|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
|
Quote:
linkamathingy said: anyone else think the way they cover this subject on this 60minutes piece is strange?
no, it pretty well explains that there's a large group of dumbasses that believe they're above the law and are quickly finding out they arent
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: sovereignty knowledge? [Re: 4runner]
#14485001 - 05/20/11 03:31 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
anunnakian said: Wow, your special....
Now you are just baiting.
he doest see that he trolls/baits anyone, well, he claims he doesnt and says the rules are too vague to interpret
|
linkamathingy
Aspiring Mycologist


Registered: 10/27/10
Posts: 1,235
|
Re: sovereignty knowledge? [Re: Prisoner#1]
#14485054 - 05/20/11 03:37 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
linkamathingy said: anyone else think the way they cover this subject on this 60minutes piece is strange?
no, it pretty well explains that there's a large group of dumbasses that believe they're above the law and are quickly finding out they arent
thank you.
i think that associating them in the piece with sovereign citizens shows a misunderstanding of sovereignty. The government derives it's limited powers from it's constituents, the sovereigns, meaning each US citizen is automatically sovereign. Am i mistaken?
-------------------- SCIENCE!!! If NIST didn't even investigate whether explosives were used, how can we trust their investigation? It's a rule whenever explosions are heard. Though I Laugh EyegasmArt.com anonymous: without name Anonymous: a group with a name don't be fooled, have a revolution on your own terms.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
|
as I stated, I dont think you understand how sovereignty works and would love to hear your explanation of what it is and how it's supposed to work, surely if you're defending the principal behind this you'd know what it is and it's mechanisms of operation
|
fbi365
Captain of the Sinking Ship



Registered: 02/07/11
Posts: 2,857
Loc: Nowhere
Last seen: 5 months, 10 days
|
Re: sovereignty knowledge? [Re: Prisoner#1]
#14485289 - 05/20/11 04:31 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
sovereignty comes from authority and power. It can be legitimately derived through various political systems or through force. It comes with many rights and responsibilities vis-a-vis the people and territory over which the authority is exercised.
Didn't watch the video, just freestylin..
--------------------
|
linkamathingy
Aspiring Mycologist


Registered: 10/27/10
Posts: 1,235
|
Re: sovereignty knowledge? [Re: fbi365]
#14491294 - 05/21/11 08:27 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
sovereign: 6. having supreme rank, power, or authority. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sovereign
alright. wtf do i have wrong here?
the states have limited powers through constitution by the sovereigns. the federal government has limited powers through constitution by the states.
someone want to help me out? i don't remember the evidence i had to draw this conclusion. it's something i thought i had a grasping of. at least i'm not working at 60min fucking this up.
-------------------- SCIENCE!!! If NIST didn't even investigate whether explosives were used, how can we trust their investigation? It's a rule whenever explosions are heard. Though I Laugh EyegasmArt.com anonymous: without name Anonymous: a group with a name don't be fooled, have a revolution on your own terms.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
|
Quote:
linkamathingy said: sovereign: 6. having supreme rank, power, or authority. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sovereign
alright. wtf do i have wrong here?
the states have limited powers through constitution by the sovereigns. the federal government has limited powers through constitution by the states.
someone want to help me out?
so you understand that an individual is not a sovereign then, it's the collective of the people that are sovereign, that means your individual decision doesnt over rule the law or a decision from a judge nor that of a cop or even of your fellow man while a judge, a jury, the legislative bodies, etc... do in fact have sovereignty in title and action but not as people
Quote:
i don't remember the evidence i had to draw this conclusion. it's something i thought i had a grasping of. at least i'm not working at 60min fucking this up.
so you have no idea if the 60 minutes piece was trash or truth
|
Sophistic Radiance
Free sVs!


