|
 veggie
Registered: 07/25/04
Posts: 17,504
|
 Mummies used to smoke... probably 
#10340201 - 05/14/09 08:47 PM (14 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Is it just me, or does she look a little anorexic? ...
Mummies used to smoke... probably
May 15, 2009 - SpectroscopyNow.com
 The analysis of drugs in hair is generally associated with contemporary forensic applications, to detect whether a suspected drug user has been taking banned substances and, if possible, to track the time course of usage by following the distribution along the hair. It has also been used to determine whether animals raised for meat have been given illegal hormone growth promoters. However, before these applications were developed, hair analysis was also used in an anthropological context.
In the early 1990s, the hair of South American mummies dating from 1000 BC to 1500 AD was analysed by radioimmunoassay to reveal the presence of cocaine and its metabolites benzoylecgonine and ecgonine methyl ester. These findings, later corroborated by GC/MS, were taken as evidence of coca leaf chewing by the indigenous people and helped to suggest that this practice originated in the Andes.
Another study published about the same time reported the detection of cocaine, nicotine and tetrahydrocannabinol in mummies from Egypt (1000 BC to 400 AD). This report stirred up a hornet's nest. Cocaine and nicotine are derived from South American plants and there were no known trans-oceanic voyages to Europe before Columbus sailed to the Americas. So, some commentators have criticised the work, citing the speculative nature of the requisite voyages, poor experimental techniques and external contamination.
In Germany recently, this work was expanded. A collection of 70 human and animal mummies was assembled as part of an ongoing mummy project involving specialists from anthropology, pathology, radiology, molecular biology and toxicology. One of the many operations carried out was to gather evidence of the use of drugs and this was accomplished by analysing the hair of pre-Columbian mummies for drugs.
Only eight of the human mummies had sufficient hair for sampling. The analyses were carried out by Frank Musshoff and Burkhard Madea from the Institute of Forensic Medicine, Bonn, and Wilfried Rosendahl from the museum in question, the Reiss-Engelhorn-Museum in Mannheim. In the first instance, the samples were analysed by an established GC/MS procedure for opiates, cannabinoids, cocaine and similar substances.
A second set of samples was washed successively with water, petroleum benzine and dichloromethane and the washes retained. The cleaned hair was cut into pieces and ultrasonically extracted with methanol. The washings and the extract were each screened by GC/MS using a mass spectrometric library. They were also subjected to targeted analysis for nicotine and its metabolite cotinine in selected ion monitoring mode, using deuterium-labelled internal standards to allow quantitation.
The target analyses for drugs in general were all negative but three of the mummies tested positive for nicotine: an adult woman from Peru or Argentina radiocarbon dated to 1095 ± 50 AD; a child from the Peruvian Chancay culture dated to 1415 ± 16 AD; a female bony skull complete with scalp and well-preserved braided hair from Peru that had not been dated. The nicotine levels were 57.5, 14.1 and 11.4 ng/mg, respectively, but cotinine was absent in all cases. The method quantitation limits were 0.12 and 0.10 ng/mg for nicotine and cotinine, respectively.
The nicotine concentrations are of the same order as those reported in the hair of modern-day smokers but the absence of its primary metabolite is puzzling. Given the nicotine concentrations present, the team expected to find cotinine at levels well above the quantitation limit. Although cotinine is not always detected in every active smoker, to detect none in all three mummies may be considered too coincidental.
One explanation offered by the researchers is contamination of the mummies by smoking visitors or museum employees during their collection, storage and display. However, neither nicotine nor cotinine were detected in any of the washings, which would be expected for external contamination. It is possible that the hair had been cleaned during mummy storage but this could not be confirmed because the earlier records are incomplete.
In addition, the team were able to exclude modern contamination as the mummies had been stored in their vitrines for 100 years before being rediscovered and examined in 2006.
Another potential solution is the use of the tobacco plant during a sacred ritual in which the shaman would treat an ill native with tobacco smoke but this is merely speculative.
The team concluded that the active consumption of tobacco during the lifetime of the subjects, while implicated, could not be proven. Future work will include an examination of the soft tissues of the mummies which might provide more evidence for tobacco use.
|
 Jadian
Ninja
 
Registered: 07/07/05
Posts: 7,404
Loc: The desert
Last seen: 6 years, 4 months
|
Re: Mummies used to smoke... probably [Re: veggie]
#10340267 - 05/14/09 08:58 PM (14 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
They always fuck up scientific articles with stupid lines that the second to last one
"Another potential solution is the use of the tobacco plant during a sacred ritual in which the shaman would treat an ill native with tobacco smoke but this is merely speculative"
Well fuck yeah it's speculative, and completely wrong.
1) Shaman's didn't exist in South America. They were in Siberia and the term Shaman is incorrectly applied to the South American healers.
