|
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
|
Sexycybe
bio-nut


Registered: 05/03/11
Posts: 518
Last seen: 8 months, 15 days
|
Victoria ID
#14428249 - 05/10/11 04:18 AM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Was waiting for a mate today in a park and had a look around for mushrooms after such perfect conditions, i found many other species and took photos but these i wasn't too sure about so i thought i might put it to all you experts. I know alot of these are not hallucinogenic but i was a tad exited on glimpsing some then wasn't too sure. The spore prints are in progress for those which are too hard from a pic 
Number 1
 these were found growing straight off a dead tree log, the gills connect to the stem
Number 2
 these were found growing out of soil not on any wood (that i found), maybe russela? gills are connected to stem
Number 3
 Found on a log and are quite the cute little things, stem is connected to gills. also maybe russela?
Number 4
 found on a log and has gills connected to stem... suprise 
number 5
 these are the ones i got exited about but not so sure on closer inspection... gills not connected to stem and spores appear to be purple/red/orange, too soon to tell fully yet
number6
 pleurotus?
and finally number 7
 grew on a lawn
thanks for any help on these, will update with spore colour, any photos needed in different way just say and ill take one. if it is really hard then i will check the spores under a microscope
-------------------- Successful indoor psilocybe subaeruginosa grow Nothing written above is real; it is merely a fabricated story of nonsense. Nothing said is to be believed in any way or taken seriously in the slightest.
|
Tangich


Registered: 10/28/09
Posts: 8,723
|
Re: Victoria ID [Re: Sexycybe]
#14428260 - 05/10/11 04:27 AM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
1, 3 & 4 are maybe Gymnopilus species. Possibly active. I'm not expert on them, wait for confirmation. 5 - Leratiomyces ceres 6 - probably Clitocybe sp. 7 - Panaeolus or Psathyrella
|
Sexycybe
bio-nut


Registered: 05/03/11
Posts: 518
Last seen: 8 months, 15 days
|
Re: Victoria ID [Re: Tangich]
#14428270 - 05/10/11 04:35 AM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
nice one, haha CLITocybe that is classic!
-------------------- Successful indoor psilocybe subaeruginosa grow Nothing written above is real; it is merely a fabricated story of nonsense. Nothing said is to be believed in any way or taken seriously in the slightest.
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 26,672
|
Re: Victoria ID [Re: Sexycybe]
#14428291 - 05/10/11 05:03 AM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Sexycybe said: nice one, haha CLITocybe that is classic!
You really need to find some stink horns, so we can post the genus for those. You'll like it.
|
Sexycybe
bio-nut


Registered: 05/03/11
Posts: 518
Last seen: 8 months, 15 days
|
Re: Victoria ID [Re: koraks]
#14428301 - 05/10/11 05:07 AM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
yeah ive found a fair few of them and seen a couple of the names too  i was just never expecting clit to be in taxonomy not going to have a stab at any koraks?
-------------------- Successful indoor psilocybe subaeruginosa grow Nothing written above is real; it is merely a fabricated story of nonsense. Nothing said is to be believed in any way or taken seriously in the slightest.
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 26,672
|
Re: Victoria ID [Re: Sexycybe]
#14428354 - 05/10/11 05:42 AM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Sexycybe said: yeah ive found a fair few of them and seen a couple of the names too  i was just never expecting clit to be in taxonomy
Mycologists are just sneaky pervs, apparently 
Quote:
not going to have a stab at any koraks?
I might as well, but I wouldn't be able to put a definite tag on any of those. #1 agree with Tangich on the gymnopilus guess. #2 dunno; I don't think they are a russula species, although they look pretty close. Maybe you're right after all, but something doesn't seem right to me for russula. Especially the somewhat pointed cap is odd. General shape would point more towards cortinarius, but the gills seem much too light for that genus. #3 I have a suspicion that these are the same species as #2, but a collection of slightly older specimens. Could that be the case? #4 Maybe I should follow Tangich here as well; gymnopilus sounds about right. #5 I can see where your excitement came from. Leratiomyces ceres as suggested by Tangich sounds right. #6 Clitocybe or something close; agree with T. once again. #7 panaeolus species.
|
Sexycybe
bio-nut


Registered: 05/03/11
Posts: 518
Last seen: 8 months, 15 days
|
Re: Victoria ID [Re: koraks]
#14428362 - 05/10/11 05:49 AM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
#3 I have a suspicion that these are the same species as #2, but a collection of slightly older specimens. Could that be the case?
Afraid not, the pictures dont show it as obviously i can observe but they are quite different, 2 is brown and had a completely different environment to the purple 3 which has an off centre stipe and different coloured gills and staining. good predictions on the others tho
-------------------- Successful indoor psilocybe subaeruginosa grow Nothing written above is real; it is merely a fabricated story of nonsense. Nothing said is to be believed in any way or taken seriously in the slightest.
|
Feelers
Anti-Myth-Rhythm-Rock-Shocker



Registered: 06/18/02
Posts: 1,806
Loc: Land of Oz
Last seen: 5 years, 8 months
|
Re: Victoria ID [Re: Sexycybe]
#14428812 - 05/10/11 08:41 AM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
I think number 3 looks very much like Gymnopileus purpurtus which is magic. Don't eat them based on my estimates, but Alan, Inski or Tripsis might be the ones who could tell you. Similar to the pic below. These can have very different appearances and probably need to be sorted into different species.
[image]http://i898.photobucket.com/albums/ac181/Lord_Mayonnaise/gym2a.jpg[/image]
From the name on the pics it appears Lord Mayonnaise took the photo!
Edited by Feelers (05/10/11 08:52 AM)
|
ShockValue
Because, ShockValue.