Registered: 07/11/06
Posts: 43,135
Loc: Center of the Universe
|
|
Quote:
linkamathingy said: i don't remember the evidence i had to draw this conclusion. it's something i thought i had a grasping of. at least i'm not working at 60min fucking this up.
-------------------- Enlil said: You really are the worst kind of person.
|
linkamathingy
Aspiring Mycologist


Registered: 10/27/10
Posts: 1,235
|
|
the people are the sovereigns(ruling over all), therefore an individual person is a sovereign. right?
the title remains with the people even with delegation of powers away from themselves.
i am still confused. thanks for trying.
lolz i like being human. means i can make mistakes and continue on. no such thing as a stupid question. a stupid poorly thought out original post, that's something else
-------------------- SCIENCE!!! If NIST didn't even investigate whether explosives were used, how can we trust their investigation? It's a rule whenever explosions are heard. Though I Laugh EyegasmArt.com anonymous: without name Anonymous: a group with a name don't be fooled, have a revolution on your own terms.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
|
Quote:
linkamathingy said: the people are the sovereigns(ruling over all), therefore an individual person is a sovereign. right?
nope... already explained, 'the people' is a collective term
Quote:
i am still confused.
because you ignore the answers
|
unam sanctum



Registered: 04/20/11
Posts: 6,702
|
|
Dude gets put on blast. "This is all gonna be edited right?" "Umm no this is all gonna be on the show..." lol
|
unam sanctum



Registered: 04/20/11
Posts: 6,702
|
|
Watch this too you won't regret it.
|
Sophistic Radiance
Free sVs!


Registered: 07/11/06
Posts: 43,135
Loc: Center of the Universe
|
|
These guys are retarded.
-------------------- Enlil said: You really are the worst kind of person.
|
unam sanctum



Registered: 04/20/11
Posts: 6,702
|
|
Quote:
Tchan909 said: These guys are retarded. 
You mad? You know you want those fucking dreads.
|
thescientist
Registered: 03/09/02
Posts: 807
Loc: Dade County
|
|
hey dude, don't sweat P#1.
He's that guy at the bar who gets too drunk and aggressive. You'll see no doubt that a great proportion of his posts are confrontational and intended to put people and their ideas down. Certainly not the personality type I am drawn to in a PUB.
It's unfortunate that he has a license to troll which also makes his belligerent posts and circular, tangential arguments infallible.
Chill, open, discussion is not what his moderator-ship creates. Admin take notice.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
|
what you're saying is you dont like when another's opinions are not like your own, that it would be trolling because you dont agree with it. how open minded
|
thescientist
Registered: 03/09/02
Posts: 807
Loc: Dade County
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said: what you're saying is you dont like when another's opinions are not like your own, that it would be trolling because you dont agree with it. how open minded
thank you for providing more circular and tangential reasoning, used to create confrontation, and put users down.
your MO is a problem which regularly reduces the enjoyment of the pub by many.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
|
thank you for being a broken troll record, maybe you should stop while you have that option
try discussing the topic at hand instead of trying to bait and attack me
|
snoot
look alive ∞




Registered: 01/30/05
Posts: 9,641
Loc: 45º parallel
Last seen: 5 days, 29 minutes
|
|
Quote:
thescientist said:
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said: what you're saying is you dont like when another's opinions are not like your own, that it would be trolling because you dont agree with it. how open minded
thank you for providing more circular and tangential reasoning, used to create confrontation, and put users down.
your MO is a problem which regularly reduces the enjoyment of the pub by many.
lol
what user is he 'putting down'? you make no sense, dont attack a fellow user and then fail to make sense. 
Quote:
unam sanctum said: Watch this too you won't regret it.
among one of the most ridiculous pieces of reporting I've witnessed in a while, obviously they are just picking the most confused and intoxicated people they can find; in hopes to shed a slanted stigma unto these people.
--------------------
∞ I am incapable of conceiving infinity, and yet I do not accept finity. - Simone de Beauvoir -
|
unam sanctum



Registered: 04/20/11
Posts: 6,702
|
Re: sovereignty knowledge? [Re: snoot]
#14496432 - 05/22/11 09:54 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
If you'll notice, I made no comment on the quality of reporting- I'm actually pretty disappointed with how mainstream RT is getting so quickly. However I believe you are lying to me and yourself if say you didn't enjoy watching that.
|
|