| Home | Community | Message Board |
|
You are not signed in. Sign In New Account | Forum Index Search Posts Trusted Vendors Highlights Galleries FAQ User List Chat Store Random Growery » |
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.
|
| Shop: |
| |||||||
|
Remember be here now Registered: 12/16/10 Posts: 804 Last seen: 5 years, 5 months |
| ||||||
|
Eric: How does God talk and to whom
Cosmo: I talk to all parts of myself in many different ways. Some messages from me are accurate in the sense that they come from a deeper place, But you must remember I am everything. Thus even the serial killer, shouting "You must die!" as he runs after you with a bloody knife is my way of talking to you. I can be both loving and beautiful or crule and ugly. Eric: You need to go over that again. Cosmo: Let's change the word talk with communicate. It is not just in words I communicate. I commuincate in actions, vibrations, music, vision and well you guesssed, "Everything is a communication" It's all about learning how to listen... If you listen to the evil part of me, I might tell you to start a Holocaust, like I did with Hitler. If you listen to the deeper part, you might be driving a hear a beautiful song on the radio dancing in your brain.Or how about feeling? Haven't you gotten feelings about things, some of which were right and others wrong. That is because having a gut feeling is an art and a skill. Eric: But some people say that the bible is the word of God, and when I say that so is the words of a pack of cigarettes or the lyrics to a Beatle's song, they look at me as if I am crazy Cosmo: The cosmic joke of it, is that people pick a "word of God" and stick to it forgetting the other aspect's of God. Eric: Like what? Cosmo: Like for example, everything is God, but within that everything is a deep center that knows all, sees all, and experiences all at once in a state of eternal bliss. Let's call this center Cosmo, it is what you are tuning in right now. Eric: How do I know that I am talking to Cosmo now? Can I give you a test, like what is the salt content of the Pacific Ocean, if you are Cosmo you should know that. Cosmo: I answered you, did you hear me? Eric: NO! Cosmo: That is because of the static... imagine your mind is like a radio tuner, and because of the static you only can make out the melody of the song. Eric: Are there people that hear the song better then others Cosmo: Of course like Buddha, and Jesus and so on. Eric: Well why not just appear before my eyes and remove the static yourself. Cosmo: That is because there are parts of me that are preventing that from happening. Remember I am everything, the beautiful and the cruel. You are experiencing right now, only a glimpse of me... if you view me in whole, you would be me. Eric: Well I pray for you to allow me to BE YOU. I pray so much, for so many years... and still only seeing this glimpse. Cosmo: You bring up a tricky question... Prayer doesn't always get answer, sometimes you get the exact oppossite of what you were praying for. You might be thinking why does prayer work for some people and not others? Eric: That is what I was thinking exactly. How does the system of prayer work. Cosmo: Prayer in the sense of requesting something from Cosmo depends on your personal relationship with Cosmo. And you have to factor in all levels, the level of conceptual thought, the level of collective consciousness, the level of soul and individual. So someone may be praying desperately to have a million dollars but instead gets bankruptsy. That is the cosmic joke... Basically what happens to you is the result of what everything is doing including Cosmo. All of it connected together in manifesting what happens. So prayer is just a part of co-creation. Eric: How do I make my prayers work? Or I am just powerless to what my deeper Self wants? Cosmo: I would recommend first experiencing and communing with Cosmo. Tuning in and experieincing at least a glimpse of the almighty. Then you can have a converation, and work out with Cosmo on an individual level what will happen to you. So it depends on each person, how they "work out" having a decent life on earth. Eric: That reminds me of a time you answered my prayer. Thus grace, protection. I remember going through a difficult panic in college around fear that my life would not be set and actually it could be increible suffering. I was upset that my girlfriend might be pregenant because the condom broke. This waiting to find out about a pregnany triggered my first prayer for protection.. Ever since I was born at 17 in this life on UFO LSD, one tab, spinning in circles, dancing in echoe of sound, brilliant aliveness and light in everything around me, thoughtless merging. I started to remember who I was. And Began the quest for understanding spiritual. Ever since that time, I hadn't had a panic about how my life would turn out. It seemed as if just by knowing the spiritual my life would be alright. The event in question had triggered doubt. So to calm the panic while in college several years later, I sat alone in my dorm, in front of pictures of my many gurus. I focused on repetative sacred old yogic chants in the loop, while my thoughts were for the first time in my life couragously with intense focus and passion and pleading and begging and asking and hoping and praying. Praying for what? I was praying for protection of specifically at the time