Home | Community | Message Board

Kratom Eye
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck   Left Coast Kratom Buy Kratom Extract   Myyco.com APE Liquid Culture For Sale   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds

Jump to first unread post Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next >  [ show all ]
Offlinecircastes
Big Questions Small Head
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/14/10
Posts: 8,781
Loc: straya Flag
Last seen: 7 years, 9 months
Re: evolutionists [Re: Poid]
    #14042934 - 02/28/11 03:27 PM (13 years, 4 days ago)

Quote:

Poid said:
Quote:

circastes said:
I think evolution is just a small slice of the story of what's happened to get us to the present moment.


Why do you think that?


Quote:

circastes said:
There's a greater theory we need to find that includes consciousness as primary and purposeful.


There is? What kind of evidence backs up the assertion that consciousness is "primary and purposeful"? What do you even mean by that?


Quote:

circastes said:
Consciousness wanted to play a game.


How do you know that? What kind of game? How are you defining 'consciousness' here?


Quote:

circastes said:
Seems to me science in this vein just loves to put everything down...


Why does it seem that way to you?


Quote:

circastes said:
...so we can all have an excuse to be bastards to eachother, or just satisfy our intellectual pompousity.


What does evolutionary theory have to do with people being bastards to each other? Why do you think evolutionary theory has to do with people wanting to satisfy their intellectual "pompousity"?





Well more than mere biological collisions have taken place. Intelligence is at work here.

Because I've experienced consciousness first-hand defining and redefining this world. Primary in that it is another universal constant or force, like say the strong/weak nuclear and gravity, and is just as evident - but it is not physical. Purposeful in that it has created order and also seeks purpose at least in humans, suggesting it has a goal.

I can't see anything else happening when consciousness is one in all things. I am defining consciousness here as an all-pervading singular (and never in plural) awareness which can manifest things like 'matter' or 'waves' as per its imagination.


I might be going after a straw man, but evolutionary science especially doesn't want a mystical, magical, interesting or livable world. It wants to put everything in a box with as little labeling and information as possible. It seems it's trying to match our stupid lives with its vocubulary.

Well if the world is just inert matter creating things by accident and this is all a kind of mistake, then why not just blow the shit out of eachother for money and oil?

Or, we want to just dominate this world will our intellect and since a world with any wonder or interest in it would make that a tougher enterprise, so it's all cut out before it can begin, just take how demonised something that's pretty much a sacred experience like mushrooms, is. It's all insanely cut down to brain chemicals in their view, completely missing the point but giving this trend a chance to continue so we can at least pretend to have the answers.

As it is, we don't know squat.


--------------------
My solitude...
My shield...
My armour...

TESTED
WITH
FULL
FORCE

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleIcelander
The Minstrel in the Gallery
Male


Registered: 03/15/05
Posts: 95,368
Loc: underbelly
Re: evolutionists [Re: circastes]
    #14044516 - 02/28/11 07:14 PM (13 years, 4 days ago)

but evolutionary science especially doesn't want a mystical, magical, interesting or livable world.

How did you come by that notion?:lol:

As it is, we don't know squat.

Then don't be too sure of your theories on consciousness.


--------------------
"Don't believe everything you think". -Anom.

" All that lives was born to die"-Anom.

With much wisdom comes much sorrow,
The more knowledge, the more grief.
Ecclesiastes circa 350 BC

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineYgor
Cyberite Sybarite
Male

Registered: 03/01/11 Happy 13th Shroomiversary!
Posts: 57
Last seen: 12 years, 9 months
Re: evolutionists [Re: circastes]
    #14047794 - 03/01/11 10:27 AM (13 years, 4 days ago)

Quote:

circastes said:
Because I've experienced consciousness first-hand defining and redefining this world. Primary in that it is another universal constant or force, like say the strong/weak nuclear and gravity, and is just as evident - but it is not physical. Purposeful in that it has created order and also seeks purpose at least in humans, suggesting it has a goal.




