|
maynardjameskeenan
The white stipes




Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 16,391
Loc: 'Merica
|
question I would love to have awnsered for me.
#14523021 - 05/27/11 07:47 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
So I have learned that there are some very intelligent people on this forum ( who would have figured that I would find smart people on a psycho mushroom website ). Okay question is.... What happens with quantum entanglement when one of the pair is sucked into the event horizon of a black hole? Wikipedia description of quantum entanglement; Quantum entanglement is a property of the state of a quantum mechanical system containing two or more degrees of freedom, whereby the degrees of freedom that make up the system are linked in such a way that the quantum state of any of them cannot be adequately described independently of the others, even if the individual degrees of freedom belong to different objects and are spatially separated.
-------------------- May you be filled with loving kindness. May you be well. May you be peaceful and at ease. May you be happy. AMU Q&A
|
Beanhead
IS IRONIC PARADOX


Registered: 10/11/08
Posts: 17,257
Loc: Geospatial inversion.
Last seen: 3 years, 5 months
|
|
KABOOM
|
maynardjameskeenan
The white stipes




Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 16,391
Loc: 'Merica
|
|
it happens all the time, black holes occur very frequently all over the universe. This is happening right now as we speak. What happens to the entangled particle that doesn't fall into the black hole? Is the same force applied to adjoined particle?
-------------------- May you be filled with loving kindness. May you be well. May you be peaceful and at ease. May you be happy. AMU Q&A
|
willowmp
Medical Psychedelic Mushrooms



Registered: 07/25/08
Posts: 3,346
Last seen: 12 years, 7 months
|
|
I'm taking a shot in the dark here, but is this where a particle falls into a black hole while an antiparticle falls out of it?
Basically the particle is made up for by the antiparticle which falls from the black hole, and thus matter was not lost.
It's taken from the theory where particles and antiparticles are all springing into existence very briefly and then clashing and neutralizing each other.
Off topic: I personally feel as though the theory in which matter is sucked into a black hole and deposited into a different dimension by Hawking is fairly solid. Although the projection theory by whoever is pretty nice as well.
A good trippy one is the infinite space x chance probability theory, where if space is infinite, any situation which involves chance (practically every situation), must occur although spread out very far.
I am both living and dying and being born every minute of my existence.
-------------------- "Fuck it too much Im outta wittbhjkhbhkjsrglhkrgl g I DEE JEUD." -Because it made sense on xanax and booze...
|
maynardjameskeenan
The white stipes




Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 16,391
Loc: 'Merica
|
Re: question I would love to have awnsered for me. [Re: willowmp]
#14523307 - 05/27/11 08:38 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
I don't believe that Stephen Hawking said that they were deposited into a different dimension, as I understand black holes they are like a 2 dimensional lens of our multidimensional universe and so is the edge of space. The event horizon is just the surface of where our 2 plans exists together. Black holes given enough time will expel all of there particles even if it gives off 1 particle every 100 million years. In that way no quantum information is ever lost or created. But if one of them is frozen from our dimension is the entanglement broken until the particle is given off by the black hole. I think particles and anti-particles are the ones adjoined by entanglement. lol, sorry I kinda high I hope you all can understand what I am trying to convey
-------------------- May you be filled with loving kindness. May you be well. May you be peaceful and at ease. May you be happy. AMU Q&A
|
willowmp
Medical Psychedelic Mushrooms



Registered: 07/25/08
Posts: 3,346
Last seen: 12 years, 7 months
|
|
Lol I know the theory about the 2D lens was created by Hawking's biggest academic rival.
I think you squashed like 3 different theories into one.
-------------------- "Fuck it too much Im outta wittbhjkhbhkjsrglhkrgl g I DEE JEUD." -Because it made sense on xanax and booze...
|
maynardjameskeenan
The white stipes




Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 16,391
Loc: 'Merica
|
Re: question I would love to have awnsered for me. [Re: willowmp]
#14523562 - 05/27/11 09:22 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Hawking also admitted he was wrong about his theory.
http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1053983.html On 22 July, Hawking stood before hundreds of colleagues at the 17th International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation in Dublin and said he had been wrong
I don't think that I have smashed 3 things into one. Quantum entanglement is real force of nature not a theory as are black holes.
-------------------- May you be filled with loving kindness. May you be well. May you be peaceful and at ease. May you be happy. AMU Q&A
|
maynardjameskeenan
The white stipes




Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 16,391
Loc: 'Merica
|
|
anyone? Come on now I know that there are some people out there way smarter then I am who know the answer to this question.
-------------------- May you be filled with loving kindness. May you be well. May you be peaceful and at ease. May you be happy. AMU Q&A
|
Coaster
Baʿal



Registered: 05/22/06
Posts: 33,501
Loc: Deep in the Valley
Last seen: 12 years, 3 months
|
|
Dr. Quantum knows all he will BLOW YOUR MIND
--------------------
|
ManyAk
Not A Shitgiver



Registered: 01/21/09
Posts: 1,081
Loc: Somewhere but not here
Last seen: 25 days, 14 hours
|
|
I don't know the answer to your question, but does it really mean I'm not smarter than you?
-------------------- we are all luminous beings why then do we not appear before each other radiant in our illumination
|
SheikCorp
Stranger

Registered: 01/09/08
Posts: 2,274
|
Re: question I would love to have awnsered for me. [Re: Coaster]
#14526278 - 05/28/11 12:41 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
|
Coaster
Baʿal



Registered: 05/22/06
Posts: 33,501
Loc: Deep in the Valley
Last seen: 12 years, 3 months
|
Re: question I would love to have awnsered for me. [Re: SheikCorp]
#14526286 - 05/28/11 12:42 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
we are all entangled with one another
--------------------
|
millzy


Registered: 05/12/10
Posts: 12,404
|
|
Quote:
maynardjameskeenan said: intelligent people on this forum
-------------------- I'm up to my ears in unwritten words. - J.D. Salinger
|
maynardjameskeenan
The white stipes




Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 16,391
Loc: 'Merica
|
Re: question I would love to have awnsered for me. [Re: Coaster]
#14526758 - 05/28/11 03:24 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
ManyAk said: I don't know the answer to your question, but does it really mean I'm not smarter than you?

no not at all. I guess I was trying to say more intelligent then myself on this subject.
Quote:
Coaster said: we are all entangled with one another 
I absolutely agree with you on this. It's not just we who are entangled but everything in existence past, present and future.
-------------------- May you be filled with loving kindness. May you be well. May you be peaceful and at ease. May you be happy. AMU Q&A
|
maynardjameskeenan
The white stipes




Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 16,391
Loc: 'Merica
|
Re: question I would love to have awnsered for me. [Re: Coaster]
#14526767 - 05/28/11 03:27 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Coaster said: Dr. Quantum knows all he will BLOW YOUR MIND

lol, have you ever seen this movie or read the book (I think its called what the bleep do we know)? I liked it but I think it might be made by some kind of cult.
-------------------- May you be filled with loving kindness. May you be well. May you be peaceful and at ease. May you be happy. AMU Q&A
|
pmb
12121212



Registered: 08/11/08
Posts: 2,567
Loc: Washington
Last seen: 9 years, 7 months
|
|
I thought I remember reading that if a particle thats entangled interacts with another particle the entanglement is lost and the particles in black holes are constantly interacting. So maybe entanglement is lost once the particle enters the black hole.
I could be way off base though, I don't know much about it except some light reading.
-------------------- Don't smell the flowers, They're an evil drug to make you lose your mind
|
sunset_mission
Entheonaut



