|
OrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group



Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,414
Loc: Under the C
|
"It's not in my nature."
#14322428 - 04/20/11 10:48 AM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
I sometimes hear this when someone loses control and has some sort of outburst or acts out in some way.
It can be mild, such as a curse, or extreme - think OJ stabbing his ex 13,000 times.
Obviously one cannot do something that is not in their nature. Generally it has more to do with denial and the preservation of a false self image of being some kind of 'holy' or 'good' or 'spiritual' person.
--------------------
|
quinn
some kinda love


Registered: 01/02/10
Posts: 6,799
|
|
pretty much all self images are false
-------------------- dripping with fantasy
|
Gomp
¡(Bound to·(O))be free!



Registered: 09/11/04
Posts: 10,888
Loc: I re·side [primarily] in...
Last seen: 10 months, 24 days
|
|
Quote:
OrgoneConclusion said: I sometimes hear this when someone loses control and has some sort of outburst or acts out in some way.
It can be mild, such as a curse, or extreme - think OJ stabbing his ex 13,000 times.
Obviously one cannot do something that is not in their nature. Generally it has more to do with denial and the preservation of a false self image of being some kind of 'holy' or 'good' or 'spiritual' person.
It is in my nature to type this.. It would not have been, if I did not.. ;p
|
jivJaN
yes


Registered: 08/09/08
Posts: 4,245
Last seen: 10 years, 9 months
|
Re: "It's not in my nature." [Re: Gomp]
#14325226 - 04/20/11 09:53 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
It is in my nature to type this.. It would not have been, if I did not.. ;p
--------------------
--------------------- All my posts in this forum are strictly fictional. They are derived from an acute mental illness , from which i am forced to lie compulsively. I have never induced any kind of mind altering substance in my life and i have no intentions whatsoever of doing anything illegal. If I have ever suggested such a thing it would have most likely been , due to my personality disorder and i probably do not remember it at all..
|
johnm214


Registered: 05/31/07
Posts: 17,582
Loc: Americas
|
Re: "It's not in my nature." [Re: Gomp]
#14329997 - 04/21/11 08:52 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Gomp said:
Quote:
OrgoneConclusion said: I sometimes hear this when someone loses control and has some sort of outburst or acts out in some way.
It can be mild, such as a curse, or extreme - think OJ stabbing his ex 13,000 times.
Obviously one cannot do something that is not in their nature. Generally it has more to do with denial and the preservation of a false self image of being some kind of 'holy' or 'good' or 'spiritual' person.
It is in my nature to type this.. It would not have been, if I did not.. ;p
This might be the first time I've had any notion of what you're trying to say.
|
desert father
Stranger
Registered: 07/17/10
Posts: 1,102
Last seen: 10 years, 3 months
|
|
well, we all share the same nature..that being human nature...
that being said, anything you are capable of a "spiritual" person is capable of, and also vice-versa.
so what's the difference between you and a spiritual person if you both share the same nature?
-------------------- vi veri veniversum vivus vici What she said : "I smoke 'cos I'm hoping for an Early death AND I NEED TO CLING TO SOMETHING !"
|
Gomp
¡(Bound to·(O))be free!



Registered: 09/11/04
Posts: 10,888
Loc: I re·side [primarily] in...
Last seen: 10 months, 24 days
|
Re: "It's not in my nature." [Re: johnm214]
#14332374 - 04/22/11 09:13 AM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
johnm214 said:
Quote:
Gomp said:
Quote:
OrgoneConclusion said: I sometimes hear this when someone loses control and has some sort of outburst or acts out in some way.
It can be mild, such as a curse, or extreme - think OJ stabbing his ex 13,000 times.
Obviously one cannot do something that is not in their nature. Generally it has more to do with denial and the preservation of a false self image of being some kind of 'holy' or 'good' or 'spiritual' person.
It is in my nature to type this.. It would not have been, if I did not.. ;p
This might be the first time I've had any notion of what you're trying to say.
I do not try to say, I say.. 
"Try to spit in one hand, spit in the other; then see which you got the most in!" ...
|
Gomp
¡(Bound to·(O))be free!



