Home | Community | Message Board


This site includes paid links. Please support our sponsors.


Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Shop: MagicBag.co Certified Organic All-In-One Grow Bags by Magic Bag   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   Original Sensible Seeds Autoflowering Cannabis Seeds   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Bridgetown Botanicals Bridgetown Botanicals   Mushroom-Hut Mono Tub Substrate   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Left Coast Kratom Buy Kratom Extract

Jump to first unread post Pages: 1
Offlinecubeladd
Stranger
Registered: 08/21/05
Posts: 962
Loc: Sunny ol' England
Last seen: 16 years, 7 months
If you could change the drug laws...
    #5013024 - 12/04/05 06:47 AM (18 years, 3 months ago)

OK here goes...

Drug addicts should be treated as victims not criminals. They need help and support to wean themselves of the drug and become functioning members of society, they most likely turned to hard drugs because of depression and the lack of support they received from society in the first place. I don't think punishing them by sticking them in a place with a high concentration of drugs and them releasing them with a criminal record to destroy any hopes and dreams of making a better life for themselves is right. Crimes they committed to pay for drugs should be punished, but not their addiction. Addictive drugs should remain illegal however as people under the influence of them are often a large burden and non-contributer to the good of society as well as being a great contributer of crime. Most importantly however they should be illegal because the majority of users want to quit addiction but find they can't. I feel this reason alone is more than enough reason to keep the drug in question illegal.

Non-addictive drugs with no history of frequent overdose should be legalized (steroids not included) under tight controls which would involve interested members buying a swipe card (over 18s only with photo ID) which they could then use to buy drugs at Government approved licensed premises. The swipe card would control the frequency and dosage of the drugs purchased. Non-addictive drugs cause no or very little threat of crime or negative consequences to society as a whole like addictive drugs do (i.e shoplifting/mugging). There is also no argument that these drugs would cause the user to enter a spiral of self-destruction as they could pull out anytime they wanted to. They may be psychologically addictive, but so is any fun enjoyable activity in life and despite this if they really wanted to pull out they could and would. The Government needs to realize that people need escapism and many currently non-addictive recreational drugs are in many instances far far safer than tobacco and alcohol which are legal. Based on these arguments I see no reason why non-addictive recreational drugs should be illegalised and it seems to me that they have no more substance to them (excuse the pun) that to block freedom of choice. The swipe cards will cost ?50 for 6 months (renewable) with 17.5% tax on all purchases. All drugs sold under the swipe system must be accompanied with a Government booklet detailing the effects of the drug, both mentally and physically and give important advice on dosing, harm-minimalistaion and general safety. Any premise not giving out these leaflets will either be given a substantial fine or else be shut down.

50% of the money generated from the swipe card system would be used to fund research into creating new recreational drugs which mimic and cause less harm than the present ones. The formulas for any new chemicals created would be guarded under the official secrets act 1989. Once a chemical has been created that the Government thinks would be a suitable replacement trials would be set up in certain parts of the country to test how well it fairs out. If the authorities then believe it to be a safer replacement that causes people to switch from the more harmful original then it will become legalized. It it becomes clear that the new drug is causing more harm than benefits once legalized however, it can be recalled immediately.

The other 50% of the money generated from the swipe card system will go towards studying common recreational drugs of all kinds further. Not nearly enough research is conducted due to Government restrictions on conducting research into illegal drugs. MDMA has been used recreationally for over two decades and there is still no conclusive research on just how dangerous it is. This is not acceptable in my opinion when you consider that up to a million young people use the drug in the UK every weekend.

Persons found using any drug controlled under the swipe system who are proven to not own a card will be fined or given community service with the same severity procedure applying as for possession of an illegal drug.

Persons found guilty of forging swipe cards will be given a caution with community service and severe fine. Second time offenders will be given a criminal record and possible prison sentence.

Card holders found passing swipe controlled drugs onto non card holders will have their card confiscated for 18 months with a 450% increase in the original price of the card to buy it back. They will be given a caution, severe fine and community service. Second time offenders will be given a criminal record and will be banned from owning a swipe card for life. They may also receive a prison sentence as a replacement for community service/fine.

Anti-drug education will be balanced and non-biased to form simply 'drug education'. Harm-minimization education will be taught in Schools from ages 14 up.

