Home | Community | Message Board


Everything Mushrooms
Please support our sponsors.

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!

Amazon Shop for: Beef Jerky

Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8  [ show all ]
OfflineBrAiN
Art Fag
 User Gallery
Registered: 03/01/01
Posts: 6,870
Loc: Chocolate City
Last seen: 3 years, 7 months
capitalism
    #3780486 - 02/14/05 10:20 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

I'm tired of all the shit talking about capitalism. Capitalism is just like any other economic structure.. it's fine in ideal just like any other system.. it rewards those who work hard and fucks over those who don't contribute anything to society

it's just never run properly because %1 will always fuck it up... the people that take advantage of it.

Capitalism is not evil. If you think it is... then next time you see some 6 year olds selling lemonade on the side of the road... send a carbomb their way.. because that's the EPITOME of capitalism.

The next time you buy a candy bar from a cub scout oat your door.. well.. that makes you a part of the problem.

GREED is what the problem is.... you find greed in any country... any government... and social situation.

CounterPoint?


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinefaslimy
Dead Man
 User Gallery
Registered: 04/04/04
Posts: 3,436
Last seen: 1 year, 1 month
Re: capitalism [Re: BrAiN]
    #3780527 - 02/14/05 10:32 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

capitalism = an idea(l)

capitalism + humans = evil


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinefaslimy
Dead Man
 User Gallery
Registered: 04/04/04
Posts: 3,436
Last seen: 1 year, 1 month
Re: capitalism [Re: faslimy]
    #3780531 - 02/14/05 10:32 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

faslimy said:
capitalism = an idea(l)

capitalism + humans = evil




but there so much more to it than that


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineBrAiN
Art Fag
 User Gallery
Registered: 03/01/01
Posts: 6,870
Loc: Chocolate City
Last seen: 3 years, 7 months
Re: capitalism [Re: faslimy]
    #3780584 - 02/14/05 10:44 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

socialism + humans = evil

in fact it's safe to say that

X + humans = evil

so why single out capitalism so much


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineBrAiN
Art Fag
 User Gallery
Registered: 03/01/01
Posts: 6,870
Loc: Chocolate City
Last seen: 3 years, 7 months
Re: capitalism [Re: BrAiN]
    #3780636 - 02/14/05 10:54 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

this is what i think

capitalism = darwinism.... survival of the fittest

humans are greedy by nature

capitalism is a great idea in that it's total freedom

freedom is good right?

problem is... fredom means freedom to be an asshole and freedom to be greedy

capitalism = the course of nature as it has always been... the stronger lions of the pack surviving over the weaker.... the plants with stronger roots living because they can take in mor nutrients, etc etc etc etc...

that's the way science made the world... capitalist...

I'm not saying that's good or bad. I'm just saying capitalism is just kinda gowing with the way nature has always been... selective... it's just the way it's been done for billions of years

kinda makes sense eh?


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineProsgeopax
Jaded, yethopeful?

Registered: 01/28/05
Posts: 1,258
Loc: Appearing at a mall near ...
Last seen: 7 years, 4 months
Re: capitalism [Re: BrAiN]
    #3780937 - 02/14/05 11:36 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

BrAiN said:
so why single out capitalism so much



Envy + ignorance.


--------------------
Money doesn't grow on trees, but deficits do grow under Bushes.

You can accept, reject, or examine and test any new idea that comes to you. The wise man chooses the third way.
- Tom Willhite

Disclaimer: I reserve the right to change my opinions should I become aware of additional facts, the falsification of information or different perspectives. Articles written by others which I post may not necessarily reflect my opinions in part or in whole, my opinions may be in direct opposition, the topic may be one on which I have yet to formulate an opinion or have doubts about, an article may be posted solely with the intent to stimulate discussion or contemplation.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: BrAiN]
    #3781073 - 02/14/05 11:52 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

I totally agree. And what sucked was last semester I was in a class(Sociology of the Third World) where people would bash capitalism every day. People need to recognize that capitalism did not create greed. It merely recognizes human greed as a fact of life, and creates a productive, non-violent means(the free market) through which society can benefit from that greed.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: BrAiN]
    #3781556 - 02/15/05 01:37 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

BrAiN said:

capitalism = darwinism.... survival of the fittest


capitalism = the course of nature as it has always been... the stronger lions of the pack surviving over the weaker.... the plants with stronger roots living because they can take in mor nutrients, etc etc etc etc...

that's the way science made the world... capitalist...