Registered: 09/11/04
Posts: 10,888
Loc: I re·side [primarily] in...
Last seen: 10 months, 24 days
|
|
Quote:
desert father said: well, we all share the same nature..that being human nature...
that being said, anything you are capable of a "spiritual" person is capable of, and also vice-versa.
so what's the difference between you and a spiritual person if you both share the same nature?
"Spiritualism, could be described, as human being, having a spiritual experience, .. even as the spiritual being, having a human experience!" ~ Some dude
.. There is no difference.. Nature is!
|
justin340
Rock Star



Registered: 05/02/07
Posts: 357
Last seen: 12 years, 9 months
|
Re: "It's not in my nature." [Re: Gomp]
#14332469 - 04/22/11 09:37 AM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
13,000 would have been crazy 140 ehh shrug. he was just expermenting with sin.
|
NetDiver
Wandering Mindfuck


Registered: 08/24/09
Posts: 6,024
Loc: Everywhere and Nowhere
Last seen: 1 year, 6 months
|
|
Quote:
desert father said: well, we all share the same nature..that being human nature...
that being said, anything you are capable of a "spiritual" person is capable of, and also vice-versa.
so what's the difference between you and a spiritual person if you both share the same nature?
Ding ding ding! We have a winner. Dualism sucks.
|
synapz
pee on flowing lava = fail


Registered: 04/14/11
Posts: 80
Last seen: 12 years, 9 months
|
|
Quote:
I sometimes hear this when someone loses control and has some sort of outburst or acts out in some way.
It can be mild, such as a curse, or extreme - think OJ stabbing his ex 13,000 times.
Obviously one cannot do something that is not in their nature. Generally it has more to do with denial and the preservation of a false self image of being some kind of 'holy' or 'good' or 'spiritual' person.
Is denial and preservation of a 'false self image' of being kind of holy or good, anything,
but
nature?
if it is
then
i ask
why
you include highlighting this particular content?
as it is of no higher relevance than that of any content matter of nature being nature
the fact you include it
makes you think YOU think
there's something 'askew' about it
'not quite nature being nature'
-------------------- Oh Snapz
|
desert father
Stranger
Registered: 07/17/10
Posts: 1,102
Last seen: 10 years, 3 months
|
Re: "It's not in my nature." [Re: NetDiver]
#14333391 - 04/22/11 01:28 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
word man
my question was directed to orgoneconclusion
-------------------- vi veri veniversum vivus vici What she said : "I smoke 'cos I'm hoping for an Early death AND I NEED TO CLING TO SOMETHING !"
|
johnm214


Registered: 05/31/07
Posts: 17,582
Loc: Americas
|
Re: "It's not in my nature." [Re: Gomp]
#14333420 - 04/22/11 01:34 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Gomp said:
Quote:
johnm214 said:
Quote:
Gomp said:
Quote:
OrgoneConclusion said: I sometimes hear this when someone loses control and has some sort of outburst or acts out in some way.
It can be mild, such as a curse, or extreme - think OJ stabbing his ex 13,000 times.
Obviously one cannot do something that is not in their nature. Generally it has more to do with denial and the preservation of a false self image of being some kind of 'holy' or 'good' or 'spiritual' person.
It is in my nature to type this.. It would not have been, if I did not.. ;p
This might be the first time I've had any notion of what you're trying to say.
I do not try to say, I say.. 
"Try to spit in one hand, spit in the other; then see which you got the most in!" ...
Well, that didn't take too long. Looks like you're back to the incomprehensible. At least you seem friendly- more than I can say for some folks I can understand.
|
NetDiver
Wandering Mindfuck


Registered: 08/24/09
Posts: 6,024
Loc: Everywhere and Nowhere
Last seen: 1 year, 6 months
|
Re: "It's not in my nature." [Re: johnm214]
#14333970 - 04/22/11 03:37 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
I get what he's saying.
"Do, or do not. There is no try."
|
Gomp
¡(Bound to·(O))be free!



