|
Larrythescaryrex
teardrop on the fire



Registered: 07/19/00
Posts: 11,004
Loc: further down the spiral
Last seen: 1 year, 2 months
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Samuel L Jackson]
#14331020 - 04/22/11 12:05 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
every currently living monkey is an ape?
-------------------- RIP Acidic_Sloth Sunset_Mission said: "larry the scary rex verily scary when thoroughly vexed invoke the shadows and dust, cast a hex mercifully massacring memories masterfully relocate from Ur to 8th density and become a cosmic bully mulder and scully couldn't decipher his glyphs invoke the shadows and dust, smoke infernal spliffs" April 24th 2011
|
dummy
I am you and what I see is me


Registered: 09/29/08
Posts: 3,973
Last seen: 1 year, 9 months
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Prisoner#1]
#14331023 - 04/22/11 12:06 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said:
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: No really, what have you?
you obviously shouldnt be in this debate... and really, why would you care?

it's simple, you're trying to argue something you know little or nothing about maybe try reading the bible and then put together your argument because then you'd have some foundation for the debate, instead you've come here to ask for help to bash someone's religious beliefs, I personally cant think of anything more pathetic than bashing someone's religion other than begging people to do it for you
hey but you tried to do that earlier in another thread. remember? when you tried to make facts up about renewable energy systems and such? if he you can bs over in that thread, he should be able to bs here!
-------------------- People never seem to know what they least suspect is coming next.
|
Samuel L Jackson
Bad Motherfucker


Registered: 12/10/09
Posts: 8,395
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Larrythescaryrex]
#14331029 - 04/22/11 12:08 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Larrythescaryrex said: every currently living monkey is an ape?
let me rephrase. all close relatives to humans are apes.
there.
primate would have been a better word choice.
--------------------
|
LadyLittleZeppelin
Stoner



Registered: 10/30/09
Posts: 1,513
Last seen: 11 years, 7 months
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Larrythescaryrex]
#14331030 - 04/22/11 12:09 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Larrythescaryrex said: every currently living monkey is an ape?
Guess I'm a monkeys uncle?
-------------------- SHROOMS MAKE YOU GAY ~ Crystal G said: its cuzzzzzz i giiiiiive a meeeeean blooooowjjjobbbb.
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Samuel L Jackson]
#14331031 - 04/22/11 12:09 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
SamuelLJackson said: because ostriches and penguins are both birds. we are apes. every currently living monkey is an ape. live with it. learn to read cladograms.
right and birds evolved from a reptile, feathers being a modified scale, all birds are Aves whether it be an ostrich or a penguin... did the human's common ancestor evolve from a reptile?
|
donteatasians


Registered: 08/14/07
Posts: 1,461
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: dummy]
#14331032 - 04/22/11 12:09 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
dummy said:
Quote:
LadyLittleZeppelin said: Yeahhh hahahaha 
i was hahahaing the oxygen remark but the one afterwards was ha-ha-able. i guess you didn't know oxygen isn't flammable. lol you don't think they had fire back then?!?! haha! not until man came around or something? whatev.. i'm sure you understand that humans share damn near all of our genes with other memebers of the great ape line, primarily benobs and chimps. and i'm sure you'll agree the ostrich and the penguin have a common ancestor somewhere along the line (meaning they evolved from the same thing.) the schools are failing us. not sure who to blame. sry.
What's wrong with that theory. An oxygen rich environment means that it takes less energy to get enough oxygen and more energy went towards growth. From my understanding they did tests raising insects in controlled environments, some at current levels and others at the levels that they estimated they were back then. The ones in an environment with more O2 grew bigger.
--------------------
|
Prisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!


Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: dummy]
#14331041 - 04/22/11 12:11 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
dummy said:
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said: it's simple, you're trying to argue something you know little or nothing about maybe try reading the bible and then put together your argument because then you'd have some foundation for the debate, instead you've come here to ask for help to bash someone's religious beliefs, I personally cant think of anything more pathetic than bashing someone's religion other than begging people to do it for you
hey but you tried to do that earlier in another thread. remember? when you tried to make facts up about renewable energy systems and such? if he you can bs over in that thread, he should be able to bs here!
but I know something about that subject, I know something about religion as well
|
Bodhi of Ankou
*alternate opinion blocks path*



Registered: 06/02/09
Posts: 24,778
Loc: Soviet Canukistan
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Prisoner#1]
#14331042 - 04/22/11 12:11 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
Bodhi of Ankou said: Its a topic, nobodies bashing anyone and nobodies begging for anything. whats so pathetic about a exchange of thoughts, fool.
Quote:
Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate?
I always like to bring up...
|
Larrythescaryrex
teardrop on the fire



Registered: 07/19/00
Posts: 11,004
Loc: further down the spiral
Last seen: 1 year, 2 months
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Bodhi of Ankou]
#14331044 - 04/22/11 12:12 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Wait, rats have scaly tails, does that mean they've modified residual feathers?
-------------------- RIP Acidic_Sloth Sunset_Mission said: "larry the scary rex verily scary when thoroughly vexed invoke the shadows and dust, cast a hex mercifully massacring memories masterfully relocate from Ur to 8th density and become a cosmic bully mulder and scully couldn't decipher his glyphs invoke the shadows and dust, smoke infernal spliffs" April 24th 2011
|
dummy
I am you and what I see is me


Registered: 09/29/08
Posts: 3,973
Last seen: 1 year, 9 months
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: donteatasians]
#14331047 - 04/22/11 12:13 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
i really don't know enough, or anything at all, about developmental biology or biochem or whatever... i couldn't really say whether that theory is valid or not. all i'm saying is that oxygen is not flammable. thats almost laughable that someone would think that, but i understand. the oxygen itself doesn't combust, but is require for combustion reactions to occur. while an oxygen rich atmosphere wouldn't blow up, lol, it would make it easier to start and build a fire... read a book!
-------------------- People never seem to know what they least suspect is coming next.
|
LadyLittleZeppelin
Stoner



Registered: 10/30/09
Posts: 1,513
Last seen: 11 years, 7 months
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Prisoner#1]
#14331051 - 04/22/11 12:13 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
I've read that we came from single cell organisms As if our planet could survive that long without being taken out by a large, orbiting planet or very large comet. The things people think up...
-------------------- SHROOMS MAKE YOU GAY ~ Crystal G said: its cuzzzzzz i giiiiiive a meeeeean blooooowjjjobbbb.
|
Samuel L Jackson
Bad Motherfucker


Registered: 12/10/09
Posts: 8,395
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Prisoner#1]
#14331052 - 04/22/11 12:14 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
SamuelLJackson said: because ostriches and penguins are both birds. we are apes. every currently living monkey is an ape. live with it. learn to read cladograms.
right and birds evolved from a reptile, feathers being a modified scale, all birds are Aves whether it be an ostrich or a penguin... did the human's common ancestor evolve from a reptile?

you tell me.
--------------------
|
Larrythescaryrex
teardrop on the fire



Registered: 07/19/00
Posts: 11,004
Loc: further down the spiral
Last seen: 1 year, 2 months
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: LadyLittleZeppelin]
#14331056 - 04/22/11 12:14 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
we came from single cells being orgasmed into another cell...
-------------------- RIP Acidic_Sloth Sunset_Mission said: "larry the scary rex verily scary when thoroughly vexed invoke the shadows and dust, cast a hex mercifully massacring memories masterfully relocate from Ur to 8th density and become a cosmic bully mulder and scully couldn't decipher his glyphs invoke the shadows and dust, smoke infernal spliffs" April 24th 2011
|
dummy
I am you and what I see is me