Registered: 01/22/11
Posts: 5,767
Loc: NYC (Intra Deitate...)
Last seen: 5 years, 5 months
|
Re: question I would love to have awnsered for me. [Re: pmb]
#14526878 - 05/28/11 04:17 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Questioner: I sometimes have difficulty in getting a foothold into what I am looking for. I am trying to seek out the metaphysical principles, you might say, behind our physical illusion.
Could you give me an example of the amount of gravity in the third density conditions at the surface of the planet Venus? Would it be greater or less than Earth’s?
Ra: I am Ra. The gravity, shall we say, the attractive force which we also describe as the pressing outward force towards the Creator is greater spiritually upon the entity you call Venus due to the greater degree of success, shall we say, at seeking the Creator.
This point only becomes important when you consider that when all of creation in its infinity has reached a spiritual gravitational mass of sufficient nature, the entire creation infinitely coalesces; the light seeking and finding its source and thusly ending the creation and beginning a new creation much as you consider the black hole, as you call it, with its conditions of infinitely great mass at the zero point from which no light may be seen as it has been absorbed.
Questioner: Then the black hole would be a point at which the environmental material has succeeded in uniting with unity or with the Creator? Is this correct? Ra: I am Ra. The black hole which manifests third density is the physical complex manifestation of this spiritual or metaphysical state. This is correct.
Questioner: I thought that I would make a statement and let you correct it. I’m trying to make a simple model of the portion of the universe that we find ourselves in. Starting with the sub-Logos, our sun, we have white light emanating from this which is made up of the frequencies ranging from the red to the violet. I am assuming that this white light then contains the experiences through all of the densities and as we go into the eighth density we go into a black hole which becomes, on the other side, another Logos or sun and starts another octave of experience. Can you comment on this part of my statement? Ra: I am Ra. We can comment upon this statement to an extent. The concept of the white light of the sub-Logos being prismatically separated and later, at the final chapter, being absorbed again is basically correct. However, there are subtleties involved which are more than semantic.
The white light which emanates and forms the articulated sub-Logos has its beginning in what may be metaphysically seen as darkness. The light comes into that darkness and transfigures it, causing the chaos to organize and become reflective or radiant. Thus the dimensions come into being.
Conversely, the blackness of the black hole, metaphysically speaking, is a concentration of white light being systematically absorbed once again into the One Creator. Finally, this absorption into the One Creator continues until all the infinity of creations have attained sufficient spiritual mass in order that all form once again the great central sun, if you would so imagine it, of the intelligent infinity awaiting potentiation by free will. Thus the transition of the octave is a process which may be seen to enter into timelessness of unimaginable nature. To attempt to measure it by your time measures would be useless.
Therefore, the concept of moving through the black hole of the ultimate spiritual gravity well and coming immediately into the next octave misses the subconcept or corollary of the portion of this process which is timeless.
 
Edited by sunset_mission (05/28/11 04:18 PM)
|
maynardjameskeenan
The white stipes




Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 16,391
Loc: 'Merica
|
Re: question I would love to have awnsered for me. [Re: sunset_mission]
#14526948 - 05/28/11 04:35 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
-------------------- May you be filled with loving kindness. May you be well. May you be peaceful and at ease. May you be happy. AMU Q&A
|
Coaster
Baʿal



Registered: 05/22/06
Posts: 33,501
Loc: Deep in the Valley
Last seen: 12 years, 3 months
|
|
--------------------
|
maynardjameskeenan
The white stipes




Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 16,391
Loc: 'Merica
|
Re: question I would love to have awnsered for me. [Re: pmb]
#14527021 - 05/28/11 04:48 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
pmb said: I thought I remember reading that if a particle thats entangled interacts with another particle the entanglement is lost and the particles in black holes are constantly interacting. So maybe entanglement is lost once the particle enters the black hole.
I could be way off base though, I don't know much about it except some light reading.
I believe that the entanglement of particles happened soon after the big bang and that the particles are always entangled with each other. I wonder what would happen if someone found a set of entangled particles and sent 1 of them into a black hole and observed the action of the adjoined particle here on earth.
-------------------- May you be filled with loving kindness. May you be well. May you be peaceful and at ease. May you be happy. AMU Q&A
|
maynardjameskeenan
The white stipes




Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 16,391
Loc: 'Merica
|
|
zeitgeist changed my life! Incredible stuff that man has to say. I highly recommend it.
-------------------- May you be filled with loving kindness. May you be well. May you be peaceful and at ease. May you be happy. AMU Q&A
|
mongo lloyd
Lone Free Ranger



