Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Jump to first unread post Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  [ show all ]
Re: New zodiac sign?? [Re: 4896744]
    #13788116 -

Was a Pisces, still am a Pisces.  Good thing I don't have to deal with any cognitive dissonance.  :yesnod:


--------------------
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New zodiac sign?? [Re: 4896744]
    #13788132 -

iThink said:
Silversoul said:
DieCommie said:
Im talking about amateurs and professionals.



Then frankly, I don't think you know what you're talking about.  Any professional astrologer worth his salt will understand the difference between the tropical and sidereal zodiac.  Some astrologers may prefer the sidereal zodiac, and therefore may be drawn toward Vedic astrology.  But astrologers who go by the Western system generally understand the difference.

It is certainly true that when the signs were named, they drew their names from the constellations that were there at the time.  But that does not mean that the sign is the constellation.



"Any professional astrologer worth his salt"

Kind of an oxymoron isn't it?



No, I don't think so.  Even if you consider astrology to be bogus, there is still a body of knowledge which astrologers are expected to learn, and any astrologer who does not possess such knowledge can be considered a bad astrologer.  Simple as that.


--------------------

Edited by Silversoul (01/14/11 07:59 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New zodiac sign?? [Re: Silversoul]
    #13788641 -

But it's bullshit. Being well versed in useless bullshit isn't worth anything imo.


--------------------
Live your Life! :heart:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New zodiac sign?? [Re: 4896744]
    #13788655 -

Well if you consider that ultimately everything is a distraction or a shield then one thing is as good as another as long as you really get engaged.


--------------------
"Don't believe everything you think". -Anom.

" All that lives was born to die"-Anom.

With much wisdom comes much sorrow,
The more knowledge, the more grief.
Ecclesiastes circa 350 BC

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New zodiac sign?? [Re: Icelander]
    #13788762 -

Icelander said:
Well if you consider that ultimately everything is a distraction or a shield then one thing is as good as another as long as you really get engaged.



True, however my intelligence won't allow me to believe in bullshit. I guess you could say that is a bad thing, but the trade off is that it allows me to be "successful" in life at least from a monetary/possession standpoint and i feel i do quite well from an emotional standpoint too.


--------------------
Live your Life! :heart:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New zodiac sign?? [Re: Silversoul]
    #13790238 -

thanks for the info Silversoul :thumbup:

I never got much into astrology so I didn't know about the differences between eastern and western traditions

keeping the names of the constellations is very misleading IMO


--------------------

                                                      psilohuasca is da wae
                                                                gnome sayin'?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New zodiac sign?? [Re: 4896744]
    #13790560 -

iThink said:
"Any professional astrologer worth his salt"

Kind of an oxymoron isn't it?



He said professional at first, but then referenced a body of knowledge that he expects astrologers to follow.  There is a big difference between being a professional and being a 'guru' or expert.  Professional astrologers publish traditional horoscopes and western consumers eat them up by the truck load.  Just because silversoul appeals to an esoteric form of astrology does not mean everybody else does.  Westerners who are into astrology, as an amateur or a professional, work with the twelve signs.

I have noticed this kind of evasion alot in this forum.  A poster will appeal to an esoteric and historical definition of something because it fits their world view while ignoring the modern, majority definition.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New zodiac sign?? [Re: DieCommie]
    #13790567 -

FUCK.. I LOVED AQUARIUS... NOW IM FUCKING CAPRICORN ...shit blows son.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New zodiac sign?? [Re: Kinko]
    #13790600 -

guess I'm a pisces now. :shrug:

Was Aries before, but until a few minutes ago, I thought that was the bull.  :lol:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New zodiac sign?? [Re: BothHands] * 1
    #13791307 -

I'm a Scorpio now (I always knew it).  My wife is a Taurus instead of a Gemini and my ex wife is still a Cancer.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New zodiac sign?? [Re: DieCommie]
    #13791512 -

What he was saying is that the signs positions are dictated by the position of the sun rather than the position of the constellations. This is not that esoteric and is explained in most astrology books except for the most rudimentary, for example, a pamphlet you might pick up from a shelf while waiting in a grocery store line.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New zodiac sign?? [Re: 4896744]
    #13794042 -

iThink said:
Icelander said:
Well if you consider that ultimately everything is a distraction or a shield then one thing is as good as another as long as you really get engaged.



True, however my intelligence won't allow me to believe in bullshit. I guess you could say that is a bad thing, but the trade off is that it allows me to be "successful" in life at least from a monetary/possession standpoint and i feel i do quite well from an emotional standpoint too.




No it's not a bad thing. Why would that be if you have other shields that you can tell yourself are not bullshit. :wink::satansmoking:


--------------------
"Don't believe everything you think". -Anom.

" All that lives was born to die"-Anom.

