|
jimbotron
Patty-Cake Enthusiast



Registered: 02/24/09
Posts: 2,324
Last seen: 10 years, 5 months
|
SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers
#13967612 - 02/15/11 01:30 PM (13 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
You gotta be fucking shitting me.
http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/02/south-dakota-hb-1171-legalize-killing-abortion-providers
Quote:
A law under consideration in South Dakota would expand the definition of "justifiable homicide" to include killings that are intended to prevent harm to a fetus—a move that could make it legal to kill doctors who perform abortions. The Republican-backed legislation, House Bill 1171, has passed out of committee on a nine-to-three party-line vote, and is expected to face a floor vote in the state's GOP-dominated House of Representatives soon.
"The bill in South Dakota is an invitation to murder abortion providers." The bill, sponsored by state Rep. Phil Jensen, a committed foe of abortion rights, alters the state's legal definition of justifiable homicide by adding language stating that a homicide is permissible if committed by a person "while resisting an attempt to harm" that person's unborn child or the unborn child of that person's spouse, partner, parent, or child. If the bill passes, it could in theory allow a woman's father, mother, son, daughter, or husband to kill anyone who tried to provide that woman an abortion—even if she wanted one.
If you predicted that he would try the "gee that's not what I meant at all, even thought I can't tell you exactly why this law is necessary" defense... you get a cookie.
Quote:
Jensen spoke to Mother Jones on Tuesday morning, after this story was published. He says that he disagrees with this interpretation of the bill. "This simply is to bring consistency to South Dakota statute as it relates to justifiable homicide," said Jensen in an interview, repeating an argument he made in the committee hearing on the bill last week. "If you look at the code, these codes are dealing with illegal acts. Now, abortion is a legal act. So this has got nothing to do with abortion." Jensen also aggressively defended the bill in an interview with the Washington Post's Greg Sargent on Tuesday morning.
'Consistency'. Funny how these anti-choice zealots are so concerned with 'consistency', 'preserving existing law', 'passing bills that don't change anything and if it does appear to change anything we'll totally fix it later we promise', etc.
And "these codes are dealing with illegal acts and abortion is legal" is quite the fucking non sequitur. I think even a 4-year-old can see the hole in this logic; if someone is charged with murdering an abortion provider, it has fuck-all to do with the legal status of abortion. At least that's the current law. If these nutcases have their way, abortion will be legal but punishable by death.
On the other hand, it was a 9-3 party line vote, and that means that both parties voted on the bill, so both sides do it.
|
jimbotron
Patty-Cake Enthusiast



Registered: 02/24/09
Posts: 2,324
Last seen: 10 years, 5 months
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: jimbotron]
#13969249 - 02/15/11 06:07 PM (13 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Coincidentally (or not) SD is also the rape capital of the US. Which raises the question: if you get a girl pregnant by raping her, can you go shoot up Planned Parenthood to protect your "unborn child"?
What about a pharmacist who offers her a morning-after pill? Does the fatwa apply to him as well?
|
Icelander
The Minstrel in the Gallery