Registered: 10/16/09
Posts: 9,351
Loc: UK
Last seen: 4 days, 13 hours
|
|
Shit hit the fan is what happens. Mr T becomes fonzie, fonzie beomes george w bush, who in turn becomesa sea slug.
--------------------
|
Viveka
refutation bias


Registered: 10/21/02
Posts: 4,061
Last seen: 7 years, 3 months
|
|
If you look at the origin of this term, "quantum entanglement", you may have a better chance of reaching some sort of useful thought, otherwise - and I'm going out on a limb here since mathematically I know jack shit about theoretical physics - you're playing pocket pool with a handful of words. The only reason I'm chiming in is because I was reviewing some Robert Anton Wilson footage recently and it caused me to revisit the Schrödinger's cat thought experiment so that for the first time it actually makes quite a bit of sense to me.
This term/idea you're throwing around, "quantum entanglement", was coined by Schroedinger early on - Verschränkung - when the Copenhagen interpretation was the working model. Basically, Schrödinger's point was that there are major problems with using a model of reality, in this case the Copenhagen interpretion of quantum mechanics, to describe reality. No amount of maths or models or psi-function experiments can fully account for or describe the reality that there is a cat inside of a box and it's either alive or dead, regardless of what is observed; no one, even the theoretical physicist, really doubts this. That was Schroedinger's point. Of course, even from a layman's perspective, I see that there are problem's with Schrödinger's thought experiment since in it he equates a particle with a complex system - the cat, but this doesn't diminish the point any and the absurdity reinforces the point.
And just as we know that classical descriptions and physics apparently do not apply to subatomic particles, the systems we use and are constantly developing to describe subatomic particles are not adequate to describe observable reality. Everything in quantum mechanics is a map and though certain things can be demonstrated experimentally, it all remains in the realm of descriptions at this point. The details of the map get fleshed out and revised as we feel around for details in the dark(science). A term that originated from criticism of the shortcomings of quantum mechanics, your "quantum entanglement", was embraced later on as a function of the system. And now it describes the theoretical possibilities of superposition or non-locality. Do you see the irony here or is it just me?
So what what are you actually trying to determine? From a mathematical perspective I have no idea but my question is - why do you give a fuck? Quantum entanglement is the ultimate non-classical phenomenon, and your quantum pair with black hole interference scenario is entirely in the realm of experimental mathematics. So are you trying to solve a math problem or what?
|
maynardjameskeenan
The white stipes




Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 16,391
Loc: 'Merica
|
Re: question I would love to have awnsered for me. [Re: Viveka]
#14527138 - 05/28/11 05:10 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
I am trying to solve a question that has been in my head for some time and never found anyone who was able to answer it. It's just curiosity I guess. If quantum entanglement and black holes are naturally occurring phenomenon then what happens to the entanglement when one of the pair is taken in by a black hole?
-------------------- May you be filled with loving kindness. May you be well. May you be peaceful and at ease. May you be happy. AMU Q&A
|
Viveka
refutation bias


Registered: 10/21/02
Posts: 4,061
Last seen: 7 years, 3 months
|
|
Quantum entanglement is not a naturally occurring phenomenon. It is a concept describing the theoretical possibilities that arise from a quantum superposition of particle states. The map is not the territory.
|
maynardjameskeenan
The white stipes




Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 16,391
Loc: 'Merica
|
Re: question I would love to have awnsered for me. [Re: Viveka]
#14527329 - 05/28/11 05:42 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
okay thank you.
-------------------- May you be filled with loving kindness. May you be well. May you be peaceful and at ease. May you be happy. AMU Q&A
|
Viveka
refutation bias


Registered: 10/21/02
Posts: 4,061
Last seen: 7 years, 3 months
|
|
But hey, don't take my word for it. I know next to nothing. A superposition of nothing. Non-local nothing.
|
Viveka
refutation bias


Registered: 10/21/02
Posts: 4,061
Last seen: 7 years, 3 months
|
|
Really like your albums by the way...
|
maynardjameskeenan
The white stipes




Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 16,391
Loc: 'Merica
|
Re: question I would love to have awnsered for me. [Re: Viveka]
#14527480 - 05/28/11 06:09 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Viveka said: Really like your albums by the way...
which one is your favorite?
-------------------- May you be filled with loving kindness. May you be well. May you be peaceful and at ease. May you be happy. AMU Q&A
|
Viveka
refutation bias


Registered: 10/21/02
Posts: 4,061
Last seen: 7 years, 3 months
|
|
in classical terms: Aenima
in quantum terms: Aenima/MerDeNoms/Lateralus
|
Cherk
Fashionable


Registered: 10/25/02
Posts: 46,493
Loc: International
Last seen: 1 year, 2 months
|
Re: question I would love to have awnsered for me. [Re: sunset_mission]
#14527545 - 05/28/11 06:21 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
sunset_mission said:
Quote:
Questioner: I sometimes have difficulty in getting a foothold into what I am looking for. I am trying to seek out the metaphysical principles, you might say, behind our physical illusion.
Could you give me an example of the amount of gravity in the third density conditions at the surface of the planet Venus? Would it be greater or less than Earth’s?
Ra: I am Ra. The gravity, shall we say, the attractive force which we also describe as the pressing outward force towards the Creator is greater spiritually upon the entity you call Venus due to the greater degree of success, shall we say, at seeking the Creator.
This point only becomes important when you consider that when all of creation in its infinity has reached a spiritual gravitational mass of sufficient nature, the entire creation infinitely coalesces; the light seeking and finding its source and thusly ending the creation and beginning a new creation much as you consider the black hole, as you call it, with its conditions of infinitely great mass at the zero point from which no light may be seen as it has been absorbed.
Questioner: Then the black hole would be a point at which the environmental material has succeeded in uniting with unity or with the Creator? Is this correct? Ra: I am Ra. The black hole which manifests third density is the physical complex manifestation of this spiritual or metaphysical state. This is correct.
Questioner: I thought that I would make a statement and let you correct it. I’m trying to make a simple model of the portion of the universe that we find ourselves in. Starting with the sub-Logos, our sun, we have white light emanating from this which is made up of the frequencies ranging from the red to the violet. I am assuming that this white light then contains the experiences through all of the densities and as we go into the eighth density we go into a black hole which becomes, on the other side, another Logos or sun and starts another octave of experience. Can you comment on this part of my statement? Ra: I am Ra. We can comment upon this statement to an extent. The concept of the white light of the sub-Logos being prismatically separated and later, at the final chapter, being absorbed again is basically correct. However, there are subtleties involved which are more than semantic.
The white light which emanates and forms the articulated sub-Logos has its beginning in what may be metaphysically seen as darkness. The light comes into that darkness and transfigures it, causing the chaos to organize and become reflective or radiant. Thus the dimensions come into being.
Conversely, the blackness of the black hole, metaphysically speaking, is a concentration of white light being systematically absorbed once again into the One Creator. Finally, this absorption into the One Creator continues until all the infinity of creations have attained sufficient spiritual mass in order that all form once again the great central sun, if you would so imagine it, of the intelligent infinity awaiting potentiation by free will. Thus the transition of the octave is a process which may be seen to enter into timelessness of unimaginable nature. To attempt to measure it by your time measures would be useless.
Therefore, the concept of moving through the black hole of the ultimate spiritual gravity well and coming immediately into the next octave misses the subconcept or corollary of the portion of this process which is timeless.
  
im gonna have to ask you to take ghandi out of your post
--------------------
I have considered such matters. SIKE
|
sunset_mission
Entheonaut



