|
SirBeatNikCat
Ron Paul 2012 or DIE.
Registered: 11/11/02
Posts: 110
Loc: Newport,OR USA
Last seen: 11 years, 7 months
|
|
Ok,, The AFC had crappy ass teams from 1985 to 1997. And that is the kinda teams the NFC prepare for, see? Raiders,San fran,detriot, Ever hear of em? if not its likely cause their all NFC. crappy ass divisions,,, Bummy owners, tranvestite coachs, and sideline poeple selling drugs to school kids. I could go on all day about this shit, but its nite time. See theres an AFC way of things, that feels euphoric, happy, 'in the momment," it has a nice beat, with a real bitchin groove. Its somewhat remenesent of sex.
and then theres the NFC way of things, thats kinda like penis warts. or maybe hepititis,,, it remains unknown, but its still NFC man. Peace, Happiness, and a side of fries. Mr K@
-------------------- "All wrong-doing arises because of mind. If the mind is transformed can wrong-doing remain?" "The Buddha"
|
zorbman
blarrr


Registered: 06/04/04
Posts: 5,952
|
|
I would love to hear you guys debate all day.
-------------------- “The crisis takes a much longer time coming than you think, and then it happens much faster than you would have thought.” -- Rudiger Dornbusch
|
SneezingPenis
ACHOOOOOOOOO!!!!!111!

Registered: 01/15/05
Posts: 15,427
Last seen: 6 years, 8 months
|
|
also, the overall record between AFC(AFL) and NFC(NFL) in superbowls is 23-21 with NFC up by 2.
also, in all combined superbowls the NFC has outscored the AFC 1095-907. thats 188 points, or 31.3 touchdowns. also could be looked at as 62.7 field goals, or 94 safeties/conversions.
however you want to view the dominance of the nfc is your choice.
|
LiquidSmoke
My title's cooler than yours DBK

Registered: 09/04/01
Posts: 25,335
Loc: S.A.G.G.Y.B.A.L.L.S.
Last seen: 6 months, 26 days
|
Re: Saints-Seahawks [Re: cortex]
#13766689 - 01/10/11 11:40 PM (13 years, 20 days ago) |
|
|
the Saint's D had a really strong year last year, and it looked like things were going to turn around.
But now they just look like the Saints D usually does.
-------------------- "Shmokin' weed, Shmokin' wizz, doin' coke, drinkin' beers. Drinkin' beers beers beers, rollin' fatties, smokin' blunts. Who smokes tha blunts? We smoke the blunts" - Jay and Silent Bob strike Back
|
LiquidSmoke
My title's cooler than yours DBK

Registered: 09/04/01
Posts: 25,335
Loc: S.A.G.G.Y.B.A.L.L.S.
Last seen: 6 months, 26 days
|
|
oh and the fact that you guys are arguing over which conference is better is kind of silly.
Both conferences are filled with good and bad teams. It's not like one conference has better teams across the board.
But one thing for sure, both Western divisions suck ass. Why can't you guys just debate about that one.
-------------------- "Shmokin' weed, Shmokin' wizz, doin' coke, drinkin' beers. Drinkin' beers beers beers, rollin' fatties, smokin' blunts. Who smokes tha blunts? We smoke the blunts" - Jay and Silent Bob strike Back
|
SneezingPenis
ACHOOOOOOOOO!!!!!111!

Registered: 01/15/05
Posts: 15,427
Last seen: 6 years, 8 months
|
|
cause im bored. i was actually shocked to learn that the nfc had more wins.
|
cortex
[ H ] ψ = [ E ] ψ


Registered: 10/08/02
Posts: 15,171
Loc: Gedankenexperiment
|
|
Quote:
LiquidSmoke said: the Saint's D had a really strong year last year, and it looked like things were going to turn around.
But now they just look like the Saints D usually does.
You know, that's true. I'm disappointed about that last game, but you are right, the D was actually pretty strong for most of the season...
Oh well. 12-4 ain't bad. They'll be back.
And go GREEN BAY fuck the the Falcons. I really don't want to see them in the SB.
--------------------
Signature (up to 750 characters).
|
zappaisgod
horrid asshole


Registered: 02/11/04
Posts: 81,741
Loc: Fractallife's gym
Last seen: 7 years, 7 months
|
Re: Saints-Seahawks [Re: cortex]
#13767846 - 01/11/11 09:21 AM (13 years, 20 days ago) |
|
|
If I recall correctly the Saint's D last year had an inordinate amount of turnovers and TOs for TDs. Now that certainly is somewhat by design but it is also one of the most random factors in a game. Did they change the design this year? No. Whenever you see a team with a huge plus turnover rate you can almost guarantee that it will regress sharply toward the mean the next season. Don't forget that even an entire NFL season is still a small sample size.
--------------------
|
|