Registered: 03/15/05
Posts: 95,368
Loc: underbelly
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: jimbotron]
#13970236 - 02/15/11 08:46 PM (13 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
jimbotron said: You gotta be fucking shitting me.
http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/02/south-dakota-hb-1171-legalize-killing-abortion-providers
Quote:
A law under consideration in South Dakota would expand the definition of "justifiable homicide" to include killings that are intended to prevent harm to a fetus—a move that could make it legal to kill doctors who perform abortions. The Republican-backed legislation, House Bill 1171, has passed out of committee on a nine-to-three party-line vote, and is expected to face a floor vote in the state's GOP-dominated House of Representatives soon.
"The bill in South Dakota is an invitation to murder abortion providers." The bill, sponsored by state Rep. Phil Jensen, a committed foe of abortion rights, alters the state's legal definition of justifiable homicide by adding language stating that a homicide is permissible if committed by a person "while resisting an attempt to harm" that person's unborn child or the unborn child of that person's spouse, partner, parent, or child. If the bill passes, it could in theory allow a woman's father, mother, son, daughter, or husband to kill anyone who tried to provide that woman an abortion—even if she wanted one.
If you predicted that he would try the "gee that's not what I meant at all, even thought I can't tell you exactly why this law is necessary" defense... you get a cookie.
Quote:
Jensen spoke to Mother Jones on Tuesday morning, after this story was published. He says that he disagrees with this interpretation of the bill. "This simply is to bring consistency to South Dakota statute as it relates to justifiable homicide," said Jensen in an interview, repeating an argument he made in the committee hearing on the bill last week. "If you look at the code, these codes are dealing with illegal acts. Now, abortion is a legal act. So this has got nothing to do with abortion." Jensen also aggressively defended the bill in an interview with the Washington Post's Greg Sargent on Tuesday morning.
'Consistency'. Funny how these anti-choice zealots are so concerned with 'consistency', 'preserving existing law', 'passing bills that don't change anything and if it does appear to change anything we'll totally fix it later we promise', etc.
And "these codes are dealing with illegal acts and abortion is legal" is quite the fucking non sequitur. I think even a 4-year-old can see the hole in this logic; if someone is charged with murdering an abortion provider, it has fuck-all to do with the legal status of abortion. At least that's the current law. If these nutcases have their way, abortion will be legal but punishable by death.
On the other hand, it was a 9-3 party line vote, and that means that both parties voted on the bill, so both sides do it.
Lets face it, most of America is a religious wasteland.
-------------------- "Don't believe everything you think". -Anom. " All that lives was born to die"-Anom. With much wisdom comes much sorrow, The more knowledge, the more grief. Ecclesiastes circa 350 BC
|
gluke bastid
Stinky Bum



Registered: 12/20/00
Posts: 3,322
Loc: Charm City
Last seen: 5 years, 7 months
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: jimbotron]
#13973300 - 02/16/11 11:45 AM (13 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Is this for real?
Justifiable homicide?
Fucking hell.
--------------------
Society in every form is a blessing, but government at its best is but a necessary evil - Thomas Paine
|
Phred
Fred's son


Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 12,949
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 9 years, 4 months
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: gluke bastid]
#13973557 - 02/16/11 12:35 PM (13 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
No, it's not for real. It's the standard Leftard hyperventilation from Mother Jones and Alternet and their ilk, trying to shoehorn the most far-fetched "angels-dancing-on-head-of-pin" distortion of the English language in order to fan their fever swamp delusions of the evil Rethuglicans fetus-worshippers.
In actual fact, this revision is nothing that hasn't been done many times before in other states. It has nothing to do with harming abortion doctors. It says that you have the right to defend the fetus within the woman as an act of self defense. If a woman is shot dead, you can still use deadly force to defend the fetus within the child. This might clarify things for you -
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/02/16/south-dakota-license-kill-abortion-providers/
The worst possible charge that can accurately be made about this is that the language as it is currently written in preliminary draft form could perhaps use some tightening up and have some redundant explanations clauses added to make it crystal clear that abortions don't fit the definition just to avoid nuisance suits from moonbats.
Phred
--------------------
|
Clownswor
The One The Only



Registered: 07/01/09
Posts: 1,061
Last seen: 10 years, 7 months
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: Phred]
#13973713 - 02/16/11 01:23 PM (13 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
ty for explaining that Phred, I was a bit outraged at the thought of this being possible.
-------------------- I am a connoisseur of sorts. Everything I post is fictional. None of what I post regarding cultivation of mushrooms is legit. Im am just an imaginary person living a imaginary life! Thank you. Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.
|
ScavengerType


Registered: 01/24/08
Posts: 5,784
Loc: The North
Last seen: 10 years, 6 months
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: Clownswor]
#13974445 - 02/16/11 04:11 PM (13 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Sorry phred but can you cite a credible source for a rebuttal to these claims? I'm not saying that I disbelieve what you are saying, just that I don't trust fox to tell the truth. Also if "The worst possible charge that can accurately be made about this is that the language as it is currently written in preliminary draft form could perhaps use some tightening up and have some redundant explanations clauses added" it's perhaps not overboard to assume that some of these claims might be true of the legislation in it's current manifestation.
The evil Rethuglicans fetus-worshipers are currently tabling much worse legislation atm anyway.
-------------------- "Have you ever seen what happens when a grenade goes off in a school? Do you really know what you’re doing when you order shock and awe? Are you prepared to kneel beside a dying soldier and tell him why he went to Iraq, or why he went to any war?" "The things that are done in the name of the shareholder are, to me, as terrifying as the things that are done—dare I say it—in the name of God. Montesquieu said, "There have never been so many civil wars as in the Kingdom of God." And I begin to feel that’s true. The shareholder is the excuse for everything." - Author and former M6/M5 agent John le Carré on Democracy Now. Conquer's Club
|
Phred
Fred's son


Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 12,949
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 9 years, 4 months
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: ScavengerType]
#13974768 - 02/16/11 05:09 PM (13 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
First of all, that's not a Fox News effort, though it is reprinted on a Fox website. If you had actually clicked on the link you would have seen it was an AP report.
Next, AP wasn't editorializing, it was quoting the Rep who introduced the bill. AP also noted that Rep was planning to talk with the State Attorney General about the bill's language, so clearly there is already the intention to make the language as unambiguous as possible.
Phred
--------------------
|
ScavengerType


Registered: 01/24/08
Posts: 5,784
Loc: The North
Last seen: 10 years, 6 months
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: Phred]
#13975457 - 02/16/11 07:34 PM (13 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
So your saying I should take an article from a news agency known to lie repeatedly at face value because it has slapped the AP label on it? However after reading it I agree it isn't fox because it's remotely fair. Also I think you have misrepresented the content of the article, it is clear not only that the concerns that have been raised by some about protecting abortion providers but others regarding disproportionate responses to domestic conflict or other issues need to be considdered.
Also this whole scenario seems convoluted, often if someone has killed a woman (as you claimed) they have the ability to kill any number of living people and can be taken out under other justifiable homicide/self defense clauses, being there to respond with deadly force immediately makes you legally allowed because the person is a threat to you as well. What is a scenario in which only a fetus would be put in mortal danger by someone who could immediately be subdued by another person using deadly force? And if you can find a rare single scenario ask yourself, is deadly force actually what should be permitted in such a situation? Is it worth opening a possible loophole for pregnant women and their families to kill people to make this claim?
-------------------- "Have you ever seen what happens when a grenade goes off in a school? Do you really know what you’re doing when you order shock and awe? Are you prepared to kneel beside a dying soldier and tell him why he went to Iraq, or why he went to any war?" "The things that are done in the name of the shareholder are, to me, as terrifying as the things that are done—dare I say it—in the name of God. Montesquieu said, "There have never been so many civil wars as in the Kingdom of God." And I begin to feel that’s true. The shareholder is the excuse for everything." - Author and former M6/M5 agent John le Carré on Democracy Now. Conquer's Club
|
Phred
Fred's son


Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 12,949
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 9 years, 4 months
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: ScavengerType]
#13975820 - 02/16/11 08:41 PM (13 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
I'm not saying anything other than what is quite obvious from an objective review of the facts - this bill was never intended to be a backdoor way to extend amnesty to murderers of doctors who are about to perform an abortion. Therefore the title Jimbotron chose to give to this thread is no better than the titles Annapurna1 gives to hers.
No one other than a hysterically paranoid Leftard rag like Mother Jones would give any credence to anyone trying to claim this bill has anything to do with abortion.
Phred
--------------------
|
ScavengerType


Registered: 01/24/08
Posts: 5,784
Loc: The North
Last seen: 10 years, 6 months
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: Phred]
#13976245 - 02/16/11 09:50 PM (13 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
The fox article you cited had a representative who claimed that it could be used to bring reprisal against medical professionals.
I've made it pretty clear that there is no good reason to make a bill like this, and that it is way more open to abuse than it is to any sort of practical use. Frankly, it's about as likely that a doctor will be killed over an abortion under this bill as it is a fetus will be protected. I don't think either are remotely likely. However, the likely-hood that relatively innocent people will be killed because someone was defending a perceived threat to their fetus is high.
-------------------- "Have you ever seen what happens when a grenade goes off in a school? Do you really know what you’re doing when you order shock and awe? Are you prepared to kneel beside a dying soldier and tell him why he went to Iraq, or why he went to any war?" "The things that are done in the name of the shareholder are, to me, as terrifying as the things that are done—dare I say it—in the name of God. Montesquieu said, "There have never been so many civil wars as in the Kingdom of God." And I begin to feel that’s true. The shareholder is the excuse for everything." - Author and former M6/M5 agent John le Carré on Democracy Now. Conquer's Club
|
Le_Canard
The Duk Abides


