|
Kickle
Wanderer



Registered: 12/16/06
Posts: 17,884
Last seen: 2 days, 10 hours
|
Re: Anselm's Ontological Argument [Re: deCypher]
#12398828 - 04/15/10 02:40 PM (13 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
I think his argument can be taken to mean that I am God. Unless some other being has greater value than myself.
-------------------- Why shouldn't the truth be stranger than fiction? Fiction, after all, has to make sense. -- Mark Twain
|
deCypher



Registered: 02/10/08
Posts: 56,232
|
Re: Anselm's Ontological Argument [Re: Kickle]
#12398848 - 04/15/10 02:43 PM (13 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
God doesn't exist, silly. Duh.
-------------------- We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
 
|
Kickle
Wanderer



Registered: 12/16/06
Posts: 17,884
Last seen: 2 days, 10 hours
|
Re: Anselm's Ontological Argument [Re: deCypher]
#12398855 - 04/15/10 02:44 PM (13 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
 quit limiting philosophical conversations of a word that clearly exists.
-------------------- Why shouldn't the truth be stranger than fiction? Fiction, after all, has to make sense. -- Mark Twain
|
deCypher



Registered: 02/10/08
Posts: 56,232
|
Re: Anselm's Ontological Argument [Re: Kickle]
#12398865 - 04/15/10 02:45 PM (13 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
The word exists, not God.
r u srs
-------------------- We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
 
|
Kickle
Wanderer



Registered: 12/16/06
Posts: 17,884
Last seen: 2 days, 10 hours
|
Re: Anselm's Ontological Argument [Re: deCypher]
#12398875 - 04/15/10 02:47 PM (13 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Prove God doesn't exist. It's still gonna be philosophizing about the word.
r u?
-------------------- Why shouldn't the truth be stranger than fiction? Fiction, after all, has to make sense. -- Mark Twain
Edited by Kickle (04/15/10 03:34 PM)
|
deCypher



Registered: 02/10/08
Posts: 56,232
|
Re: Anselm's Ontological Argument [Re: Kickle] 1
#12398884 - 04/15/10 02:48 PM (13 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
You are NOT asking for proofs in the philosophy forum. Are your posts always gonna be this retarded??
-------------------- We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
 
|
Kickle
Wanderer



Registered: 12/16/06
Posts: 17,884
Last seen: 2 days, 10 hours
|
Re: Anselm's Ontological Argument [Re: deCypher]
#12398890 - 04/15/10 02:49 PM (13 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|

I'm not expecting proof, but I am requesting openness.
|
noticeofeviction
Roller


Registered: 02/06/10
Posts: 2,391
Loc: 818
Last seen: 12 years, 7 months
|
Re: Anselm's Ontological Argument [Re: Kickle]
#12399157 - 04/15/10 03:45 PM (13 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
"Prove God doesn't exist. "
Anyway, yeah. I think this argument is grounded around equating real things with concepts... It's interesting but I don't quite buy it.
The cosmological argument has parts that are more persuasive
|
deCypher



Registered: 02/10/08
Posts: 56,232
|
|
?
-------------------- We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
 
|
Poid
Shroomery's #1 Spellir




Registered: 02/04/08
Posts: 40,372
Loc: SF Bay Area
|
Re: Anselm's Ontological Argument [Re: Kickle]
#12401325 - 04/16/10 12:36 AM (13 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Kickle said: Prove God doesn't exist. It's still gonna be philosophizing about the word.
r u?
It's an unfalsifiable theory, there's no point.
-------------------- Well I try my best to be just like I am, but everybody wants you to be just like them. -- Bob Dylan  fireworks_god said:It's one thing to simply enjoy a style of life that one enjoys, but it's another thing altogether to refer to another person's choice as "wrong" or to rationalize their behavior as being pathological or resulting from some sort of inadequacy or failing so as to create a sense of superiority or separation as yet another projection of a personal fear or control issue.
|
OrgoneConclusion
Blue Fish Group



Registered: 04/01/07
Posts: 45,414
Loc: Under the C
|
Re: Anselm's Ontological Argument [Re: Poid] 1
#12401407 - 04/16/10 12:51 AM (13 years, 9 months ago) |
|
|
Unlike the 100,000 posts here that DO contain a point.
--------------------
|
|