Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Offlinezeronio
Stranger
Male

Registered: 10/16/01
Posts: 2,349
Loc: Slovenia
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
Condoleezza Rice about WMD threat
    #1400025 - 03/22/03 06:54 AM (21 years, 30 days ago)

Here's an article published in Foreign affairs magazine written by Condoleezza Rice (http://www.foreignpolicy2000.org/library/issuebriefs/readingnotes/fa_rice.html).
Here's an interesting part about Iraqui & N. Korean WMD. It seems that she doesn't really beleive that Iraq WMD are a real threat to USA.

Quote:

These regimes are living on borrowed time, so there need be no sense of panic about them. Rather, the first line of defense should be a clear and classical statement of deterrence -- if they do acquire WMD, their weapons will be unusable because any attempt to use them will bring national obliteration.




So is possesion of WMD really a good reason to attack Iraq?  :grin: :grin: :grin: 

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Anonymous

Re: Condoleezza Rice about WMD threat [Re: zeronio]
    #1400049 - 03/22/03 07:05 AM (21 years, 30 days ago)

national obliteration

what the hell does that mean?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleEvolving
Resident Cynic

Registered: 10/01/02
Posts: 5,385
Loc: Apt #6, The Village
Re: Condoleezza Rice about WMD threat [Re: ]
    #1400681 - 03/22/03 12:33 PM (21 years, 30 days ago)

It means to turn their countries into parking lots.


--------------------
To call humans 'rational beings' does injustice to the term, 'rational.'  Humans are capable of rational thought, but it is not their essence.  Humans are animals, beasts with complex brains.  Humans, more often than not, utilize their cerebrum to rationalize what their primal instincts, their preconceived notions, and their emotional desires have presented as goals - humans are rationalizing beings.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Anonymous

Re: Condoleezza Rice about WMD threat [Re: zeronio]
    #1401326 - 03/22/03 05:38 PM (21 years, 30 days ago)

Quote:

Condoleezza Rice




I hate that bitch....

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinemntlfngrs
The Art of Casterbation
Male User Gallery

Registered: 07/18/02
Posts: 3,937
Last seen: 5 years, 7 months
Re: Condoleezza Rice about WMD threat [Re: zeronio]
    #1401358 - 03/22/03 05:53 PM (21 years, 30 days ago)

So we should wait for them to use them (megadeath), and then we should whip them out after the fact (more megadeath).
That's brilliant.
Ever heard of preventative maintenance


--------------------
Be all and you'll be to end all

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinezeronio
Stranger
Male

Registered: 10/16/01
Posts: 2,349
Loc: Slovenia
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
Re: Condoleezza Rice about WMD threat [Re: mntlfngrs]
    #1401467 - 03/22/03 06:33 PM (21 years, 30 days ago)

Ever hear of MAD (mutual assured destruction) concept that kept the cold war cold?

She wanted to say that WMD are not a threat because those who are in possesion of it would never dare to use it.
This shows that even high US officials don't beleive that they're attacking Iraq because of WMD. It's good only for manufacturing pro-war public opinion.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinemntlfngrs
The Art of Casterbation
Male User Gallery

Registered: 07/18/02
Posts: 3,937
Last seen: 5 years, 7 months
Re: Condoleezza Rice about WMD threat [Re: zeronio]
    #1401535 - 03/22/03 07:16 PM (21 years, 30 days ago)

With a sane person that is true but Saddam is not exactly sane by most reports.
trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is in itself insane.


--------------------
Be all and you'll be to end all

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineuno
enthusiast

Registered: 04/06/02
Posts: 448
Last seen: 11 years, 10 months
Re: Condoleezza Rice about WMD threat [Re: mntlfngrs]
    #1622535 - 06/09/03 10:40 PM (20 years, 10 months ago)

Quote:

With a sane person that is true but Saddam is not exactly sane by most reports.
trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is in itself insane.


Ya, he went totally crazy and attacked the US in the past decade, or anyone else for that matter. -=oB


--------------------
- uno

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisible1stimer
Religion=Rape
Registered: 11/18/01
Posts: 1,280
Loc: Amerika
Re: Condoleezza Rice about WMD threat [Re: mntlfngrs]
    #1622545 - 06/09/03 10:43 PM (20 years, 10 months ago)

last i herd the us was the only country to use nukes. also over 500,000 cancer deaths across the midwest were due to nuke testing in arizona. 500,000 of our own people.