Registered: 01/22/11
Posts: 5,767
Loc: NYC (Intra Deitate...)
Last seen: 5 years, 5 months
|
Re: question I would love to have awnsered for me. [Re: Cherk]
#14528267 - 05/28/11 09:02 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
cherokee said:
Quote:
sunset_mission said:
Quote:
Questioner: I sometimes have difficulty in getting a foothold into what I am looking for. I am trying to seek out the metaphysical principles, you might say, behind our physical illusion.
Could you give me an example of the amount of gravity in the third density conditions at the surface of the planet Venus? Would it be greater or less than Earth’s?
Ra: I am Ra. The gravity, shall we say, the attractive force which we also describe as the pressing outward force towards the Creator is greater spiritually upon the entity you call Venus due to the greater degree of success, shall we say, at seeking the Creator.
This point only becomes important when you consider that when all of creation in its infinity has reached a spiritual gravitational mass of sufficient nature, the entire creation infinitely coalesces; the light seeking and finding its source and thusly ending the creation and beginning a new creation much as you consider the black hole, as you call it, with its conditions of infinitely great mass at the zero point from which no light may be seen as it has been absorbed.
Questioner: Then the black hole would be a point at which the environmental material has succeeded in uniting with unity or with the Creator? Is this correct? Ra: I am Ra. The black hole which manifests third density is the physical complex manifestation of this spiritual or metaphysical state. This is correct.
Questioner: I thought that I would make a statement and let you correct it. I’m trying to make a simple model of the portion of the universe that we find ourselves in. Starting with the sub-Logos, our sun, we have white light emanating from this which is made up of the frequencies ranging from the red to the violet. I am assuming that this white light then contains the experiences through all of the densities and as we go into the eighth density we go into a black hole which becomes, on the other side, another Logos or sun and starts another octave of experience. Can you comment on this part of my statement? Ra: I am Ra. We can comment upon this statement to an extent. The concept of the white light of the sub-Logos being prismatically separated and later, at the final chapter, being absorbed again is basically correct. However, there are subtleties involved which are more than semantic.
The white light which emanates and forms the articulated sub-Logos has its beginning in what may be metaphysically seen as darkness. The light comes into that darkness and transfigures it, causing the chaos to organize and become reflective or radiant. Thus the dimensions come into being.
Conversely, the blackness of the black hole, metaphysically speaking, is a concentration of white light being systematically absorbed once again into the One Creator. Finally, this absorption into the One Creator continues until all the infinity of creations have attained sufficient spiritual mass in order that all form once again the great central sun, if you would so imagine it, of the intelligent infinity awaiting potentiation by free will. Thus the transition of the octave is a process which may be seen to enter into timelessness of unimaginable nature. To attempt to measure it by your time measures would be useless.
Therefore, the concept of moving through the black hole of the ultimate spiritual gravity well and coming immediately into the next octave misses the subconcept or corollary of the portion of this process which is timeless.
  
im gonna have to ask you to take ghandi out of your post
nawwww
as ghandi too is down
with the Oneness of All
 
|
realfuzzhead



Registered: 03/03/10
Posts: 10,783
Loc: above the smog layer
Last seen: 1 year, 2 months
|
Re: question I would love to have awnsered for me. [Re: willowmp]
#14528321 - 05/28/11 09:22 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
willowmp said: I'm taking a shot in the dark here, but is this where a particle falls into a black hole while an antiparticle falls out of it?
Basically the particle is made up for by the antiparticle which falls from the black hole, and thus matter was not lost.
It's taken from the theory where particles and antiparticles are all springing into existence very briefly and then clashing and neutralizing each other.
Off topic: I personally feel as though the theory in which matter is sucked into a black hole and deposited into a different dimension by Hawking is fairly solid. Although the projection theory by whoever is pretty nice as well.
A good trippy one is the infinite space x chance probability theory, where if space is infinite, any situation which involves chance (practically every situation), must occur although spread out very far.
I am both living and dying and being born every minute of my existence.
otherwise known as hawking radiation. i think its still a theory, but yes technically the theory states that space is nat truly empty but there are particle.antiparticle pairs that come into existence and anhiliate eachother almost instantaneously, but if one were do appear inside the event horizon and another outside the event horizon the one outside would escape as radiation into space
what OP is talking about might be different, it might be what happens if someone falls into a black hole. The person on the outside would see the person fall infinitely slowly into the hole while the person falling into the whole would see herself falling away at a normal speed.
something like that, its because the person inside would be moving much more slowly through time compared to the observer outside the event horizon
|
DieCommie