Registered: 05/16/03
Posts: 94,392
Loc: Earthfarm 1
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: jimbotron]
#13977691 - 02/17/11 06:41 AM (13 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Oh, that's nothing. Thanks to the Tennessee GOP it is now legal to carry firearms in bars. (Great idea, guys!). Also, fishing and hunting is now a constitutional right. I expect more insanity in the upcoming year.
|
despisedicon
Stranger

Registered: 06/16/06
Posts: 8,361
Loc:
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: gluke bastid]
#13979163 - 02/17/11 02:39 PM (13 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
gluke bastid said: Is this for real?
Justifiable homicide?
Fucking hell. 
Oh cool, so it's like abortion. These idiots have a lot in common with the baby killers.
|
ScavengerType


Registered: 01/24/08
Posts: 5,784
Loc: The North
Last seen: 10 years, 6 months
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: Le_Canard]
#13979185 - 02/17/11 02:44 PM (13 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
but if fishing and hunting is a constitutional right, how are they going to engage in conservation? Is there still seasons and game tickets?
-------------------- "Have you ever seen what happens when a grenade goes off in a school? Do you really know what you’re doing when you order shock and awe? Are you prepared to kneel beside a dying soldier and tell him why he went to Iraq, or why he went to any war?" "The things that are done in the name of the shareholder are, to me, as terrifying as the things that are done—dare I say it—in the name of God. Montesquieu said, "There have never been so many civil wars as in the Kingdom of God." And I begin to feel that’s true. The shareholder is the excuse for everything." - Author and former M6/M5 agent John le Carré on Democracy Now. Conquer's Club
|
Le_Canard
The Duk Abides


Registered: 05/16/03
Posts: 94,392
Loc: Earthfarm 1
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: ScavengerType]
#13979408 - 02/17/11 03:31 PM (13 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
Good question. Your guess is as good as mine.
|
GI_Luvmoney
Vote Republican!


Registered: 05/10/09
Posts: 939
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: jimbotron]
#13979667 - 02/17/11 04:08 PM (13 years, 3 months ago) |
|
|
The Dims are preparing to kill more people than Hitler and Stalin combined.
The Democratic Party has opposed ANWR exploration, coal-to-liquids technology, oil shale exploration, outer continental shelf (OCS) exploration and increasing refinery capacity http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives2/2008/06/020696.php
|
GI_Luvmoney
Vote Republican!


Registered: 05/10/09
Posts: 939
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: GI_Luvmoney]
#13990965 - 02/19/11 04:51 PM (13 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Obummer's baby killers are gearing up for more mass murder.
Bush Health-Care Measure Reversed
WASHINGTON—The Obama administration on Friday peeled back a rule defining when health-care workers can refuse to administer treatments they find morally objectionable, reversing a final act of George W. Bush's administration.
The Bush measure said that a wide variety of health-care workers could object to participating in abortions if they had moral objections to the procedure. Hospitals and clinics faced a loss of federal funds if they failed to uphold what the Bush administration termed workers' "right of conscience."
Liberal groups opposed the rule, saying it could open the door to a broader denial of services. They said it could allow insurance companies to deny claims for birth-control pills or enable hospitals to refuse emergency contraception to victims of rape.
While there was little evidence that such denials were happening with any frequency, the Obama administration said it needed to act to prevent ambiguity. It said decades of law already protect workers from participating in abortions if they don't wish to.
The Department of Health and Human Services said it wanted to make clear that existing conscience protections don't mean health-care providers can refuse to treat entire groups of people based on religious or moral beliefs. The agency said it was concerned the Bush rule could restrict access to contraception or other medical services.
"The administration strongly supports provider conscience laws that protect and support the rights of health care providers, and also recognizes and supports the rights of patients," the department said in a statement. "Strong conscience laws make it clear that health care providers cannot be compelled to perform or assist in an abortion."
The Obama administration's guidance, released Friday, nullified most of the Bush regulation, while leaving in place a piece that designates a federal office to receive complaints about violations of the earlier statutes.
Antiabortion advocates said the change could open the door for pressure on nurses, medical students and other health workers to provide abortion services. "Pro-life health-care providers need the strongest protections they can get," said David O'Steen, executive director for National Right to Life. Abortion-rights supporters hailed the change, saying it will prevent improper denials of service.
The administration said that rescinding the certification requirements under the Bush rule would result in a cost savings of $43.6 million each year to the health-care industry.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703803904576152722411300728.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
|
Rebirtha
I really like bread




