Home | Community | Message Board

Sporeworks
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
InvisibleXlea321
Stranger
Registered: 02/25/01
Posts: 9,134
UK cabinet minister resigns
    #1385590 - 03/17/03 05:47 PM (21 years, 7 days ago)

Why I had to leave the cabinet

This will be a war without support at home or agreement abroad

Robin Cook
Tuesday March 18, 2003
The Guardian

I have resigned from the cabinet because I believe that a fundamental principle of Labour's foreign policy has been violated. If we believe in an international community based on binding rules and institutions, we cannot simply set them aside when they produce results that are inconvenient to us
I cannot defend a war with neither international agreement nor domestic support. I applaud the determined efforts of the prime minister and foreign secretary to secure a second resolution. Now that those attempts have ended in failure, we cannot pretend that getting a second resolution was of no importance.

In recent days France has been at the receiving end of the most vitriolic criticism. However, it is not France alone that wants more time for inspections. Germany is opposed to us. Russia is opposed to us. Indeed at no time have we signed up even the minimum majority to carry a second resolution. We delude ourselves about the degree of international hostility to military action if we imagine that it is all the fault of President Chirac.

The harsh reality is that Britain is being asked to embark on a war without agreement in any of the international bodies of which we are a leading member. Not Nato. Not the EU. And now not the security council. To end up in such diplomatic isolation is a serious reverse. Only a year ago we and the US were part of a coalition against terrorism which was wider and more diverse than I would previously have thought possible. History will be astonished at the diplomatic miscalculations that led so quickly to the disintegration of that powerful coalition.

Britain is not a superpower. Our interests are best protected, not by unilateral action, but by multilateral agreement and a world order governed by rules. Yet tonight the international partnerships most important to us are weakened. The European Union is divided. The security council is in stalemate. Those are heavy casualties of war without a single shot yet being fired.

The threshold for war should always be high. None of us can predict the death toll of civilians in the forthcoming bombardment of Iraq. But the US warning of a bombing campaign that will "shock and awe" makes it likely that casualties will be numbered at the very least in the thousands. Iraq's military strength is now less than half its size at the time of the last Gulf war. Ironically, it is only because Iraq's military forces are so weak that we can even contemplate invasion. And some claim his forces are so weak, so demoralised and so badly equipped that the war will be over in days.

We cannot base our military strategy on the basis that Saddam is weak and at the same time justify pre-emptive action on the claim that he is a seri ous threat. Iraq probably has no weapons of mass destruction in the commonly understood sense of that term - namely, a credible device capable of being delivered against strategic city targets. It probably does still have biological toxins and battlefield chemical munitions. But it has had them since the 1980s when the US sold Saddam the anthrax agents and the then British government built his chemical and munitions factories.

Why is it now so urgent that we should take military action to disarm a military capacity that has been there for 20 years and which we helped to create? And why is it necessary to resort to war this week while Saddam's ambition to complete his weapons programme is frustrated by the presence of UN inspectors?

I have heard it said that Iraq has had not months but 12 years in which to disarm, and our patience is exhausted. Yet it is over 30 years since resolution 242 called on Israel to withdraw from the occupied territories.

We do not express the same impatience with the persistent refusal of Israel to comply. What has come to trouble me most over past weeks is the suspicion that if the hanging chads in Florida had gone the other way and Al Gore had been elected, we would not now be about to commit British troops to action in Iraq.

I believe the prevailing mood of the British public is sound. They do not doubt that Saddam Hussein is a brutal dictator. But they are not persuaded he is a clear and present danger to Britain. They want the inspections to be given a chance. And they are suspicious that they are being pushed hurriedly into conflict by a US administration with an agenda of its own. Above all, they are uneasy at Britain taking part in a military adventure without a broader international coalition and against the hostility of many of our traditional allies. It has been a favourite theme of commentators that the House of Commons has lost its central role in British politics. Nothing could better demonstrate that they are wrong than for parliament to stop the commitment of British troops to a war that has neither international authority nor domestic support.

? Robin Cook was, until yesterday, leader of the House of Commons.



--------------------
Don't worry, B. Caapi

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblecarbonhoots
old hand

Registered: 09/11/01
Posts: 1,351
Loc: BC Canada
Re: UK cabinet minister resigns [Re: Xlea321]
    #1385834 - 03/17/03 07:01 PM (21 years, 7 days ago)

Quote:

We cannot base our military strategy on the basis that Saddam is weak and at the same time justify pre-emptive action on the claim that he is a seri ous threat. Iraq probably has no weapons of mass destruction in the commonly understood sense of that term - namely, a credible device capable of being delivered against strategic city targets. It probably does still have biological toxins and battlefield chemical munitions.