--------------------
ash dingy donker mo gollyhopper patty popiton rockstop bueno mayo riggedy jig bobber johnathan pattywhacker gogboob t-shirt monkey.

There is such emotion in the distortion.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineHagbardCeline
Student-Teacher-Student-Teacher
Male User Gallery

Registered: 05/10/03
Posts: 10,028
Loc: Overjoyed, at the bottom ...
Last seen: 1 month, 30 days
Re: Condoleezza Rice about WMD threat [Re: uno]
    #1622629 - 06/09/03 11:08 PM (20 years, 10 months ago)

Quote:

Ya, he went totally crazy and attacked the US in the past decade, or anyone else for that matter. -=oB




I know right. Like all those mass graves. But it is ok to kill his own people.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/correspondent/2785095.stm
http://www.hrw.org/photos/2003/iraq/
http://indypgh.org/news/2003/04/5625.php


--------------------
I keep it real because I think it is important that a highly esteemed individual such as myself keep it real lest they experience the dreaded spontaneous non-existance of no longer keeping it real. - Hagbard Celine

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineHagbardCeline
Student-Teacher-Student-Teacher
Male User Gallery

Registered: 05/10/03
Posts: 10,028
Loc: Overjoyed, at the bottom ...
Last seen: 1 month, 30 days
Re: Condoleezza Rice about WMD threat [Re: 1stimer]
    #1622642 - 06/09/03 11:13 PM (20 years, 10 months ago)

Quote:

last i herd the us was the only country to use nukes. also over 500,000 cancer deaths across the midwest were due to nuke testing in arizona. 500,000 of our own people.




You must have quit listening.http://www.geo.arizona.edu/~/paquette/NUCS/history.html


--------------------
I keep it real because I think it is important that a highly esteemed individual such as myself keep it real lest they experience the dreaded spontaneous non-existance of no longer keeping it real. - Hagbard Celine

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinezeronio
Stranger
Male

Registered: 10/16/01
Posts: 2,349
Loc: Slovenia
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
Re: Condoleezza Rice about WMD threat [Re: HagbardCeline]
    #1622837 - 06/10/03 12:54 AM (20 years, 10 months ago)

It's funny that this thread was started before the war. I wanted to show that the current administration knows that WMD of countires like Iraq & North Korea aren't a threat to USA. Now it seems that Iraq didn't even have any.
Administration deliberatly caused panic and mass hysteria to convince people to support war.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineuno
enthusiast

Registered: 04/06/02
Posts: 448
Last seen: 11 years, 10 months
Re: Condoleezza Rice about WMD threat [Re: HagbardCeline]
    #1622941 - 06/10/03 01:49 AM (20 years, 10 months ago)

Quote:

Quote:

Ya, he went totally crazy and attacked the US in the past decade, or anyone else for that matter. -=oB




I know right. Like all those mass graves. But it is ok to kill his own people.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/correspondent/2785095.stm
http://www.hrw.org/photos/2003/iraq/
http://indypgh.org/news/2003/04/5625.php


By "anyone else" I meant another nation. Sorry, next time I'll specify. There is also a difference between killing dissidents and uprisers and declaring war on other nations.


--------------------
- uno

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineHagbardCeline
Student-Teacher-Student-Teacher
Male User Gallery

Registered: 05/10/03
Posts: 10,028
Loc: Overjoyed, at the bottom ...
Last seen: 1 month, 30 days
Re: Condoleezza Rice about WMD threat [Re: uno]
    #1623289 - 06/10/03 08:46 AM (20 years, 10 months ago)

So it is ok to kill people that don't agree with you?


--------------------
I keep it real because I think it is important that a highly esteemed individual such as myself keep it real lest they experience the dreaded spontaneous non-existance of no longer keeping it real. - Hagbard Celine

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineSev
Astropath
Registered: 06/06/03
Posts: 1,426
Loc: NY
Last seen: 9 years, 6 months
Re: Condoleezza Rice about WMD threat [Re: HagbardCeline]
    #1624906 - 06/10/03 09:25 PM (20 years, 10 months ago)

Actually, Saddam is rather sane. He never attacked the US -- he only defended his country against it. He never threatened to take action except in defense, at least against the US. He actually had somewhat decent reason to think that the US wouldn't do anything about Kuwaite. As far as the US goes, he was only defending the sovereignty of his own country and committing a little invasion. I mean, we'd been supporting him invading Iran all the time...

