|
 Silversoul
Rhizome
 
Registered: 01/02/05
Posts: 23,576
Loc: The Barricades
|
 Chrome vs. Firefox 
#12065554 - 02/20/10 10:54 PM (12 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
I just switched my main browser from Firefox to Google Chrome. Liking it so far, but I still have some exploring to do with it. Seems to run a bit faster. I also like the layout: You see more of the browser window and less of the browser. There's add-ons just like you have for Firefox, though I imagine there's far fewer. Anyway, I'm pretty satisfied with it so far. Anyone else care to offer a comparison?
--------------------
|
chooken
Between the Earth and Sky
Registered: 08/15/09
Posts: 2,009
Loc: Aus 
|
 Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: Silversoul]
#12065577 - 02/20/10 10:58 PM (12 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
I wanna give it a go, but I don't think they are gonna release it for tiger 
--------------------
[
|
frith
God
Registered: 10/28/09
Posts: 7,512
Loc: Philadelphia, PA 
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: chooken]
#12065904 - 02/20/10 11:54 PM (12 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
i think it runs a little faster but the extensions i use in firefox are essential.
if im not able to use the browser the way i want then i dont want to use it.
ill stick with firefox for the time being 
--------------------
|
CosmicJoke
happy mutant
Registered: 04/06/00
Posts: 10,848
Loc: Portland, OR
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: Silversoul]
#12065917 - 02/20/10 11:58 PM (12 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
i find an occasional website that isn't displayed properly w/ chrome here and there, but otherwise prefer it. all of them seem equally fast to me though.
--------------------
Everything is better than it was the last time. I'm good.
If we could look into each others hearts, and understand the unique challenges each of us faces, I think we would treat each other much more gently, with more love, patience, tolerance, and care.
It takes a lot of courage to go out there and radiate your essence.
I know you scared, you should ask us if we scared too. If you was there, and we just knew you cared too.
|
daytripper05
Psychonaut
Registered: 10/31/06
Posts: 6,962
Loc: In my garden
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: chooken]
#12066291 - 02/21/10 01:06 AM (12 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
http://www.google.com/chrome?platform=mac
It's available for 10.5 and later but for Intel only Macs. I don't like it as much as firefox though. I love ad blocker.
Quote:
frith said:
i think it runs a little faster but the extensions i use in firefox are essential.
if im not able to use the browser the way i want then i dont want to use it.
ill stick with firefox for the time being
|
chooken
Between the Earth and Sky
Registered: 08/15/09
Posts: 2,009
Loc: Aus
|
|
Quote:
daytripper05 said:
http://www.google.com/chrome?platform=mac
It's available for 10.5 and later but for Intel only Macs. I don't like it as much as firefox though. I love ad blocker.
Guess I'm out of luck then 
I doubt it would top firefox in the end though. FF just has too much of a backing already. Kind of how Bing and yahoo will never become close to Google.
--------------------
[
|
tak
geo's henchman
Registered: 11/21/00
Posts: 3,774
Loc: nowhereland
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: CosmicJoke]
#12067264 - 02/21/10 03:58 AM (12 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
CosmicJoke said:
i find an occasional website that isn't displayed properly w/ chrome here and there, but otherwise prefer it. all of them seem equally fast to me though.
What browser does display it correctly? Not being a fanboy, but typically if its not displayed correctly in chrome, its the web developers fault.
--------------------
The DJ's took pills to stay awake and play for seven days.
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 26,126
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: tak]
#12069508 - 02/21/10 01:36 PM (12 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
I switched to Chrome on the day it was released. My experiences so far:
- more robust than Firefox; i.e. more difficult to crash. However, if it crashes, mostly the problem isn't isolated to one tab as Google implies.
- better performance with Flash and PDF plugins than with Firefox.
- introduction of plugins recently has improved functionality greatly, although for most purposes, Chrome was adequate even before that point in my experience
The differences aren't too big in any case. I prefer Chrome at the moment. I use FireFox and IE for the two sites/apps I use regularly that don't work with Chrome. IE still sucks tremendously, and between FF and Chrome it's a close call.
|
 ButtWizard
Magician
Registered: 11/28/09
Posts: 118
Loc: U.S.A.
Last seen: 12 years, 2 months
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: koraks]
#12069530 - 02/21/10 01:55 PM (12 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
The first versions of Chrome were weak, but Google has since fixed many a bug. It's fast as shit and now compatible with most pages. Not as many plug-ins as for Firefox, but it has a few nice touches of its own, like being able to re-size forms and the most visited page.