I'm not saying that's good or bad. I'm just saying capitalism is just kinda gowing with the way nature has always been... selective... it's just the way it's been done for billions of years

kinda makes sense eh?




uh... what?!?

capitalism is the building off of free labour. when someone can make profit without paying for labour [fully] then that is capitalism. making the most.

its not that some people are stronger or more fit or whatever, it that they are being expoited for the work and labour that they do produce. freedom?? on what terms.

i hate when i hear ppl going on about "oh capitalism isn't all that bad" because until you understand all the consequences and what it truly is you will remain ignorant of the true 'nature' of capitalism.

-jue


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblez@z.com
Libertarian
Registered: 10/13/02
Posts: 2,876
Loc: ATL
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3781605 - 02/15/05 01:51 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
capitalism is the building off of free labour. when someone can make profit without paying for labour [fully] then that is capitalism. making the most.



How do you feel we should determine what labor is worth? And how are people not "fully" paid for their labor?

Quote:

its not that some people are stronger or more fit or whatever, it that they are being expoited for the work and labour that they do produce.



How is anyone exploited? Are they forced to take certain jobs?

Quote:

freedom?? on what terms.



How do you define freedom and how exactly does capitalism conflict with it? Really. I'm very curious.


Quote:

i hate when i hear ppl going on about "oh capitalism isn't all that bad" because until you understand all the consequences and what it truly is you will remain ignorant of the true 'nature' of capitalism.




Capitalism sucks, but I challenge you to show me a better system.


--------------------
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." - C.S. Lewis

"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniencies attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinefaslimy
Dead Man
 User Gallery
Registered: 04/04/04
Posts: 3,436
Last seen: 1 year, 1 month
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3781606 - 02/15/05 01:51 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Agreed ^ (what juende said)

the rich get rich from the poor being poor, and as a result the rich have more power


Edited by faslimy (02/15/05 01:52 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblez@z.com
Libertarian
Registered: 10/13/02
Posts: 2,876
Loc: ATL
Re: capitalism [Re: faslimy]
    #3781615 - 02/15/05 01:54 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

faslimy said:
the rich get rich from the poor being poor, and as a result the rich have more power



How exactly do the rich get rich from the poor being poor? Please explain because it doesn't seem to me that it works that way in capitalism.


--------------------
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." - C.S. Lewis

"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniencies attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinerelativexistance
"beads, bees!?!?beads ....BEADS!!!"
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/08/04
Posts: 1,778
Last seen: 10 months, 28 days
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3781629 - 02/15/05 01:59 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

well in a sense it is. a stronger person can make a weaker one do the work. subsequently gaining a profit in terms of the work that the weaker person/being did. the stronger party capitalized on the weaker, thus gaining. given taking advantage of one is considered immoral, but if you look at it in the sense that they were of less skill; then in sense it is totally justified. we need to distinguish necessary and sufficient here. this is what determines right. given things may not be morally right, they can still have ground for occurance. again i agree with capitalism being not evil. i would see evil as wishing to do harm to others, whereas you dont wish to do harm to others, you only wish to do good for your own self. if another party is put in a position of weakness that is only their own fault.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblez@z.com
Libertarian
Registered: 10/13/02
Posts: 2,876
Loc: ATL
Re: capitalism [Re: relativexistance]
    #3781649 - 02/15/05 02:05 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

relativexistance said:
well in a sense it is. a stronger person can make a weaker one do the work.



In Capitalism no one can force another to do something against their will so how exactly does this work?


