|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*



Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: donteatasians]
#14331087 - 04/22/11 12:21 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
LadyLittleZeppelin said: There is no other creature on this planet with our understanding to the degree that we have so it's hard to imagine that we could evolve from monkeys. Monkeys are intelligent but not nearly as intelligent as we are. I don't understand how the monkeys of today got left behind in evolutionary bind and we moved on to become earths worst nightmare 
Whys it so hard for you to grasp that concept, we simply branched off and evolved and eventually our social skills catalyzed us into what we are today. Do you have a more plausible explanation?
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Bodhi of Ankou]
#14331096 - 04/22/11 12:22 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said:
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: Its a topic, nobodies bashing anyone and nobodies begging for anything. whats so pathetic about a exchange of thoughts, fool.
Quote:
Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate?
I always like to bring up...

and like I said, you obviously have no place in a debate where you know little about the subject
|
Samuel L Jackson
Bad Motherfucker


Registered: 12/10/09
Posts: 8,395
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Bodhi of Ankou]
#14331097 - 04/22/11 12:23 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said:
Quote:
LadyLittleZeppelin said: There is no other creature on this planet with our understanding to the degree that we have so it's hard to imagine that we could evolve from monkeys. Monkeys are intelligent but not nearly as intelligent as we are. I don't understand how the monkeys of today got left behind in evolutionary bind and we moved on to become earths worst nightmare 
Whys it so hard for you to grasp that concept, we simply branched off and evolved and eventually our social skills catalyzed us into what we are today. Do you have a more plausible explanation?
i want to hear how she explains black people being made from the 2 original white people.
thats going to be a damn creative load of shit.
--------------------
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: dummy]
#14331100 - 04/22/11 12:23 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
dummy said:
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
dummy said:
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said: it's simple, you're trying to argue something you know little or nothing about maybe try reading the bible and then put together your argument because then you'd have some foundation for the debate, instead you've come here to ask for help to bash someone's religious beliefs, I personally cant think of anything more pathetic than bashing someone's religion other than begging people to do it for you
hey but you tried to do that earlier in another thread. remember? when you tried to make facts up about renewable energy systems and such? if he you can bs over in that thread, he should be able to bs here!
but I know something about that subject, I know something about religion as well
but you don't... it's all written out in my rebuttal in that thread you should give it a read.
but I do and I've rebutted your rebuttal
|
LadyLittleZeppelin
Stoner



Registered: 10/30/09
Posts: 1,513
Last seen: 11 years, 7 months
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Samuel L Jackson]
#14331108 - 04/22/11 12:25 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
SamuelLJackson said:
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said:
Quote:
LadyLittleZeppelin said: There is no other creature on this planet with our understanding to the degree that we have so it's hard to imagine that we could evolve from monkeys. Monkeys are intelligent but not nearly as intelligent as we are. I don't understand how the monkeys of today got left behind in evolutionary bind and we moved on to become earths worst nightmare 
Whys it so hard for you to grasp that concept, we simply branched off and evolved and eventually our social skills catalyzed us into what we are today. Do you have a more plausible explanation?
i want to hear how she explains black people being made from the 2 original white people.
thats going to be a damn creative load of shit. 
I don't believe the first two living people were white and I don't believe Jesus was either.
-------------------- SHROOMS MAKE YOU GAY ~ Crystal G said: its cuzzzzzz i giiiiiive a meeeeean blooooowjjjobbbb.
|
Larrythescaryrex
teardrop on the fire



Registered: 07/19/00
Posts: 11,004
Loc: further down the spiral
Last seen: 1 year, 2 months
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Samuel L Jackson]
#14331109 - 04/22/11 12:26 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
dude. mark of cain.
duh.
-------------------- RIP Acidic_Sloth Sunset_Mission said: "larry the scary rex verily scary when thoroughly vexed invoke the shadows and dust, cast a hex mercifully massacring memories masterfully relocate from Ur to 8th density and become a cosmic bully mulder and scully couldn't decipher his glyphs invoke the shadows and dust, smoke infernal spliffs" April 24th 2011
|
donteatasians