--------------------
|
Dynoo
-
Registered: 07/08/09
Posts: 1,229
Loc: -
|
|
Post deleted by DynooReason for deletion: Invaid
--------------------
-
Edited by Dynoo (04/12/10 06:29 AM)
|
fragmentedeye
Stranger
Registered: 02/21/10
Posts: 5
Last seen: 12 years, 11 months
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: Dynoo]
#12070351 - 02/21/10 07:45 PM (12 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
Im goin to have to try it cause lately ive gotten so many crashes on firefox and times it just doesnt want to start up, or it freezes. Sad cause they used to run so well, i do like the apps, but i like something i can rely on and not hassle with all the time
|
Redstorm
Prince of Bugs
Registered: 10/09/02
Posts: 44,174
Last seen: 6 years, 5 months
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: Silversoul]
#12070409 - 02/21/10 08:01 PM (12 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
My GF has Chrome on her pc and I've used FF on mine for as long as I can remember. Browsing is much quicker on Chrome, but I have so many apps on FF that I need to continue to use it for now. As Google grows a more robust selection of apps, I'll probably jump over.
|
frith
God
Registered: 10/28/09
Posts: 7,512
Loc: Philadelphia, PA
|
|
Quote:
fragmentedeye said:
Im goin to have to try it cause lately ive gotten so many crashes on firefox and times it just doesnt want to start up, or it freezes. Sad cause they used to run so well, i do like the apps, but i like something i can rely on and not hassle with all the time
update your shit. maybe one of the extentions is messing it up. i never have crashes.. weird flash bugs but thats crappy ass flash.
--------------------
|
Simms
Fuckwit
Registered: 11/18/08
Posts: 1,109
Loc: Somewhere in Europe
Last seen: 1 year, 6 months
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: frith]
#12071266 - 02/21/10 11:15 PM (12 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
What about Opera??
No one cares about Opera anymore
--------------------
|
golden1
Registered: 06/19/08
Posts: 1,707
Loc: north korea
|
|
chrome has ad block now
|
frith
God
Registered: 10/28/09
Posts: 7,512
Loc: Philadelphia, PA
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: golden1]
#12072724 - 02/22/10 03:08 AM (12 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
golden1 said:
chrome has ad block now
ahh so it has..
http://is.gd/8TFTL
im still waiting on a good version (or port) of Vimperator though. there is Vrome but its not nearly as polished.
--------------------
|
ThirdEyeOpening
Lost In My Head
Registered: 08/24/04
Posts: 2,287
Loc: How the fuck should i kno...
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: Silversoul]
#12073906 - 02/22/10 05:59 AM (12 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
I prefer chrome on my PC's, its just much leaner and ive had no problems with flash or java.
But flash isnt working in the Mac version, so im still using FF on my macs.
--------------------
  
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity. Im not too sure about the former. -Einstein
Of course the rules need to be enforced, but the goal of law and order should be to create a just society, not to enforce laws. -Unknown
“I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.” -Stephen Roberts
|
KillaFoRilla
Heretic
Registered: 12/23/09
Posts: 1,520
Last seen: 2 years, 8 months
|
|
Chrome is rockin for its speed and simplicity. BAM!
|
ricinus
suspicious indeed
Registered: 06/20/08
Posts: 90
Last seen: 5 years, 2 months
|
|
dunno but I think that chrome requires a better PC to work on than Firefox
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 26,126
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: ricinus]
#12081604 - 02/23/10 11:39 AM (12 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
ricinus said:
dunno but I think that chrome requires a better PC to work on than Firefox
I'm not sure. Based on my experience, I'd expect little difference. Both will run on pretty outdated hardware anyway.
|
veda_sticks
Cultivator
Registered: 07/29/07
Posts: 14,191
Loc: UK 
Last seen: 3 years, 30 days
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: ricinus]
#12097784 - 02/26/10 04:15 AM (12 years, 11 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
ricinus said:
dunno but I think that chrome requires a better PC to work on than Firefox
that makes very little sense since chrome is a lightweight browser designed for performance.
Chrome consumes less memory that firefox for a start.
--------------------
PF TEK - writeup by EvilMushroom666
Lets Grow Mushrooms - RogerRabbit & RoadKills website with sample videos plus the full PF TEK video series. Alot of great information - BUY THE DVD
Cakes can and will pin! - So you think cakes suck for pins. Your wrong
Franks Simple Coir/Verm Tek
Franks Proper Pasturisation Tek
Franks Spawning To Bulk - Monotub
Professor Pinheads RTV Injection Port Tek
Foo Mans No Soak WBS Prep Tek
|
UtOpiaN-MiNdStAtEs
Registered: 10/25/09
Posts: 1,820
Loc: place
|
|
i just found out about chrome from this thread. i havnt heard of it before but i just downloaded it and it seems very fast. i like
--------------------
   ]KILLEER TOFFUUUUUU!!!!
love life and live loving
Wizard of the Night
~Peace Love and Hippy Shit~
|
Annom
※※※※※※
Registered: 12/22/02
Posts: 6,367
Loc: Europe
Last seen: 8 months, 13 days
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: ricinus]
#12162084 - 03/08/10 08:18 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
ricinus said:
dunno but I think that chrome requires a better PC to work on than Firefox
Chrome feels faster on my netbook with ubuntu netbook remix.
|
Frinkz
Strange
Registered: 02/25/10
Posts: 580
Loc: Yorkshire
Last seen: 12 years, 2 months
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: Annom]
#12162988 - 03/08/10 01:56 PM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Don't get me wrong, I love Chrome...