--------------------
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." - C.S. Lewis

"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniencies attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: relativexistance]
    #3781655 - 02/15/05 02:06 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

you may not "wish" to do harm to others, but that doesn't seem to stop some ppl....

and as for some ppl putting themselves into a "potion of weakness". look broader. it is not just a group of workers at a factory or the kid at the store. these ppl are whole classes and sexes and that are being expoilted. and it is not because they are weaker.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: z@z.com]
    #3781699 - 02/15/05 02:19 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

z@z.com said:
Quote:

relativexistance said:
well in a sense it is. a stronger person can make a weaker one do the work.



In Capitalism no one can force another to do something against their will so how exactly does this work?




whoa. really. so yer telling me that one person/group cannot force another to do something against their will. hmmmm. really. have you been outside you house..ever. or read anything. cuz maybe i'm reading this wrong.
think. think. think. and then think again before you write something.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineBrAiN
Art Fag
 User Gallery
Registered: 03/01/01
Posts: 6,870
Loc: Chocolate City
Last seen: 3 years, 7 months
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3781705 - 02/15/05 02:20 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

wrong... here's the definition of capitalism:

an economic system based on private ownership of capital

An economic system in which the means of production and distribution are privately or corporately owned and development is proportionate to the accumulation and reinvestment of profits gained in a free market.

Which is also the definition of a 6 year old girl selling lemonade on the sidewalk.... and then reinvesting her money to put up stands down at the school, the church, etc..

Capitalism is not defined by slave labor or screwing over someone else... it's taking a product someone else has sold you to make you ow product to fit the needs of others and making money off it... nothing wrong with it...

GREED is the problem.. not capitalism...


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3781718 - 02/15/05 02:23 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
capitalism is the building off of free labour. when someone can make profit without paying for labour [fully] then that is capitalism. making the most.



Without paying for labor? I was under the impression that people under capitalism worked for wages. The entrepreneur, or capitalist, takes financial risks by investing his or her money in labor and the means of production with the intention of creating profit. The capitalist pays his or her employees whatever he or she decides their labor is worth to them. I don't suppose you're going to argue that labor(or anything else) has an objective value, are you? Entrepreneurs risk their own money to pay these workers, so why shouldn't they decide how much they're willing to pay? If the worker does not agree with the wages one company offers, they are free to seek employment elsewhere.

Quote:

its not that some people are stronger or more fit or whatever, it that they are being expoited for the work and labour that they do produce. freedom?? on what terms.



Exploited? They are given an opportunity to earn money in exchange for their labor. Who are you to decide what's good for them and what isn't? They made a choice. It may not be a choice you or I would want to make, but the worker has decided that they are better off for having made that decision, or else they wouldn't have made it. Freedom is peacefully making one's own choices without coersion.

Quote:

i hate when i hear ppl going on about "oh capitalism isn't all that bad" because until you understand all the consequences and what it truly is you will remain ignorant of the true 'nature' of capitalism.

-jue



I've read Marx. I've read several books criticising capitalism. I've taken quite college courses with liberal professors who had plenty of disdain for capitalism. I grew up in a liberal family that adamantly supports the welfare state. I once considered myself a socialist. But I grew out of it. Capitalism is by no means perfect, but it is the least coercive system that exists today(albeit not in its pure form), and is the best guarantee of financial prosperity. I'm afraid it is you who is ignorant of the true nature of capitalism.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3781730 - 02/15/05 02:26 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
whoa. really. so yer telling me that one person/group cannot force another to do something against their will. hmmmm. really. have you been outside you house..ever. or read anything. cuz maybe i'm reading this wrong.
think. think. think. and then think again before you write something.



You know, instead of just acting arrogant and condescending, you could try to explain to someone why they are wrong. Or can you?


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: z@z.com]
    #3781736 - 02/15/05 02:31 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

z@z.com said:
Quote:

juende said:
capitalism is the building off of free labour. when someone can make profit without paying for labour [fully] then that is capitalism. making the most.