If this force is not physical, then how does it interact with the physical world? If it does interact with the physical world, then in what measurable way does it do this?


Quote:

circastes said:
I can't see anything else happening when consciousness is one in all things. I am defining consciousness here as an all-pervading singular (and never in plural) awareness which can manifest things like 'matter' or 'waves' as per its imagination.





You can define consciousness like that if you want, but I'm not sure what it adds to the discussion. Either you have a physical world made of matter and waves, mass and energy; or you have a "consciousness" which imagines a physical world made of matter and waves, mass and energy. Occam's razor would suggest the former option.

Quote:

circastes said:
I might be going after a straw man, but evolutionary science especially doesn't want a mystical, magical, interesting or livable world. It wants to put everything in a box with as little labeling and information as possible. It seems it's trying to match our stupid lives with its vocubulary.

Well if the world is just inert matter creating things by accident and this is all a kind of mistake, then why not just blow the shit out of eachother for money and oil?





Well, because we evolved to be altruistic. Some of us, at least.


Quote:

circastes said:
As it is, we don't know squat.




We know a huge amount of things. The ridiculous level of understanding that we have, the huge amount of detail and control that we have over the world is made manifest in front of you now, in your computer.


--------------------
Flowers gathered in the morning,
Afternoon they blossom on.
Still are withered by the evening,
You can be me when I'm gone.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblewondercat
Dashing


Registered: 07/25/10
Posts: 476
Loc: Flag
Re: evolutionists [Re: Ygor]
    #14061983 - 03/03/11 06:33 PM (13 years, 1 day ago)

i agree with circastes, evolution is just boxing us in a world of social darwinism. perhaps there's truths to it, like adaptation, but for the most part, its trying to make the system of life objective.

i forget who's sig it is, but it says something along the lines of 'we are all experiencing a single consiousness subjectively' and i agree.

personally i think evolutions trying to falsely simplify too much, and deny the part of us that is alien. yes, i believe we are partly descendents of aliens. look at a picture of a chimp skull and ours, and try to tell me that the our angles and proportions would have really evolved from that.

I also think that we don't know anything, except how to manipulate systems in systems, relatively. Evolution is usually supported by those who value knowledge over wisdom, if you know what i mean. i consider myself stupid, but at least i have the happiness of believing in mystical, magic, wonderous magnificence that cannot be explained by a theory, even though there are is recognizable scheme to most of these things, which could be called synchronicity.

science is useful in its relativity, but evolution if just a collective lie with some convincing 'evidence' that we can use it as the perfect excuse to propel ourselves in the rat race and destroy our ethics. what happened to brotherhood and helping one another?

mushrooms definately helped me tear down some socially acceptable walls, and now i realize how harmful they were and how unhappy they made me. those walls held me back from marveling as much as i do now.

so many people now are so bent on phycicality, and tangible evidence, and material fact, they don't see how that is all interconnected with the world of the spirituality, even if that part appears invisible at times, maybe we just have to start looking at things in a different way.

if we look at everything as infinite, alot of big questions get answers, or they just become futile.








did what i just wrote make any sense or did i spiral off in weird tangents? ahahaha.


--------------------


it truly is an illusion- your senses are just perceiving the varying vibrations in different ways- its holography; a representation.

"Nothing" is easy - Mooji

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDieCommie

Registered: 12/11/03
Posts: 29,258
Re: evolutionists [Re: wondercat]
    #14062908 - 03/03/11 08:48 PM (13 years, 1 day ago)

Quote:

look at a picture of a chimp skull and ours, and try to tell me that the our angles and proportions would have really evolved from that.




If you are gonna claim that, then step back and look at the big picture.  The theory of evolution by natural selection does not only claim that chimps and us have a common ancestor - we have a common ancestor with cows, dogs, pigs, whales and even birds and reptiles.  Its also very likely that we have a common ancestor with plants and fungi.  The biochemical evidence that all/most earth life shares a common ancestor is staggering.  If there is to be any claim of alien influence it must be reconciled with that.  That puts the hypothesized alien influence all the way back to the beginning billions of years ago, as the first form of life on earth.  There is speculation and research going on with respect to the idea that life started on earth by being transported here from a meteorite.