Wonder if Saddam will use gas? The states would nuke Iraq for sure then!

I've never understood why these people resign. Would it not do more good to be there, in cabinet, then in the the backbenches? Doesn't this just make their job easier?

Anyways, good speech.


--------------------
  -I'd rather have a frontal lobotomy than a bottle in front of me

CANADIAN CENTER FOR POLICY ALTERNATIVES

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineuno
enthusiast

Registered: 04/06/02
Posts: 448
Last seen: 11 years, 9 months
Re: UK cabinet minister resigns [Re: Xlea321]
    #1386986 - 03/18/03 05:26 AM (21 years, 6 days ago)

Now a total of 3 brits resigned.


--------------------
- uno

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineMurex
Reality Hacker

Registered: 07/28/02
Posts: 3,599
Loc: Traped in a shell.
Last seen: 16 years, 6 months
Re: UK cabinet minister resigns [Re: carbonhoots]
    #1387049 - 03/18/03 05:56 AM (21 years, 6 days ago)

Wonder if Saddam will use gas? The states would nuke Iraq for sure then!

Nukes? I don't think so. Nukes would kill thousands of innocent lives you retard. We just go after the specific targets- like military bases and factories.


--------------------
What if everything around you
Isn't quite as it seems?
What if all the world you think you know,
Is an elaborate dream?
And if you look at your reflection,
Is it all you want it to be?


Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleRevelation

 User Gallery

Registered: 08/04/01
Posts: 6,135
Loc: heart cave
Re: UK cabinet minister resigns [Re: Murex]
    #1387313 - 03/18/03 07:27 AM (21 years, 6 days ago)

I wonder what will happen if/when the US "liberates" Iraq, and finds that they had no weapons of mass destruction after all. What could Bush do to justify his actions? Would he admit that he was wrong all along?

And surely if Iraq does have WMD, then they would use them against the US in this war.

So, if no WMD are used, then the US will have to concede that Saddam never had any in the first place...

I sure hope Bush doesn't do anything stupid in order to save face...


--------------------

Edited by Revelation (03/18/03 07:29 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineGazzBut
Refraction

Registered: 10/15/02
Posts: 4,773
Loc: London UK
Last seen: 2 months, 14 days
Re: UK cabinet minister resigns [Re: Revelation]
    #1389684 - 03/19/03 12:08 AM (21 years, 5 days ago)

If the Iraqis dont use them you can bet your bollocks the US will find them.


--------------------
Always Smi2le

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleRevelation

 User Gallery

Registered: 08/04/01
Posts: 6,135
Loc: heart cave
Re: UK cabinet minister resigns [Re: GazzBut]
    #1389689 - 03/19/03 12:14 AM (21 years, 5 days ago)

Not if there aren't any.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflineEllis Dee
Archangel
Male User Gallery

Registered: 06/29/01
Posts: 13,104
Loc: Fire in the sky
Last seen: 5 years, 5 days
Re: UK cabinet minister resigns [Re: Xlea321]
    #1389732 - 03/19/03 12:50 AM (21 years, 5 days ago)

I'll summarize the whole letter.

"Boo hoo hoo, I'm a crybaby."


--------------------
"If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do."-King Solomon

And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels,

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Unfolding Nature Shop: Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* UK Prime Minister wants to privatise army mm. 1,259 8 02/16/02 12:56 PM
by -
* Canada's Prime Minister resigns...
( 1 2 all )
carbonhoots 1,737 22 11/09/03 01:23 AM
by carbonhoots
* UK: Lib Dems Edame 723 3 09/25/03 11:15 AM
by Lazerouth
* Pro-Syrian Contingent in Lebanese Government Resigns afoaf 900 12 02/28/05 06:09 PM
by zappaisgod
* International Drug Laws Tao 730 6 03/05/04 02:16 AM
by azurescens
* Biological Warfare in the War on Drugs LSDempire 1,397 8 05/19/05 01:48 AM
by LSDempire
* Why Iraq Was a Mistake - A General's View
( 1 2 all )
Skeptikos 1,907 25 04/20/06 03:18 PM
by zappaisgod
* Canada Says Yes to Sodomy, No to Jesus
( 1 2 3 4 ... 9 10 all )
Ravus 10,866 186 07/01/05 09:41 AM
by Phluck

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Enlil, ballsalsa
660 topic views. 1 members, 6 guests and 9 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.03 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 14 queries.