Quote:

---

despisedicon said:

Quote:

---

BothHands said:
Women should not have kids they can't pay for.  But they do.  And we really can't do anything about it.  And at that point, we really have to look at the wellbeing of the kid.  It didn't ask for an irresponsible parent who would bring it into the world without means to pay for it.  So should it starve? 
In many cases, the kid would be better off not being born at all.  Should it still be born and live in a crack house because abortions aren't available?

---

Poverty isn't a permanent situation.  You don't see the irony in your statements?  That the baby should die if the parents aren't well off? So it should die?  Give me a break, "better off not being born at all" like what the fuck are you kidding me? This is liberal compassion at work.  And you fear mongering a statement about being born in crack houses because abortions aren't available.  Condoms and birth control work quite well.  It's your right to kill your own child if you want because I know the female will throw themselves down a flight of stairs and do it some other way if they really want to kill the defenseless baby, but MURDERING THE BABY is looking out for its well being? 
Having an abortion is probably a dramatic experience but you sure as hell don't act like it is with your words. You act like human life is some sort of game where you can have a do over whenever you want. This is so sad.

---

Last Edited 07/04/11 08:10 AM

despisedicon responded on 07/06/11 02:43 PM:

---

That kid is better looking than you, Poid.  LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

---

Quote:

---

You have way too many five ratings.

---