2) They didn't have "sacred" rituals. That's a post-Columbian thing, the "natives" as they like to call them didn't have a separation of the profane and sacred like Eliade would have us all believe.
--------------------
LNC's official Alaskan stoner
 
|
Moronicus
smokehousebacon.
Registered: 05/13/09
Posts: 4,430
Last seen: 11 years, 5 months
|
Re: Mummies used to smoke... probably [Re: Jadian]
#10340628 - 05/14/09 10:11 PM (14 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
if i was about to become a mummy, i would roll a blunt with the bandages they would wrap me in 
--------------------
BACON RANCH, FUCK YEAH
A post about m00nshine
Anonymous #6 said:
Yes, it is. The shine stands for his job title, which is Shoe Shiner, the moon stands for the time he comes out to be a nigger, which is best suited for the negroid camouflage.
|
Tripp420
What?
Registered: 06/17/08
Posts: 614
Loc: Northern Nevada
Last seen: 11 years, 2 months
|
Re: Mummies used to smoke... probably [Re: veggie]
#10341297 - 05/15/09 12:30 AM (14 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
veggie said:
Is it just me, or does she look a little anorexic? ...
haha?....
--------------------
|
Suggs4Drugs
Newb
Registered: 04/30/09
Posts: 58
Loc: Arkansas
Last seen: 14 years, 6 months
|
Re: Mummies used to smoke... probably [Re: Tripp420]
#10348313 - 05/16/09 12:11 PM (14 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
I read a story where they found some nugz in a mummy's tomb.
I beleive it was in HighTimes.
--------------------
Ive never had problems with Drugs, Ive had problems with the police.
|
clover606
Stranger
Registered: 08/13/07
Posts: 656
Last seen: 10 years, 6 months
|
Re: Mummies used to smoke... probably [Re: Jadian]
#10348321 - 05/16/09 12:13 PM (14 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Jadian said:
They always fuck up scientific articles with stupid lines that the second to last one
"Another potential solution is the use of the tobacco plant during a sacred ritual in which the shaman would treat an ill native with tobacco smoke but this is merely speculative"
Well fuck yeah it's speculative, and completely wrong.
1) Shaman's didn't exist in South America. They were in Siberia and the term Shaman is incorrectly applied to the South American healers.
2) They didn't have "sacred" rituals. That's a post-Columbian thing, the "natives" as they like to call them didn't have a separation of the profane and sacred like Eliade would have us all believe.
so they had no concept of spirituality before then? i find that a little hard to believe.
also shaman is more likely used as a general term for a tribal healer/spiritual leader. whether they used the word "shaman" when they talked to him doesnt make a difference, a russian shaman and an african witch doctor have the same cultural role.
and that separation of the profane and sacred...that would mean everything had roughly the same spiritual value. a jaguar would be no more special than a mouse if they didnt separate what they considered the sacred or important animals, but they clearly did as evident by south/central amercian pre-columbian art.
--------------------
grassman said:
I remember being in DARE when i was much younger and some of the stories they would tell you are not only ridiculous, but completely untrue. One story was that a woman was on LSD and thought her infant was a turkey so she baked it in the oven. Now I look back and think thats hilarious, but at the time I guess it scared me.
|
Jadian
Ninja
Registered: 07/07/05
Posts: 7,404
Loc: The desert
Last seen: 6 years, 4 months
|
Re: Mummies used to smoke... probably [Re: clover606]
#10349311 - 05/16/09 04:26 PM (14 years, 10 months ago) |
|
|
They don't view spirituality the same way we do, hence the problem considering the historians and anthropologists looked at them from OUR perspective not THEIRS. The Mayans and the Machica believed spirits were "attached" in a way to everything, but they were not sacred. Value was relative. They didn't pray or worship the spirits, they talked to them like people, they argued, bickered, and played jokes on each other.
It's like saying I consider my relationship with my friend spiritual or my roommate is sacred, it's just misuse of the term.
And the "Shaman" role is not the same as many other natural healers or witch doctors. Shaman's communicated with spirits (hence why the term is applied sometimes to Mesoamerican medicine men) as a means of diagnosing a problem or ailment. They did so by a specific means however that's not reciprocated elsewhere in the world.
So if I say I like dogs more than cats that means dogs are sacred to me? No. And just because I paint a dog doesn't mean my whole culture valued the dog now does it? This is the way things have been applied to modern anthropology when it comes to these areas.
--------------------
LNC's official Alaskan stoner
|
|
Threaded
Previous
Index
Next
Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order 
Feminized Cannabis Seeds 
Buy Bali Kratom Powder 
Bridgetown Botanicals 
Red Vein Kratom 
Isolated Cubensis Liquid Culture For Sale
Edit 
Reply 
motaman
veggie
theocean06
Lana
1 2 all )