|
teknix
πβπ
’ππ
π°π‘ πΌπ⨻


Registered: 09/16/08
Posts: 11,953
|
Matter Vs. Anti-matter
#14301074 - 04/16/11 01:37 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
I think this is interesting and directly relates to polarities.
Say for instance, that all we percieve with our waking eyes is that of the positive polarity (matter). We know that Anti-Matter exists, not by actually seeing the nothingness, but by the absence of matter.
These cannot exists in combination (combined), therefore there must exist a plane that may encompass both Matter and Anti-matter.
This is the plane of Neutrality (zero-point). It cannot have a polarity or one of the aspects wouldn't be able to exist within it.
This is the very fine line that is evident when atoms are smashed and the duality becomes apparent.
|
Doc_T
Random Dude




Registered: 03/06/09
Posts: 42,395
Loc: Colorado
|
Re: Matter Vs. Anti-matter [Re: teknix] 1
#14301118 - 04/16/11 01:44 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
That's not really how antimatter works.
-------------------- You make it all possible. Doesn't it feel good?
|
teknix
πβπ
’ππ
π°π‘ πΌπ⨻


Registered: 09/16/08
Posts: 11,953
|
Re: Matter Vs. Anti-matter [Re: Doc_T]
#14301146 - 04/16/11 01:49 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Then please enlighten me 
The point is that for these aspects to be manifest side by side, there must be a plane that they are manifest from, otherwise they would cancel each other out. And one wouldn't be able to be percieved by any means.
|
Doc_T
Random Dude




Registered: 03/06/09
Posts: 42,395
Loc: Colorado
|
Re: Matter Vs. Anti-matter [Re: teknix]
#14301156 - 04/16/11 01:51 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
We deal with antimatter every day. PET scans, for example- Positron Emission Tomography.
-------------------- You make it all possible. Doesn't it feel good?
|
teknix
πβπ
’ππ
π°π‘ πΌπ⨻


Registered: 09/16/08
Posts: 11,953
|
Re: Matter Vs. Anti-matter [Re: teknix]
#14301188 - 04/16/11 01:55 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
You don't think this is proof enough of the 1st and last plane of neutrality?
|
Doc_T
Random Dude




Registered: 03/06/09
Posts: 42,395
Loc: Colorado
|
Re: Matter Vs. Anti-matter [Re: teknix]
#14301344 - 04/16/11 02:19 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Certainly not, our plane is strongly weighted towards matter and not antimatter or an equal split.
-------------------- You make it all possible. Doesn't it feel good?
|
teknix
πβπ
’ππ
π°π‘ πΌπ⨻


Registered: 09/16/08
Posts: 11,953
|
Re: Matter Vs. Anti-matter [Re: Doc_T]
#14301464 - 04/16/11 02:39 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
I realize that doc, we are basically the plane of existence.
Could the Dark Matter be Antimatter? It is conceivable that the dark matter (or at least part of it) could be antimatter, but there are very strong experimental reasons to doubt this. For example, if the dark matter out there were antimatter, we would expect it to annihilate with matter whenever it meets up with it, releasing bursts of energy primarily in the form of light. We see no evidence in careful observations for that, which leads most scientists to believe that whatever the dark matter is, it is not antimatter.
See how this correlates?
http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/cosmology/antimatter.html
|
teknix
πβπ
’ππ
π°π‘ πΌπ⨻


Registered: 09/16/08
Posts: 11,953
|
Re: Matter Vs. Anti-matter [Re: teknix]
#14301489 - 04/16/11 02:44 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
A blackhole may be just as infinite within itself as our universe of existence is. Although it appears to be heavily weighted towards matter, our knowledge isn't conclusive enough to say for certain.
Edited by teknix (04/16/11 02:52 PM)
|
Doc_T
Random Dude




Registered: 03/06/09
Posts: 42,395
Loc: Colorado
|
Re: Matter Vs. Anti-matter [Re: teknix]
#14301532 - 04/16/11 02:54 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Could the Dark Matter be Antimatter?
Antimatter isn't dark, so no it probably isn't.
-------------------- You make it all possible. Doesn't it feel good?
|
teknix
πβπ
’ππ
π°π‘ πΌπ⨻


