Home | Community | Message Board


Kraken Kratom
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
OfflinePhred
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,949
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 1 year, 10 months
Time to Disagree Without Being Disagreeable
    #1374659 - 03/14/03 05:29 AM (13 years, 8 months ago)

This is one of the fairest, most evenhanded commentaries I have read so far on the split between Europe and the US. A nice piece of work by a thoughtful commentator. I hope you will all enjoy it as much as I did.

Time to Disagree Without Being Disagreeable

by Ted Galen Carpenter

March 9, 2003

The writer is vice-president for defence and foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute, and author of "Peace and Freedom: Foreign Policy for a Constitutional Republic".

George W. Bush's administration now confronts the shocking possibility that France will this week join with Russia in vetoing a new UN Security Council resolution authorising force against Iraq, and that Germany will vote against the resolution too. Such a feud between Washington and its major allies over a key US policy initiative would have been unthinkable only a few years ago.

The disagreement over Iraq has brought the divergence of perspectives into sharp relief, but there have been many other sources of tension. Washington and several of its key allies have adopted different views on such issues as the Kyoto protocol on the environment, the International Criminal Court, ballistic missile defence and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Neither side in these controversies is likely to win any awards for maturity. European critics of the Bush administration routinely deride the president as a trigger-happy cowboy and a closet isolationist, although he could scarcely be guilty of both offences simultaneously. The US record is worse. Bush administration officials have responded to Franco-German opposition to its Iraq policies with the foreign policy equivalent of a temper tantrum. Donald Rumsfeld, the defence secretary, dismissed the opposition as coming from "old Europe", and invited the nations of central and eastern Europe to follow US leadership. Members of Congress followed by proposing economic sanctions against France and Germany.

Neither side wants to admit the obvious: that American and European interests and perspectives are diverging on an array of issues. With the demise of the Soviet Union, there is no longer a focal point of unity in the Western alliance. It has taken more than a decade, but transatlantic relations are beginning to return to their normal pattern - the pattern that existed during the century or so before the second world war and the cold war. US and European interests may still overlap on some issues, but we are likely to find more and more instances where they do not coincide.

Both the US and the leading European powers need to adopt a more realistic and mature attitude about these developments. Too often, Europeans want an activist US that will be responsible for global security and take a leading role in resolving Europe's specific security problems, such as the Balkan crises of the 1990s. At the same time, many of those same Europeans want the US to follow the wishes of its allies passively on key policy issues. They seek a US that is powerful enough to be a hegemon, but humble enough not to exercise that awesome power unilaterally.

In essence, the European allies want the US to be a tethered hegemon. But that is an inherently contradictory and unrealistic concept. If the European countries want to be taken seriously by Washington, they must forge a cohesive foreign and security policy and back it up with serious military resources. And, if necessary, they must be willing to challenge US policy and not back down. Beyond those steps, they must ask the US to do less in the security arena while demonstrating their willingness to do more.

US policymakers and opinion leaders harbour their own illusions about the country's allies. They expect the prosperous and proud European countries to act as obedient clients of the US whenever Washington pursues an initiative. They apparently expect such deference even when the Europeans disagree with the substance of US policy and when European interests may not be served by that policy. Such expectations may have been plausible at the dawn of NATO, when a war-ravaged western Europe faced a powerful threat to its security and desperately needed the US as a protector. They are, however, woefully out of touch with reality in the 21st century.

In short, there is an urgent need for greater realism as well as greater calm on both sides of the Atlantic. Americans and Europeans could continue the unproductive and demeaning spectacle of transatlantic name-calling until bitterness grows to the point that there is little hope of effective co-operation even on those issues where there are common interests.

It would be far better for both sides to acknowledge that the US and Europe are two regions with overlapping but frequently different interests and perspectives, and that the divergence is likely to grow rather than diminish. In the future, America and its traditional allies may have to agree to disagree on some important issues. Above all, they must learn to disagree without becoming disagreeable.