Registered: 09/22/03
Posts: 5,680
Loc: over there
Last seen: 2 days, 1 hour
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: GI_Luvmoney]
#13994999 - 02/20/11 10:56 AM (13 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
If you read your own article you would realize the only reason wasn't abortion... so stop with the baby killers shit.
|
Maharishi_2_U
Opt Out Super Fag


Registered: 10/21/09
Posts: 6,316
Loc: The Streets
Last seen: 9 years, 2 months
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: Rebirtha]
#13995046 - 02/20/11 11:10 AM (13 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Yaawwwwnnnnn.... Fishing and hunting SHOULD b a const. right. I am no longer allowed to hunt because I am a drug felon. Nor can I receive any gvmnt assist. for food. Backdoor starving of non violent offenders. I can go burn churches and rape kids, do my time, get out and get full gvmnt assit. But because I grew a plant to aid myself and others I am an outcast. Dims and gLops both need to all be booted out and a whole new system implemented. Sorry, off topic. BC
|
ScavengerType


Registered: 01/24/08
Posts: 5,784
Loc: The North
Last seen: 10 years, 6 months
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: Maharishi_2_U]
#13996146 - 02/20/11 03:15 PM (13 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Uhh, no game and fish stocks need to be replenished and if any fucktard (no offense to you I don't think growing pot should be a crime nor that you should be unable to hunt because of it) could go out and hunted and fished animals into extinction that's as bad as being denied by the government. Hell it's worse because extinction is forever and for everyone, nobody could hunt those animals ever again.
-------------------- "Have you ever seen what happens when a grenade goes off in a school? Do you really know what you’re doing when you order shock and awe? Are you prepared to kneel beside a dying soldier and tell him why he went to Iraq, or why he went to any war?" "The things that are done in the name of the shareholder are, to me, as terrifying as the things that are done—dare I say it—in the name of God. Montesquieu said, "There have never been so many civil wars as in the Kingdom of God." And I begin to feel that’s true. The shareholder is the excuse for everything." - Author and former M6/M5 agent John le Carré on Democracy Now. Conquer's Club
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 11 months
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: ScavengerType]
#13996330 - 02/20/11 03:52 PM (13 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
White tail deer are a pestilence in my county and have no predators. Many humans have been debilitated by a disease they contribute to the spread of because they no longer have any natural predators and we can't hunt the fuckers. Canada Geese are also a problem. They do not belong here as permanent residents but they have become so because there are no natural predators and we can't hunt them.
--------------------
|
Maharishi_2_U
Opt Out Super Fag


Registered: 10/21/09
Posts: 6,316
Loc: The Streets
Last seen: 9 years, 2 months
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: zappaisgod]
#13997498 - 02/20/11 07:42 PM (13 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
I do not suggest any "fucktard" lol no offense taken.... should be allowed to just go kill thangs.... I do feel if someone can PROVE a firearm safety training program and and a need for food, they should be given either free or discounted tags for x Whitetail and x Turkeys or x Fish .... I know it is "hippy bs" but it is how I fel... BC
|
despisedicon
Stranger

Registered: 06/16/06
Posts: 8,361
Loc:
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: Maharishi_2_U]
#13998029 - 02/20/11 08:59 PM (13 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
boredcertified said: I am no longer allowed to hunt because I am a drug felon
Just do it anyway. You won't get caught. You can fish lakes at night if you know people. But that is fucked they don't let you hunt or fish. I couldn't do it, they are too much fun. Haha
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 11 months
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: despisedicon]
#13999837 - 02/21/11 07:44 AM (13 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
I think he is allowed to fish.
--------------------
|
Maharishi_2_U
Opt Out Super Fag