Any organization distributing deliberately misleading information on drugs in order to shock people into not taking them will become a criminal offense. Misleading information is far more dangerous than the drugs themselves. Although this crime may be difficult to prove due to the need to prove that the mis-information was deliberate I still feel it should be implemented.

The ABC classification system will be completely revised. The system is generally accepted as an indicator of how dangerous a drug is. Medical use of the drug also plays a part in the classification system however which gives people the wrong impression. As far as I'm aware if an illegal recreational drug has no accepted medical use then it is automatically a class A (i.e Magic mushrooms) This does not mean that it is in the highest order of dangerous substances however as this would suggest that shrooms are more dangerous than Speed and Ketamine which is just plain wrong. It is also unfair that someone should be punished more or less severely for crimes relating to the illegal drug in question based on its medical usage. The ABC classification system would be used solely as an indicator of how dangerous a drug is and the penalties for possession/dealing/trafficking etc.

Cannabis would be legalized in pill form which would be available through the swipe system controlling dose and frequency.

Magic Mushrooms would be fully legalized in all forms under the swipe system.

MDMA would be downgraded to  class B status and would gain significant funds for extra research.

LSD would be downgraded to Class B status.

Ketamine would be upgraded to Class B status.

Heroin, Cocaine and crack would retain their Class A status.

Methamphetamine would be upgraded to Class A status.

Persons found guilty of personal possession of an illegal drug will given a fine and/or community service relevant to the class of the drug. Imprisonment will be scrapped, however persistent offending will result in the punishment of fine/community service becoming rapidly more severe for each time the offense is committed. Third time offenders will be subject to unlimited severity and a criminal record. First and second time offenders will be given separate cautions. If there is agreement by the authorities that the person found in possession is an addict and expresses a wish to beat addiction they will be given just a caution and treatment consisting of a drug re-habilitation programme will be mandatory. Counseling will be available should it be required. If that person then turns back to the drug it should be decided by the authorities whether it is necessary to apply the extra penalties available for possession. Crimes committed to pay for or under the influence of illegal drugs should be punished accordingly, however depending on the persons mental condition as well as personal and criminal history, compassionate sentencing should be available if it is felt necessary.

Sorry about the long read :wink: As you've probably guessed it's a subject I'm quite passionate about. Please let me know what you think, whether you agree, don't agree or bits you would change or feel are flawed. Iam interested to hear all opinions.


--------------------
"The only thing I'm high on is Love for my Son and Daughters. Yes, a little LSD is all I need."
-Marge Simpson

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleChikitta
Registered: 03/12/05
Posts: 632
Re: If you could change the drug laws... [Re: cubeladd]
    #5013034 - 12/04/05 07:09 AM (18 years, 3 months ago)

Apparently MDMA is under review (or will be soon) for a downgrade to class B.

I beleive the ABC system currently is a measure of how much a drug changes you i.e how able are you to carry out basic functions when under the influence, not how dangerous a drug is (although recently there seems to have been some confusion by the government).

Sad thing is, alcohol (if illegal) would be class A (don't have a source for it though... can't remember where I saw it). Big potential for abuse and it makes you either act like a twat or get violent at high doses.

Totally agree with you on the penalties for personal possesion and reclassifications though. No idea why more cash isn't being spent on MDMA research - so much potential there but it's being largely ignored.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinecubeladd
Stranger
Registered: 08/21/05
Posts: 962
Loc: Sunny ol' England
Last seen: 16 years, 7 months
Re: If you could change the drug laws... [Re: Chikitta]
    #5013038 - 12/04/05 07:24 AM (18 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Chikitta said:
Apparently MDMA is under review (or will be soon) for a downgrade to class B.

I beleive the ABC system currently is a measure of how much a drug changes you i.e how able are you to carry out basic functions when under the influence, not how dangerous a drug is (although recently there seems to have been some confusion by the government).

Sad thing is, alcohol (if illegal) would be class A (don't have a source for it though... can't remember where I saw it). Big potential for abuse and it makes you either act like a twat or get violent at high doses.

Totally agree with you on the penalties for personal possesion and reclassifications though. No idea why more cash isn't being spent on MDMA research - so much potential there but it's being largely ignored.




