|
Phluck
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 04/10/99
Posts: 11,394
Loc: Canada
Last seen: 5 months, 4 days
|
Re: Scepticism [Re: raytrace]
#1079487 - 11/23/02 01:58 PM (21 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
"Or just try using logic to understand some forms of art, it is like trying to use a calculator to prepare dinner. "
The human mind is designed in a logical fashion. This doesn't mean that it won't produce things that seem illogical. I'm sure the art that you're talking about is stimulating various emotions and ideas through images, sounds, tastes, smells, whatever. These connections already exist in our minds, we see the art, and we don't have to use logic to make the connections. Just because logic as a system of thought isn't being used, doesn't mean that what is happening is illogical.
Let's say you had a very elaborate calculator. It took into account one's past, what they were fed as a child, where they grew up, their likes and dislikes, and it had various tastes programmed into it, it would likely spit out an excellent recipe.
"Push logic to the limits and will get paradoxes."
Please explain this further.
-------------------- "I have no valid complaint against hustlers. No rational bitch. But the act of selling is repulsive to me. I harbor a secret urge to whack a salesman in the face, crack his teeth and put red bumps around his eyes." -Hunter S Thompson http://phluck.is-after.us
|
raytrace
Stranger
Registered: 01/15/02
Posts: 720
|
Re: Scepticism [Re: Phluck]
#1079492 - 11/23/02 02:00 PM (21 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
you can never know these things for sure, believing in them would be stupid if you are so afraid to be stupid, you can always sit tight in your comfortable (proovable) couch. you hold tight, let the idiots explore
there are far more plausible explanations that one can come up with logically i'm sure there are. just not for everything
|
raytrace
Stranger
Registered: 01/15/02
Posts: 720
|
Re: Scepticism [Re: Phluck]
#1079560 - 11/23/02 02:29 PM (21 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
The human mind is designed in a logical fashion. designed? by whom?
Let's say you had a very elaborate calculator. It took into account one's past, what they were fed as a child, where they grew up, their likes and dislikes, and it had various tastes programmed into it, it would likely spit out an excellent recipe. I mean a simple arithmetic calculator This was supposed to be taken metaphorically
"Push logic to the limits and will get paradoxes." There are paradoxes in the scientific world. I suspect some of them may be because the tool being used to understand them is inappropriate. This does not mean that there are no "logical" explanations, but at least that the current "logic" being used is kind of flawed or incomplete. It has to do with the symbolic, concrete approach of concepts.
|
raytrace
Stranger
Registered: 01/15/02
Posts: 720
|
Re: Scepticism [Re: GoBlue!]
#1079571 - 11/23/02 02:34 PM (21 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
"there are things that are true, that cannot be proven, e.g. something is either true or false" Are you sure that's "true"? How do you know? I personally don't, but Goedel proved it.
|
raytrace
Stranger
Registered: 01/15/02
Posts: 720
|
Re: Scepticism [Re: Phluck]
#1079707 - 11/23/02 03:34 PM (21 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Just because logic as a system of thought isn't being used, doesn't mean that what is happening is illogical this kind of what I am trying to say, with your words
|
Anonymous
|
Re: Scepticism [Re: raytrace]
#1079814 - 11/23/02 04:38 PM (21 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
And Goedel 'proved' it using logic. Sounds kinda circular to me.
|
Phluck
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 04/10/99
Posts: 11,394
Loc: Canada
Last seen: 5 months, 4 days
|
Re: Scepticism [Re: raytrace]
#1079816 - 11/23/02 04:40 PM (21 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
"if you are so afraid to be stupid, you can always sit tight in your comfortable (proovable) couch. you hold tight, let the idiots explore"
I'm all for exploring. Here's the difference between science and religion:
Science: based on well documented observations, come to what is the most logical conclusion.
Religion: based on emotions and whimsy, come up with an idea, then selectively find evidence to back it up.
The second model is how most people come up with various forms of alternative medicine, theories about aliens, esp, etc... They start with a conclusion, and work backwards.
Lots of artists and scientists use the first method of thinking. It doesn't hinder you creativity, it just prevents you from believing in things that are likely false. The problem with most of these whimsical ideas is that a lot of them are false. The kind of evidence that people use to prove them doesn't really have any basis, and can be used to "prove" anything. That's exactly what my pseudoscience post is about.
Did you read this?: http://skepdic.com/pseudosc.html
"i'm sure there are. just not for everything"
Okay, give me some examples.