Registered: 10/21/09
Posts: 6,316
Loc: The Streets
Last seen: 9 years, 2 months
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: zappaisgod]
#14000318 - 02/21/11 10:12 AM (13 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Ya I can fish. I am not allowed to posses or fire any, and I am not quoting here, projectile firing device, including fireworks. If you read through some of the rights loss and other penalties for felons (non-violent) you would probably, hopefully, be shocked. I am a fan of less government, in everyway. However, I feel like if there are assistance based programs, that it only makes sense to allow a former drug "abuser" to be fed and such. As it is the general consensus, of the government, that people on drugs pay less tax.... lulz. So keep em fed n working, away from the scene.... I dunno I have crazy logic I guess. Now if ya rape a baby, well its not really socio-economically related. So, well it makes me mad that rapists are on a higher pedestal in society than a pot farmer..... Ok I m done lol BC
|
imachavel
I loved and lost but I loved-ftw



Registered: 06/06/07
Posts: 31,564
Loc: You get banned for saying that
Last seen: 2 hours, 38 minutes
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: Phred]
#14000835 - 02/21/11 11:45 AM (13 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Phred said: No, it's not for real. It's the standard Leftard hyperventilation from Mother Jones and Alternet and their ilk, trying to shoehorn the most far-fetched "angels-dancing-on-head-of-pin" distortion of the English language in order to fan their fever swamp delusions of the evil Rethuglicans fetus-worshippers.
In actual fact, this revision is nothing that hasn't been done many times before in other states. It has nothing to do with harming abortion doctors. It says that you have the right to defend the fetus within the woman as an act of self defense. If a woman is shot dead, you can still use deadly force to defend the fetus within the child. This might clarify things for you -
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/02/16/south-dakota-license-kill-abortion-providers/
The worst possible charge that can accurately be made about this is that the language as it is currently written in preliminary draft form could perhaps use some tightening up and have some redundant explanations clauses added to make it crystal clear that abortions don't fit the definition just to avoid nuisance suits from moonbats.
Phred
god, that is fucking bull shit. they are trying to pass a bill where it's legal to walk into an abortion clinic and shoot up the place because the people there aren't fucking allowed to kill babies? HOLY SHIT
what is someone supposed to do if they don't feel they are fit to raise the child, (e.g. heroin addict, murderer, no job no education etc.), just force them to have the child and give it away to an adoption agency? WTF
this is some serious red neck bull shit
--------------------
I did not say to edit my signature soulidarity! Now forever I will never remember what I said about understanding the secrets of the universe by paying attention to subtleties!
I'm never giving you the password again. Jerk
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 11 months
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: imachavel]
#14000929 - 02/21/11 12:05 PM (13 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
imachavel said:
Quote:
Phred said: No, it's not for real. It's the standard Leftard hyperventilation from Mother Jones and Alternet and their ilk, trying to shoehorn the most far-fetched "angels-dancing-on-head-of-pin" distortion of the English language in order to fan their fever swamp delusions of the evil Rethuglicans fetus-worshippers.
In actual fact, this revision is nothing that hasn't been done many times before in other states. It has nothing to do with harming abortion doctors. It says that you have the right to defend the fetus within the woman as an act of self defense. If a woman is shot dead, you can still use deadly force to defend the fetus within the child. This might clarify things for you -
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/02/16/south-dakota-license-kill-abortion-providers/
The worst possible charge that can accurately be made about this is that the language as it is currently written in preliminary draft form could perhaps use some tightening up and have some redundant explanations clauses added to make it crystal clear that abortions don't fit the definition just to avoid nuisance suits from moonbats.
Phred
god, that is fucking bull shit. they are trying to pass a bill where it's legal to walk into an abortion clinic and shoot up the place because the people there aren't fucking allowed to kill babies? HOLY SHIT
If this is what you actually believe the bill does you need to sue the shit out of whatever schools you went to. You wuz robbed.
--------------------
|
Le_Canard
The Duk Abides


Registered: 05/16/03
Posts: 94,392
Loc: Earthfarm 1
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: Maharishi_2_U]
#14001689 - 02/21/11 02:04 PM (13 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
Oh, I have no problem with hunting and fishing, I just thought putting it in the state constitution a bit silly. What next, make cable TV a constitutional right too?
|
GI_Luvmoney
Vote Republican!


Registered: 05/10/09
Posts: 939
|
Re: SD GOP wants to legalize assassination of abortion providers [Re: Le_Canard]
#14008620 - 02/22/11 05:01 PM (13 years, 2 months ago) |
|
|
|
|