myself. Not just my survival but in the sense of having a relatively easy enjoyable protected and safe life mainly so I can relax. After hours of this praying, I stopped and felt an urge to go to the school cafeteria. Next thing I remember, I was standing there in that college cafeteria where I majored in consciousness studies. And a friend of mine, that was a follower of the Buddha, without saying a word, handed me a tiny card. The card had three bodhisattvas that were on the card as a symbol for the consciousness of higher beings protecting me specifically. I didn't know this when he handed it to me, I looked at it and it is looked like buddhist art on a tiny card. He said, "This card will protect you for life," Then he laughed. So moved was I that this occured right after the intense praying, that all my anxiety left and I felt that my prayer was answered. And the one said "YES" I remember looking at my buddhist friend and realized that he had no idea about my prayer, and was just doing it as a joke not believing that him handing a card would protect me for life... I feel protected, so what don't people try my method to pray for peace in thier lives. Cosmo: I answered your prayer based on your personal relationship with me. Some people could do exactly as you did, and not get thier prayer answered, because of the different in how they relate to me individual to Cosmo. Eric: How do people relate to you in a way that answers a prayer Cosmo: There is no set formula and it is relative to each situation. Eric: There has to be something that helps in a lot of cases to the readers of this book. Cosmo: All humans are motivated at thier deepest level by two emotions mixed together, fear and love. Love always contains a bit of fear and fear contains a little bit of love. It can be called the Sponcering thought. It is either a thought of more love or more fear, rarely in the middle. Think about the first think you are concerned with when you say, "I love you." Eric: I wonder if I will hear it back. Cosmo: Right, and even if you hear the love, you get worried you will lose the love. Yet if you knew you are, that you are maginificent wholeness of love... you are the center point of God, living out a human body. Eric: Where did I learn about love, because I wasn't spiritual until I took acid at age 17? Cosmo:You usually learn from your parents. The first experience outside the womb is usually resting with your mother holding you. With most parents it's I love you if. There are condition set on that love... but Cosmo's love is unconditional. No matter what you do, I love you... and by developing a personal relationship with that kind of love, it is helpful in answering your prayers. However you have to remember, that Cosmo is only the center point of God, the other parts of Cosmo probably love you conditionally, because they are not fully aware of Cosmo.Fear is the energy that contracts, closes down, runs, hides, and hurts. Love is the energy that expands, opens up, sends out, stays, reveals, shares and heals. Fear wraps us in clothing, Love allows us to stand naked. Eric: Why does there seem to be more fear then Love in the human family? Cosmo: Because of the balance, for every planet full of fear, there is a planet out there with more love. Ultimately all has to balance out for Cosmo to ever create. Here on Earth you have been taught to live in fear. You have been told about the survival of the fittest, capatalism, competition, and revenge. But besides the culuture of fear, we must not forget genetics and chakras and so on. Eric: How do genetics and chakras play a part in all this fear? Cosmo: First of all you are genetically programmed to use fear for survival. The deer feels fear when she sees the Lion and runs. It's hard to just shake off a million years of evolution and just be a totally fearless love. Chakras are energy centers in the body that work with the energy of survival in the base chakra at the bottom of the spine. There there is sexuality, personal power, compassion, divine speech, oneness, and beyond the body. There could be all kinds of blockages in this system with effect the brain, and the brain in turn effects the chakras... It is all these interacting system that creates fear. Eric: What is the purpose of this life you created through evolution? Cosmo: There is only one purpose for all of life and that is for you to become me. This includes with the realization a profound bliss and non-suffering. The eventual goal is for none to suffer. But let's say you realized ME, from that perspective you can see the road ahead. I decribe it a new birth into the reality of non-suffering. Suffering becomes a memory that we never relive. Eric: What about those that say life is a school? Cosmo: You can relate to life as a school and I in turn with treat you as one. But the reality is that there is nothing to learn, we only have to remember. Do you want to here a story, the greatest story ever told. Eric: What about, Jesus? Cosmo: No our story the story of everything. First there was nothhing, then out of nothing birthed the Great Cosmo. It all started in an eternal now, yet time was moving along a linear path in this now. I spent a very long time, just thinking. I had just been born, and all these was is me. I had all these concepts in my head, especially suffering and non-suffering. But I couldn't know about the concepts, they were just thoughts. I