I don't know whether the Goverment is thinking of re-classifying MDMA, I doubt it'll happen anytime soon :frown: I do know that David Cameron who is battling to become the leader of the Conservative party in the UK has recetly been critized and had his lead slashed (supposedly) after expressing his views that it should be downgraded. This is such a shame as the polititians that critized him probably don't have a clue about the drug, I think it's highly likely that they are just following the general concenus that it is all bad. If you look beyond the surface there are so many long-term positive mental aspects about the MDMA experience that people just don't know about due to propaganda.


--------------------
"The only thing I'm high on is Love for my Son and Daughters. Yes, a little LSD is all I need."
-Marge Simpson

Edited by cubeladd (12/04/05 07:26 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisiblePrisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
Re: If you could change the drug laws... [Re: Chikitta]
    #5013040 - 12/04/05 07:26 AM (18 years, 3 months ago)

many psychiatrists are fighting (at least in the US) to have MDMA down scheduled because of it's theraputic value

LSD and psilocybin are under study for treatment of migrains and cluster headaches

http://clusterbusters.com/

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinecubeladd
Stranger
Registered: 08/21/05
Posts: 962
Loc: Sunny ol' England
Last seen: 16 years, 7 months
Re: If you could change the drug laws... [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #5013060 - 12/04/05 07:42 AM (18 years, 3 months ago)

Personally although MDMA has a huge potential for therapy I don't think it would be the best for the purpose. MDMA, at least in my case causes you to have over-the-top and often irrational expectations about your future. Numerous times I have thought while under the influence that I'm gonna be ultimatly happy and satisfied forever after this drug has worn off becuase now I have seen the light I can never think differently. Once it has worn off you realize that life just isn't like that. Something like Methylone would probably be perfect for therapy as from what I've heard it has a very similar effect to MDMA, but you don't feel an over the top euphoria and you can review your life clearly without being irrational.


--------------------
"The only thing I'm high on is Love for my Son and Daughters. Yes, a little LSD is all I need."
-Marge Simpson

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisiblePrisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
Re: If you could change the drug laws... [Re: cubeladd]
    #5013065 - 12/04/05 07:46 AM (18 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

cubeladd said:
MDMA, at least in my case causes you to have over-the-top and often irrational expectations about your future.




then maybe MDMA would be ideal for your therapy, I get nothing like that from the drug, of course I handle drugs much different than most others, I'm still quite
capable of functioning normaly under the influence of most drugs

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblememes
Blessed

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 01/11/05
Posts: 27,785
Loc: In a Tree
Re: If you could change the drug laws... [Re: Prisoner#1]
    #5013068 - 12/04/05 07:51 AM (18 years, 3 months ago)

very nice review cubelad.

The only two things I don't like about the current system are mushroom's - should be monitored (not legalized copmletly, or you'd have people driving all over the highways tripping nuts)
Legalize marijuana of course
And intensify the punishments for anything involving cocaine, crak, meth, and heroine - because those drugs ruin lives (not to say others don't, these just ruin MORE lives)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleChikitta
Registered: 03/12/05
Posts: 632
Re: If you could change the drug laws... [Re: cubeladd]
    #5013070 - 12/04/05 07:52 AM (18 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

cubeladd said:
Personally although MDMA has a huge potential for therapy I don't think it would be the best for the purpose. MDMA, at least in my case causes you to have over-the-top and often irrational expectations about your future. Numerous times I have thought while under the influence that I'm gonna be ultimatly happy and satisfied forever after this drug has worn off becuase now I have seen the light I can never think differently. Once it has worn off you realize that life just isn't like that. Something like Methylone would probably be perfect for therapy as from what I've heard it has a very similar effect to MDMA, but you don't feel an over the top euphoria and you can review your life clearly without being irrational.




Can't say that happens to me (can still think clearly and pretty rationaly), although any use in therapy would obviously be in planned sessions with the help of a trained professional.

