|
PreparationH
apply daily


Registered: 03/28/05
Posts: 18,306
Loc: Amsterdam
Last seen: 15 hours, 13 minutes
|
"I do not want 16-year-old boys but younger. Fourteen-year-olds are O.K..."
#14513600 - 05/26/11 03:07 AM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2072613,00.html?xid=rss-world
 And Sunday a whole lot of dumb fucks will fork over there hard earned cash to these freaks. I need to get rich, I should start a religion.
|
Le_Canard
The Duk Abides


Registered: 05/16/03
Posts: 94,392
Loc: Earthfarm 1
|
Re: "I do not want 16-year-old boys but younger. Fourteen-year-olds are O.K..." [Re: PreparationH]
#14513602 - 05/26/11 03:12 AM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
It worked for L. Ron Hubbard.
|
Sophistic Radiance
Free sVs!


Registered: 07/11/06
Posts: 43,135
Loc: Center of the Universe
|
Re: "I do not want 16-year-old boys but younger. Fourteen-year-olds are O.K..." [Re: PreparationH]
#14513613 - 05/26/11 03:19 AM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
I really don't get what the deal is with Catholic priests and the boyz. The Church just released a study saying it had nothing to do with pedophilia or homosexuality, but I just don't know dude. If I had that kind of power over the hearts and minds of my congregation, in absence of any moral compunctions, I would just get with some fine-ass ladyfolk in the confessional, offer them the healing meat of Christ. I mean... why would you go with boys instead? It's fucking bizarre.
-------------------- Enlil said: You really are the worst kind of person.
|
Mind Transcribing
Candy Baron



Registered: 11/08/09
Posts: 2,356
Loc: Lost in Tanaris
Last seen: 10 years, 2 months
|
Re: "I do not want 16-year-old boys but younger. Fourteen-year-olds are O.K..." [Re: Sophistic Radiance]
#14513689 - 05/26/11 04:24 AM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
I think there was some theory that priests never fully sexually develop after a lifetime of sexual repression so they look in the world for how they feel psychologically - like a young boy with no sexual experience. Only a theory though.
--------------------
|
memes
Blessed



Registered: 01/11/05
Posts: 27,785
Loc: In a Tree
|
Re: "I do not want 16-year-old boys but younger. Fourteen-year-olds are O.K..." [Re: Sophistic Radiance]
#14513820 - 05/26/11 06:03 AM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Tchan909 said: I mean... why would you go with boys instead? It's fucking bizarre.
I think originally they went with boys because the bible prohibited them from having a wife. lolol
either that, or a life full of church makes you want the cawk.
|
pouihi
Mary Jane Doe



Registered: 01/04/11
Posts: 2,384
Last seen: 1 year, 9 months
|
Re: "I do not want 16-year-old boys but younger. Fourteen-year-olds are O.K..." [Re: memes]
#14513974 - 05/26/11 07:10 AM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
--------------------
"If the doors of perception were cleansed everything would appear to man as it is, infinite."
|
Legend
RIP Sasha



Registered: 03/29/10
Posts: 28,336
Loc: TX
|
Re: "I do not want 16-year-old boys but younger. Fourteen-year-olds are O.K..." [Re: Sophistic Radiance]
#14514145 - 05/26/11 08:41 AM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Tchan909 said: offer them the healing meat of Christ.
This is a great idea for a porn
--------------------
No sympathy for the devil, keep that in mind. [url=]Buy the ticket, take the ride. [/url]Are you lost?
|
robbyberto
Water Boy


Registered: 05/11/06
Posts: 15,499
Loc: Netherlands
Last seen: 1 month, 6 days
|
Re: "I do not want 16-year-old boys but younger. Fourteen-year-olds are O.K..." [Re: PreparationH]
#14514165 - 05/26/11 08:49 AM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
I'll never cease to be amazed by the amount of terrible things that the Catholic church can do and still have people believe in and support it. It's madness.
-------------------- “People say having kids is life changing, well that doesn’t necessarily mean a good thing, does it? I could take one of my legs off. That would change my life.” -Karl Pilkington
|
|