Angles and proportions are nothing, we evolved from single celled organisms billions of years ago.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblemushiepussy
 User Gallery
Registered: 02/06/11
Posts: 1,198
Loc: Flag
Re: evolutionists [Re: DieCommie]
    #14063184 - 03/03/11 09:32 PM (13 years, 1 day ago)

personally i think evolutions trying to falsely simplify too much, and deny the part of us that is alien. yes, i believe we are partly descendents of aliens. look at a picture of a chimp skull and ours, and try to tell me that the our angles and proportions would have really evolved from that.

:lol: which part of us is alien exactly?

How can you think evolution simplifies things when you don't even
understand it? It complicates things compared to anyway else you
look at it. The principal of natural selection is simple, but it's
process and implications are complex and profound.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblemushiepussy
 User Gallery
Registered: 02/06/11
Posts: 1,198
Loc: Flag
Re: evolutionists [Re: mushiepussy]
    #14063213 - 03/03/11 09:36 PM (13 years, 1 day ago)

those who value knowledge over wisdom, if you know what i mean.

wtf do you mean?

i consider myself stupid

thanks for saving me the trouble

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblejohnm214
Male User Gallery
Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 05/31/07
Posts: 17,582
Loc: Americas
Re: evolutionists [Re: DieCommie]
    #14063240 - 03/03/11 09:41 PM (13 years, 1 day ago)

Quote:

DieCommie said:
Quote:

look at a picture of a chimp skull and ours, and try to tell me that the our angles and proportions would have really evolved from that.




If you are gonna claim that, then step back and look at the big picture.  The theory of evolution by natural selection does not only claim that chimps and us have a common ancestor - we have a common ancestor with cows, dogs, pigs, whales and even birds and reptiles.  Its also very likely that we have a common ancestor with plants and fungi.  The biochemical evidence that all/most earth life shares a common ancestor is staggering.  If there is to be any claim of alien influence it must be reconciled with that.  That puts the hypothesized alien influence all the way back to the beginning billions of years ago, as the first form of life on earth.  There is speculation and research going on with respect to the idea that life started on earth by being transported here from a meteorite.

Angles and proportions are nothing, we evolved from single celled organisms billions of years ago.





Hmmm, appeal to incredulity vs accepted scientific knowledge....


This one's a tough call, I'm gonna have to think on it.

(btw, yeah, the allegation that we evolved from a chimp is flat wrong as diecommie mentions.  This seems yet another case of anti-evolution believers arguing against incorrect theory.  )

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblewondercat
Dashing


Registered: 07/25/10
Posts: 476
Loc: Flag
Re: evolutionists [Re: johnm214]
    #14063385 - 03/03/11 10:03 PM (13 years, 1 day ago)

lloyd pye. i know most people don't, but i agree with his logic.


--------------------


it truly is an illusion- your senses are just perceiving the varying vibrations in different ways- its holography; a representation.

"Nothing" is easy - Mooji

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisiblePoid
Shroomery's #1 Spellir
Male User Gallery


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 02/04/08
Posts: 40,372
Loc: SF Bay Area Flag
Re: evolutionists [Re: circastes]
    #14064341 - 03/04/11 01:35 AM (13 years, 1 day ago)

Quote:

circastes said:
Well more than mere biological collisions have taken place. Intelligence is at work here.


What the hell is that supposed to mean?


Quote:

circastes said:
Because I've experienced consciousness first-hand defining and redefining this world.


What exactly do you mean by this, and what do you think it proves?


Quote:

circastes said:
Primary in that it is another universal constant or force, like say the strong/weak nuclear and gravity...


How do you figure that consciousness is universal?


Quote:

circastes said:
...and is just as evident - but it is not physical.


You're saying that consciousness is just as evident is the weak/strong nuclear forces? How do you figure? Do you have any proof that it's not phsycal?