Registered: 09/11/04
Posts: 10,888
Loc: I re·side [primarily] in...
Last seen: 10 months, 24 days
|
Re: "It's not in my nature." [Re: NetDiver]
#14337227 - 04/23/11 06:41 AM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
|
g00ru
lit pants tit licker



Registered: 08/09/07
Posts: 21,088
Loc: georgia, us
Last seen: 5 years, 1 month
|
Re: "It's not in my nature." [Re: NetDiver]
#14337596 - 04/23/11 09:43 AM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Samurai Drifter said: Dualism sucks.
could you expand on this opinion? I'm sure you have before but I dig dualism so I'd like to hear more.
-------------------- check out my music! drowse in prison and your waking will be but loss
|
OrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group



Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,414
Loc: Under the C
|
Re: "It's not in my nature." [Re: g00ru]
#14338262 - 04/23/11 12:33 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
In Mel Gibson's latest interview, he explains how his emotional meltdown was not in his nature.
"It's one terribly awful moment in time, said to one person, in the span of one day and doesn't represent what I truly believe or how I've treated people..."
I guess the same applied when he bashed Jews a few years back in a drunken rage. He doens't really hate Jews.
--------------------
|
Poid
Shroomery's #1 Spellir




Registered: 02/04/08
Posts: 40,372
Loc: SF Bay Area
|
|
Quote:
OrgoneConclusion said: He doens't really hate Jews. 
It's not in my nature to ignore your typos.
-------------------- Well I try my best to be just like I am, but everybody wants you to be just like them. -- Bob Dylan  fireworks_god said:It's one thing to simply enjoy a style of life that one enjoys, but it's another thing altogether to refer to another person's choice as "wrong" or to rationalize their behavior as being pathological or resulting from some sort of inadequacy or failing so as to create a sense of superiority or separation as yet another projection of a personal fear or control issue.
|
OrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group



Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,414
Loc: Under the C
|
Re: "It's not in my nature." [Re: Poid]
#14338591 - 04/23/11 01:53 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
I am not dsylexic, but my fingers are when I type.
--------------------
|
Poid
Shroomery's #1 Spellir




Registered: 02/04/08
Posts: 40,372
Loc: SF Bay Area
|
|
Maybe you need more drugs.
-------------------- Well I try my best to be just like I am, but everybody wants you to be just like them. -- Bob Dylan  fireworks_god said:It's one thing to simply enjoy a style of life that one enjoys, but it's another thing altogether to refer to another person's choice as "wrong" or to rationalize their behavior as being pathological or resulting from some sort of inadequacy or failing so as to create a sense of superiority or separation as yet another projection of a personal fear or control issue.
|
NetDiver
Wandering Mindfuck


Registered: 08/24/09
Posts: 6,024
Loc: Everywhere and Nowhere
Last seen: 1 year, 6 months
|
Re: "It's not in my nature." [Re: g00ru]
#14340414 - 04/23/11 08:25 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
guruu said: could you expand on this opinion? I'm sure you have before but I dig dualism so I'd like to hear more.
Oh, I have before, many times, only to be met with "just look inside yourself." But I'll elaborate again anyway.
There is not one single thing in existence that is not qualia; some sort of sense perception. Touch, taste, sight, sound, smell, etc- our universe is sensed. Even thoughts are qualia. They are sensations in the same way as pain or taste. To us, everything is some sort of sense perception.
If you don't believe me that thoughts are just sense perceptions, like sounds or smells, try to explain what it means to "know" something. It's just something you feel intuitively, without being able to explain. It's like trying to define a word without using other words.
Sense perception itself is not definable; you can't explain how you know red is different than blue. You just do. But, this doesn't mean that sense perception is anything apart from the physical Universe. In fact, it is the physical Universe. So often people develop the idea of a soul, or a mind, "inhabiting" a body because they get the idea that they have a dual nature- as a thinking thing and as a feeling, sensing thing. But your thoughts are just senses too. You are only one kind of thing- a sensing thing.
This can further be realized by an examination of consciousness. Consciousness is never something isolated, by itself. It's always consciousness of something. In fact, consciousness is inseparable from the objects of which it is conscious. If I'm holding a glass, you can't separate my awareness of the glass from the glass itself. There is no duality; consciousness is its object; the observer is the observed.
There is no ghost in the machine. The ghost is the machine. That being the case, everything is equal; no one part is any more spiritual, special, or "holy" than any other, because everything is one. Claiming some sort of special power beyond the physical Universe is egotistical. You are the physical Universe, and it is you. This is why empirical investigation is so useful. It's an investigation directly into our own nature.
If you don't have anything to say to that other than claiming you mystically know that I'm wrong, don't bother responding.
|
zoomfan
doubt 'er


