|
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
|
mjshroomer
Sage
Registered: 07/21/99
Posts: 13,774
Loc: gone with my shrooms
|
Re: brisbane, australia.. mushrooms [Re: brizvegasguy]
#1333218 - 02/25/03 03:16 AM (20 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
Read John Allen's book at http://www.erowid.org
It is, "Magic Mushrooms of Australia and New Zealand."
Everything in there is in Australia except the Psilocybe cyanescens which Guzman added to my paper by mistake.
mj
|
mjshroomer
Sage
Registered: 07/21/99
Posts: 13,774
Loc: gone with my shrooms
|
Re: brisbane, australia.. mushrooms [Re: Zen Peddler]
#1334508 - 02/25/03 10:48 AM (20 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
In order to keep my status as a casual observer of habits, I cannot add anyones personal info until something is published. That validates my research.
I did talk to fire once about adding an update in a seaprate section ffrom the book since my book is based soleluy on my published research.
I know there are a lot of shrooms in different Australian States which tend to overlap other states boundary lines.
Anyway good luck on yoiur hunt.
mjshroom
|
mjshroomer
Sage
Registered: 07/21/99
Posts: 13,774
Loc: gone with my shrooms
|
Re: brisbane, australia.. mushrooms [Re: Zen Peddler]
#1336878 - 02/26/03 05:04 AM (20 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
I spent 6 weeks in Australia and collected many specimens which I gave to Guzm?n. If you read the list of acknowledgements I personally contacted, both by mail and by telephoine, many of the people listed in the acknowledgements. I merely said that Unless it is published it is not valid to the mycological academia. That is all. I also said I would work with erowid to make an update if that is what you all want. Published works are often scrutinized and gone over AND information always changes. Kreigelstreiners paper caused riffes throughout the mycological world but everything in his paper on P. cyanescens and suspected species which he thought were one are not. Much of his work was and is considered invalid by western mycologists. Gerhaardt does this with Panaeolus. He wants the genus to be Panaeolus witrhout Copelandia, Yet Western mycologists prefer the genus Copelandia. Paul Stamets for instance added a whole bunmch of Stropharias to the Psilocybe genus but never published a paper so many mycologists do not considered those Stropharias to be Psilocybes. Take a look at the Southcoot P. subaerugionosa photo at my site. Southcott did the taxonmy on that collection. They too are very different than a lot of the ones I collected in the early 1980s. Anyway have a shroomy day and as you say yhe debate goes on. The article is called a Review of Psychoactive Agarics in Australia and new Zealand and was originally published in the Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. AND AS i NOTED WAS A REVI9EW OF THEKNOWN LITERATURE, PLUS NEW INFO AND PHOTOS. I would also like to point out that Paul Velgalys has already made microscopic identification obsolete with his new 50 page paper on DNA which now reclassifies all of the psilocybian mushrooms into a new genus (Clade) in phylogeny called Psychedlia. Based on DNA examination he has already put many of the genus into the DNA clades classifications. I have the papes on that. Too big to post but I will post the works I have on trhe Psilocybe. Eventually they will rename the whole genus to Psychedelia . Imagine, Psychedelia subaeruginosa, Psychedelia semilanceata, etc. So that removes the word psilocybe. This only is being appliesd to those psilocybes which produce psilocine and/or psilocybine. Of which there are now 190 known species. Here are a few pages of the paper to bring confusion to an aleready confused genus.
Edited by mjshroomer (02/26/03 05:26 AM)
|
mjshroomer
Sage
Registered: 07/21/99
Posts: 13,774
Loc: gone with my shrooms
|
Re: brisbane, australia.. mushrooms [Re: mjshroomer]
#1336935 - 02/26/03 05:35 AM (20 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
HEre are three pages from the paper,
mj
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX



XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
mjshroomer
|
mjshroomer
Sage
Registered: 07/21/99
Posts: 13,774
Loc: gone with my shrooms
|
Re: brisbane, australia.. mushrooms [Re: ToxicMan]
#1340815 - 02/27/03 12:52 PM (20 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Chlorophyllum molybdites Is the number one cause of most accidental poisonous mushroom ingestions in the state of Florida/ Accoprding to the poison control center of Atlanta, Georgia and Steven Peele.
It is commonly knonw as 'green gills' and 'Morgan's Lepiota.'
mj
|
mjshroomer
Sage
Registered: 07/21/99
Posts: 13,774
Loc: gone with my shrooms
|
Re: brisbane, australia.. mushrooms [Re: Zen Peddler]
#1343405 - 02/28/03 03:46 PM (20 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
I have eaten what I beli9eved were P. subaeruginosa three times. I also was fortunate to be turned on to by a doctor friend of mine whom I cannot name to P. aucklandii, Anyway,
YEs many books have errors in them intheir research which is incorect. Good examples are the books which list certain species as pois0onous/hallucinogenic, by relying on older books befo9re their books for the data. panaeolina foenisecii, Panaeolus sphinctrinus, Psilocybe coprophila, etc.
Even High TImes had an article by Lynn and Jucy Osbourne (written under the pseudonym of Brolyn) wrote a phony article fopr High TImes called americas Home Harvest Mushroom. with photos of a mutated Panaeolina foenisecii.
I confronted them and they told me their article was truthful and factual on information ferom their friends.
However the article is complete BS>
Later, Still looking for Cleland;'s water color of the subaeruginosa he drew.
mj
|
|
|
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: ToxicMan, inski, Alan Rockefeller, Duggstar, TimmiT, Anglerfish, Tmethyl, Lucis, Doc9151, Land Trout 11,141 topic views. 0 members, 16 guests and 8 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ] |
|