Home | Community | Message Board

MagicBag Grow Bags
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: North Spore Bulk Substrate   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Left Coast Kratom Buy Kratom Extract   PhytoExtractum Kratom Powder for Sale   Mushroom-Hut Mono Tub Substrate   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | Next >  [ show all ]
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
OfflineAnnoA
Experimenter
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 06/17/99
Posts: 24,166
Loc: my room
Last seen: 19 days, 16 hours
Re: Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens [Re: Zen Peddler] * 2
    #5414331 - 03/17/06 07:30 PM (17 years, 10 months ago)

>that seems to suggest that the potency of pans equates to the potency of psilocybe cyanescens

Yes, it suggests that the potency is roughly the same as in P. cyanescens.

Panaeolus cyanescens contains more psilocin, the combined psilocybin and psilocin are roughly the same.
So fresh, Panaeolus cyanescens is definitely as strong as P. cyanescens, whereas dried(if drying wasn't done proper) Panaeolus cyanescens will lose some of the psilocin and thus P. cyanescens will be slightly stronger.


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
OfflineJazzMatazz
addict

Registered: 09/07/02
Posts: 770
Loc: Vienna, Austria
Last seen: 2 years, 6 months
Re: Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens [Re: fugu] * 1
    #1249421 - 01/26/03 04:07 AM (21 years, 7 days ago)

Quote:

yea lots of fucking texts are like that . i have got also a text like the potenties about fly agarics.but if you know how to read the instructions they are very funny to have an idea about what is what




and
Quote:

Cubensis




What am I to think of these answers?! Im confused!


--------------------
Perception is limited to consciousness.Expand it and unfold other realities.


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinefugu
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 01/06/03
Posts: 2,223
Loc: istanbul
Last seen: 13 years, 6 months
Re: Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens [Re: JazzMatazz] * 1
    #1249428 - 01/26/03 04:12 AM (21 years, 7 days ago)

i dont know .i just wait for the dinner and i saw nothing was written .so i want to give you a feeling thats all.


--------------------
mushroom culture history making ...Mr. Allan is the best .....


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Anonymous

Re: Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens [Re: Zen Peddler] * 1
    #1250962 - 01/26/03 05:09 PM (21 years, 6 days ago)

I think all of those bioassay tests are very misleading.

A one gram sample of dried copelandia contains a significant quantity of actual specimens. A one gram sample of Psilocybe cyanescens COMPLEX, contains sometimes one specimen only. If psilocibin content within a SPECIES is a range, that differs from specimen to specimen, the chances of consuming mushrooms at the high end of the range is increased with the quantity of specimens you consume. You can eat a weak Psilocybe cyanescens that makes up a one gram sample, YOU WILL FIND IT VERY DIFFICULT TO DO THE SAME WITH COPELANDIAS.

Gram for gram over time, and I would think Copelandias and P.cyanescens are very comparable, I would even give the edge to the Copelandias. I personally think they are about 2.5+ times as strong as Cubensis from personal " Bioassay" on Average. Have had a 1 gram sample that was stronger then a 3 gram sample of cubensis on several occasions. As the sample size increases weight wise, I tend to think the copelandias get even stronger. Have eaten 2 gram samples of Copelandias that felt like 7+ gram samples of cubensis. Anything over 3 grams dry for the copelandias, and I personally HAVE a VERY DIFFICULT TIME comparing Potencies any more.
I think SIZE of SPECIMEN(quantity of specimens in sample) is EXTREMELY important in comparing potencies of SPECIES to SPECIES. Developemental stage to Developemental stage.

Always remeber the Figures Stated are for MAXIMUM PERCENTAGE. Percentage varies from specimen to specimen.

WHERE ARE YOU GETTING YOUR AVERAGES and MAXIMUMS from Bluemeanie?







Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
OfflineJazzMatazz
addict

Registered: 09/07/02
Posts: 770
Loc: Vienna, Austria
Last seen: 2 years, 6 months
Re: Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens [Re: shirley knott] * 1
    #1251777 - 01/26/03 11:45 PM (21 years, 6 days ago)

Do Psilocybe cyanescens and Auzrencens (or whatever... :wink: ) yield comparably to Cubensis , or not? All pictures of Outdoor patches Ive seen , only show very few fruits, wouldnt it be better to grow Cubensis , and just eat twice the amount? Or is the trip really "higher" on Woodloving strains?


--------------------
Perception is limited to consciousness.Expand it and unfold other realities.


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Anonymous

Re: Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens [Re: Hamurabi] * 1
    #1253674 - 01/27/03 01:21 PM (21 years, 5 days ago)

According to the Literature P. cyanescens is Stronger then Copelandia species. I would regard the literature with a grain of salt. BOTH mushrooms are of the EXTREMELY POTENT variety.

Let your local climate determine which one you grow, and let yourself be the judge of potency. Start small 1/2 gram and increase accordingly.

As is being determined every day, the Literature is becoming more and more outdated. It appears there has always been some kind of Ego battle between the various Mycologists that study these mushrooms. I think that Battle is contagous, and only SLOWS down the progress that can be made.