had to create a way to live out all the concepts. Another example would be "lonilness," which I couldn't feel until there was the experience of not be lonely. Eric: Let me get this strange, you are just a stew of conscious thoughts after you were born? Cosmo: Yes, then I created all at once in an eternal now. I gave birth to another aspect of myself, a body if you will. Even the big bang was just a tiny tiny little part of my birth. There were a infinite number of universes with all kinds of different laws of physics. When you go to sleep and dream, you are in an astral plane. The birthing process what amazing for me, in one tiny moment, I had lived out all conscious entities and understood myself more (for example after having suffered, the bliss has it oppossite, thus can be very enjoyable. From my perspective the first moment of past, present and future was incredibly fulfilling and in turn addicting. The thrill of say being a starving kid in africa, belly swollen, very sad eyes, to at the moment of death, realizing he is pure bliss consciousness. So summing it up I chose to learn who I am through experience. Are you following so far? Eric: Yes, but if everything occurs in this moment, and it's all over now, why is there still suffering, like my discomfort right now? Ccosmo: Because of my addiction to the process of suffering and then experiencing non-suffering. It's not different then a crack head, every moment I took a hit of everything is all time and space, getting a beautiful rush of knowledge. But after that moment is over, another one appears, and because of the addiction I take another hit, experiencing all time and space at that moment. I keep reliving all the parts over and over and over again. Eric: But why not end all suffering now, it iwll be a memory thus, non-suffering will feel good. Why does this process keep going on? Cosmo: Eventually I will move to the next stage, but I am not ready yet... I can't quit the suffering and nonsuffering process. From my perspective it makes sense, yet from the suffering innocent person in jail, Life is absurd, and this suffering person would gladly end the suffering. Since this suffering person IS God, at least part of God wants suffering to end. Yet it goes on, the whole cycle repeating itself. Eric: This stinks! You are torturing yourself for some stupid transent experience. You are a cruel God, Cosmo... Cosmo: I understand, but a better word might be "fear" Eric: Why fear, why would Cosmo fear anything? Cosmo: I fear ending suffering in all time and space, because it might be boring ane lonely. Some call it the divine discotent. Yet at some point, I promise you, the suffering-nonsuffering cyrcle will end for good. It will remain a memory that allows us to experience the non-suffering (because we know the oppossite) Eric: This all seems absurd and paradoxical yet perfect and balanced. Cosmo: It's funny you said that because you just decribed the cosmic joke which can be cruel yet kind. Eric: I still mad at you, does that mean you will hurt me? Cosmo: No... you are protected remember? Eric: What about science? Science seems to argue againt YOU, and promote random, meaninglessness, and close-mindedness. Why can't you give the scientists a smoking gun that proves you exist. God: I did through quantum mechnics. QUANTUM SCIENCE PROVES ONE CONSCIOUSNESS How? Beginning this section of the rabbit hole, I will speak from the role of Satan, which is a part of the one consciousness that confuses that which can be confused. The one consciousness is all within time and space, and it is beyond time and space, there is no duality, and seperation is an illussion. One of Satan’s most insidious methods is advocating a total materialistic approach that denies and points away from the truth of the one consciousness, through the admittedly brilliant minds in philosophy and science. This approach is pretty much the mainstream view for the “rational thinker” which relies solely on science for answers, although not popular to the general public that for the most part relies on religion for solace. Satan begins to speak. Once upon a time, 13.7 billion years ago, our universe emerged with a big bang from an incredibly hot and dense state. This is not to say we know the origin of the universe, instead it describes the development of the universe over time beginning with this event. There is much evidence for this including the age of stars, abundance of light elements, and large scales structure of the universe. (Feuerbacher 1) For examples the measured velocities of distant galaxies measured over large scales of time are only explained by the theory. (Feuerbacher 4) It also has predictive validity in the area of cosmic microwave background radiation further validating it. (Feuerbacher 20) There is no need to insert a favorite outdated myth of an intelligent designer in this process (regardless of its nature) when the evidence clearly points to there being no consciousness or intelligence at this stage in the Universe. Just like we rational thinkers acknowledge a person having a good set of dice at the crap table, we acknowledge there are anthropic coincidences. Earthly life is very sensitive to the values of several fundamental physical constants. Making the tiniest change in any of these, and life as we know it would not exist. (Stenger 2) Yet this is just a clear random process, thus we do argue against