Registered: 07/16/09
Posts: 505
Loc: eastern Canada
Last seen: 2 years, 10 months
|
|
Quote:
OrgoneConclusion said: In Mel Gibson's latest interview, he explains how his emotional meltdown was not in his nature.
"It's one terribly awful moment in time, said to one person, in the span of one day and doesn't represent what I truly believe or how I've treated people..."
I guess the same applied when he bashed Jews a few years back in a drunken rage. He doens't really hate Jews. 
haha i saw that on tmz today, funny enough, what one of the guys on there said was exactly what i would argue philosophically, everyone has good and bad in their nature, belief systems only allow us to associate ourself with the good ones though usually. the fact is though that were all capable to differing degrees of any and all emotions and actions. i went to jail for armed robbery after my life went to hell and you would never think it to talk to me today.
-------------------- Thinking is dreaming wake up and enjoy the dream.
|
g00ru
lit pants tit licker



Registered: 08/09/07
Posts: 21,088
Loc: georgia, us
Last seen: 5 years, 1 month
|
Re: "It's not in my nature." [Re: NetDiver]
#14344563 - 04/24/11 05:33 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Samurai Drifter said:
Quote:
guruu said: could you expand on this opinion? I'm sure you have before but I dig dualism so I'd like to hear more.
Oh, I have before, many times, only to be met with "just look inside yourself." But I'll elaborate again anyway.
There is not one single thing in existence that is not qualia; some sort of sense perception. Touch, taste, sight, sound, smell, etc- our universe is sensed. Even thoughts are qualia. They are sensations in the same way as pain or taste. To us, everything is some sort of sense perception.
Ah, but there is something that is not sense perception. "I". True, the sense of being does seem to arise in the body, and as a matter of fact when you meditate on it this sense will increase. However, it's more than that. You can't point to any single sensation and say "that's I. That's me." Seriously, look for it. Look for the sense perception that constitutes you. It's not there, I feel quite confident in saying. All the same, "I" is sensed, which is great cause you have something to focus on. This is really difficult to even talk about honestly because "I" is indeed an object, but that which gives life to our sense of individuality is not an object, it's totally formless. But because "I am" is the original and most intimate thought, focusing on it brings us right into that formless reality.
Quote:
If you don't believe me that thoughts are just sense perceptions, like sounds or smells, try to explain what it means to "know" something. It's just something you feel intuitively, without being able to explain. It's like trying to define a word without using other words.
Yes, I would call that knowing something in the heart, when it's intuitive as well as rational. But here's an experiment: what the fuck kind of sense perception is the voice in your head? Who is this person up there talking? What physical sense is that? And who observes it? WHO AM I? I definitely think thoughts are perceptions but of an entirely different nature than sounds or smells. Take imagination: you can create an image in your mind. Are you really seeing that? Yeah, obviously it's somehow possible to see a mental image, but its different in some fundamental way from our physical seeing. You're not seeing it at all with your fleshly eyes, but somehow you can still perceive it. You're seeing it with your third eye, the mind's eye. 
Quote:
Sense perception itself is not definable; you can't explain how you know red is different than blue. You just do. But, this doesn't mean that sense perception is anything apart from the physical Universe. In fact, it is the physical Universe. So often people develop the idea of a soul, or a mind, "inhabiting" a body because they get the idea that they have a dual nature- as a thinking thing and as a feeling, sensing thing. But your thoughts are just senses too. You are only one kind of thing- a sensing thing.
You're totally right that sense perception and the manifest universe are one and the same. I would define sense perception as differentiation, pure and simple. If it has a quality, it can be differentiated, and as such it's an object. But you keep saying everything is perception, which means something is perceiving everything. Who is this perceiver? Can the perceiver himself be perceived? Are we in our truest nature a perception? If so, doesn't that imply...something else that's doing the perceiving?
Quote:
This can further be realized by an examination of consciousness. Consciousness is never something isolated, by itself. It's always consciousness of something. In fact, consciousness is inseparable from the objects of which it is conscious. If I'm holding a glass, you can't separate my awareness of the glass from the glass itself. There is no duality; consciousness is its object; the observer is the observed.
There is no ghost in the machine. The ghost is the machine. That being the case, everything is equal; no one part is any more spiritual, special, or "holy" than any other, because everything is one. Claiming some sort of special power beyond the physical Universe is egotistical. You are the physical Universe, and it is you. This is why empirical investigation is so useful. It's an investigation directly into our own nature.
Yes you're right, ultimately the universe is totally nondual. But I disagree that there is no ghost in the machine. It's like the buddhist doctrine. 1. samsara (physical world) is illusory 2. nirvana (the true self) alone is real 3. nirvana is samsara. You're jumping to that last one and saying that we are the physical universe and it is us, which is true. But that doesn't change the fact that there can exist a duality between the exterior world and our inner being, and that an understanding of this is necessary if we are to truly realize oneness in an experiential fashion.
Consciousness can indeed be separated from objects. And this is where it just gets mystical. You have to focus on "i am," or keep your mind totally silent, or meditate until you are totally relaxed to a point of complete stillness. You just have to sort of push forward and just do it, it's a totally self-inclusive movement that can't be defined in rational terms because it's just beyond that. Sorry if that's intellectually unsatisfying but hopefully you'll try, because it's....good 
Quote:
If you don't have anything to say to that other than claiming you mystically know that I'm wrong, don't bother responding. 
actually i mystically know you're right
-------------------- check out my music! drowse in prison and your waking will be but loss
|
Poid
Shroomery's #1 Spellir