-------------------- "I have no valid complaint against hustlers. No rational bitch. But the act of selling is repulsive to me. I harbor a secret urge to whack a salesman in the face, crack his teeth and put red bumps around his eyes." -Hunter S Thompson http://phluck.is-after.us
|
Phluck
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 04/10/99
Posts: 11,394
Loc: Canada
Last seen: 5 months, 4 days
|
Re: Scepticism [Re: raytrace]
#1079825 - 11/23/02 04:47 PM (21 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Everything follows logic. Even if you don't know the intricacies, it is still logical.
If something goes against logic as we understand it, this does not mean that our logic is flawed, or that it is beyond our understanding. Maybe it does, but in most cases, this is certainly not true. It would be pretty stupid to just to that conclusion without first subjecting the theory to well laid out scientific analysis. Something that many of these people avoid doing, or when they do fail these tests, as many inevitably do, they brush off the results using ad-hoc hypothesis.
-------------------- "I have no valid complaint against hustlers. No rational bitch. But the act of selling is repulsive to me. I harbor a secret urge to whack a salesman in the face, crack his teeth and put red bumps around his eyes." -Hunter S Thompson http://phluck.is-after.us
|
David_Scape
Anti Genius
Registered: 08/05/02
Posts: 878
Loc: U.S. of muthafuckin A.
Last seen: 14 years, 9 months
|
Re: Scepticism [Re: ]
#1079827 - 11/23/02 04:47 PM (21 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
hmmm, can logic be right and be correct that it's wrong? Does logic have a self-destruct button?
|
raytrace
Stranger
Registered: 01/15/02
Posts: 720
|
Re: Scepticism [Re: Phluck]
#1081277 - 11/24/02 07:13 AM (21 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
I am all for science. I love the sense of wonderment science inspires.
Yes, beliefs can be dangerous. Yes, people are being deceived, but what causes people fall into deception?
"Hardcore" scientists have been practicing bad science, they have scared people away from science:
"look, you are nothing special, I can make someone like you" "look, there is nothing unexplained in love" "look, you are the puppets of your genes", etc
You have to leave the human element breathe.
These BELIEFS are a lot more dangerous than having faith that there is something ineffable about you, no logic can describe, no human system can accommodate.
The very basis of scientific beliefs have to be challenged, for they have bring us to the verge of destruction. The mechanistic point of view of nature is simply a belief. Such beliefs are very well guarded by self proclaimed "skeptics", for they serve the current exploitation of nature, and fulfil personal ambitions.
The second model is how most people come up with various forms of alternative medicine, theories about aliens, esp, etc... They start with a conclusion, and work backwards." There is nothing wrong with letting your intuition (or empirical evidence) point the way. Then there is the work to back it up. There are many wonderful theories that are expecting to be validated, but that is only if given the chance.
Okay, give me some examples. I'll let you guess.
Edited by raytrace (11/24/02 07:18 AM)
|
Shroomism
Space Travellin
Registered: 02/13/00
Posts: 66,015
Loc: 9th Dimension
|
Re: Scepticism [Re: Phluck]
#1081427 - 11/24/02 10:14 AM (21 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Lots of artists and scientists use the first method of thinking. It doesn't hinder you creativity, it just prevents you from believing in things that are likely false.
Mmm...how exactly does an artist use logical thinking? Nothing is "right" or "wrong" in art. Creativity and Logic are in different hemispheres of the brain.
--------------------
|
David_Scape
Anti Genius
Registered: 08/05/02
Posts: 878
Loc: U.S. of muthafuckin A.
Last seen: 14 years, 9 months
|
Re: Scepticism [Re: raytrace]
#1081571 - 11/24/02 11:33 AM (21 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
"These BELIEFS are a lot more dangerous than having faith that there is something ineffable about you, no logic can describe, no human system can accommodate."
Excellent point! If I had enough posts i'd rate you. The subjective experience is why we should RESPECT sentient life! It's the special somthing that we all have in common. I dont think it should get to our heads though; who knows? Sombody may come up with an answer one day that might blow are minds!
|
Swami
Eggshell Walker
Registered: 01/18/00
Posts: 15,413
Loc: In the hen house
|
|
The subjective experience is why we should RESPECT sentient life!
Dear Aretha,
How we define what life is sentient is totally subjective.
-------------------- The proof is in the pudding.
|
Phluck
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 04/10/99
Posts: 11,394
Loc: Canada
Last seen: 5 months, 4 days
|
Re: Scepticism [Re: raytrace]
#1081762 - 11/24/02 12:57 PM (21 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
"look, you are nothing special, I can make someone like you" "look, there is nothing unexplained in love" "look, you are the puppets of your genes", etc
No scientist is saying these things. None of those things have anything to do with science. No scientist is claiming to be able to create humans from scratch.
Many might argue that love is really just a biological function. While this might take the magic out of it if you let it, and you may not WANT it to be true, but it's a perfectly valid idea. I think this may be true, and I still think love is a wonderful thing. Why do you have to be confused by something to enjoy it?