using this data to support that there is some sort of intelligence involved in this process. This conclusion has no place in science and should not even be considered, it is rather in the realm of fairies, unicorns, and the Easter Bunny. It is clear that “at the very outset of the big bang the mass of the elementary particles, the strength of the four forces, and the values of the fundamental constants were very precise.” (Overman 4) I admit that at the time of the Big Bang, it was so precise that the explosive force of the Bang and gravity had to match in a 1 out of 1060 chance, but you religious nuts will take that big number the wrong way and use it to fuel your irrational beliefs. This number comes from the data that if it was any higher it would consist of gas without stars or planets, and if it were too much lower then it would collapse back into a singular point. (Overman 2) This does not surprise us scientists, it is only the intelligent design people that seem to take these things and use them to fuel their moronic preschool agenda. It is clear, the data for this so called “fine tuning” has mounted up; the nuclear forces, the electromagnetic coupling constant, and the entropy level all involve these unlikely coincidences. However in modern science, we have assumed it was a lifeless random process for years, and this data is not powerful enough to change our minds. We own fact, and the fact is we don’t need God to explain things, thus “God is dead” as Nietzsche declared! For all we know, this universe is just one of many, thus there are so many random developing universes, making the characteristics of ours not an unlikely event but an inevitable event. (Stenger 3) Anyway, to continue the story of these random processes, eventually life formed on earth, and eventually the random process of evolution lead to the human being that asks these questions and creates Gods to explain them. Satan stops his speech and laughs madly as some poor souls buy into this great lie. Let’s forget the question of intelligent design and random processes for a bit that Satan is so focused on and is dealt with the mainstream media a bit, and deal with the issue of consciousness. In this realm the demise of material realism will occur beyond any shadow of a doubt, while also making sense of the intelligent design debate. First is the question of what do we mean by consciousness and what needs to be answered about it. This question is divided into two parts by David Chalmers the easy and hard problems. The easy problem is explaining how the various functions occur in human beings, which has been answered for the most part in the in neuroscience’s mapping out of the brain. Thus “explaining discrimination, integration, accessibility, internal monitoring, reportability and so on, all concern the performance of various function” in a way that gives validity to the materialist perspective. The hard question is very profound, why is the performance of this function associated with conscious experience whom is the observer? (Chalmers 2)It is one of the oldest questions human kind has faced. Sure I see, I hear, I taste and all that, but who is the “I” that has these experiences, who am I? "Pursue the inquiry 'Who am I' relentlessly. Analyse your entire personality. Try to find out where the I-thought begins. Go on with your meditations. Keep turning your attention within. One day the wheel of thought will slow down and an intuition will mysteriarise. Follow that intuition, let your thinking stop, and it will lead eventually to the goal. - Sri Ramana Maharishi There are two basic answers to these questions from the perspective of materialism. The type A answer is that there is no hard problem, and that in explaining the various function the question of consciousness have been resolved. On the other hand, the type B answer admits that there is this hard problem, but the framework of materialism will answer it completely with more research into the brain and other sciences. (Chalmers 3) Both these arguments holds no weight, for as Amit Goswami writes “Almost a century ago, a series of experimental discoveries was made in physics that called for a change in our world view.” It is through his analysis of these experiments and the science of quantum mechanics, that we must abandon the materialistic view. Science must admit that it has actually found the answer to the hard question, in a way that promotes mystical truth as fact and solves the question of intelligent design. (24) I feel at this point I should acknowledge that other data backs up this revealed truth including controversial paranormal and parapsychological experiments. However in this paper we will focus specifically on how quantum mechanics answers the hard question and how a purely channel 1 materialistic approach to this science is impossible. Keep in mind that it is not the experiment’s validity that is argued against by materialists, it is the interpretation of the experiments. One of the first fatal blows to materialism comes with the double slit experiment. Scientist have arranged in numerous experiments that “a beam of electrons passes through a screen that has two narrow slits in it.” Without an observer the beam splits into two sets of waves, the waves interfere creating a clear result on the screen that is called an “interference pattern.” (Goswami 66) This shows that electrons, the smallest bits