This article originally appeared in The Financial Times on March 9, 2003.

pinky


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblesilversoul7
Chill the FuckOut!
 User Gallery

Registered: 10/10/02
Posts: 27,301
Loc: mndfreeze's puppet army
Re: Time to Disagree Without Being Disagreeable [Re: Phred]
    #1374933 - 03/14/03 06:56 AM (13 years, 8 months ago)

Excellent article!  :laugh:  That editor really took the time to look at both sides of the issue.


--------------------


"It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong."--Voltaire


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisibleluvdemshrooms
Two inch dick..but it spins!?


Registered: 11/29/01
Posts: 33,723
Loc: Lost In Space
Re: Time to Disagree Without Being Disagreeable [Re: Phred]
    #1374952 - 03/14/03 07:01 AM (13 years, 8 months ago)

Fairly well balanced.


--------------------
You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for that my dear friend is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it. ~ Adrian Rogers


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinevalour
Swordbearer

Registered: 03/02/02
Posts: 1,453
Loc: USA
Last seen: 10 years, 11 months
Re: Time to Disagree Without Being Disagreeable [Re: Phred]
    #1379510 - 03/16/03 12:29 AM (13 years, 8 months ago)

Very interesting!


--------------------
"Remember, son,
I didn't sell out-
I bought in."


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleXlea321
Stranger
Registered: 02/26/01
Posts: 9,134
Re: Time to Disagree Without Being Disagreeable [Re: Phred]
    #1379522 - 03/16/03 12:38 AM (13 years, 8 months ago)

In essence, the European allies want the US to be a tethered hegemon

Nno-one wants them tethered, they just want them to stop bombing third world countries for specious reasons.


--------------------
Don't worry, B. Caapi


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblesilversoul7
Chill the FuckOut!
 User Gallery

Registered: 10/10/02
Posts: 27,301
Loc: mndfreeze's puppet army
Re: Time to Disagree Without Being Disagreeable [Re: Phred]
    #1380043 - 03/16/03 07:36 AM (13 years, 8 months ago)

Quote:

European critics of the Bush administration routinely deride the president as a trigger-happy cowboy and a closet isolationist, although he could scarcely be guilty of both offences simultaneously.



I tend to agree more with the first characterization.

Quote:

The US record is worse. Bush administration officials have responded to Franco-German opposition to its Iraq policies with the foreign policy equivalent of a temper tantrum.



So true.


--------------------


"It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong."--Voltaire


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Anonymous

Re: Time to Disagree Without Being Disagreeable [Re: Phred]
    #1380106 - 03/16/03 08:05 AM (13 years, 8 months ago)

Which is why the UN's days are limited.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Women want U-M athlete put on tether YidakiMan 871 16 02/11/05 12:24 PM
by Mushmonkey
* European Petition.
( 1 2 3 all )
Fliquid 2,737 54 05/30/05 03:33 AM
by ivi
* The European dream AntiMeme 533 8 10/02/04 07:04 PM
by zappaisgod
* European Parliament Endorses EU Constitution heidegger 358 1 01/14/05 07:19 PM
by Alan Stone
* This just in: Holland REJECTS the proposed European Constitition
( 1 2 3 all )
AsanteA 3,099 49 07/05/05 02:59 AM
by Redstorm
* Shed your white european guilt here.
( 1 2 3 all )
looner2 2,297 43 06/23/05 11:06 AM
by LSDempire
* Why are Europeans trying to Pollute OUR Oceans? Innvertigo 543 19 11/21/02 07:09 AM
by Innvertigo
* Is anyone here a European citizen? Health Care Q BrAiN 1,455 16 09/24/07 01:09 PM
by Andy21

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Prisoner#1, Enlil
471 topic views. 3 members, 2 guests and 9 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Everything Mushrooms
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2016 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.055 seconds spending 0.004 seconds on 14 queries.