Home | Community | Message Board

Kraken Kratom
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
Male User Gallery

Registered: 12/15/02
Posts: 14,463
Loc: International waters
Last seen: 3 years, 11 months
Say goodbye to the corporate "I"
    #1475320 - 04/20/03 02:29 AM (13 years, 6 months ago)

While the white house works to create the first postmodern corporate feudal state, a resistance is rising at the level of the local town hall. Municipal officials in Porter Township, Pennsylvania, have become the first US jurisdiction to introduce binding law eliminating corporate claims to civil and constitutional privileges. The move stems from a battle between sludge companies (like Synagro and Alcosan) and Pennsylvania citizens who do not want toxic waste unloaded on their communities. From the legislature to the courtroom, corporations have used claims to ?personhood? in order to sanction their right to pollute. But Porter Township officials have drawn a line, and sewage sludge companies can no longer claim ?human rights? the next time they want to dump their load on the community.

And wait just a minute ? don?t we own some of these companies? As America?s big accounting firms faced accusations of nudge-nudge-wink-wink bookkeeping practices, citizen shareholders started asking tougher questions about the financial reports of the companies they invest in. As a result, the Securities and Exchange Commission recently accepted a proposal by a carpenters? union to make it harder for companies to hide their financial high jinks from their shareholders. In another example of a growing corporate crackdown, a large investor coalition called Campaign ExxonMobil recently convinced 20 percent of the oil company?s shareholders to support a resolution that the company adopt a renewable energy plan. That number is more than twice the support the resolution received at last year?s annual general meeting, and suggests that the company?s head-in-the-sand denial of global warming won?t even fly with its own investors much longer.

Still, corporate america is winning victories of its own. Oil companies and the Bush administration breathed a joint sigh of relief last year when judge John D. Bates ruled that the grubby American public doesn?t need to see the details of their government?s energy policy. Congress? General Accounting Office had sought the release of records from Vice President Dick Cheney?s energy task force in light of the fact that the VP received a heavy dose of input from the criminals at Enron, among other Republican political contributors. But Bates himself gave money to the Bush 2000 campaign prior to being appointed by Dubya as District Judge for the District of Columbia in December 2001. Understandably, Bates gave his bosses the decision they wanted, and ensured that corporate execs will continue to influence the White House behind closed doors ? until they end up in jail, that is.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
liberal pussy
Female User Gallery
Registered: 05/21/02
Posts: 5,646
Loc: innsmouth..MA
Re: Say goodbye to the corporate "I" [Re: Psilocybeingzz]
    #1475490 - 04/20/03 03:53 AM (13 years, 6 months ago)

The Real War--On American Democracy
Thom Hartmann, AlterNet
April 18, 2003
Viewed on April 20, 2003

In the midst of news of foreign wars, Americans are beginning to wake up to the real war being waged here at home. It is, however, a confused awakening.

For example, Americans wonder why the Bush administration seems so intent on crippling local, state, and federal governments by starving them of funds and creating huge federal debt that our children will have to repay.

Many think it's just to fund tax cuts and subsidies for the rich, that the multimillionaire CEOs who've taken over virtually all senior posts in the Bush administration are just pigs at the trough, and this is a spectacular but ordinary form of self-serving corruption. It all seems so plausible, and there's even a grain of truth to it.

But juicy deals for Bush administration insiders are just a by-product of the real and deeper war against democracy. The neoconservatives are perfectly happy for us to think they're just opportunists skirting the edges of legality and morality, but this is far more dangerous than simple government corruption.

Indeed, the neo-conservatives claim to be anti-government. As a leading spokesman for the neo-con agenda, Grover Norquist, told National Public Radio's Mara Liasson in a May 25, 2001 Morning Edition interview, "I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub."

Without a larger view, the issues of domestic spending, oil, neo-conservative power plays in both major parties, the loss of liberties, anti-government rhetoric, and war in the Middle East all seem like separate and unconnected events. They're not.

The "new conservatives" who've seized the Republican Party and, through the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) are nipping at the heels of the Democratic Party, are not our parents' conservatives. Historic conservatives like Barry Goldwater, Harry Truman, and Dwight Eisenhower would be appalled. Although their philosophical roots go back to Alexander Hamilton, who openly argued during the Constitutional Convention that royalty was the best form of government, the neocons have always been kept to the fringe, nipping at the heels of democracy.

In past times those promoting what is now called the neo-conservative agenda went by different names.

The Founders of America knew that for 6000 years "civilized" humans had always been ruled by one of three groups: kings, theocrats, or feudal lords. Kings held power by threat of violence and continual warfare; theocrats and popes held power by the people's fear of a god or gods; and feudal lords held power by wealth and the power that comes from throwing average people into poverty.

The "new" idea of our Founders in 1776 was to throw off all three of these historic tyrannies and replace them with a fourth way - people being ruled by themselves. A government that derived its legitimacy and continuing existence solely from the approval of its citizens. Government of, by, and for "We, The People." They called it a republican democracy.

What we are seeing now in the neoconservative agenda is nothing less than an attempt to overthrow republican democracy and replace it with a worldwide feudal state.

The last time this happened, the feudalists took over a monarchy and then North America. In December 1600, Queen Elizabeth I chartered the East India company, ultimately leading to a corporate takeover of the Americas that the colonists ended with the Boston Tea Party and, three years later, the American Revolution. This corporate-state partnership went on to conquer India, but eventually faded out as the British Empire faded, and the British government, along with most of Western Europe, embraced Jeffersonian forms of democracy.