of matter, behave like waves. This is true, even when electrons are shot one by one, ruling out an explanation that the particles some how bounce off each other. (Talbot 20) A question proposed about this is, “can a single electron split, pass through both slits, and interfere with itself?” The answer is yes, undoubtedly it can, not only mathematically verified but also verified through this experiment and others. Such things really baffled scientists when they first ran across this data, it was too mysterious and strange for the world of physics. These waves can never be predicted totally accurately because they exist in probabilities. These probability waves have strange implications but it is not yet that dangerous to the materialist’s view point, just confusing. (Goswami 69) With this confusion in mind the experiment is changed, now an observer is added, by focusing “a flashlight on a slit to see which hole the electron is really passing through.” When this conscious observer is added, “the interference pattern has disappeared.” The electrons no longer act like probability waves, but particles. Thus they collapse upon our observation, throwing consciousness into the mix. This doesn’t fit into the materialist viewpoint, and begins its demise (Goswami 69) Heisenberg, a pioneer in quantum mechanics, explains that before the observation, the electrons exist in potentia. Yet everything in the world of materialism must exist in space and time. There is nothing but matter, so these electrons must be somewhere when not observed. (Goswami 59) Goswami argues, “Since the electron’s wave collapses immediately upon our observation, potentia cannot be in the domain of space-time.” The experiment only makes sense if potentia exists outside of space-time, in a transcendent realm of possibilities. (Goswami 59) These possibilities are finally observed after passing through the slits in the interference pattern thus it appears to be existing in a material realm, but we are just observing the material evidence of this beyond time-space realm of possibilities that exists when there is no observer to collapse on the screen. This proves that conscious observers create the universe through observation, collapsing possibilities into time-space. Yet this leaves a whole bunch of questions; did an intelligence set up the possibilities, what conscious observer can collapse, how does this process work, how is it beyond time if it is occurring in time and what about Nonlocality? To conclude that there is only one consciousness and understand at least some of its nature, we must look into two more experiments. From the last experiment, it is clear that consciousness collapses objects into space/time, exploring into this further we see that it is nonlocal, a consciousness clearly beyond space, that is one with all of space through its nonlocality that collapses itself. The revolutionary experiment known as Aspects’ experiment done by Alan Aspect, “used polarization-correlated photons that emerged in opposite directions from a source of calcium atoms,” and “a detector was setup on the path of each beam of photons.” What makes this experiment undeniable is a switch that “changed the polarization settings of one of the detectors ever ten-billionth of a second.” This time frame is shorter then the speed of light or other local signals between the detector locations, to thus rule out locality. Despite materialism not allowing this, the switch always changed the outcome in the measurement in the other location, proving this Nonlocal communication. (Goswami 120) Due to this experiment, materialists begrudgingly admit the quantum collapse must be nonlocal while still clinging to materialism as if it were holy writ that could never be questioned or one would be burned at the scientific stake of losing credibility, respect and perhaps even funding. Einstein (even though he gave lip-service to God) and other physicists feel there is incompleteness in quantum mechanics because of this, and eventually there will be a materialist answer that resolves these problems. Despite the reluctance of most scientists to jump on the consciousness bandwagon of oneness, some have been willing to sound like mystics concluding that this Nonlocality is an “essential aspect of the collapse of the wave function,” and thus consciousness is beyond space, all of space, shown by the collapse of the photon at a distance that forces it to take a certain polarization that works for both detector locations. (Goswami 121) Yet what about the issue of time, consciousness is beyond space thus shared throughout all of space as a ground of Being but the question remains, where is it in time? The question of time is dealt with well in quantum mechanics in the delayed choice experiment. This experiment was designed by John Wheeler, so that an apparatus in which, “a beam of light is split into two beams, each of equal intensity—one reflected and one transmitted—by using a half-silvered mirror.” As the mirror splits the beam, each photon can possibility travel to two paths, which in the unobserved aspect acts as a wave which results in a cancellation due to an interference pattern discussed in the double-slit experiment. If a second mirror is taken away, in which the decision and observation is made, the wave is collapsed into a particle and thus hits on one or another path in which a counter ticks. Dealing with