Quote:

---

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mycoangler said:
Some of the versions that you mentioned are the only ones that a few Christian sects that I know of (other than Catholic) will accept as the "true" versions (especially KJV).


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Don't post something that is neglectfully wrong about the Bible.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Like every one else on here I can post whatever the hell I feel like posting about the Bible.

The Bible sucks!!! There!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



You sure can and when you get called on it, you can type somemore about how the Bible sucks. Way to back up your statement.

MM

---

No,
You responded to me in hostility, and I responded in the same immature manner. You didn't back yourself up either. So it's simply your statement against mine that I was wrong. What makes your statements any better than mine? The fact that you spell better than me?

When I went to Catholic school, I was taught in Theology class that it was decided at The Council Of Nicea which of the ancient writings would be included in the Bible, and which wouldn't. This teaching disturbed me so much that I actually remembered it! So it's your word against a nun with a Theology background.

Instead of telling me what I can and can't post, you could have politely told me that I was wrong, and provided some links that disprove my statement. Perhaps then I might have taken you seriously, and my response would have been different.

Seriously, I think that there are some good bits of information in the Bible, particularly in the words of Jesus, but you, and all of the other Bible pushing, born again preaching types will never see that side of me.

Post Extras