Quote:

circastes said:
Purposeful in that it has created order and also seeks purpose at least in humans, suggesting it has a goal.


In what way are you saying has consciousness created order? Why would you think that it has a goal? :undecided:


Quote:

circastes said:
I can't see anything else happening when consciousness is one in all things. I am defining consciousness here as an all-pervading singular (and never in plural) awareness which can manifest things like 'matter' or 'waves' as per its imagination.


That is a fucking retarded definition of consciousness. :lol:


Quote:

circastes said:
I might be going after a straw man, but evolutionary science especially doesn't want a mystical, magical, interesting or livable world. It wants to put everything in a box with as little labeling and information as possible. It seems it's trying to match our stupid lives with its vocubulary.


Science doesn't want anything, science is just a sophisticated method of discovering phenomenon.

Why do you say "our stupid lives"? :rofl:


Quote:

circastes said:
Well if the world is just inert matter creating things by accident and this is all a kind of mistake, then why not just blow the shit out of eachother for money and oil?


:wtf::cuckoo:


Quote:

circastes said:
Or, we want to just dominate this world will our intellect and since a world with any wonder or interest in it would make that a tougher enterprise, so it's all cut out before it can begin, just take how demonised something that's pretty much a sacred experience like mushrooms, is. It's all insanely cut down to brain chemicals in their view, completely missing the point but giving this trend a chance to continue so we can at least pretend to have the answers.


What do you mean by "missing the point"? Who decides what "the point" of experiencing mushrooms is?


Quote:

circastes said:
As it is, we don't know squat.


As it is, science has brought us shit like cars, computers, lasers, and GPS, so it turns out that we actually do know a shitload of stuff. :shrug:


--------------------
Well I try my best to be just like I am, but everybody wants you to be just like them. --  Bob Dylan
fireworks_god said:
It's one thing to simply enjoy a style of life that one enjoys, but it's another thing altogether to refer to another person's choice as "wrong" or to rationalize their behavior as being pathological or resulting from some sort of inadequacy or failing so as to create a sense of superiority or separation as yet another projection of a personal fear or control issue.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblemushiepussy
 User Gallery
Registered: 02/06/11
Posts: 1,198
Loc: Flag
Re: evolutionists [Re: Poid]
    #14065730 - 03/04/11 11:08 AM (13 years, 1 day ago)

We didn't evolve from monkeys, but we evolved from the same thing
they evolved from. So we are closely related, more so to apes.


it has created order and also seeks purpose at least in humans, suggesting it has a goal.

Your personifying nature. Nature doesn't work like the mind, it
is thoughtless and it certainly doesn't have any goals. The universe
is more of a machine than anything else, a continuous cycle of births
and deaths. People, stars, galaxys, even the universe itself, all are
finite in time and when their time is up they are recycled(thanks to
the laws of physics)to create a new life form, star, galaxy, or universe.

No supernatural guidance necassary, no purpose necassary.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisiblePoid
Shroomery's #1 Spellir
Male User Gallery


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 02/04/08
Posts: 40,372
Loc: SF Bay Area Flag
Re: evolutionists [Re: mushiepussy] * 1
    #14066160 - 03/04/11 12:48 PM (13 years, 1 day ago)

Quote:

mushiepussy said:
We didn't evolve from monkeys, but we evolved from the same thing
they evolved from. So we are closely related, more so to apes.