I would say the only thing Potency analysis is good for is DETERMINATION of CHEMICAL composition, and the scientific PROOF of the prescence of the Alkaloids for Taxonomic identification and submission into JOURNALS. Other then that SELF EXPERIMENTATION will be your ultimate guide to potency. Just take the basic advice that some people hear think Copelandia is more potent and some thing P. cyanescens is more potent. All agree that they are both more potent then cubensis, and you should TAKE that AGREED upon EXPERIENCE into SERIOUS consideration when INGESTING EITHER SPECIES.

Good luck and Be careful.



Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
OfflineJazzMatazz
addict

Registered: 09/07/02
Posts: 770
Loc: Vienna, Austria
Last seen: 2 years, 6 months
Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens
    #1249148 - 01/25/03 09:58 PM (21 years, 7 days ago)

Ive found both species on the net, as I was looking for an alternate species for a wild patch (rather than cubensis).
The problem is, that at FSRE.org I found the following statement:
Quote:

The Panaeolus Cyanescens is also known as the Copelandia Cyanescens. The Copelandia Cyanescens is a very small mushroom, but it's considered one of the most strongest.



But at MushMush.nl , it says:
Quote:

(The Psilocybe cyanescens) is a very potent species. People report that these mushrooms contain 2-3 times more active compounds that the average Psilocybe cubensis



The Mushroom Dosage Proggie at the Shroomery only has the Psilocybe , and states , that this is roughly twice as potent as a Cubensis , which would coincide with MushMush.
BUT at Sporeworks, they say the following:
Quote:

Panaeolus cyanescens: A small, fast growing mushroom found on dung in pastures and fields. A strong producer of psilocybin, it is considered highly active. Cultivation requires a substrate of manure based composts or pasteurized straw




Could someone just elaborate on both , concerning Potency , Substrate , Regions of possible outdoor cultivation.
Thanks a lot,
Jazz


--------------------
Perception is limited to consciousness.Expand it and unfold other realities.


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlinefugu
Pooh-Bah

Registered: 01/06/03
Posts: 2,223
Loc: istanbul
Last seen: 13 years, 6 months
Re: Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens [Re: JazzMatazz]
    #1249159 - 01/25/03 10:06 PM (21 years, 7 days ago)

yea lots of fucking texts are like that . i have got also a text like the potenties about fly agarics.but if you know how to read the instructions they are very funny to have an idea about what is what


--------------------
mushroom culture history making ...Mr. Allan is the best .....


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
OfflineHamurabi
the babylonianleader..

Registered: 03/31/02
Posts: 2,421
Loc: Greece
Last seen: 2 years, 5 months
Re: Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens [Re: fugu]
    #1249282 - 01/26/03 12:51 AM (21 years, 7 days ago)



Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlineshirley knott
not my real name
 User Gallery
Registered: 11/11/02
Posts: 9,105
Loc: London
Last seen: 7 years, 27 days
Trusted Cultivator
Re: Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens [Re: JazzMatazz]
    #1249445 - 01/26/03 04:28 AM (21 years, 7 days ago)

check out the answer to this    cyans query :confused:
posted just a few hours before yours.

hope this helps.   


--------------------
buh


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
OfflineHamurabi
the babylonianleader..

Registered: 03/31/02
Posts: 2,421
Loc: Greece
Last seen: 2 years, 5 months
Re: Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens [Re: shirley knott]
    #1249463 - 01/26/03 04:41 AM (21 years, 7 days ago)

sorry for my previews reply,don't know what happened! this is my correct reply:

cubensis are weaker than psilocybe cyanescens which are weaker than panaeolus(copelandia) cyanescens


Edited by Hamurabi (01/26/03 04:42 AM)


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
OfflineAnnoA
Experimenter
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 06/17/99
Posts: 24,166
Loc: my room
Last seen: 19 days, 16 hours
Re: Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens [Re: JazzMatazz]
    #1249479 - 01/26/03 04:54 AM (21 years, 7 days ago)

Panaeolus cyanescens is a substropical dung inhabiting species.
Not hard to cultivate indoors on dung and straw. Roughly double the potency of Psilocybe cubensis.

Psilocybe cyanescens is a wood decomposing species growing naturally in the temperate zone(in the usa in the pacific northwest, for instance). It needs a coldschock to fruit. Cultivation indoor is very difficult and fruiting unlikely to occur without an elaborate setup. Potency also roughly double the potency of Psilocybe cubensis.

Check out the Cultivation FAQ for the cultivation parameters.


Edited by Anno (01/26/03 04:55 AM)


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
InvisibleZen Peddler
Male User Gallery

Registered: 06/18/01
Posts: 6,379
Loc: orbit
Re: Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens [Re: Anno]
    #1250287 - 01/26/03 12:06 PM (21 years, 6 days ago)

No way.
Psilicybe Cyanescens and related binomials are easily three times more potent than Psilocybe Cubensis.
The average maxima for Cubensis measured is around 15% psilocybin and .40% psilocin (and this is too high i think anyway) - maxima of ps.cyanescens tend to range around 1.2%-1.3% while Australiana, Azurescens and Bohemica which are all closely related to Ps.Cyanescens record maxima of over 2.0% psilocybin if not more.
MJ suggests that Ps.Cyanescens in bioassay is more potent by weight than Ps.Azurescens and the alkaloid maxima reported by Gartz are incorrect.
Panaeolus cyanesces is certainly potent, but not as potent as Ps.cyanescens by any stretch of the imagination.