Registered: 09/29/08
Posts: 3,973
Last seen: 1 year, 9 months
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Prisoner#1]
#14331055 - 04/22/11 12:14 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said:
Quote:
dummy said:
Quote:
Prisoner#1 said: it's simple, you're trying to argue something you know little or nothing about maybe try reading the bible and then put together your argument because then you'd have some foundation for the debate, instead you've come here to ask for help to bash someone's religious beliefs, I personally cant think of anything more pathetic than bashing someone's religion other than begging people to do it for you
hey but you tried to do that earlier in another thread. remember? when you tried to make facts up about renewable energy systems and such? if he you can bs over in that thread, he should be able to bs here!
but I know something about that subject, I know something about religion as well
but you don't... it's all written out in my rebuttal in that thread you should give it a read.
-------------------- People never seem to know what they least suspect is coming next.
|
donteatasians


Registered: 08/14/07
Posts: 1,461
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: LadyLittleZeppelin]
#14331067 - 04/22/11 12:16 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
LadyLittleZeppelin said: There is no other creature on this planet with our understanding to the degree that we have so it's hard to imagine that we could evolve from monkeys. Monkeys are intelligent but not nearly as intelligent as we are. I don't understand how the monkeys of today got left behind in evolutionary bind and we moved on to become earths worst nightmare 
Coming from a common ancestor is different than coming from monkeys them selves as we know them. Maybe our social skills and ability to work together allowed more success and different development.
--------------------
|
Samuel L Jackson
Bad Motherfucker


Registered: 12/10/09
Posts: 8,395
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: LadyLittleZeppelin]
#14331072 - 04/22/11 12:18 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
LadyLittleZeppelin said: I've read that we came from single cell organisms As if our planet could survive that long without being taken out by a large, orbiting planet or very large comet. The things people think up...
ive read that a ghost materialized an entire universe in 7 days. and that dinosaur bones are just there to test our faith.
the things people think up....
--------------------
|
LadyLittleZeppelin
Stoner



Registered: 10/30/09
Posts: 1,513
Last seen: 11 years, 7 months
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Larrythescaryrex]
#14331075 - 04/22/11 12:19 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Thats not evolution. Thats mom and dad doing the dirty. I'm talking about millions and millions of years ago our ancestors were single celled organisms living in a puddle of water. So says the evolutionist.
-------------------- SHROOMS MAKE YOU GAY ~ Crystal G said: its cuzzzzzz i giiiiiive a meeeeean blooooowjjjobbbb.
|
Larrythescaryrex
teardrop on the fire



Registered: 07/19/00
Posts: 11,004
Loc: further down the spiral
Last seen: 1 year, 2 months
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: Samuel L Jackson]
#14331079 - 04/22/11 12:19 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
way to obsess over a linear comprehension of time...
-------------------- RIP Acidic_Sloth Sunset_Mission said: "larry the scary rex verily scary when thoroughly vexed invoke the shadows and dust, cast a hex mercifully massacring memories masterfully relocate from Ur to 8th density and become a cosmic bully mulder and scully couldn't decipher his glyphs invoke the shadows and dust, smoke infernal spliffs" April 24th 2011
|
Larrythescaryrex
teardrop on the fire



Registered: 07/19/00
Posts: 11,004
Loc: further down the spiral
Last seen: 1 year, 2 months
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: LadyLittleZeppelin]
#14331081 - 04/22/11 12:20 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
my idea is more fun.
-------------------- RIP Acidic_Sloth Sunset_Mission said: "larry the scary rex verily scary when thoroughly vexed invoke the shadows and dust, cast a hex mercifully massacring memories masterfully relocate from Ur to 8th density and become a cosmic bully mulder and scully couldn't decipher his glyphs invoke the shadows and dust, smoke infernal spliffs" April 24th 2011
|
dummy
I am you and what I see is me


Registered: 09/29/08
Posts: 3,973
Last seen: 1 year, 9 months
|
Re: Arguments to destroy a religious person in a debate? [Re: donteatasians]
#14331084 - 04/22/11 12:20 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
whatever we came from had to have been pretty damn ape like, if not down right monkey like.
-------------------- People never seem to know what they least suspect is coming next.
|
|