Registered: 08/14/07
Posts: 1,461
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Samuel L Jackson]
#14331114 - 04/22/11 12:27 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
SamuelLJackson said:
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said:
Quote:
LadyLittleZeppelin said: There is no other creature on this planet with our understanding to the degree that we have so it's hard to imagine that we could evolve from monkeys. Monkeys are intelligent but not nearly as intelligent as we are. I don't understand how the monkeys of today got left behind in evolutionary bind and we moved on to become earths worst nightmare 
Whys it so hard for you to grasp that concept, we simply branched off and evolved and eventually our social skills catalyzed us into what we are today. Do you have a more plausible explanation?
i want to hear how she explains black people being made from the 2 original white people.
thats going to be a damn creative load of shit. 
Not that it really matters but I'm pretty sure life originated in Africa and darker skinned folks came first. When people started migrating to areas with less sun, into Europe and Asia, they developed lighter skin to better take advantage of the sun. Vitamin D for one comes to mind. They also didn't need as much protection from the harmful aspects of sun like sunburn.
--------------------
|
psilyguy


Registered: 12/03/08
Posts: 3,305
Last seen: 12 years, 1 month
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: LadyLittleZeppelin]
#14331118 - 04/22/11 12:28 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
LadyLittleZeppelin said: I'm not seeing the monkey-human connection If monkey's evolved why are they still monkeys and we are human?
We did not evolve from monkeys. Both humans and monkeys have evolved from a common ancestor that was not a human or a monkey.
|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*



Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Samuel L Jackson]
#14331125 - 04/22/11 12:30 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
SamuelLJackson said:
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said:
Quote:
LadyLittleZeppelin said: There is no other creature on this planet with our understanding to the degree that we have so it's hard to imagine that we could evolve from monkeys. Monkeys are intelligent but not nearly as intelligent as we are. I don't understand how the monkeys of today got left behind in evolutionary bind and we moved on to become earths worst nightmare 
Whys it so hard for you to grasp that concept, we simply branched off and evolved and eventually our social skills catalyzed us into what we are today. Do you have a more plausible explanation?
i want to hear how she explains black people being made from the 2 original white people.
thats going to be a damn creative load of shit. 
I remember going to bible camp and questining that story I asked them why no genetic defects arose from inbreeding and how the different races came about, they said they had perfect genes and that they diversified over time into the different "races" I asked him why perfect genes would ever need to change and he said that was a good question and moved on to some other garbage about Jesus.
|
dummy
I am you and what I see is me


Registered: 09/29/08
Posts: 3,973
Last seen: 1 year, 9 months
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: donteatasians]
#14331130 - 04/22/11 12:31 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
donteatasians said:
Quote:
SamuelLJackson said:
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said:
Quote:
LadyLittleZeppelin said: There is no other creature on this planet with our understanding to the degree that we have so it's hard to imagine that we could evolve from monkeys. Monkeys are intelligent but not nearly as intelligent as we are. I don't understand how the monkeys of today got left behind in evolutionary bind and we moved on to become earths worst nightmare 
Whys it so hard for you to grasp that concept, we simply branched off and evolved and eventually our social skills catalyzed us into what we are today. Do you have a more plausible explanation?
i want to hear how she explains black people being made from the 2 original white people.
thats going to be a damn creative load of shit. 
Not that it really matters but I'm pretty sure life originated in Africa and darker skinned folks came first. When people started migrating to areas with less sun, into Europe and Asia, they developed lighter skin to better take advantage of the sun. Vitamin D for one comes to mind. They also didn't need as much protection from the harmful aspects of sun like sunburn.
but lighter colors reflect more light.
-------------------- People never seem to know what they least suspect is coming next.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Bodhi of Ankou]
#14331137 - 04/22/11 12:33 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said:
Quote:
SamuelLJackson said: i want to hear how she explains black people being made from the 2 original white people.
thats going to be a damn creative load of shit. 
I remember going to bible camp and questining that story I asked them why no genetic defects arose from inbreeding and how the different races came about, they said they had perfect genes and that they diversified over time into the different "races" I asked him why perfect genes would ever need to change and he said that was a good question and moved on to some other garbage about Jesus.
well, since cain was exiled from his family after killing abel and he went to the land of nod, obviously a race of monkeys, and took a wife... what happened to the gene pool then?
|
Samuel L Jackson
Bad Motherfucker


