Icelander said:

Psychonot2329 said:

To use what you said: "Your ideas here are not new at all." Of course not. Everything that we will ever say or think of have been thought of or said.
You say you agree with some of them, well, could you discuss it?
You say its "blah blah for" you. You're on a forum called shroomery. With thousands of posts. You have time and have done a lot of "blah blah"'ing.
Don't pretend you're some shit

Proceed.

---

I'm just saying your thread does not interest me at this time. On another day it might but I rarely get into things I agree with unless I have a big insight to add. And I don't. I gave my two cents and it went right past you. I'm satisfied.

---

Icelander said:

Still whining cause you feel slighted.

Time to get over it.

---

Icelander said:

Well I prefer not to be selfish like you and think of the tender lads and lassies who might be taken in by the god concept.


(just kidding) Well, not totally, I do worry about them sometimes but it's really not any of my business.

I like Tao or Nagual. If you don't know that second term you will once you read the forth Castaneda book. Once you read that I doubt you will ever call anything god again.

---

Right. If you want to base one's spiritual life on pure fiction, rather than mythology, entheogenic experience, spontaneous mysticism, or midrash, I prefer Zardoz.

MarkostheGnostic said:

Right. If you want to base one's spiritual life on pure fiction, rather than mythology, entheogenic experience, spontaneous mysticism, or midrash, I prefer Zardoz.

---