Registered: 09/16/08
Posts: 11,953
|
Re: Matter Vs. Anti-matter [Re: Doc_T]
#14301557 - 04/16/11 02:58 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
lol...
|
Doc_T
Random Dude




Registered: 03/06/09
Posts: 42,395
Loc: Colorado
|
Re: Matter Vs. Anti-matter [Re: teknix]
#14301764 - 04/16/11 03:35 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Thread might be better suited to the Science forum, IMO.
-------------------- You make it all possible. Doesn't it feel good?
|
moi
Stranger


Registered: 02/17/10
Posts: 843
Last seen: 2 years, 8 months
|
Re: Matter Vs. Anti-matter [Re: Doc_T]
#14301922 - 04/16/11 04:15 PM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
btw, 1 gram of antimatter colliding with matter will produce an explosion as strong as 3 hiroshima bombs
|
teknix
πβπ
’ππ
π°π‘ πΌπ⨻


Registered: 09/16/08
Posts: 11,953
|
Re: Matter Vs. Anti-matter [Re: moi]
#14315858 - 04/19/11 06:59 AM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
How much does anti-matter cost per gram?
|
Doc_T
Random Dude




Registered: 03/06/09
Posts: 42,395
Loc: Colorado
|
Re: Matter Vs. Anti-matter [Re: teknix]
#14315865 - 04/19/11 07:04 AM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Won't cost much when we figure out how to do it right. Like aluminum.
-------------------- You make it all possible. Doesn't it feel good?
|
DieCommie

Registered: 12/11/03
Posts: 29,258
|
Re: Matter Vs. Anti-matter [Re: teknix]
#14316123 - 04/19/11 08:45 AM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
We know that Anti-Matter exists, not by actually seeing the nothingness, but by the absence of matter.
Anti-matter isn't nothingness nor is it absence of matter. Its just particles with an opposite charge, thats all.
|
OrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group



Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,414
Loc: Under the C
|
Re: Matter Vs. Anti-matter [Re: Doc_T]
#14316415 - 04/19/11 10:11 AM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Doc_T said: Won't cost much when we figure out how to do it right. Like aluminum.
Not true. The limitation is due to physics and not technology.
--------------------
|
Doc_T
Random Dude




Registered: 03/06/09
Posts: 42,395
Loc: Colorado
|
|
Not (necessarily) true. Physics holds many mysteries we have yet to unlock.
-------------------- You make it all possible. Doesn't it feel good?
|
teknix
πβπ
’ππ
π°π‘ πΌπ⨻


Registered: 09/16/08
Posts: 11,953
|
Re: Matter Vs. Anti-matter [Re: DieCommie]
#14316497 - 04/19/11 10:29 AM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
DieCommie said:
Quote:
We know that Anti-Matter exists, not by actually seeing the nothingness, but by the absence of matter.
Anti-matter isn't nothingness nor is it absence of matter. Its just particles with an opposite charge, thats all.
And you know this for a fact?
|
DieCommie

Registered: 12/11/03
Posts: 29,258
|
Re: Matter Vs. Anti-matter [Re: Doc_T]
#14316504 - 04/19/11 10:31 AM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Doc_T said: Not (necessarily) true. Physics holds many mysteries we have yet to unlock.
By that same token, anti-matter may not even exist then. 
Appealing to possibilities instead of or in spite of plausibilities is an intellectual trap.
|
DieCommie

Registered: 12/11/03
Posts: 29,258
|
Re: Matter Vs. Anti-matter [Re: teknix]
#14316508 - 04/19/11 10:32 AM (12 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
teknix said:
Quote:
DieCommie said:
Quote:
We know that Anti-Matter exists, not by actually seeing the nothingness, but by the absence of matter.
Anti-matter isn't nothingness nor is it absence of matter. Its just particles with an opposite charge, thats all.
And you know this for a fact?
Yes. Antimatter is defined that way. Antimatter was defined first, then it was looked for and found.
|
|