Home | Community | Message Board

Original Seeds Store
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: PhytoExtractum Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 | Next >  [ show all ]
OfflineRonoS
DSYSB since '01
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/25/01
Posts: 16,259
Loc: Calgary, Alberta
Last seen: 1 year, 1 day
US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction'
    #1527059 - 05/07/03 09:07 AM (20 years, 9 months ago)

Link

By Neil Mackay



The Bush administration has admitted that Saddam Hussein probably had no weapons of mass destruction.
Senior officials in the Bush administration have admitted that they would be 'amazed' if weapons of mass destruction (WMD) were found in Iraq.

According to administration sources, Saddam shut down and destroyed large parts of his WMD programmes before the invasion of Iraq.

Ironically, the claims came as US President George Bush yesterday repeatedly justified the war as necessary to remove Iraq's chemical and biological arms which posed a direct threat to America.

Bush claimed: 'Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. We will find them.'

The comments from within the administration will add further weight to attacks on the Blair government by Labour backbenchers that there is no 'smoking gun' and that the war against Iraq -- which centred on claims that Saddam was a risk to Britain, America and the Middle East because of unconventional weapons -- was unjustified.

The senior US official added that America never expected to find a huge arsenal, arguing that the administration was more concerned about the ability of Saddam's scientists -- which he labelled the 'nuclear mujahidin' -- to develop WMDs when the crisis passed.

This represents a clearly dramatic shift in the definition of the Bush doctrine's central tenet -- the pre-emptive strike. Previously, according to Washington, a pre-emptive war could be waged against a hostile country with WMDs in order to protect American security.

Now, however, according to the US official, pre-emptive action is justified against a nation which simply has the ability to develop unconventional weapons.




--------------------
"Life has never been weird enough for my liking"

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineMadtowntripper
Sun-Beams out of Cucumbers
 User Gallery

Registered: 03/06/03
Posts: 21,287
Loc: The Ocean of Notions
Last seen: 6 months, 24 days
Re: US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction' [Re: Rono]
    #1527132 - 05/07/03 09:47 AM (20 years, 9 months ago)

Heh. That actually brings a smile to face. Our President is a duplicitous sonuvabitch. Blatant lies, and then ADMITTING to them!

And you guys like the Republicans...Ha!

Nice post though....


--------------------
After one comes, through contact with it's administrators, no longer to cherish greatly the law as a remedy in abuses, then the bottle becomes a sovereign means of direct action.  If you cannot throw it at least you can always drink out of it.  - Ernest Hemingway

If it is life that you feel you are missing I can tell you where to find it.  In the law courts, in business, in government.  There is nothing occurring in the streets. Nothing but a dumbshow composed of the helpless and the impotent.    -Cormac MacCarthy

He who learns must suffer. And even in our sleep pain that cannot forget falls drop by drop upon the heart, and in our own despair, against our will, comes wisdom to us by the awful grace of God.  - Aeschylus

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineDemon
A Drug AgainstWar

Registered: 06/18/00
Posts: 457
Loc: j00/2 m07h3/2
Last seen: 20 years, 2 days
Re: US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction' [Re: Madtowntripper]
    #1527166 - 05/07/03 10:05 AM (20 years, 9 months ago)

Right-wingers behold! Your leading party is a bunch of crooks.


--------------------
"Sex is like a gun.. you aim, you shoot, you run" - Aerosmith

Come visit SacredShrooms.org!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Anonymous

Re: US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction' [Re: Rono]
    #1527202 - 05/07/03 10:19 AM (20 years, 9 months ago)

"The Bush administration has admitted that Saddam Hussein probably had no weapons of mass destruction.
Senior officials in the Bush administration have admitted that they would be 'amazed' if weapons of mass destruction (WMD) were found in Iraq."

who were these 'senior officials'? what exactly did they say?

"According to administration sources, Saddam shut down and destroyed large parts of his WMD programmes before the invasion of Iraq."

administration sources?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleXlea321
Stranger
Registered: 02/25/01
Posts: 9,134
Re: US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction' [Re: Rono]
    #1527206 - 05/07/03 10:20 AM (20 years, 9 months ago)

Surprise surprise.


