|
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
|
caphillkid
Coquus Boleti

Registered: 10/09/08
Posts: 4,666
Loc: Jet City
|
Inski
#13979583 - 02/17/11 03:57 PM (12 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
Curious as to what if anything you have discovered regarding the two species P. subaeruginosa and P. "cyanofriscosa" and if they are synonymous. Thank you.
|
sum0


Registered: 06/04/10
Posts: 733
Loc: New Zealand
Last seen: 1 year, 7 months
|
|
I too am very curious as to anything Inski has to say, in other words, i have nothing to add.
|
inski
Cortinariologist



Registered: 02/28/06
Posts: 5,720
|
|
As far as I can tell the macroscopic and microscopic characteristics are a match, we'll have to wait to compare the DNA sequences to get any further though!
|
BlimeyGrimey
Collector of Spores




Registered: 08/24/05
Posts: 3,788
Loc: Puget Sound
|
Re: Inski [Re: inski] 1
#13985119 - 02/18/11 02:39 PM (12 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
When I picked my first fricosas, I was told they were Ps. subaeruginosa by a few friends.
Quote:
BlimeyGrimey said: I showed those mushrooms to a friend and they said they looked like Ps. subaeruginosa. When I told them where they had been picked he then said they were probably cyanofibrillosa.
Alan, do you have a description of Ps. subaeruginosa to compare those cyanofib spores to?
Quote:
Alan Rockefeller said: > Alan, do you have a description of Ps. subaeruginosa to compare those cyanofib spores to?
P. cyanescens spores are 9-12 x 5 - 8, elongate-ellipsoid while P. subaeruginosa has spores that are 13-15 x 6.6 - 7.6 microns and have a subellipsoid shape.
Just based on the spores it looks like a good match for P. subaeruginosa, they are slightly larger and differently shaped than the P. cyanescens spores. It would be interesting to see what the pleurocystidia and cheilocystidia look like.
From this thread.
If they are Ps. subaeruginosa, I'd still think they were a valid variety as they do have some noticeable morphological differences.
-------------------- Message me for free microscopy services on Psilocybe, Panaeolus, and Gymnopilus species. Looking for wild Panaeolus cinctulus and Panaeolus olivaceus prints.
|
caphillkid
Coquus Boleti

Registered: 10/09/08
Posts: 4,666
Loc: Jet City
|
Re: Inski [Re: inski]
#13985257 - 02/18/11 03:08 PM (12 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
inski said: As far as I can tell the macroscopic and microscopic characteristics are a match, we'll have to wait to compare the DNA sequences to get any further though!
Thanks for the reply. I have been out of the loop and wanted to make sure I hadn't missed any developments. This is interesting stuff!
|
psylosymonreturns
aka Gym Sporrison



Registered: 10/16/09
Posts: 13,948
Loc: Mos Eisley,
Last seen: 3 years, 5 months
|
|
Quote:
caphillkid said:
Quote:
inski said: As far as I can tell the macroscopic and microscopic characteristics are a match, we'll have to wait to compare the DNA sequences to get any further though!
Thanks for the reply. I have been out of the loop and wanted to make sure I hadn't missed any developments. This is interesting stuff!
hells ya.
--------------------
|
|
|
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: ToxicMan, inski, Alan Rockefeller, Duggstar, TimmiT, Anglerfish, Tmethyl, Lucis, Doc9151, Land Trout 1,087 topic views. 1 members, 28 guests and 12 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ] |
|