Registered: 12/10/09
Posts: 8,395
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: LadyLittleZeppelin]
#14331145 - 04/22/11 12:34 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
ok. im done after this statement.
have fun trying to disprove evolution when you can witness it happening in a lab....
ever heard of diseases becoming resistant to medications? and then that strain of the disease continues on infecting people? and that strain of the disease is differentiated from other strains of the disease specifically?
fucking miracles, man. fucking miracles.
evolution happens RIGHT IN FRONT OF PEOPLES FACES ON A DAILY BASIS.
genetic variation. how did all this variety of humans come from 2 people? 2.... people. there is no fucking way that they contained the alleles for every single trait you can observe on earth today.
its evolution. its right in front of your face and you refuse to look up from a 2000 year old book and into the present instead of reading some crap from the past which was written when people lived in mud huts. its time to be an intelligent human and stop denying hard evidence for "something i like to believe because im scared to die and go to hell"
hell doesnt exist. nothing happens when you die. the time after your death is the exact same as the billions of years before you were born. its incomprehensibly NOTHING.
stop believing fairy tales because you are scared of what comes after death.
--------------------
|
Salomon
ಠ︵ಠ balance ಠ_ಠ weaver ಠ‿ಠ

Registered: 01/17/09
Posts: 25,128
Loc: America, FUCK YEAH
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: LadyLittleZeppelin]
#14331149 - 04/22/11 12:35 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
LadyLittleZeppelin said: I've read that we came from single cell organisms As if our planet could survive that long without being taken out by a large, orbiting planet or very large comet. The things people think up...
yes we came from single celled organisms
infact you did it yourself, and it only took you nine months
-------------------- EVERYTHING EVENTUALLY BECOMES A DESERT
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: donteatasians]
#14331151 - 04/22/11 12:35 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
donteatasians said: When people started migrating to areas with less sun, into Europe and Asia, they developed lighter skin to better take advantage of the sun. Vitamin D for one comes to mind. They also didn't need as much protection from the harmful aspects of sun like sunburn.
are you saying that black people dont need vitamin D?
|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*



Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Prisoner#1]
#14331155 - 04/22/11 12:35 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Well for one interbreeding between species is impossible and again why would perfect genes ever evolve or change at all.
|
donteatasians


Registered: 08/14/07
Posts: 1,461
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: dummy]
#14331161 - 04/22/11 12:37 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
dummy said: but lighter colors reflect more light.
Darker skin has more melanin, which protects a person from sun. That's why white folks tan. While this protects people from being burned it also prevents absorption of Vitamin D.
--------------------
|
Larrythescaryrex
teardrop on the fire



Registered: 07/19/00
Posts: 11,004
Loc: further down the spiral
Last seen: 1 year, 2 months
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Samuel L Jackson]
#14331162 - 04/22/11 12:37 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
dude, god created evolution.
-------------------- RIP Acidic_Sloth Sunset_Mission said: "larry the scary rex verily scary when thoroughly vexed invoke the shadows and dust, cast a hex mercifully massacring memories masterfully relocate from Ur to 8th density and become a cosmic bully mulder and scully couldn't decipher his glyphs invoke the shadows and dust, smoke infernal spliffs" April 24th 2011
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Salomon]
#14331164 - 04/22/11 12:37 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Salomon said:
Quote:
LadyLittleZeppelin said: I've read that we came from single cell organisms As if our planet could survive that long without being taken out by a large, orbiting planet or very large comet. The things people think up...
yes we came from single celled organisms
where's the single celled organism come from
LLZ, there's been at least 3 global extinction events in the last 4 billion years
|
LadyLittleZeppelin
Stoner



Registered: 10/30/09
Posts: 1,513
Last seen: 11 years, 7 months
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Prisoner#1]
#14331168 - 04/22/11 12:38 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
donteatasians said: When people started migrating to areas with less sun, into Europe and Asia, they developed lighter skin to better take advantage of the sun. Vitamin D for one comes to mind. They also didn't need as much protection from the harmful aspects of sun like sunburn.
are you saying that black people dont need vitamin D?
They don't need to drink where white people drink or sit in the front of the bus either
-------------------- SHROOMS MAKE YOU GAY ~ Crystal G said: its cuzzzzzz i giiiiiive a meeeeean blooooowjjjobbbb.
|
psilyguy


Registered: 12/03/08
Posts: 3,305
Last seen: 12 years, 1 month
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Samuel L Jackson]
#14331172 - 04/22/11 12:39 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
SamuelLJackson said: because ostriches and penguins are both birds. we are apes. every currently living monkey is an ape. live with it. learn to read cladograms.
I don't like being too picky, but talk like this doesn't help the collective argument at all and I hear it too often. Yes we are apes, but monkeys and apes are not the same thing! Both are primates, but not monkeys.
PRIMATES:
Apes: Humans, chimps, bonobos, gorillas, orangutans Monkeys: new world, and old world Tarsiers Lemurs Lorises
All of the above are primates. Ape is not a Monkey. Lemur is not a monkey. Loris is not a Tarsier.
|
|