|
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
|
Anonymous
|
Post deleted by Administrator
#1570181 - 05/22/03 07:05 PM (20 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
|
ToxicMan
Bite me, it's fun!
Registered: 06/28/02
Posts: 6,725
Loc: Aurora, Colorado
Last seen: 3 hours, 59 minutes
|
Re: Panaeolus Foenisecii? [Re: ]
#1570501 - 05/22/03 09:22 PM (20 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
That's what they look like...
-------------------- Happy mushrooming!
|
baraka
Registered: 07/15/00
Posts: 10,768
Loc: hyperspace
Last seen: 2 years, 2 months
|
Re: Panaeolus Foenisecii? [Re: ToxicMan]
#1570506 - 05/22/03 09:26 PM (20 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Thats what they look like, them things grow like mad around here. In almost every single lawn. If only they where subbs....
-------------------- This is the only time I really feel alive.
|
mjshroomer
Sage
Registered: 07/21/99
Posts: 13,774
Loc: gone with my shrooms
|
Re: Panaeolus Foenisecii? [Re: baraka]
#1570538 - 05/22/03 09:36 PM (20 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Why would you drop spores. The mushrooms do that pefectly okay all by theirselves.
Once the cap is open the spores have spread.
mj
|
Gumby
Fishnologist
Registered: 06/13/01
Posts: 26,656
|
Re: Panaeolus Foenisecii? [Re: mjshroomer]
#1570636 - 05/22/03 10:06 PM (20 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Why would you drop spores. The mushrooms do that pefectly okay all by theirselves.
Once the cap is open the spores have spread.
mj
I'm pretty sure he meant it in the context of taking a spore print... not that flicking the cap bullshit rumor
|
UberAlles
Stranger
Registered: 04/17/03
Posts: 48
Last seen: 14 years, 29 days
|
Re: Panaeolus Foenisecii? [Re: Gumby]
#1570790 - 05/22/03 11:05 PM (20 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Whoa, those are pretty beautiful Foe's. I can't wait for the rain so I can get my hands on those babies. Just out of curiousity, what do you plan to do with them and what state do you live in?
|
mjshroomer
Sage
Registered: 07/21/99
Posts: 13,774
Loc: gone with my shrooms
|
Re: Panaeolus Foenisecii? [Re: UberAlles]
#1571615 - 05/23/03 06:45 AM (20 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
PANAOLINA FOENISECII ARE NOT A PSCYHOACTIVE MUSHROOM.
THEY DO NOT CONTAIN ANY PSILOCINE OR PSILOCYBINE.
MJ
|
GGreatOne234
Stranger
Registered: 12/23/99
Posts: 8,946
|
Re: Panaeolus Foenisecii? [Re: ]
#1571720 - 05/23/03 08:34 AM (20 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Yeah those definately look like Panaeolina foenisecii to me.
|
tranced2
the runner of it all
Registered: 04/17/02
Posts: 420
Loc: where peace reigns
|
|
take a print, you could be surprised, i know that a lot of LBMs i thought were Foenisecii turned out to be subbs or if they werent subbs had a jet black print and were definately active.
-------------------- in trees. fighting bears.
|
Anonymous
|
|
we get acuminatus to the south of Greatone.
|
baraka
Registered: 07/15/00
Posts: 10,768
Loc: hyperspace
Last seen: 2 years, 2 months
|
Re: Panaeolus Foenisecii? [Re: tranced2]
#1601849 - 06/02/03 03:27 PM (20 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
tranced a lot of the foenesscii i find in yards seam to have a jet black print. Never printed one for an extended period tho just saw minor dustings. They dont bruise i dont think they where active but i never tested.
-------------------- This is the only time I really feel alive.
|
showcivic17
good fella
Registered: 05/18/03
Posts: 147
Loc: northeastern USA
Last seen: 20 years, 4 months
|
Re: Panaeolus Foenisecii? [Re: baraka]
#1602129 - 06/02/03 04:58 PM (20 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Foes aren't poisonous right?
On a couple web sites I went on they said that some foes may have some psilocybine in them...enough were you eat many you will trip..
just a couple of things i heard..
thanks for the help
|
ToxicMan
Bite me, it's fun!
Registered: 06/28/02
Posts: 6,725
Loc: Aurora, Colorado
Last seen: 3 hours, 59 minutes
|
Re: Panaeolus Foenisecii? [Re: showcivic17]
#1602330 - 06/02/03 06:09 PM (20 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
The reports suggesting their possible activity seem to be based on misidentification. There seems to be little evidence that there is any activity in them.
Happy mushroming!
-------------------- Happy mushrooming!
|
mjshroomer
Sage
Registered: 07/21/99
Posts: 13,774
Loc: gone with my shrooms
|
Re: Panaeolus Foenisecii? [Re: ToxicMan]
#1602913 - 06/02/03 09:11 PM (20 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
IF one reads my paper published inthe yearbook for Ethnomedicine and the study of consciousness you can read of hundreds of analysations of Panaelina foenisecii which show they really are not active.
Even Gary Menser spead the rumour by saying they were active on the east coast while aDavid Arora said they were not active onthe west coast.All basing their comments on three aseparate analysis of mixed collections of shrooms. Furhtermore, the P. shinctrius story came from Shcultes original collection of shrooms with Blas Pablo Reko in Mexico in 19398. The shrooms place on a herbarium sheet were read as P. shinctrinus and p. cubensis.
Later they found specimens of P. mexicana inthe shrooms and allegedly P. caerulescens, although there is still confusion over the latter shroom.
It was mentioned becasue of a Nahuatl phrase used by Indians in the region.
But again and agian, I still see many people who say that P. foenisecii gets them high and/or that they had a jet black sproeprint. Just like those I show pictures of Galerinas to and then they tell me how they tripped on them.
mj
|
|