But the only problem I have, is when opening a new tab you get your top 8 sites visited...
This is all well and good, but when one of them is YouPorn, and it's not me that opened the tab, it's not so good.
Anyone know how to change that? 
--------------------
uk grow logs
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 26,126
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: Frinkz]
#12163020 - 03/08/10 02:31 PM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Hover over the page, then click the cross in the right-top corner which says 'don't show this page' when you hover over it 
|
Frinkz
Strange
Registered: 02/25/10
Posts: 580
Loc: Yorkshire
Last seen: 12 years, 2 months
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: koraks]
#12163236 - 03/08/10 04:37 PM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
koraks said:
Hover over the page, then click the cross in the right-top corner which says 'don't show this page' when you hover over it
Yeah, I guess I could do that, thanks
I'd still rather just have it a blank white page though, that possible?
--------------------
uk grow logs
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 26,126
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: Frinkz]
#12163263 - 03/08/10 04:51 PM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
I haven't tried it, but I suppose if you go to Options and in Startup, you select 'Open the following pages' and then add an entry for 'about:blank', you might have what you want.
|
Frinkz
Strange
Registered: 02/25/10
Posts: 580
Loc: Yorkshire
Last seen: 12 years, 2 months
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: koraks]
#12163349 - 03/08/10 05:20 PM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Nah, that's for the first startup rather than each new tab.
From a little research, it turns out there WAS an extension to do this, but a security update a while ago rendered it useless, and apparently unresolvable.
Thanks anyway 
--------------------
uk grow logs
|
koraks
Registered: 06/02/03
Posts: 26,126
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: Frinkz]
#12163360 - 03/08/10 05:26 PM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Oh crap. Well, you'll just have to use incognito browsing to view your pr0n. It's what it's there for anyways
|
Cloud9
I don't feel, and it feels great
Registered: 07/03/03
Posts: 1,554
Loc: between here and there
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: koraks]
#12163902 - 03/08/10 08:04 PM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
i've been debating to get it for a while, this thread has prompted me to give it a try.
--------------------
|
UtOpiaN-MiNdStAtEs
Registered: 10/25/09
Posts: 1,820
Loc: place
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: Cloud9]
#12163957 - 03/08/10 08:17 PM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
i dont think ull regret it
--------------------
]KILLEER TOFFUUUUUU!!!!
love life and live loving
Wizard of the Night
~Peace Love and Hippy Shit~
|
kpatel888
Stranger
Registered: 02/12/10
Posts: 12
Last seen: 12 years, 6 months
|
|
Here's a good article on browser comparison testing with benchmarks: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/firefox-chrome-opera,2558.html
|
El Honcho
Stranger
Registered: 03/10/10
Posts: 24
Last seen: 12 years, 10 months
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: kpatel888]
#12180726 - 03/11/10 07:58 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
If you will notice, your source reports single tab references for memory testing. Open 10 different tabs in FF and report your memory usage. Compare tests with Google Chrome after opening 10 different tabs and you'll find that it will take more memory than FF.
Also, be aware that chrome has a lot of flaws and is prone to security risks.
|
cortex
[ H ] ψ = [ E ] ψ
Registered: 10/09/02
Posts: 15,171
Loc: Gedankenexperiment
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: El Honcho]
#12184952 - 03/12/10 02:33 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
El Honcho said:
Also, be aware that chrome has a lot of flaws and is prone to security risks.
Such as?
--------------------
Signature (up to 750 characters).
|
supra
computerEnthusiast
Registered: 10/26/03
Posts: 6,446
Loc: TEXAS
Last seen: 11 years, 9 months
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: cortex]
#12215003 - 03/17/10 04:35 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
just put chromium (the open source implementation of chrome) on my archlinux box, using it now, going to check it out for a while and see how i like it, seems much much snappier so far, but its probably due to precacheing whatever i'm hovering over...
peace
|
Chespirito
Stranger
Registered: 02/14/09
Posts: 3,259
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: supra]
#12215479 - 03/17/10 05:54 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Ive never been able to load pdf's on chrome. Theres probably a way to do it, honestly Ive just been too lazy to look. Anyone use Linux and have the same problem?
|
Tripp420
What?