I guess they'd have stuff planned to work on with the patient, and would help guide them through the experience. Think they only use "common" doses (80-100mg) so it probably wouldn't be overly intense.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisiblePrisoner#1
Even Dumber ThanAdvertized!
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/22/03
Posts: 193,665
Loc: Pvt. Pubfag NutSuck
Re: If you could change the drug laws... [Re: memes]
    #5013083 - 12/04/05 08:02 AM (18 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

meams said:
And intensify the punishments for anything involving cocaine, crak, meth, and heroine - because those drugs ruin lives (not to say others don't, these just ruin MORE lives)




I disagree, I've known crack heads that work a job and support their habit, same
with meth monkeys, most people that use cocaine aer recreational users and havent
made a career of it, it's all about the individual, some are more capable than
others when it comes to handling various drugs

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblememes
Blessed

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 01/11/05
Posts: 27,785
Loc: In a Tree
Re: If you could change the drug laws... [Re: Chikitta]
    #5013085 - 12/04/05 08:03 AM (18 years, 3 months ago)

mdma used to be taken by patients and doctors in low doses (40mg i think), before a session would start.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
OfflinePsylence
Stranger

Registered: 07/17/04
Posts: 13
Last seen: 17 years, 10 months
Re: If you could change the drug laws... [Re: cubeladd]
    #5013096 - 12/04/05 08:10 AM (18 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Drug addicts should be treated as victims not criminals. They need help and support to wean themselves of the drug and become functioning members of society, they most likely turned to hard drugs because of depression and the lack of support they received from society in the first place.




Your sentiment here is a noble one, but society for the most part doesn't care about these people whether or not they are addicted to drugs. Society, as I view it, would rather see them vanish than consume more good-will contributions. I do not believe society should automatically shoulder the burden for anyone who can't shake a meth addiction, but a case-by-case basis is something I would be in agreement with.

Quote:

Addictive drugs should remain illegal however as people under the influence of them are often a large burden and non-contributer to the good of society as well as being a great contributer of crime. Most importantly however they should be illegal because the majority of users want to quit addiction but find they can't. I feel this reason alone is more than enough reason to keep the drug in question illegal.




I quite disagree with keeping them illegal. There are multiple uses for powerfully addictive chemicals, not the least of which includes military uses. As well, given enough research I expect it possible to determine the means of creating the high without the physical addiction properties. Nothing wrong with pursuing that, if you ask me. :wink:

I would also disagree with your statement which says the majority want to quit but can't. I've never met the majority, but I would speculate that the majority is still made up by those who don't know (or admit) they are addicted.

As for them not being contributors to society, the only reason they don't contribute to society is because society refuses to sell them the chemical to which they are so addicted. Society needs to control and accept this industry just as it has pornography by approving regulated production and consumption. Suddenly the addicts will become contributors. True, they will still commit crimes to make ends meet, but it will never be because a drug deal went bad, which I estimate to be half of the problems encountered in such an unregulated industry.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
InvisibleOJK
Stranger
 User Gallery
Registered: 06/08/03
Posts: 10,629
Re: If you could change the drug laws... [Re: cubeladd]
    #5013118 - 12/04/05 08:35 AM (18 years, 3 months ago)

Drug addicts are a burden on society?

Hope you won't be offended if I don't classify myself as a burden.

Quote:

Most importantly however they should be illegal because the majority of users want to quit addiction but find they can't. I feel this reason alone is more than enough reason to keep the drug in question illegal.




If this was OTD I could use langauge fitting to how wrong that statement is.

Firstly, the majority of "addictive" drug users are not physically addicted. Most heroin use, for example, is non-compulsive, and is undertaken by reasonable affluent individuals on a recreational basis. The only type of heroin user who gets any type of media attention is poor, working class and chronically addicted
- so most people think that that represents the majority of use. Bullshit.

Secondly, most addictive drug users don't want to quit. They continue patterns of behaviour mostly because they enjoy them. I've always wanted to ask people who subscribe to this myth how exactly they think that this type of addiction works? Do you really believe that a few days of unpleasant vomiting, diarrhoea and migraines is enough to keep someone on a drug against their will for the rest of their life?

Chronic addiction to drugs is not a feature of drugs, it's a feature of environment. Chronic and compulsive drug use occurs when drugs are the only significant pursuit of an individual, usually because the individual is very poor. When you hear about people who live in bedsits and shoplift to get enough money to buy their next fix, it's not because the drug has destroyed their life, it's because their life featured nothing of sufficient value to contend with the pleasure of the drug.