--------------------
Don't worry, B. Caapi

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisibleblink
eye of horus
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/31/02
Posts: 11,349
Loc: Geographic Location (Stat...
Re: US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction' [Re: ]
    #1527217 - 05/07/03 10:26 AM (20 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

  who were these 'senior officials'? what exactly did they say?



Quote:

  administration sources?




Would you want YOUR name attached to something like this if you worked in washington?  And to possibly get the bandwagon rolling for some war crimes or breaking the laws of war? :tongue:

enjoy your president people, I love living in canada, i just wish the govnt did something (anything really at this point) about pot... offtopic, just my .02 :grin: 


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Anonymous

Re: US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction' [Re: blink]
    #1527225 - 05/07/03 10:32 AM (20 years, 9 months ago)

i saw this story in the news forum, and i was gonna cut and paste it to here, but i thought the story was kinda weak. if 'senior' officials came out with something like this, i think there'd be more papers covering it than the 'sunday herald' or whatever it is. or are they not because it's all propaganda?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinemixpix
C'est dommage!
Female

Registered: 06/18/02
Posts: 92
Last seen: 15 years, 6 months
Re: US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction' [Re: ]
    #1527243 - 05/07/03 10:41 AM (20 years, 9 months ago)

Weak yes, based in truth (like all news now) yes.
Quote:

because it's all propaganda?



That I agree with.... ALL
increase the peace


--------------------
and when you try to toy with nature
youll be falling with the leaves

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineAzmodeus
Seeker

Registered: 11/27/02
Posts: 3,392
Loc: Lotus Land!! B.C.
Last seen: 19 years, 1 month
Re: US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction' [Re: Rono]
    #1527305 - 05/07/03 11:18 AM (20 years, 9 months ago)

Disgusting! :mad:  I think sanctions should be instilled on america to keep them from pre-emptively attacking countries with "capabilites" to produce WMD....which, believe it or not, could include canada.


--------------------
"Know your Body - Know your Mind - Know your Substance - Know your Source.

Lest we forget. "

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblesilversoul7
Chill the FuckOut!
 User Gallery

Registered: 10/10/02
Posts: 27,301
Loc: mndfreeze's puppet army
Re: US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction' [Re: Rono]
    #1527325 - 05/07/03 11:23 AM (20 years, 9 months ago)

But I thought this was about liberating the Iraqi people...  :confused:


--------------------


"It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong."--Voltaire

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineAzmodeus
Seeker

Registered: 11/27/02
Posts: 3,392
Loc: Lotus Land!! B.C.
Last seen: 19 years, 1 month
Re: US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction' [Re: silversoul7]
    #1527330 - 05/07/03 11:25 AM (20 years, 9 months ago)

NO,no...protecting the home front from terrorism.

Shouldn't "evil" come berore "terrorism"?!? :confused: 


--------------------
"Know your Body - Know your Mind - Know your Substance - Know your Source.

Lest we forget. "

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineLearyfanS
It's the psychedelic movement!
Male User Gallery

Registered: 04/20/01
Posts: 34,139
Loc: High pride!
Last seen: 7 hours, 38 minutes
Re: US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction' [Re: silversoul7]
    #1527631 - 05/07/03 01:14 PM (20 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

But I thought this was about liberating the Iraqi people...  :confused: 




It was. They were the only people in the world who were being oppressed, and now they're free.

What's your point?


 


--------------------
--------------------------------


Mp3 of the month:  The Fe-Fi-Four Plus 2 - I Wanna Come Back (From the World of LSD)


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinegrib
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 03/01/03
Posts: 550
Loc: Here and there
Last seen: 9 years, 8 months
Re: US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction' [Re: silversoul7]
    #1527635 - 05/07/03 01:14 PM (20 years, 9 months ago)

Quote:

But I thought this was about liberating the Iraqi people...




I always thought it was about security...

Here's an excerpt from an MSNBC article:

'The Bush administration said destroying Iraq?s suspected chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs was the main reason for the war. Despite weeks of searching its top suspected sites, none has been reported found so far.'


