|
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
|
Zen Peddler


Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 6,379
Loc: orbit
|
|
Im sending my old mate on the job. He is a local in that area and knows his stuff.
--------------------
|
mjshroomer
Sage
Registered: 07/21/99
Posts: 13,774
Loc: gone with my shrooms
|
Re: Anyone got good pics of Ps. Aucklandii ? [Re: Zen Peddler]
#1559387 - 05/19/03 03:32 AM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
HI, I made an error in my typing when i identified those as P. aucklandii. I was working on rewriting the Australian/New Zealand book in bringoing it up to date. I oinly became aware of the eror when Blue meanie PM'ed me about the ID.
I have a bunch of n0otes here on my Computer tab;le and inadvertantly wrote down P. auclklandii becasue Chris King had just sent me a new photo of the Aucklandii, unfortunateluy it is in Black and white.
Those shrooms Cassie posted are small P. subaeruginosa,a species I have collected in Australia when iwas there.
My apologies for the confusion and thanks to Blue meanie for hiss corrections.
He also has finally accepted the P. eucalypta as an actual species in hios countrey.
I think he will later find the P. tasmaniana is also valid as is probably the P. australiana which he considers a variation of P. subaeruginosa.
have a shroomy day ,
mj
|
fastbut
newbie
Registered: 05/11/02
Posts: 38
Last seen: 19 years, 8 months
|
Re: Anyone got good pics of Ps. Aucklandii ? [Re: mjshroomer]
#1559389 - 05/19/03 03:34 AM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
So Mr. Blue Meanie, Exactly how old is your old mate?
Fast Butt
|
Zen Peddler


Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 6,379
Loc: orbit
|
Re: Anyone got good pics of Ps. Aucklandii ? [Re: fastbut]
#1559400 - 05/19/03 03:44 AM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
What a strange question... How old is he? Why do you ask? MJ Im glad you now agree with me. Actually if you examine my pics of Eucalypta you can see that they are almost macroscopically identical to Subaeruginosa. The only differences ive found arent any more significant to those i find in regional distributions of Subaeruginosa. MJ you seem a little too faithful to Guzman's interpretation despite increasing evidence to the opposite. I am still not making conclusions about Eucalypta being synonymous with Subaeruginosa until i have time to study it further because i have very little experience with this mushroom. On the other hand Australiana is a misnomer and i can and have proven so. I know that i will never find that Australiana is a seperate species, and im not sure why you still think that i will. After examining or having someone else examine about 20 seperate collections of Australiana, and upon consultation with a number of academics and Buchanan's work, it is clear that 11 of the 12 specimens left by Cleland and identified as Subaeruginosa are identical to Australiana. Tasmaniana now that ive seen it im pretty sure is am entirely different species and i very much doubt Guzman's description of a coprophilic member of the family Cyanescens - as did Stamets. Also its forked cystidia are a clear indication of a seperate entity. Before you continue to edit your book, id suggest that you re-evaluate your opinion of the Buchanan/CHang and Mills Vs. Guzman/Watling stance. Buchanan's argument is entirely sound.
--------------------
|
Anonymous
|
Re: Anyone got good pics of Ps. Aucklandii ? [Re: Zen Peddler]
#1559750 - 05/19/03 10:36 AM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
- Post History Deleted Upon User's Request -
|
MagmaManiac
Stranger


Registered: 12/12/02
Posts: 799
Loc: 352
Last seen: 9 years, 5 months
|
|
|
Reverend_Jim_Jones
Stranger
Registered: 04/23/03
Posts: 91
|
Re: Anyone got good pics of Ps. Aucklandii ? *DELETED* [Re: MagmaManiac]
#1560331 - 05/19/03 02:27 PM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Post deleted by Reverend_Jim_JonesReason for deletion: .
|
mjshroomer
Sage
Registered: 07/21/99
Posts: 13,774
Loc: gone with my shrooms
|
|
Those shrooms in the photos at my site were the ones used to do the taxonomy on the species. AS I noted, Chris King is suppose to supply me with some more images. I am waiting on him to get to it.
mj
|
Zen Peddler


Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 6,379
Loc: orbit
|
Re: Anyone got good pics of Ps. Aucklandii ? [Re: mjshroomer]
#1561145 - 05/19/03 07:00 PM (20 years, 6 months ago) |
|
|
Great to hear that your in contact with King as he helped describe the species after all. Looking forward to the pics.
--------------------
|
|
|
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: ToxicMan, inski, Alan Rockefeller, Duggstar, TimmiT, Anglerfish, Tmethyl, Lucis, Doc9151, Land Trout 9,200 topic views. 2 members, 20 guests and 8 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ] |
|