How do you feel we should determine what labor is worth? And how are people not "fully" paid for their labor?
uh. if you are not being paid or recognized for the work you do or your place [or role in this capitalistic society] as awhole class or race or gender and someone else is benefiting from it than that work that person has done is worth something.

Quote:

its not that some people are stronger or more fit or whatever, it that they are being expoited for the work and labour that they do produce.



How is anyone exploited? Are they forced to take certain jobs?
its not taking certain jobs. as if it were as simple as if little bob and jane could just 'work harder and get a better job'

Quote:

freedom?? on what terms.



How do you define freedom and how exactly does capitalism conflict with it? Really. I'm very curious.
all our rights have little fine print to it


Quote:

i hate when i hear ppl going on about "oh capitalism isn't all that bad" because until you understand all the consequences and what it truly is you will remain ignorant of the true 'nature' of capitalism.




Capitalism sucks, but I challenge you to show me a better system.



oh that is such a common response. so many ppl i've talked to will after a while cop out and say well if this sucks show me something better. that is not how things work. sure lets just toss out what we have now and start over. i'll make sumthing up real quick,


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: Silversoul]
    #3781756 - 02/15/05 02:37 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Paradigm said:
Quote:

juende said:
whoa. really. so yer telling me that one person/group cannot force another to do something against their will. hmmmm. really. have you been outside you house..ever. or read anything. cuz maybe i'm reading this wrong.
think. think. think. and then think again before you write something.



You know, instead of just acting arrogant and condescending, you could try to explain to someone why they are wrong. Or can you?




i'm not trying to be condescending. but to say that ppl cannot be forced to do something against their will...i mean c'mon, do i really need to explain it. do i have to go into things like rape,sweatshops, domestic voilence, slavery, poverty etc... think. yes i think that we should think before saying shit like "no one is forced against their will". sorry if that offends you.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: Silversoul]
    #3781776 - 02/15/05 02:41 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Paradigm said:
Quote:

juende said:
I'm afraid it is you who is ignorant of the true nature of capitalism.




but i guess it depends on which view you take. the perosn who is able to start up their own business, and to have workers to pay. or the ppl who are effected by it. i think we are looking at it from two different perspectives. you seem to be focusing on individaul situations. i'm trying to expose the larger picture.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3781812 - 02/15/05 02:48 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
i'm not trying to be condescending. but to say that ppl cannot be forced to do something against their will...i mean c'mon, do i really need to explain it. do i have to go into things like rape,sweatshops, domestic voilence, slavery, poverty etc... think. yes i think that we should think before saying shit like "no one is forced against their will". sorry if that offends you.



Actually, let's go ahead and discuss those things you brought up. First of all, what does rape have to do with capitalism? Or slavery, for that matter? As for sweatshops, what is a sweatshop, anyway? The term gets thrown around all the time by people to describe working in conditions that they personally consider unacceptable. But it is not for you to decide what conditions are acceptable for those workers. That is for them to decide. They may not like working there, but they are better off for it, or else they would not have chosen to work there. As for poverty, since capitalism is the system under which economies tend to perform best, I would say it's a rather good antidote to poverty. Just because you have been conditioned to associate capitalism with all these evils you speak of does not mean it is self-apparent.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinerelativexistance
"beads, bees!?!?beads ....BEADS!!!"
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/08/04
Posts: 1,778
Last seen: 10 months, 28 days
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3781820 - 02/15/05 02:50 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

alright i will modify and reiterate what i attempted to convey. a employer does not seek to take advantage of an employee. they wish to use the employess resources. the employee in turn gains benefit for working for the employer. this is where you look at net profit and opportunity cost. the employee can make just as much off the work as the employer if they were in the proper situation. before i refered to weaker and i was refering in the sense as in the party that could not gained the least. i was simply stating that it can directly relate to the animals, if you took the animals as as an analogy to business the hunter gains while the hunted looses. the hunted is the weaker party. it is all a level of skill. regardless of what degree, of manifestation that skill is. capitalism is based of level of skill and decisions on chances of opportunity. again capitalism is not evil. i argue evil would be intent to harm others. this harm would in no way benefit one own's self. net profit of own self = 0, however other party would incur net loss. this is what i view as evil and capitalism in no way promotes causing another party net loss when that party has no net profit to gain.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3781875 - 02/15/05 03:02 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
uh. if you are not being paid or recognized for the work you do or your place [or role in this capitalistic society] as awhole class or race or gender and someone else is benefiting from it than that work that person has done is worth something.