Registered: 02/04/08
Posts: 40,372
Loc: SF Bay Area
|
Re: "It's not in my nature." [Re: g00ru]
#14345906 - 04/24/11 09:48 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
guruu said:
Quote:
Samurai Drifter said:
Quote:
guruu said: could you expand on this opinion? I'm sure you have before but I dig dualism so I'd like to hear more.
Oh, I have before, many times, only to be met with "just look inside yourself." But I'll elaborate again anyway.
There is not one single thing in existence that is not qualia; some sort of sense perception. Touch, taste, sight, sound, smell, etc- our universe is sensed. Even thoughts are qualia. They are sensations in the same way as pain or taste. To us, everything is some sort of sense perception.
Ah, but there is something that is not sense perception. "I".
Proof?
Quote:
guruu said: True, the sense of being does seem to arise in the body, and as a matter of fact when you meditate on it this sense will increase. However, it's more than that. You can't point to any single sensation and say "that's I. That's me."
That's because we are more than a single sensation.
Quote:
guruu said: Seriously, look for it. Look for the sense perception that constitutes you. It's not there, I feel quite confident in saying.
It is there--everything you sense is part of you.
Quote:
guruu said: All the same, "I" is sensed, which is great cause you have something to focus on. This is really difficult to even talk about honestly because "I" is indeed an object, but that which gives life to our sense of individuality is not an object, it's totally formless.
Proof?
Quote:
guruu said: But because "I am" is the original and most intimate thought, focusing on it brings us right into that formless reality.
What makes you think that is the most intimate thought? Do you honestly think you know what people's thoughts are like?
Quote:
guruu said:
Quote:
If you don't believe me that thoughts are just sense perceptions, like sounds or smells, try to explain what it means to "know" something. It's just something you feel intuitively, without being able to explain. It's like trying to define a word without using other words.
Yes, I would call that knowing something in the heart, when it's intuitive as well as rational. But here's an experiment: what the fuck kind of sense perception is the voice in your head? Who is this person up there talking? What physical sense is that? And who observes it? WHO AM I?
What do you mean "What physical sense is that?"? The person "up there" is called the dialogical self, and each individual observes it.
Quote:
guruu said: I definitely think thoughts are perceptions but of an entirely different nature than sounds or smells.
They are in that they're not created by processing information gathered by a sense organ, but they are perceptions nonetheless.
Quote:
guruu said: Take imagination: you can create an image in your mind. Are you really seeing that? Yeah, obviously it's somehow possible to see a mental image, but its different in some fundamental way from our physical seeing. You're not seeing it at all with your fleshly eyes, but somehow you can still perceive it. You're seeing it with your third eye, the mind's eye. 
Call it what you want, but so what? Why is this so totally amazing for you, and what is spiritual about it?
Quote:
guruu said:
Quote:
Sense perception itself is not definable; you can't explain how you know red is different than blue. You just do. But, this doesn't mean that sense perception is anything apart from the physical Universe. In fact, it is the physical Universe. So often people develop the idea of a soul, or a mind, "inhabiting" a body because they get the idea that they have a dual nature- as a thinking thing and as a feeling, sensing thing. But your thoughts are just senses too. You are only one kind of thing- a sensing thing.
You're totally right that sense perception and the manifest universe are one and the same. I would define sense perception as differentiation, pure and simple. If it has a quality, it can be differentiated, and as such it's an object. But you keep saying everything is perception, which means something is perceiving everything. Who is this perceiver? Can the perceiver himself be perceived? Are we in our truest nature a perception? If so, doesn't that imply...something else that's doing the perceiving?
Why does a "who" have to be the perceiver? The perceiver is the organism, and yes, the organism can perceive itself--why is this so totally amazing for you, and what's spiritual about it?
Quote:
guruu said:
Quote:
This can further be realized by an examination of consciousness. Consciousness is never something isolated, by itself. It's always consciousness of something. In fact, consciousness is inseparable from the objects of which it is conscious. If I'm holding a glass, you can't separate my awareness of the glass from the glass itself. There is no duality; consciousness is its object; the observer is the observed.
There is no ghost in the machine. The ghost is the machine. That being the case, everything is equal; no one part is any more spiritual, special, or "holy" than any other, because everything is one. Claiming some sort of special power beyond the physical Universe is egotistical. You are the physical Universe, and it is you. This is why empirical investigation is so useful. It's an investigation directly into our own nature.
Yes you're right, ultimately the universe is totally nondual. But I disagree that there is no ghost in the machine. It's like the buddhist doctrine. 1. samsara (physical world) is illusory 2. nirvana (the true self) alone is real 3. nirvana is samsara.
Why do you just unquestioningly swallow that shit? 
Quote:
guruu said: You're jumping to that last one and saying that we are the physical universe and it is us, which is true. But that doesn't change the fact that there can exist a duality between the exterior world and our inner being, and that an understanding of this is necessary if we are to truly realize oneness in an experiential fashion.
What does it mean to "realize oneness"?
-------------------- Well I try my best to be just like I am, but everybody wants you to be just like them. -- Bob Dylan  fireworks_god said:It's one thing to simply enjoy a style of life that one enjoys, but it's another thing altogether to refer to another person's choice as "wrong" or to rationalize their behavior as being pathological or resulting from some sort of inadequacy or failing so as to create a sense of superiority or separation as yet another projection of a personal fear or control issue.
|
g00ru
lit pants tit licker