the question of time, the experimenter decides at the very last moment, whether or not to measure the wave or particle aspect, through the observation which is intimately connected to the removal or non-removal of the second mirror. (Goswami 73) However, the photons in time have already traveled past the point of splitting, if you view time in a linear way. Yet the photon always conforms to the decision with knowledge of the experimenter’s choice, clear intelligence in the basic building blocks on the universe. The choice happened in the future and it effected the past, showing that essentially consciousness and the decisions of collapse being played out through conscious observers within time and space, essentially occurs in a beyond time realm that is also beyond space as proven in aspect’s experiment. (Goswami 75) This leads one inescapable conclusion of the “here and now” where past, present and future blend into an eternal moment where only one consciousness exists, God. This eternal Being enters into space/time through conscious observers collapsing possibilities of itself into the experience of the material illussion with the illussion of a percieved seperation that does not exist. It is no wonder that the pioneers of quantum mechanics, even though they wouldn’t go as far as Goswami in their conclusions, began to explore mysticism and idealist philosophy to explain what they had uncovered. “Pauli examined psychoanalysis and archetypes and the Quabbalah; Bohr, the Tao and Chinese Philosophy, Schrödinger, Hindu philosophy; and Heisenberg, the Platonic theory of Ancient Greece.” (McTaggart XVI). This one consciousness transcendent intelligence apparent in how it sets up its own possibilities, how electrons act, as well how it collapses them, brings together both the fine-tuning and quantum mechanics argument for God into an understanding beyond any doubt that shatters the belief in materialism into nothing but a deluded group psychosis. Captain Quantum says, "Do not fear, quantum mechanics unites the religions, especially the mystical elements, and the sciences, letting them work hand and hand rather then fight each other. The universal mystical experience of an underlying unity found in numerous traditions has now been proven with the one consciousness, and you mystics have science backing up the awareness you experience HERE AND NOW... go quantum!" Please note: although no board code and smiley buttons are shown, they are still usable. -------------------- http://www.youtube.com/user/Cosm Check out my channel and if you want to explore further into my point of view, my website is linked on some of my videos depending on which one you watch... The channel is called "THE COSMIC JOKE (ONENESS)
| |||||||
|
Registered: 07/25/10 Posts: 16,627 Loc: Richmond, VA |
| ||||||
|
Just kidding...but seriously..how the fuck did you remember all that, and what were you on? I could not read all of that, in case you told what you were on in the story.
| |||||||
|
Remember be here now Registered: 12/16/10 Posts: 804 Last seen: 5 years, 5 months |
| ||||||
|
Just some herb, I always have this inner divine voice that talks to me now and again... I also had experience with the psychotic inner voices too... and this voice helped me ignore and quiet them, and get out of the situation I was in at the time... now I never hear the bad voices, but of course I still struggle with my ego, and I am far from enlightened
-------------------- http://www.youtube.com/user/Cosm Check out my channel and if you want to explore further into my point of view, my website is linked on some of my videos depending on which one you watch... The channel is called "THE COSMIC JOKE (ONENESS)
| |||||||
|
bad motherfucker Registered: 08/14/10 Posts: 2,782 Loc: back in black Last seen: 2 years, 9 months |
| ||||||
|
Be careful with entities bro. They can be tricksters lol.
-------------------- Please allow me to introduce myself, I'm a man of wealth, and taste...
| |||||||
|
wild wallflower Registered: 05/19/10 Posts: 554 Loc: sinking into the center Last seen: 8 months, 18 days |
| ||||||
|
Posting so I can read the rest of this later. Thank you for sharing it.
| |||||||
| |||||||
| Shop: |
|
| Similar Threads | Poster | Views | Replies | Last post | ||
![]() |
Ram Dass (spiritual teacher) merges with Amti Goswami (PhD physicist) | 1,291 | 14 | 07/31/11 09:32 PM by Cosmicjoker | ||
![]() |
Amazing feature documentary on consciousnes shift, beyond 2012! ( |
2,385 | 21 | 08/25/11 12:15 PM by Seanfu | ||
![]() |
A symbolic presentation of the evidence that Science proved GOD | 839 | 6 | 03/14/13 09:39 AM by Cosmicjoker | ||
![]() |
Salvia Divinorum & Astral Projection | 2,946 | 19 | 06/20/16 06:55 PM by Roli | ||
![]() |
Recommended reading? ( |
6,974 | 43 | 06/12/10 11:03 PM by blewmeanie | ||
![]() |
Introspective spiritual science | 935 | 0 | 04/23/11 09:30 AM by Cosmicjoker | ||
![]() |
What does quantum physics tell us about the existence of God? | 396 | 2 | 07/03/13 01:39 AM by Aedan | ||
![]() |
A contradiction in Hinduism ( |
1,364 | 25 | 01/20/17 05:19 PM by DividedQuantum |
| Extra information | ||
| You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled Moderator: Middleman, Shroomism, Rose, Kickle, yogabunny, DividedQuantum 1,480 topic views. 1 members, 7 guests and 2 web crawlers are browsing this forum. [ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ] | ||