Who is not being paid? You keep bringing this up without backing it up. Workers are paid whatever their employer decides labor is worth to them, and they agree to it voluntarily.

Quote:

its not taking certain jobs. as if it were as simple as if little bob and jane could just 'work harder and get a better job'



How are they prevented from doing so? This is what I mean when I mention your condescending tone. You assume your beliefs to be so obviously true that only a moron would doubt them, when in fact you have so far been unable to back them up.

Quote:

all our rights have little fine print to it



WTF is that supposed to mean?

Quote:

oh that is such a common response. so many ppl i've talked to will after a while cop out and say well if this sucks show me something better. that is not how things work. sure lets just toss out what we have now and start over. i'll make sumthing up real quick,



In other words, you don't have an answer. Let me tell you something: Utopia is not an option. No system is perfect, and none will give everyone what they need. However, unlike other systems, capitalism allows everyone the freedom to pursue their own goals peacefully without forceful interference.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblez@z.com
Libertarian
Registered: 10/13/02
Posts: 2,876
Loc: ATL
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3781891 - 02/15/05 03:05 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
Quote:

z@z.com said:
Quote:

relativexistance said:
well in a sense it is. a stronger person can make a weaker one do the work.



In Capitalism no one can force another to do something against their will so how exactly does this work?




whoa. really. so yer telling me that one person/group cannot force another to do something against their will. hmmmm. really. have you been outside you house..ever. or read anything. cuz maybe i'm reading this wrong.
think. think. think. and then think again before you write something.




I'll repeat this one more time so you can absorb it. Capitalism does not allow one person to force another to do anything at all. That is against the idea of capitalism. Capitalism is all about voluntary exchanges of goods and labor.


--------------------
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." - C.S. Lewis

"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniencies attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblez@z.com
Libertarian
Registered: 10/13/02
Posts: 2,876
Loc: ATL
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3781903 - 02/15/05 03:08 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
oh that is such a common response. so many ppl i've talked to will after a while cop out and say well if this sucks show me something better. that is not how things work. sure lets just toss out what we have now and start over. i'll make sumthing up real quick,



So are you saying that you don't know of anything better?


--------------------
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." - C.S. Lewis

"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniencies attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: Silversoul]
    #3781924 - 02/15/05 03:14 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Paradigm said:
Quote:

juende said:
i'm not trying to be condescending. but to say that ppl cannot be forced to do something against their will...i mean c'mon, do i really need to explain it. do i have to go into things like rape,sweatshops, domestic voilence, slavery, poverty etc... think. yes i think that we should think before saying shit like "no one is forced against their will". sorry if that offends you.



Actually, let's go ahead and discuss those things you brought up. First of all, what does rape have to do with capitalism? Or slavery, for that matter? As for sweatshops, what is a sweatshop, anyway? The term gets thrown around all the time by people to describe working in conditions that they personally consider unacceptable. But it is not for you to decide what conditions are acceptable for those workers. That is for them to decide. They may not like working there, but they are better off for it, or else they would not have chosen to work there. As for poverty, since capitalism is the system under which economies tend to perform best, I would say it's a rather good antidote to poverty. Just because you have been conditioned to associate capitalism with all these evils you speak of does not mean it is self-apparent.