Most drug use is a feature of the affluent, is controlled, and is therefor socially invisible. Most drug users control drug use to be a contained part of their lives. They hold down jobs, maintain healthy social relationships, etc.

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblegoobler
Reanimated
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 02/24/03
Posts: 48,909
Re: If you could change the drug laws... [Re: OJK]
    #5013130 - 12/04/05 08:46 AM (18 years, 3 months ago)

DING DING DING!

well Said


PM me your addy

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinecubeladd
Stranger
Registered: 08/21/05
Posts: 962
Loc: Sunny ol' England
Last seen: 16 years, 7 months
Re: If you could change the drug laws... [Re: Psylence]
    #5013131 - 12/04/05 08:47 AM (18 years, 3 months ago)

Thanks for your views Psylence.

Where I mentioned that addictive drugs should remain illegal I meant that they should remain illegal for recreational purposes. For example Cocaine and Heroin (Diamorphine) both have medical uses in this country and I wouldn't want to see them banned medicinally. Creating the high of addictive drugs without the addiction would be one of the things that I would like to see researched upon funded by the money created by the sale of the legalized non-addictive drugs.

I agree with your point about addicts not contributing to society because society refuses to sell them their chemical. However by way of contributing I meant in other ways other than financial, such as holding down a job, being friendly and helpful towards others etc. While some addicts may well contribute towards society most don't as drug addiction messes you up both mentally and physically.


--------------------
"The only thing I'm high on is Love for my Son and Daughters. Yes, a little LSD is all I need."
-Marge Simpson

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblegoobler
Reanimated
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 02/24/03
Posts: 48,909
Re: If you could change the drug laws... [Re: cubeladd]
    #5013133 - 12/04/05 08:49 AM (18 years, 3 months ago)

legalizing drugs isn't going to cause a mass downfall of society, ,although it will weed out the weak

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinecubeladd
Stranger
Registered: 08/21/05
Posts: 962
Loc: Sunny ol' England
Last seen: 16 years, 7 months
Re: If you could change the drug laws... [Re: OJK]
    #5013153 - 12/04/05 09:04 AM (18 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Odiumjunkie said:
Drug addicts are a burden on society?

Hope you won't be offended if I don't classify myself as a burden.

Quote:

Most importantly however they should be illegal because the majority of users want to quit addiction but find they can't. I feel this reason alone is more than enough reason to keep the drug in question illegal.




If this was OTD I could use langauge fitting to how wrong that statement is.

Firstly, the majority of "addictive" drug users are not physically addicted. Most heroin use, for example, is non-compulsive, and is undertaken by reasonable affluent individuals on a recreational basis. The only type of heroin user who gets any type of media attention is poor, working class and chronically addicted
- so most people think that that represents the majority of use. Bullshit.

Secondly, most addictive drug users don't want to quit. They continue patterns of behaviour mostly because they enjoy them. I've always wanted to ask people who subscribe to this myth how exactly they think that this type of addiction works? Do you really believe that a few days of unpleasant vomiting, diarrhoea and migraines is enough to keep someone on a drug against their will for the rest of their life?

Chronic addiction to drugs is not a feature of drugs, it's a feature of environment. Chronic and compulsive drug use occurs when drugs are the only significant pursuit of an individual, usually because the individual is very poor. When you hear about people who live in bedsits and shoplift to get enough money to buy their next fix, it's not because the drug has destroyed their life, it's because their life featured nothing of sufficient value to contend with the pleasure of the drug.

Most drug use is a feature of the affluent, is controlled, and is therefor socially invisible. Most drug users control drug use to be a contained part of their lives. They hold down jobs, maintain healthy social relationships, etc.




Maybye I'm wrong but I was under the impression that users of the majority of addictive drugs were regually under attack from side effects, not just the first few days into a new addiction. I'm not being sarcastic here, I'd be interested to learn from anybody who has had a drug addiction give your take on this.

I agree with you to a point where you say that 'When you hear about people who live in bedsits and shoplift to get enough money to buy their next fix, it's not because the drug has destroyed their life, it's because their life featured nothing of sufficient value to contend with the pleasure of the drug.' However getting involved in a drug addiction will only make things worse for them. Life will become more enjoyable in the short term, but having an addiction will likely cause you to think of nothing else except your next fix, blocking out all thoughts relating to how you are going to make your present reality any better.