But it raised its head again in the 20th Century, revived by Franco, Hitler, and Mussolini. The Italian dictator even used the word "corporatism" to describe it, and then later renamed it as "fascism" - a word that was defined in American dictionaries such as The American Heritage Dictionary (Houghton Mifflin Company) in 1983 as "fas-cism (fash'iz'em) n. A system of government that exercises a dictatorship of the extreme right, typically through the merging of state and business leadership, together with belligerent nationalism."

Since the "Reagan Revolution," two centuries after we rose up and rebelled against King George III's support of corporate feudalism in Boston Harbor, this ancient enemy of democracy is again trying to seize America. Reagan ignored the Sherman Act and other restraints on corporations, and sold at fire-sale prices the airwaves once held in common by We, The People. The result was predictable: a merger and acquisitions frenzy, and the takeover of American media by a handful of mega-corporations. Bill Clinton then helped export corporatism to the industrialized world when he pushed GATT/WTO through Congress.

Thus, the war on Iraq was just one front in the larger feudal war against democracy itself. (And a particularly useful one - it gave the corporate feudal lords access to oil wealth, and was so effective at distracting the populace from Bush's outrageous domestic agenda that we can expect to see another war, somewhere, in November of 2004.)

In 1936 - years before America turned its attention to fighting fascism in Germany - Franklin D. Roosevelt was concerned about the rise of a corporate feudalism here in the United States. In a speech in Philadelphia on June 27th, he said: "Out of this modern civilization economic royalists carved new dynasties. New kingdoms were built upon concentration of control over material things. Through new uses of corporations, banks and securities, new machinery of industry and agriculture, of labor and capital - all undreamed of by the Fathers - the whole structure of modern life was impressed into this royal service."

Roosevelt suggested that human nature may play a part in it all, but that didn't make it tolerable. "It was natural and perhaps human," he said, "that the privileged princes of these new economic dynasties, thirsting for power, reached out for control over government itself."

It was a control the Democratic Party of 1936 found intolerable. "As a result," Roosevelt said, "the average man once more confronts the problem that faced the Minute Man."

Republicans of the day lashed out in the press and on radio, charging that Roosevelt was anti-American, even communist. Without a moment's hesitation, he threw it back in their faces.

"These economic royalists complain that we seek to overthrow the institutions of America," Roosevelt thundered in that 1936 speech. "What they really complain of is that we seek to take away their power. Our allegiance to American institutions requires the overthrow of this kind of power. In vain they seek to hide behind the flag and the Constitution. In their blindness they forget what the flag and the Constitution stand for."

Those of us who still believe in republican democracy would have "We, The People" make the decisions through representatives we've elected without the feudal influence of corporate money. We realize that "big government" is, indeed, a menace when it's no longer responsive to its own people, as happened in Germany and Russia in the last century - and is happening today in America under the neoconservatives.

But we also remember the vision of a free and democratic America - a sacred archetype so powerful that protestors in Tiananmen Square marched to their deaths carrying a 36-foot-tall paper mache replica of the Statue Of Liberty while quoting the words of Thomas Jefferson.

Facing the power of The East India Company's corporate feudalism in 1773, the Founders of our nation, unable to get their voices heard in the halls of the British government or even in many of the newspapers of the day, turned to two nonviolent and very effective methods to spread the new meme of democracy.

The first was pamphleteering - and the internet is today's pamphlet. Millions are using email and pointing to websites to awaken people and promote democratic change.

The second was creating "committees of correspondence," also used extensively by the Women's Suffrage movement. These were groups organized to write letters to the editors of newspapers.

People across American have already begun letter writing, faxing, and email campaigns, and you can see the results on the editorial pages of our newspapers and in the reactions of some of our politicians. Other correspondents are blogging or calling in to talk shows, modern variations on this theme.

A correspondent in York, New York, who is pamphleteering in email and encouraging committees of correspondence to write letters to newspaper editors against the new feudalism's wars on America and overseas, shared the following quote from Emerson: "One of the illusions [of life] is that the present hour is not the critical, decisive hour."

Yet this is the critical and decisive hour, and we are not without voices or tools.

Thom Hartmann is an author and talk show host (www.thomhartmann.com).


? 2003 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.


"anchor blocks counteract the process of pontiprobation..while omalean globes regulize the pressure"...

Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* An Open Letter to the Corporations of America PsiloKitten 1,218 17 10/30/03 05:53 AM
by luvdemshrooms
* When You Say You Hate Corporate America...
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 all )
Anonymous 8,786 140 12/29/02 08:05 PM
by djfrog
* legal plunder and corporate personhood mntlfngrs 428 4 05/13/03 12:45 AM
by mr freedom
* Corporate connections in the Bush administration! FreeLaws1_6 637 10 03/04/05 11:39 AM
by Innvertigo
* feudal system / indentured servetude automanM 837 4 01/08/06 12:21 AM
by automan
* Corporate Slavery
( 1 2 3 4 all )
ekomstop 2,823 61 09/23/04 01:03 AM
by BleaK
* NAFTA's Investor ''Rights'': A Corporate Dream, A Citizens.. Psilocybeingzz 554 3 06/09/03 12:17 PM
by Anonymous
* 14 worst Corporations
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
DoctorJ 5,625 88 02/18/06 01:12 PM
by wilshire

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Prisoner#1, Enlil
584 topic views. 0 members, 0 guests and 1 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
High Mountain Compost
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2016 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.073 seconds spending 0.004 seconds on 14 queries.