We are apes...:monkeydance:


--------------------
Well I try my best to be just like I am, but everybody wants you to be just like them. --  Bob Dylan
fireworks_god said:
It's one thing to simply enjoy a style of life that one enjoys, but it's another thing altogether to refer to another person's choice as "wrong" or to rationalize their behavior as being pathological or resulting from some sort of inadequacy or failing so as to create a sense of superiority or separation as yet another projection of a personal fear or control issue.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblemushiepussy
 User Gallery
Registered: 02/06/11
Posts: 1,198
Loc: Flag
Re: evolutionists [Re: Poid]
    #14069471 - 03/05/11 02:22 AM (13 years, 10 hours ago)

speak for yourself pimp

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisiblePoid
Shroomery's #1 Spellir
Male User Gallery


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 02/04/08
Posts: 40,372
Loc: SF Bay Area Flag
Re: evolutionists [Re: mushiepussy]
    #14069476 - 03/05/11 02:24 AM (13 years, 10 hours ago)

Hell nah, I'm humanity's spokesman. :stoned:


--------------------
Well I try my best to be just like I am, but everybody wants you to be just like them. --  Bob Dylan
fireworks_god said:
It's one thing to simply enjoy a style of life that one enjoys, but it's another thing altogether to refer to another person's choice as "wrong" or to rationalize their behavior as being pathological or resulting from some sort of inadequacy or failing so as to create a sense of superiority or separation as yet another projection of a personal fear or control issue.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinejunkyardgod
A psychedelic mess.
Male

Registered: 08/12/08
Posts: 443
Last seen: 2 years, 2 days
Re: evolutionists [Re: Poid]
    #14069878 - 03/05/11 07:55 AM (13 years, 4 hours ago)

Why didn't "abstract thought" stop when it was clear that humans could survive in nature? My guess is that socialization caused competition - so even when the elements were defeated we still had each other to best. That sort of explains our need to "destroy" one another. We became our own enemies.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisiblePoid
Shroomery's #1 Spellir
Male User Gallery


Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 02/04/08
Posts: 40,372
Loc: SF Bay Area Flag
Re: evolutionists [Re: junkyardgod]
    #14069968 - 03/05/11 08:33 AM (13 years, 4 hours ago)

Quote:

junkyardgod said:
Why didn't "abstract thought" stop when it was clear that humans could survive in nature?


What do you mean? Abstract thought is what assisted us in surviving in nature, without that ability our relatively defenseless, fragile bodies would just be easy prey.


Quote:

junkyardgod said:
My guess is that socialization caused competition...


All creatures compete against others, either directly or indirectly..it's pretty doubtful that socialization caused competition, there would be competition of some sort amongst us even if we weren't social.


Quote:

junkyardgod said:
...so even when the elements were defeated we still had each other to best. That sort of explains our need to "destroy" one another. We became our own enemies.


What "need to "destroy" each other"? :undecided:


--------------------
Well I try my best to be just like I am, but everybody wants you to be just like them. --  Bob Dylan
fireworks_god said:
It's one thing to simply enjoy a style of life that one enjoys, but it's another thing altogether to refer to another person's choice as "wrong" or to rationalize their behavior as being pathological or resulting from some sort of inadequacy or failing so as to create a sense of superiority or separation as yet another projection of a personal fear or control issue.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinejunkyardgod
A psychedelic mess.
Male

Registered: 08/12/08
Posts: 443
Last seen: 2 years, 2 days
Re: evolutionists [Re: Poid]
    #14070043 - 03/05/11 09:13 AM (13 years, 3 hours ago)

Quote:

Poid said:
Quote:

junkyardgod said:
Why didn't "abstract thought" stop when it was clear that humans could survive in nature?


What do you mean? Abstract thought is what assisted us in surviving in nature, without that ability our relatively defenseless, fragile bodies would just be easy prey.


Quote:

junkyardgod said:
My guess is that socialization caused competition...


All creatures compete against others, either directly or indirectly..it's pretty doubtful that socialization caused competition, there would be competition of some sort amongst us even if we weren't social.


Quote:

junkyardgod said:
...so even when the elements were defeated we still had each other to best. That sort of explains our need to "destroy" one another. We became our own enemies.