Registered: 11/18/08
Posts: 5,097
Loc: Tipping at windmills.
|
Re: Victoria ID [Re: Feelers]
#14428847 - 05/10/11 08:50 AM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
I was going to say that #3 looks a lot like Gymnopilus luteofolius, but Gymnopileus purpurtus seems like an OK match too. I'm not familiar enough with AU mushrooms to be in the least bit confident, but they're at least in that clade I'm sure.
--------------------
- When we built temples to view the stars, we knew about all 2000 of them.
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 26,672
|
|
G. purpuratus sounds like a reasonable guess!
|
The Thinker

Registered: 09/01/10
Posts: 4,000
|
|
1 3 4 psychoactive Gymnopilus 2 maybe Tricholoma 5 Leratiomcyes ceres 6 Omphalotus nidiformis I think 7 Psathyrella instead of Panaeolus I think
|
Byrain


Registered: 01/07/10
Posts: 9,664
|
|
7 = Panaeolina foenisecii
|
Sexycybe
bio-nut


Registered: 05/03/11
Posts: 518
Last seen: 8 months, 15 days
|
Re: Victoria ID [Re: Byrain]
#14430516 - 05/10/11 03:52 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
jeez you guys are on fire! number 7 has black spores, 3/4 have rust colour and 5 had the expected purple. considering checking them under a microscope
-------------------- Successful indoor psilocybe subaeruginosa grow Nothing written above is real; it is merely a fabricated story of nonsense. Nothing said is to be believed in any way or taken seriously in the slightest.
|
Sexycybe
bio-nut


Registered: 05/03/11
Posts: 518
Last seen: 8 months, 15 days
|
Re: Victoria ID [Re: Sexycybe]
#14430522 - 05/10/11 03:52 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
and number 3 is very small, cant tell from the pic but only 1.5cm in diameter max
-------------------- Successful indoor psilocybe subaeruginosa grow Nothing written above is real; it is merely a fabricated story of nonsense. Nothing said is to be believed in any way or taken seriously in the slightest.
|
Byrain


Registered: 01/07/10
Posts: 9,664
|
Re: Victoria ID [Re: Sexycybe]
#14430542 - 05/10/11 03:58 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Sexycybe said: jeez you guys are on fire! number 7 has black spores
Could you post a picture? Paneolina foenisecii has brown to blackish prints, Panaeolus species have jet black (Absent of any brown/lighter tones).
|
Lord Mayonnaise


Registered: 08/20/08
Posts: 1,284
Loc: Sub Country
|
Re: Victoria ID [Re: Byrain]
#14430815 - 05/10/11 05:06 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
2. Maybe Rhodocybe gemina.
|
Alan Rockefeller
Mycologist


Registered: 03/10/07
Posts: 48,276
Last seen: 11 hours, 42 minutes
|
|
1 3 4) psychoactive Gymnopilus, maybe G. purpuratus or G. luteofolius 2) maybe Tricholoma 5) Faded Leratiomcyes ceres or another Leratiomyces species or Stropharia 6) Omphalotus nidiformis 7) Psathyrella
|
maynardjameskeenan
The white stipes




Registered: 11/11/10
Posts: 16,391
Loc: 'Merica
|
|
You TI's never cease to impress me, the world thanks you.
-------------------- May you be filled with loving kindness. May you be well. May you be peaceful and at ease. May you be happy. AMU Q&A
|
TimmiT


Registered: 03/23/10
Posts: 5,303
Loc: Victoria
|
Re: Victoria ID [Re: Sexycybe]
#14432745 - 05/10/11 11:46 PM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Awesome stuff!  
I don't have my head around Australian Gymnopili yet. We have about 40 species and I haven't even seen descriptions for most of them.
-------------------- "Reality leaves a lot to the imagination" ~ John Lennon
|
Sexycybe
bio-nut


Registered: 05/03/11
Posts: 518
Last seen: 8 months, 15 days
|
Re: Victoria ID [Re: TimmiT]
#14432895 - 05/11/11 12:35 AM (12 years, 8 months ago) |
|
|
Number 7's spore print for you byrian 
-------------------- Successful indoor psilocybe subaeruginosa grow Nothing written above is real; it is merely a fabricated story of nonsense. Nothing said is to be believed in any way or taken seriously in the slightest.
|
|