--------------------


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
OfflineAnnoA
Experimenter
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 06/17/99
Posts: 24,166
Loc: my room
Last seen: 19 days, 16 hours
Re: Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens [Re: Zen Peddler]
    #1250419 - 01/26/03 01:04 PM (21 years, 6 days ago)

Do you know what the word "roughly" means?


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Invisibledeanofmean
mycophagous

Registered: 12/06/02
Posts: 2,017
Loc: PNW
Re: Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens [Re: Anno]
    #1251040 - 01/26/03 05:42 PM (21 years, 6 days ago)



Edited by deanofmean (01/26/03 05:44 PM)


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
OfflineAnnoA
Experimenter
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 06/17/99
Posts: 24,166
Loc: my room
Last seen: 19 days, 16 hours
Re: Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens [Re: deanofmean]
    #1251401 - 01/26/03 08:19 PM (21 years, 6 days ago)

Yes, I locked the other posts and linked to here.


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
OfflineAnnoA
Experimenter
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 06/17/99
Posts: 24,166
Loc: my room
Last seen: 19 days, 16 hours
Re: Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens [Re: Anno]
    #1251423 - 01/26/03 08:25 PM (21 years, 6 days ago)

Re: Gthirteens

>Ok, now of all of these "extemely potent' species which is the easiest to grow
>(indoors) and which has the highest yields?

Panaeolus cyanescens is easy to grow indoors, but the yield is not very high.

Psilocybe cyanescens is easy to grow OUTDOORS and the yield is much, much better.
But it can?t be cultivated easily (in comparable quantity) indoors.


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlineshirley knott
not my real name
 User Gallery
Registered: 11/11/02
Posts: 9,105
Loc: London
Last seen: 7 years, 27 days
Trusted Cultivator
Re: Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens [Re: Anno]
    #1251514 - 01/26/03 09:01 PM (21 years, 6 days ago)

could someone please rate this > ps. azure / cyan "mmgg" for me .

thanks. don't want to waste two months if it's no good.


--------------------
buh


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
OfflineAnnoA
Experimenter
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 06/17/99
Posts: 24,166
Loc: my room
Last seen: 19 days, 16 hours
Re: Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens [Re: shirley knott]
    #1251544 - 01/26/03 09:18 PM (21 years, 6 days ago)

It doesn?t work.
The species the tek was tested with was most likely P. cubensis.


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Offlineshirley knott
not my real name
 User Gallery
Registered: 11/11/02
Posts: 9,105
Loc: London
Last seen: 7 years, 27 days
Trusted Cultivator
Re: Panaeolus cyanescens vs Psilocybe cyanescens [Re: Anno]
    #1251556 - 01/26/03 09:24 PM (21 years, 6 days ago)

hmmm, thanks.  *drops document into rubbish bin*
any recommendations for how best to indoor-start my prints of Ps. azures and Ps. semis  ?

i have read all the links in the faqs under 'how are those species cultivated?' but found that most people only succeeded with either a live specimen or agar isolates and a lot of knowhow. if i can get grain spawn to colonise, do i try for wood shavings next? then move straight outdoors at 50-60F ?

:grin:shirl
xx



--------------------
buh


Edited by shirley knott (01/26/03 09:44 PM)


Extras: Unfilter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | Next >  [ show all ]

Shop: North Spore Bulk Substrate   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Left Coast Kratom Buy Kratom Extract   PhytoExtractum Kratom Powder for Sale   Mushroom-Hut Mono Tub Substrate   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* cyanescens GuruMSD 1,387 4 12/23/06 06:22 AM
by hyphae
* Copelandia Cyanescens on BRF/VERMI cakes Thax8 6,238 16 01/22/21 02:23 PM
by Baby_Hitler
* Re: Panaeolus Cyanescens Cultivation kbone 2,984 6 08/04/00 09:30 AM
by Anonymous
* Growing Cyanescens thechromeboy 1,193 5 05/19/03 06:52 AM
by Anno
* Best tek for Cyanescens scotsman1 2,935 3 06/29/02 06:52 AM
by goolag
* Cyanescens hawksapprentice 638 3 06/17/03 11:45 PM
by zeronio
* Psilocybe Cyanescens fireworks_godS 5,871 16 03/28/06 02:21 PM
by fireworks_god
* Psilocybe Cyanescens on grain, cardboard, alder chips (pics) BobHumboldt 5,754 6 11/19/05 01:16 PM
by BobHumboldt

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Shroomism, george castanza, RogerRabbit, veggie, mushboy, fahtster, LogicaL Chaos, 13shrooms, Stipe-n Cap, Pastywhyte, bodhisatta, Tormato, Land Trout, A.k.a
56,684 topic views. 20 members, 140 guests and 52 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Date | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.026 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 14 queries.