With much wisdom comes much sorrow,
The more knowledge, the more grief.
Ecclesiastes circa 350 BC

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New zodiac sign?? [Re: DieCommie]
    #13794063 -

DieCommie said:
iThink said:
"Any professional astrologer worth his salt"

Kind of an oxymoron isn't it?



He said professional at first, but then referenced a body of knowledge that he expects astrologers to follow.  There is a big difference between being a professional and being a 'guru' or expert.  Professional astrologers publish traditional horoscopes and western consumers eat them up by the truck load.  Just because silversoul appeals to an esoteric form of astrology does not mean everybody else does.  Westerners who are into astrology, as an amateur or a professional, work with the twelve signs.

I have noticed this kind of evasion alot in this forum.  A poster will appeal to an esoteric and historical definition of something because it fits their world view while ignoring the modern, majority definition.



This is NOT esoteric.  This is straightforward astrology that any astrologer who does charts and readings should be able to do.  This is about straightforward competence in one's own craft.

If I said we use more than 10% of our brains, would that fact be "esoteric" simply because the average layperson doesn't know any better?


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New zodiac sign?? [Re: falcon] * 1
    #13796091 -

falcon said:
...except for the most rudimentary, for example, a pamphlet you might pick up from a shelf while waiting in a grocery store line.



That is how the vast majority of western astrology takes place.  And without any empirical evidence to distinguish their pamphlet from your more developed system I see no reason to dismiss the pamphlet relative to a more developed system.  They are each just sects of a false religion IMO and you talking shit about the pamphlet is like a mormon saying that catholics arnt real christians.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New zodiac sign?? [Re: DieCommie]
    #13796142 -

WTF! Libera? my whole life people have talked to me for ten minutes and said: "you a scorpio" now all those people where wrong? fuck that!


--------------------
:willynilly:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New zodiac sign?? [Re: DieCommie]
    #13796201 -

The pamphlet is a consumer product, with little explanation how the astrologers create prognostications that they do. In the western system the positions of the signs is a common trait shared by all the 'sects'. Calling the pamphlets rudimentary was not meant to be derogatory, it was meant to distinguish the pamphlets and the people who enjoy them from those who have a deeper understanding of  astrology and the books that they use as references.

Edited by falcon (01/16/11 12:05 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New zodiac sign?? [Re: falcon] * 1
    #13797959 -

So there are several different flavors of astrology, each with its own system and its own predictions, and each contradicts the others and yet they are all are correct and give valid predictions.

Uh... yeah... :flowstone:


--------------------
Republican Values:

1) You can't get married to your spouse who is the same sex as you.
2) You can't have an abortion no matter how much you don't want a child.
3) You can't have a certain plant in your possession or you'll get locked up with a rapist and a murderer.

4) We need a smaller, less-intrusive government.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New zodiac sign?? [Re: Diploid]
    #13797992 -

Due to your closemindedness and general contrary attitude, I bet you're a Capricorn.  :razz:


--------------------
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New zodiac sign?? [Re: Diploid]
    #13798193 -

Diploid said:
So there are several different flavors of astrology, each with its own system and its own predictions, and each contradicts the others and yet they are all are correct and give valid predictions.

Uh... yeah... :flowstone:



Kinda like psychology.


--------------------

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Re: New zodiac sign?? [Re: deCypher]
    #13798735 -

Due to your closemindedness and general contrary attitude, I bet you're a Capricorn.

You lose. Pay up! :bananadance:


--------------------
Republican Values:

1) You can't get married to your spouse who is the same sex as you.
2) You can't have an abortion no matter how much you don't want a child.
3) You can't have a certain plant in your possession or you'll get locked up with a rapist and a murderer.

4) We need a smaller, less-intrusive government.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |  [ show all ]


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* what is your sign?
( 1 2 3 4 ... 10 11 all )
kaiowas 13,929 213 04/22/05 10:19 AM
by Icelander
* What's Your Sign? >:)
( 1 2 all )
Adamist 3,621 39 09/26/02 08:59 PM
by Adamist
* whats your sign?
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
CleverName 4,558 97 10/10/03 01:39 AM
by caolite
* zodiac influence felix 1,762 14 03/17/02 11:31 PM
by felix
* how true are zodiacs and astrology
( 1 2 all )
2Experimental 3,989 26 08/01/04 10:52 AM
by Shroomism
* Signs Zeus 874 6 01/17/02 12:45 AM
by tak
* Chinese Zodiac
( 1 2 all )
Tangerines 3,387 36 04/11/08 09:24 PM
by Middleman
* Signs in the Sky
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
Swami 4,372 81 08/15/05 12:41 AM
by iambobby

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Middleman, DividedQuantum
3,829 topic views. 1 members, 184 guests and 3 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2026 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.038 seconds spending 0.011 seconds on 17 queries.