Home | Community | Message Board


World Seed Supply
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Music, Art, and Media

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
Offlinemachineelf368
self-transforming

Registered: 09/05/02
Posts: 119
Loc: in the mountains, awaitin...
Last seen: 11 years, 10 months
star trek: nemesis
    #1176017 - 12/28/02 09:04 PM (13 years, 11 months ago)

Just saw it today. The only way I can describe it is: Goddamn.
Definitely the best of the TNG movies.


--------------------
(the above was deciphered from phi (~1.62) using an advanced alphanumeric conversion algorhythm and should not be perceived as meaningful.)


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleRandalFlagg
Stranger
Registered: 06/15/02
Posts: 15,608
Re: star trek: nemesis [Re: machineelf368]
    #1176586 - 12/29/02 06:37 AM (13 years, 11 months ago)


Just saw it today. The only way I can describe it is: Goddamn.
Definitely the best of the TNG movies.

Dammit!  It is already out of my theater and I didn't get a chance to see it.

:mad: 


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineJackal
Well Versed In Etiquette
 User Gallery

Registered: 10/16/02
Posts: 4,571
Last seen: 2 years, 2 months
Re: star trek: nemesis [Re: machineelf368]
    #1178471 - 12/30/02 12:53 AM (13 years, 11 months ago)

Ever notice how the even-numbered Star Trek films are good, and the odd-numbered ones are not so good :wink:


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinemachineelf368
self-transforming

Registered: 09/05/02
Posts: 119
Loc: in the mountains, awaitin...
Last seen: 11 years, 10 months
Re: star trek: nemesis [Re: Jackal]
    #1181767 - 12/31/02 12:49 PM (13 years, 11 months ago)

Quote:

Ever notice how the even-numbered Star Trek films are good, and the odd-numbered ones are not so good




I keep hearing that from people, and I keep not believeing it. In my humble opinion numbers 3 (search for spock) and 7 (generations) were great movies, while numbers 6 and 8 were terrible, just terrible.
-m


--------------------
(the above was deciphered from phi (~1.62) using an advanced alphanumeric conversion algorhythm and should not be perceived as meaningful.)


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineJackal
Well Versed In Etiquette
 User Gallery

Registered: 10/16/02
Posts: 4,571
Last seen: 2 years, 2 months
Re: star trek: nemesis [Re: machineelf368]
    #1182311 - 01/01/03 12:46 AM (13 years, 11 months ago)

Quote:

while numbers 6 and 8 were terrible



The Undiscovered Country and First Contact are the best  :tongue:


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1

General Interest >> Music, Art, and Media

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Star Trek: Nemesis chrispc 556 2 01/14/03 10:03 AM
by spleen
* Doorway to the Stars mjshroomer 333 0 10/04/03 11:20 PM
by mjshroomer
* The Death of a Star (photoshop art) Syle 1,010 9 05/18/06 08:48 AM
by PurpleKush
* Extreme Star Wars fans... JacquesCousteau 620 3 05/29/05 08:40 AM
by OJK
* I <3 Mazzy Star Mello KittyS 395 2 02/24/09 08:18 AM
by Mello Kitty
* STAR WARS
( 1 2 all )
zepphead 2,662 24 05/29/02 10:01 PM
by sir tripsalot
* Heinlein - Time for the stars sleepy 694 13 05/04/09 10:11 PM
by sleepy
* Star Gate by mj mjshroomer 750 8 03/24/06 07:59 PM
by Blastrid

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, automan, sui, DividedQuantum
497 topic views. 0 members, 1 guests and 3 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic | Stats ]
Search this thread:
Magic-Mushrooms-Shop.com
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2016 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.026 seconds spending 0.005 seconds on 14 queries.