--------------------
"The only thing I'm high on is Love for my Son and Daughters. Yes, a little LSD is all I need."
-Marge Simpson

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Invisiblegoobler
Reanimated
 User Gallery

Folding@home Statistics
Registered: 02/24/03
Posts: 48,909
Re: If you could change the drug laws... [Re: cubeladd]
    #5013178 - 12/04/05 09:20 AM (18 years, 3 months ago)

this is no FLAME

are you out of HS yet?

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinetheuser
DON'T LOOK
Male User Gallery
Registered: 08/04/05
Posts: 5,859
Last seen: 4 years, 1 month
Re: If you could change the drug laws... [Re: goobler]
    #5013401 - 12/04/05 10:50 AM (18 years, 3 months ago)

De criminalize and legalize pot. Keep shrooms and LSD illegal, lower the fines/jail time for possestion and sale of them.


--------------------
:heart:

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Offlinecubeladd
Stranger
Registered: 08/21/05
Posts: 962
Loc: Sunny ol' England
Last seen: 16 years, 7 months
Re: If you could change the drug laws... [Re: theuser]
    #5032862 - 12/08/05 04:58 AM (18 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

theolduser said:
De criminalize and legalize pot. Keep shrooms and LSD illegal, lower the fines/jail time for possestion and sale of them.




Why should anyone be thrown in jail for wanting to experiment with shrooms/LSD held for personal possesion? It does happen and it still baffles me. Motive=Having a good time/Self exploration. Concequences on society=None!

The only argument that could be given for giving a person found with drugs for personal use time would be that prison would scare him off from trying the drug again and that this would be benificial to him in the long term because of the damage that the drug would cause if he/she carried on using it (because he/she hadn't been sent to jail) would be greater than the sum of damage that prison would cause. For example resenting police and authority, being given a criminal record destroying your hopes of getting a succsesful job and working/traveling abroad to a lot of countries.

Somehow I don't think it weighs up...


--------------------
"The only thing I'm high on is Love for my Son and Daughters. Yes, a little LSD is all I need."
-Marge Simpson

Edited by cubeladd (12/08/05 05:06 AM)

Extras: Filter Print Post Top
Jump to top Pages: 1

Shop: MagicBag.co Certified Organic All-In-One Grow Bags by Magic Bag   PhytoExtractum Buy Bali Kratom Powder   Original Sensible Seeds Autoflowering Cannabis Seeds   Unfolding Nature Unfolding Nature: Being in the Implicate Order   Bridgetown Botanicals Bridgetown Botanicals   Mushroom-Hut Mono Tub Substrate   North Spore North Spore Mushroom Grow Kits & Cultivation Supplies   Kraken Kratom Red Vein Kratom   Left Coast Kratom Buy Kratom Extract


Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Jamaican Drug Laws, Harsh/ Leniant? fjbk47985 2,880 12 03/12/03 06:04 AM
by fjbk47985
* Some stuff. It's about drugs. Phluck 2,462 17 07/14/23 10:51 AM
by theRealrollforever
* Any norwegians here have a clue about our laws concerning filthysock 1,245 11 05/28/04 08:43 AM
by shamantra
* What is with the Law.........
( 1 2 all )
Shroom_a_lope 1,447 24 08/19/04 04:06 PM
by TheSlapnCapn
* Shoplifting from chain stores and victimless crimes
( 1 2 3 4 ... 18 19 )
Adamist 27,131 375 06/29/05 04:46 PM
by Todcasil
* Famous psychedelic & other drugs users
( 1 2 3 all )
mntlfngrs 14,722 45 07/06/09 07:00 AM
by entheogensmurf
* War on Drugs. War on Humanity. MXNR 1,295 5 08/23/04 12:40 AM
by SmokeyMcpot
* Wal-Mart LP's KILL shoplifter!
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 all )
Drink_Punk_Soda 23,803 169 11/27/12 11:36 AM
by VivaLaMushie

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Entire Staff
1,588 topic views. 4 members, 58 guests and 164 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Show Images Only | Sort by Score | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:

Copyright 1997-2024 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.026 seconds spending 0.008 seconds on 14 queries.