Registered: 06/17/08
Posts: 614
Loc: Northern Nevada
Last seen: 10 years, 15 days
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: cortex]
#12216049 - 03/17/10 07:32 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
cortex said:
Quote:
El Honcho said:
Also, be aware that chrome has a lot of flaws and is prone to security risks.
Such as?
It's an internet browser.
--------------------
|
jenns_hot
Hungry
Registered: 12/31/06
Posts: 3,459
Loc: East Coast
Last seen: 1 year, 26 days
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: Tripp420]
#12216077 - 03/17/10 07:37 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Chrome would definitely be superior if it had the adblocker firefox did, plus the capability to do all the cool addons that you can put in firefox.
i use stumbleupon and autopager regularly and don't want to go without them.
they need to give me more incentive to switch over, other than just speed.
--------------------
"Fear makes the wolf look bigger"
|
jenns_hot
Hungry
Registered: 12/31/06
Posts: 3,459
Loc: East Coast
Last seen: 1 year, 26 days
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: cortex]
#12216081 - 03/17/10 07:38 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
cortex said:
Quote:
El Honcho said:
Also, be aware that chrome has a lot of flaws and is prone to security risks.
Such as?
it might get jacked from you in the hood. niggas love their chromezzzzzzzzz
--------------------
"Fear makes the wolf look bigger"
|
Chespirito
Stranger
Registered: 02/14/09
Posts: 3,259
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: jenns_hot]
#12216116 - 03/17/10 07:45 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Actually IE9 is looking pretty sexy so far
|
jenns_hot
Hungry
Registered: 12/31/06
Posts: 3,459
Loc: East Coast
Last seen: 1 year, 26 days
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: Chespirito]
#12216134 - 03/17/10 07:49 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
IE9 has 5 stars from the CNet editors, but only 2.5 from about 1500 users.
Chrome and Firefox both have 5 from editors and 4.5 stars from users
--------------------
"Fear makes the wolf look bigger"
|
Chespirito
Stranger
Registered: 02/14/09
Posts: 3,259
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: jenns_hot]
#12216151 - 03/17/10 07:51 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Ha IE9 isn't even in beta yet man, what are you talking about? It was only really first discussed in appreciable detail today. Do you just have an anti-Microsoft response function?
|
jenns_hot
Hungry
Registered: 12/31/06
Posts: 3,459
Loc: East Coast
Last seen: 1 year, 26 days
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: Chespirito]
#12216160 - 03/17/10 07:53 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
oh, you're right. i was looking at the current IE.
don't get me wrong, i generally like microsoft, that's why after i read your post i checked out cnet to see what they thought.
--------------------
"Fear makes the wolf look bigger"
|
Chespirito
Stranger
Registered: 02/14/09
Posts: 3,259
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: jenns_hot]
#12216187 - 03/17/10 07:57 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Yea IE8 blows. IE9 though really sounds like its some advanced shit. Seems like they are finally actually tapping their absurdly good workforce. I mean honestly, they hire some of the best CS students out there, yet their products generally suck. Meaning the management is atrocious over there, seems like they did some kind of shakeup as now they have a few decent products in the works, mainly IE9 and Windows Mobile Phone 7
|
frith
God
Registered: 10/28/09
Posts: 7,512
Loc: Philadelphia, PA
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: jenns_hot]
#12216237 - 03/17/10 08:09 AM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
jenns_hot said:
Chrome would definitely be superior if it had the adblocker firefox did, plus the capability to do all the cool addons that you can put in firefox.
Adblock:
https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/gighmmpiobklfepjocnamgkkbiglidom
overall yeah, chrome needs some more extensions for me to switch full time..
--------------------
Edited by frith (03/17/10 08:12 AM)
|
UtOpiaN-MiNdStAtEs
Registered: 10/25/09
Posts: 1,820
Loc: place
|
Re: Chrome vs. Firefox [Re: frith]
#12218389 - 03/17/10 09:19 PM (12 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
i loved how quick chrome was but i was a little scared about using it becouse i dont want any spyware or anything like that. im not shure if its as safe as firefox so ive just been using that.
does anyone know how safe chrome is to use?
--------------------
]KILLEER TOFFUUUUUU!!!!
love life and live loving
Wizard of the Night
~Peace Love and Hippy Shit~
|
|
Threaded
Previous
Index
Next
North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies 
Bulk Cannabis Seeds 
Buy Bali Kratom Powder 
Red Vein Kratom
Edit 
Reply 
1 2 all )
Warrior
Diploid
Madtowntripper
Chespirito
Barakanaten
Asante
dr_gonz
playapez