--------------------
<~>Our truest life is when we are in dreams awake <~>

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineAzmodeus
Seeker

Registered: 11/27/02
Posts: 3,392
Loc: Lotus Land!! B.C.
Last seen: 19 years, 1 month
Re: US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction' [Re: grib]
    #1527646 - 05/07/03 01:16 PM (20 years, 9 months ago)

I dont see how america can swallow such a cock!


--------------------
"Know your Body - Know your Mind - Know your Substance - Know your Source.

Lest we forget. "

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinezeronio
Stranger
Male

Registered: 10/16/01
Posts: 2,349
Loc: Slovenia
Last seen: 7 years, 5 months
Re: US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction' [Re: grib]
    #1527654 - 05/07/03 01:18 PM (20 years, 9 months ago)

I'm also sceptic about this. I doubt they'll admit that they lied so easily. lol

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineJohnnyRespect
Nomadic Wanderer
Registered: 04/16/03
Posts: 676
Loc: East Coast
Last seen: 20 years, 8 months
Re: US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction' [Re: zeronio]
    #1527670 - 05/07/03 01:20 PM (20 years, 9 months ago)

The Bush administration has admitted that Saddam Hussein probably had no weapons of mass destruction.

Bush claimed: 'Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. We will find them.'




Your post contradicts itself within the first page of itself.  Did the admin say he didn't ,or he did? I'm confused :smile:


--------------------
As I felt the soft cool mud squish between my toes, I thought, Man, these are not very good shoes!

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineRonoS
DSYSB since '01
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/25/01
Posts: 16,259
Loc: Calgary, Alberta
Last seen: 1 year, 1 day
Re: US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction' [Re: JohnnyRespect]
    #1527680 - 05/07/03 01:23 PM (20 years, 9 months ago)

The article doesn't contradict itself at all...it just shows that Bush is a liar. (not that it's exactly a news flash)


--------------------
"Life has never been weird enough for my liking"

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Anonymous

Re: US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction' [Re: Rono]
    #1527807 - 05/07/03 01:55 PM (20 years, 9 months ago)

or that a certain news source is misrepresenting or fabricating statements. or that certain 'government officials' are wrong... we'll see. it's early still.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineRonoS
DSYSB since '01
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/25/01
Posts: 16,259
Loc: Calgary, Alberta
Last seen: 1 year, 1 day
Re: US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction' [Re: ]
    #1527871 - 05/07/03 02:16 PM (20 years, 9 months ago)

Those are all very possible...but personally I'm going to stick my view that Bush is evil incarnate.  :smirk:


--------------------
"Life has never been weird enough for my liking"

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinepattern
multiplayer

Registered: 07/19/02
Posts: 2,185
Loc: Canada
Last seen: 3 years, 11 months
Re: US: 'Saddam had no weapons of mass destruction' [Re: Rono]
    #1528099 - 05/07/03 03:56 PM (20 years, 9 months ago)



--------------------
man = monkey + mushroom

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 | Next >  [ show all ]

Shop: PhytoExtractum Maeng Da Thai Kratom Leaf Powder   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* So Where Are The Weapons Of Mass Destruction?
( 1 2 all )
RonoS 2,061 35 04/19/03 05:35 PM
by EchoVortex
* Weapons of Mass Destruction ToxicManM 575 8 07/02/03 09:28 PM
by Learyfan
* weapons of mass destruction search at Google LOL kykeon 481 3 07/04/03 05:41 AM
by luvdemshrooms
* Weapons of Mass Destruction ShroomismM 231 0 11/07/03 12:49 AM
by Shroomism
* No Saddam/Bin Laden connection eh? Top Secret memo
( 1 2 all )
HagbardCeline 2,694 38 11/20/03 10:08 AM
by Xlea321
* Bomb Saddam! Free Iraq!!
( 1 2 3 4 ... 13 14 )
flow 17,543 264 01/07/06 07:11 PM
by CommunismIsRight
* "Bush is an idiot, but he was right about Saddam" EchoVortex 1,558 14 03/22/03 11:03 PM
by Xlea321
* Kay: No weapons yet, but evidence of intent wingnutx 528 1 10/02/03 05:50 PM
by wingnutx

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
1,833 topic views. 5 members, 10 guests and 4 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.026 seconds spending 0.007 seconds on 16 queries.