Registered: 08/09/07
Posts: 21,088
Loc: georgia, us
Last seen: 5 years, 1 month
|
Re: "It's not in my nature." [Re: NetDiver]
#14349615 - 04/25/11 03:14 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
i probably should have pm'd that to you
-------------------- check out my music! drowse in prison and your waking will be but loss
|
NetDiver
Wandering Mindfuck


Registered: 08/24/09
Posts: 6,024
Loc: Everywhere and Nowhere
Last seen: 1 year, 6 months
|
Re: "It's not in my nature." [Re: g00ru]
#14350454 - 04/25/11 05:45 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
I think everything you think of as the "I" is sense perception, though. Your sense perceptions are always changing, too, so if your self is reducible to your sense perceptions, we would expect to find a personal identity that isn't fixed, either, which is exactly what we find. The person you are now is different from who you were as a child; some people have multiple identities, etc.
Identity is just a chemical house of cards. Where's the soul, the consciousness, the dual nature, separate from sense perception?
BTW, mental visualizations are still sense perceptions, which are the result of our brain's ability to abstract and symbolize based on other sense perceptions. If seeing an apple is a sense perception, imagining an apple is as well. There's probably a great degree of similarity between the two in terms of brain activity.
|
Poid
Shroomery's #1 Spellir




Registered: 02/04/08
Posts: 40,372
Loc: SF Bay Area
|
Re: "It's not in my nature." [Re: g00ru] 1
#14351631 - 04/25/11 08:53 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
guruu said: i probably should have pm'd that to you 
You should respond to my post, and stop fucking trolling this forum with your inane/insane bullshit.
-------------------- Well I try my best to be just like I am, but everybody wants you to be just like them. -- Bob Dylan  fireworks_god said:It's one thing to simply enjoy a style of life that one enjoys, but it's another thing altogether to refer to another person's choice as "wrong" or to rationalize their behavior as being pathological or resulting from some sort of inadequacy or failing so as to create a sense of superiority or separation as yet another projection of a personal fear or control issue.
|
|