Registered: 12/11/03
Posts: 29,258
|
|
Quote:
maynardjameskeenan said: I am trying to solve a question that has been in my head for some time and never found anyone who was able to answer it. It's just curiosity I guess. If quantum entanglement and black holes are naturally occurring phenomenon then what happens to the entanglement when one of the pair is taken in by a black hole?
Why should an entangled particle act any different from a non-entangled particle upon entering the black hole?
|
willowmp
Medical Psychedelic Mushrooms



Registered: 07/25/08
Posts: 3,346
Last seen: 12 years, 7 months
|
|
Quote:
maynardjameskeenan said: I don't believe that Stephen Hawking said that they were deposited into a different dimension, as I understand black holes they are like a 2 dimensional lens of our multidimensional universe and so is the edge of space. The event horizon is just the surface of where our 2 plans exists together.
Black holes given enough time will expel all of there particles even if it gives off 1 particle every 100 million years. In that way no quantum information is ever lost or created. But if one of them is frozen from our dimension is the entanglement broken until the particle is given off by the black hole. I think particles and anti-particles are the ones adjoined by entanglement. lol, sorry I kinda high I hope you all can understand what I am trying to convey 
I separated these two statements to illustrate what I was saying. The first statement about the 2D lens is a theory created by Hawking's rival, although after googling I can't figure out his name.
The second piece is unconnected, from what I remember. This would be more the realm of Hawking radiation/other radiative theories, you were correct the particle/antiparticle stuff is Hawking radiation.
Yes, Hawking said that he was wrong, but that was his theory involving black holes simply disappearing. The issue was if a black hole were to simply vanish, huge amounts of mass is also vanishing. As a result science and cause/effect become broken and we can no longer know anything without a doubt (ex. our memories) due to data loss. I also remember that he is now thinking over a theory in which black holes essentially are transporting the matter into other dimensions in which black holes do not exist. Thus preserving the data.
Theoretical physics is a complicated yet interesting bitch.
-------------------- "Fuck it too much Im outta wittbhjkhbhkjsrglhkrgl g I DEE JEUD." -Because it made sense on xanax and booze...
|
Apollyphelion
Dungeon Master/Princess(1009)


Registered: 03/15/07
Posts: 16,757
Loc: Festival of Deaths
|
|
Is Kingtard better than Peasant Genius?
--------------------
"I'm looking at you looking at it" SUBSCRIBE TO MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL PLEASE! www.youtube.com/apollyphelion Creator of the World's Worst Comic Book
|
Cherk
Fashionable


Registered: 10/25/02
Posts: 46,493
Loc: International
Last seen: 1 year, 2 months
|
Re: question I would love to have awnsered for me. [Re: Apollyphelion]
#14529260 - 05/29/11 02:48 AM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
this thread is like when a cop makes you follow his fingers and then he splits them and goes in opposite directions
--------------------
I have considered such matters. SIKE
|
Cherk
Fashionable


Registered: 10/25/02
Posts: 46,493
Loc: International
Last seen: 1 year, 2 months
|
Re: question I would love to have awnsered for me. [Re: Apollyphelion]
#14529262 - 05/29/11 02:49 AM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Apollyphelion said: Is Kingtard better than Peasant Genius?
i want to be kingtard
hey lets sell art and get rich quick
--------------------
I have considered such matters. SIKE
|
sunset_mission
Entheonaut



Registered: 01/22/11
Posts: 5,767
Loc: NYC (Intra Deitate...)
Last seen: 5 years, 5 months
|
Re: question I would love to have awnsered for me. [Re: Cherk]
#14530852 - 05/29/11 01:50 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
cherokee said:
Quote:
Apollyphelion said: Is Kingtard better than Peasant Genius?
i want to be kingtard
hey lets sell art and get rich quick
NO
only I have been chosen to fully merge with his unbroliness grand poobah
|
|