What "need to "destroy" each other"? :undecided:




It did more than simply assist us - that's not the question. What I'm asking is why our thought process didn't stop evolving at a certain point? What drove humanity forward? At some point I think nature on Earth stopped being our 'primary threat' and our own ideas took its place. You can hardly call Humans vs. Other Creatures a competition anymore. On a basic level, sure, they still compete for their survival. But we control or have the means to control every available resource on the planet. Their survival is as much under our control as our own. By our "need to destroy" I mean humanity seems to have an underlying drive to be better itself at the expense of its surroundings. Our need to expand doesn't REQUIRE us to destroy but we do it anyway out of convenience. We're aware of the consequences of our actions yet we choose to destroy things anyway. What gives, humanity? At what point exactly did we evolve into heartless parasites?

Note that the next smartest animals alive are highly social beings - whales, dolphins, apes, elephants. Social beings have more interaction and therefore a greater need for competition to prove they're the 'fittest to survive'/'possess the best genes for reproduction'. Humanity is way beyond this point, but I think that's the key - the idea to stick together.

Edited by junkyardgod (03/05/11 09:30 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDieCommie

Registered: 12/11/03
Posts: 29,258
Re: evolutionists [Re: junkyardgod]
    #14070087 - 03/05/11 09:34 AM (13 years, 3 hours ago)

Quote:

At what point exactly did we evolve into heartless parasites?




We have always been this way, just like each and every species on the planet.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinejunkyardgod
A psychedelic mess.
Male

Registered: 08/12/08
Posts: 443
Last seen: 2 years, 2 days
Re: evolutionists [Re: DieCommie]
    #14070116 - 03/05/11 09:49 AM (13 years, 3 hours ago)

Quote:

DieCommie said:
Quote:

At what point exactly did we evolve into heartless parasites?




We have always been this way, just like each and every species on the planet.




What balances us out though? Certainly not any creature currently alive, certainly not our Earthly elements! Is global warming a valid elemental threat, or is it caused by ourselves? Universal elements are the main threat now and all of our eggs are in one basket. Mankind recognizes this and so we continue to exploit our resources to bring us nearer to the goal of galactic expansion aka survival on a Universal scale, not just on Earth.

If another species were to exploit its resources, the next year there would be less food and thus more deaths. No other animal has managed to achieve independence from the cycle of life like humanity has.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleDieCommie

Registered: 12/11/03
Posts: 29,258
Re: evolutionists [Re: junkyardgod]
    #14070130 - 03/05/11 09:55 AM (13 years, 2 hours ago)

Humanity has in absolutely no way achieved independence from the cycle of life. 

I dont know what you are getting at... Every species grows in population until it reaches the current environment's carrying capacity.  When the environment changes, carrying capacities change and populations grow/shrink.  Humans have done well with the end of the ice age, and have been growing for a few thousand yeas.  When we reach our carrying capacity, our population will stabilize.  This is predicted to happen in only a couple hundred more years, barring any other significant change to the environment.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: < Back | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next >  [ show all ]

Shop: MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck   Left Coast Kratom Buy Kratom Extract   Myyco.com APE Liquid Culture For Sale   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* For Evolutionists?
( 1 2 3 all )
gettinjiggywithit 3,314 53 04/16/05 02:51 AM
by Ganesh2005
* Are humanists the new Flat Earth Society? Conservationist 964 15 03/15/09 07:24 AM
by Omegachrist
* Humanist Ideals and Determinism XUL 180 0 10/02/13 12:31 AM
by XUL
* Challenge for Evolutionists
( 1 2 all )
Anonymous 3,779 32 12/01/02 12:27 AM
by johnnyfive
* Entropy, (dis)Order, and Abstraction
( 1 2 all )
trendalM 3,390 23 09/09/16 11:56 PM
by BrendanFlock
* Abstract Concepts
( 1 2 3 all )
Freedom 3,083 40 05/27/10 01:20 AM
by Lakefingers
* The Abstract Machine
( 1 2 3 all )
seeker 3,265 49 02/27/06 10:39 AM
by BlueCoyote
* Reality as a set of abstractions
( 1 2 all )
trendalM 2,999 33 04/06/04 10:00 AM
by Viaggio

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
1,771 topic views. 6 members, 14 guests and 8 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.029 seconds spending 0.005 seconds on 14 queries.