaders, in rich and poor countries alike, are not taking poverty seriously enough. You don't solve this problem by making the leaders of poor countries accountable to their rich-country counterparts. They need to be accountable to their own citizens. Poor people must have a voice."

Don't worry, B. Caapi

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
carbon unit

Registered: 01/23/00
Posts: 1,718
Loc: Europe
Last seen: 16 days, 2 hours
Re: Is capitalism working? [Re: Xlea321]
    #1699198 - 07/09/03 11:45 AM (13 years, 3 months ago)

A couple of comments just because some of these points keep coming up. I'm paraphrasing statements in the article in boldface:

Living on less than a dollar a day. What this means is just that they don't participate much in the market. There are isolated pockets of people who live on zero dollars a day, and still live healthy fulfilling lives. Increasing the amounts of dollars per day generally means transferring labor from self-subsistency to market economy.

The quotient between average per capita incomes in western Europe and Africa has increased between 1820 and 1990. Okay, could this be caused by the fact that there were lots of poor people in Europe in 1820 who since then got their standard of living raised through scientific and technical developments, free markets, and democratic rule, while this process has been much slower in Africa? Or could it be that in the Eternal Zero-Sum Game of Economy, the europeans have found new, better and more evil ways to oppress and exploit the africans?

A newborn child will be lucky to reach its 35th birthday. Life expectancy is an often misunderstood statistic. It's an artificially constructed expectation value based on the death rates in a certain year, for people of varying ages. In most countries with low life expectancy for newborns, the life expectancy for an adult is often in the 70's, because it's the high infant death rate that pulls down the value.

Also, historic events can obscure the meaning of the statistic. For example, there was a significant rise in life expectancy for newborns in Ukraine right after the communist mass murders, due only to the fact that the annual death rate among adults fell sharply when the murdering stopped.

Literacy and healthcare are very important, and the article managed to convey that without misleading statistics.

But the article fails to mention how much of all these problems are caused by lack of democracy, oppression of women, disregard for human rights in general, and bad capital management.

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator

Re: Is capitalism working? [Re: Xlea321]
    #1699935 - 07/09/03 04:30 PM (13 years, 3 months ago)

The widening gulf between the global haves and have-nots was starkly revealed last night when the United Nations announced that while the United States was booming in the 1990s more than 50 countries suffered falling living standards.

citing the great success of a capitalist nation over nations run by despotic leaders who nationalize their industries and smother their nation's economies doesn't seem like a good way to start off an article which aims to criticize capitalism.

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Registered: 02/26/01
Posts: 9,134
Re: Is capitalism working? [Re: ]
    #1699993 - 07/09/03 04:52 PM (13 years, 3 months ago)

It's usually best to read an article before you judge it. Where do you get the idea it "aims to criticise capitalism"?

Don't worry, B. Caapi

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator

Re: Is capitalism working? [Re: Xlea321]
    #1700015 - 07/09/03 05:00 PM (13 years, 3 months ago)

alex, what do YOU think this article has to say about capitalism, and why did you give this tread the title you did?

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

Amazon Shop for: Scales

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Who Really Feels Capitalism Works?
( 1 2 3 4 all )
MisterKite 2,875 75 12/13/04 05:52 PM
by SoopaX
* Only capitalism can save Africa Luddite 1,414 17 12/04/07 01:24 PM
by Silversoul
* Why Does Capitalism Get Such A Bum Rap? JesusChrist 1,237 19 05/15/05 02:59 PM
by Annapurna1
* capitalism
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 all )
BrAiN 11,330 149 02/24/05 01:50 PM
by cb9fl
* Pure Capitalism
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Lallafa 7,232 76 12/26/01 01:30 AM
by Phred
* Capitalism or Communism? Which is better?
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
HagbardCeline 3,531 95 06/27/03 02:28 AM
by downforpot
* Anti-poverty campaign gets it almost all wrong lonestar2004 1,047 18 07/07/05 04:11 AM
by Tao
* On Capitolism, Poverty, and Suffering Eightball 1,581 18 07/07/02 12:07 PM
by luvdemshrooms

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Prisoner#1, Enlil
401 topic views. 1 members, 2 guests and 3 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Marijuana Demystified
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2016 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.059 seconds spending 0.004 seconds on 14 queries.