Home | Community | Message Board

Cannabis Seeds Zamnesia
This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: Mushroom-Hut Substrate Mix   MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck   North Spore Bulk Substrate   Left Coast Kratom Buy Kratom Extract   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Some of these posts are very old and might contain outdated information. You may wish to search for newer posts instead.
Offlinecubensisfrenzy55
Stranger

Registered: 04/13/06
Posts: 204
Last seen: 17 years, 6 months
casing poo= higher contam risk??
    #5735152 - 06/10/06 06:37 PM (17 years, 9 months ago)

Ok, straight poo is completely colonized when it starts to grow mushrooms so it is pretty resistant to contaminations, right? A casing layer is not colonsized completely so it is more suseptable to contams. So in thoery you should you get more flushes from straight poo because you eliminate the contamination factor, just not as even of a pin set, right. Just a thought I had that I would liked a little feedback on. I am new to the whole poo thing. Got my first poo tub colonizing right now, and will porbably case it no matter what. Just was wondering what all you guys think about think. thanks

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinethenewguy05
The Mushroom Man
 User Gallery

Registered: 02/11/05
Posts: 2,123
Loc: My Underground Layer
Last seen: 2 years, 7 months
Re: casing poo= higher contam risk?? [Re: cubensisfrenzy55]
    #5735156 - 06/10/06 06:39 PM (17 years, 9 months ago)

no water is key in mushrooms. that is one of the reasons for a casing layer. they shouldn't contam if you are clean about your procedures.

casing material holds more water and therefore can help produce more mushrooms. if you have a str8 poo substrate with no casing than you will yeild less because there is less water being retained in the growing medium.

just cause cutting the time doesn't mean you are yeilding more.

Edited by thenewguy05 (06/10/06 06:47 PM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinecubensisfrenzy55
Stranger

Registered: 04/13/06
Posts: 204
Last seen: 17 years, 6 months
Re: casing poo= higher contam risk?? [Re: thenewguy05]
    #5735173 - 06/10/06 06:45 PM (17 years, 9 months ago)

I'm not sure I understand what you mean? Do you mean that the poo will dry out too quick? I have seen staight poo grows that have yielded a couple flushes.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlineskeletor
the dude
Registered: 09/06/05
Posts: 1,235
Loc: heaven on earth
Last seen: 17 years, 6 months
Re: casing poo= higher contam risk?? [Re: cubensisfrenzy55]
    #5735209 - 06/10/06 07:02 PM (17 years, 9 months ago)

sure but the point of a casing laying is to help. you will get better flushes and more of them with a pro case. you can fruit without but it won't be quite as good. since you casing layer has no nutrients or almost none its not a contam risk. if you get a contam in a later flush it likely started in you substrate then moved its way up to were you could see it.


--------------------
im sorry about your mother. She was a terrible attrative woman.

Get back to nature; hunting burgers and gathering fries.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinethenewguy05
The Mushroom Man
 User Gallery

Registered: 02/11/05
Posts: 2,123
Loc: My Underground Layer
Last seen: 2 years, 7 months
Re: casing poo= higher contam risk?? [Re: cubensisfrenzy55]
    #5735210 - 06/10/06 07:03 PM (17 years, 9 months ago)

and i have gotten seven flushes out of a propperly cared for casing.

what is meant is that when you apply a casing layer it contains more moisture right... more than it would if you only applied poo to the substrate. a mushroom is 90 percent water. everytime you remove a mushroom you are removing that much in water.

in otherwords the casing must be able to absorb and release water which is substantial in fruitbody generation.

also the substrate must be pourous to water and i don't know if you noticed or not but mycellium has a tendency to repell water when applied to rehydrate.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinecubensisfrenzy55
Stranger

Registered: 04/13/06
Posts: 204
Last seen: 17 years, 6 months
Re: casing poo= higher contam risk?? [Re: cubensisfrenzy55]
    #5735233 - 06/10/06 07:12 PM (17 years, 9 months ago)

gotcha, didn't really think about the moisture content. Thanks for the advice.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: Mushroom-Hut Substrate Mix   MagicBag.co All-In-One Bags That Don't Suck   North Spore Bulk Substrate   Left Coast Kratom Buy Kratom Extract   Original Sensible Seeds Bulk Cannabis Seeds


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* What is the least contam prone substrate? *DELETED* MeetMeInEleusis 1,275 4 03/24/02 11:59 AM
by HisStudent
* One large casing? *DELETED* Jnykiel 925 10 05/25/05 09:09 AM
by scatmanrav
* Re: can i sterilize top layer of casing mix like i do substrate? Anonymous 947 2 01/19/00 05:23 PM
by Anonymous
* casing from "The mushroom Cultivator" upupup 17,990 8 11/13/20 10:41 AM
by tiptrippy
* Casings and humidity
( 1 2 all )
angryshroom 20,200 23 04/07/18 09:52 AM
by SarahBorealis
* Quick Casing Question *HeGz* 921 1 05/10/01 02:06 PM
by 40oz
* Afraid to case again LearyfanS 677 4 12/28/01 10:16 PM
by TCatz
* Re: What to do with casings nononsense 662 10 04/17/01 04:06 AM
by nononsense

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Shroomism, george castanza, RogerRabbit, veggie, mushboy, fahtster, LogicaL Chaos, 13shrooms, Stipe-n Cap, Pastywhyte, bodhisatta, Tormato, Land Trout, A.k.a
1,208 topic views. 37 members, 195 guests and 101 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.019 seconds spending 0.007 seconds on 14 queries.