Genes are the blueprint for a person. I'm not entirely sure what you meant by that last
"You have to leave the human element breathe."
What does that even mean?
"There is nothing wrong with letting your intuition (or empirical evidence) point the way."
No, nothing wrong with letting them point you in the right direction, but you need to do a few tests before you start claiming it might work, and then you need to a full blown analysis before you can start claiming it DOES work.
"Okay, give me some examples. I'll let you guess."
Guess? I think you just can't come up with any.
-------------------- "I have no valid complaint against hustlers. No rational bitch. But the act of selling is repulsive to me. I harbor a secret urge to whack a salesman in the face, crack his teeth and put red bumps around his eyes." -Hunter S Thompson http://phluck.is-after.us
|
Phluck
Carpal Tunnel
Registered: 04/10/99
Posts: 11,394
Loc: Canada
Last seen: 5 months, 4 days
|
Re: Scepticism [Re: Phluck]
#1081781 - 11/24/02 01:05 PM (21 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
You're claiming that those things are beliefs. A claim like that just proves that you don't even know what science is.
The very basis of science is that there are no beliefs. None of the three things that you listed are believed by ANY scientist. Science is a system of documenting observations and attempting to implement this data. When there is enough evidence that a theory is incorrect, then that theory is abandoned. This generally isn't the case for systems based on beliefs.
No scientist claims to be able to explain love, for instance, because no scientist has a full understanding of the human brain.
Just because you WANT the universe to be a magical place with gods and spirits controlling forces you cannot comprehend doesn't mean that it IS this way.
-------------------- "I have no valid complaint against hustlers. No rational bitch. But the act of selling is repulsive to me. I harbor a secret urge to whack a salesman in the face, crack his teeth and put red bumps around his eyes." -Hunter S Thompson http://phluck.is-after.us
|
David_Scape
Anti Genius
Registered: 08/05/02
Posts: 878
Loc: U.S. of muthafuckin A.
Last seen: 14 years, 9 months
|
Re: Scepticism [Re: Swami]
#1081792 - 11/24/02 01:10 PM (21 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Who's Aretha? I did a search and all i found was Aretha franklin. I know nothing about this woman except that she is "The Queen of Soul who reigns supreme with a heavenly voice and terrestrial passion".
"How we define what life is sentient is totally subjective."
After looking up sentient to be sure i was even using the word correctly... Subjective experience is synonymous with sentience so maybe i didnt have to use it. But I think your saying that there is no way of knowing absolutley that all of us are sentient and your right. I should have put "The subjective experience is why I RESPECT sentient life!"
|
Swami
Eggshell Walker
Registered: 01/18/00
Posts: 15,413
Loc: In the hen house
|
|
sidebar: "R-E-S-P-E-C-T" - Aretha's #1 hit.
What I meant was that we have NO WAY of knowing which life forms are sentient and which ones aren't. I believe that the popular criterion is by which life forms interact with humans.
Creatures such as ants don't "acknowledge" humans, so we tend to deem them as not sentient.
-------------------- The proof is in the pudding.
|
FreakQlibrium
Son of Uncle Meat
Registered: 06/06/02
Posts: 19,058
Loc: Toronto Canada
|
Re: Scepticism [Re: Swami]
#1081993 - 11/24/02 02:53 PM (21 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
"R-E-S-P-E-C-T" - Aretha's #1 hit.
Not to be confused with "Rescue me" by Fontella Bass..........although many have fallen into this trap
-------------------- "Being crazier than a shithouse rat is not sufficient grounds for banishment"
|
raytrace
Stranger
Registered: 01/15/02
Posts: 720
|
Re: Scepticism [Re: Phluck]
#1082079 - 11/24/02 03:43 PM (21 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
Everything follows logic. says who?
No scientist is saying these things. Daniel Dennet, Marvin Minsky, Ray Kurtzwell, Richard Dawkins?
I think you just can't come up with any Of course I can, you.
"You have to leave the human element breathe." What does that even mean? It is fairly clear by now, that there is something binary behind you. Human-like structure does not mean there is a human inside. Try to read me not with only your analytical brain, it?s boring talking with a Prolog program. If you fail, I suggest you cut yourself, check if there is blood running inside you.
|
raytrace
Stranger
Registered: 01/15/02
Posts: 720
|
Re: Scepticism [Re: raytrace]
#1082088 - 11/24/02 03:47 PM (21 years, 4 months ago) |
|
|
The many $100,000,000 Las Vegas hotels were built by people using intuition and hunches. pretty good example for where logic is essential, now if you could give us some examples where logic does not fit...
silence... as expected...
|
|