Hussein was an evil bastard, but he wasn't nuts.


--------------------
"Do we want the stars? We can have them. Can we borrow cups of fire from the sun? We can and must and light the world." --"On the Shoulders of Giants", Ray Bradbury

All of my posts are full of fiction and blatant lies.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineGazzBut
Refraction

Registered: 10/15/02
Posts: 4,773
Loc: London UK
Last seen: 3 months, 11 days
Re: Condoleezza Rice about WMD threat [Re: mntlfngrs]
    #1625805 - 06/11/03 06:18 AM (20 years, 10 months ago)

Quote:

With a sane person that is true but Saddam is not exactly sane by most reports.
trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is in itself insane.




Ask yourself how you formed this opinion, you didnt do it all by yourself did you? What shred of evidence is there to suggest Saddam would have attacked us if we hadnt attacked him first?
Why dont you just wiseup and admit our governments are basically gangsters and all they have done is invaded anothers gangsters turf to benefit themselves. All this other shit about WMD and the threat of Saddam insane is just grass for the sheep.


--------------------
Always Smi2le

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineuno
enthusiast

Registered: 04/06/02
Posts: 448
Last seen: 11 years, 10 months
Re: Condoleezza Rice about WMD threat [Re: HagbardCeline]
    #1640168 - 06/17/03 04:32 PM (20 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

HagbardCeline said:
So it is ok to kill people that don't agree with you?


Didn't we prove that its ok in the US's eyes?


--------------------
- uno

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineAzmodeus
Seeker

Registered: 11/27/02
Posts: 3,392
Loc: Lotus Land!! B.C.
Last seen: 19 years, 3 months
Re: Condoleezza Rice about WMD threat [Re: mntlfngrs]
    #1640201 - 06/17/03 04:43 PM (20 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

mntlfngrs said:
With a sane person that is true but Saddam is not exactly sane by most reports.
trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is in itself insane.




Restraint with what? sand? his non-WMD?...i've only heard the propoganda describing one side of his actions, and having never been there or met the guy,,, admit any opinion i may have is only that...

See in a country like his where there are several strong factions willing to fight to the death regardless of civil war, executions may be what he thought were nescessary to keep "order"...not saying he didn't do it for completely selfish reasons, or without consciouns.....just you cant say...


--------------------
"Know your Body - Know your Mind - Know your Substance - Know your Source.

Lest we forget. "

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineLearyfanS
It's the psychedelic movement!
Male User Gallery

Registered: 04/20/01
Posts: 34,213
Loc: High pride!
Last seen: 54 minutes, 41 seconds
Re: Condoleezza Rice about WMD threat [Re: HagbardCeline]
    #1640568 - 06/17/03 07:50 PM (20 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

I know right. Like all those mass graves. But it is ok to kill his own people.




Pro war people always fall back on that.

It's terrible that Saddam killed his own people, but you act like that's the reason we invaded. If it is the reason we invaded why aren't we invading every other country that kills it's own people?




--------------------
--------------------------------


Mp3 of the month:  Sons Of Adam - Feathered Fish


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Condoleezza Rice and the Plame Game Prosgeopax 2,186 15 08/01/05 10:27 PM
by afoaf
* Condoleezza Rice blissedout 475 1 07/01/06 04:51 PM
by Penguarky Tunguin
* Rice: Claim vs. Fact EchoVortex 1,216 13 04/10/04 06:58 AM
by EchoVortex
* WMD Intel: A Well-Designed Failure SquattingMarmot 320 0 01/24/05 01:57 AM
by SquattingMarmot
* Blix: Iraq had no WMD since 1991
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 all )
Xlea321 6,509 106 09/23/03 03:43 PM
by infidelGOD
* Pentagon WMD Report Stokes Doubts About Prewar Intel Zahid 430 0 09/29/03 11:10 PM
by Zahid
* U.S. study: 'Unlikely' Iraq shipped WMD to Syria
( 1 2 3 4 all )
Vvellum 4,609 62 04/30/05 04:40 PM
by Psychoactive1984
* Kay: WMD never existed
( 1 2 3 all )
Xlea321 3,813 41 02/15/04 12:35 AM
by The_Red_Crayon

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
900 topic views. 2 members, 3 guests and 6 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.027 seconds spending 0.006 seconds on 12 queries.