a aweatshop. i'm srry i throw around words and such. i am use to being around ppl who would know what that is [and i don't mean that in a bad way]
a sweatshop is a factory usually, but not always, overseas where the people working there are not getting the basic rights of their counrty. like getting paid 18 cents an hour. forced overtime, no benefits at all. blacklisting of ppl who try to start a union, womyn being fired for being pregenat [or losing their jobs because of it] unsafe machinery, and the list goes on. and i sgree it is for them to decided and this is not what they want. i work with a group called USAS [united student against sweatshops] and currently on getting my school to be on the list of over 150 other schools that have the WRC [thats the workers rights consortium] i'll post a bunch of links afterwards. and these conditions happen becasue these factories either are located in free trade zones or the corporations like nike, gap, new era etc have made agreement with the country.

as for capitalism and rape. its is all about power. and control.
i brought up slavery because that was one whole big forcing ppl to do something against there will.

and i guess it is my responsibilty to make sure the ppl i talk to know my backround and foundation for my thining. like if i was to pput things like NFTAA, WTF anarcho-feminism, seatshops, etc would everyone know what i'm talking about.
and i am not trying to be condescending i am just talking for granted what ppl do and do not know.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblez@z.com
Libertarian
Registered: 10/13/02
Posts: 2,876
Loc: ATL
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3781929 - 02/15/05 03:16 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
uh. if you are not being paid or recognized for the work you do or your place [or role in this capitalistic society] as awhole class or race or gender and someone else is benefiting from it than that work that person has done is worth something.



I have absolutely no idea what you are trying to say here. Last time I checked people were paid for their work in a capitalist system (if you were trying to say that they weren't because frankly I have no idea).


--------------------
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." - C.S. Lewis

"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniencies attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3781934 - 02/15/05 03:19 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
but i guess it depends on which view you take. the perosn who is able to start up their own business, and to have workers to pay. or the ppl who are effected by it. i think we are looking at it from two different perspectives. you seem to be focusing on individaul situations. i'm trying to expose the larger picture.



You have yet to give even the slightest indication that you understand the larger picture. The free market allows society to benefit from its citizens pursuing their own self-interest. That is the larger picture. The employer needs labor and the worker needs money, so they make an agreement that satisfies both agendas. The free market functions on such voluntary transactions.

Not only do such actions benefit the people involved in them, they also benefit society as a whole by keeping the economy strong. Whenever government intervenes in the free market, some of that economic growth is inhibited, and society is less prosperous as a result. This is not to say that it is never acceptable to intervene in the market. Sometimes it may be necessary to do so in order to do such things as preserving the environment for future generations or preventing dangerous people from obtaining nukes, but any such intervention must take into account the economic loss that will result from it. A healthy economy is not just beneficial to Wall Street. It benefits the poor by providing gainful employment opportunities with which to improve their lives.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: Silversoul]
    #3781947 - 02/15/05 03:22 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Paradigm said:
Quote:

juende said:
uh. if you are not being paid or recognized for the work you do or your place [or role in this capitalistic society] as awhole class or race or gender and someone else is benefiting from it than that work that person has done is worth something.



Who is not being paid? You keep bringing this up without backing it up. Workers are paid whatever their employer decides labor is worth to them, and they agree to it voluntarily.

Quote:

its not taking certain jobs. as if it were as simple as if little bob and jane could just 'work harder and get a better job'



How are they prevented from doing so? This is what I mean when I mention your condescending tone. You assume your beliefs to be so obviously true that only a moron would doubt them, when in fact you have so far been unable to back them up.

Quote:

all our rights have little fine print to it



WTF is that supposed to mean?

Quote:

oh that is such a common response. so many ppl i've talked to will after a while cop out and say well if this sucks show me something better. that is not how things work. sure lets just toss out what we have now and start over. i'll make sumthing up real quick,



In other words, you don't have an answer. Let me tell you something: Utopia is not an option. No system is perfect, and none will give everyone what they need. However, unlike other systems, capitalism allows everyone the freedom to pursue their own goals peacefully without forceful interference.



oh. first [to whats in bold] ideally that would be true. but it also opens up the oportunity for ppl to expoit the system for their needs. the needs of percentage few rich, those who have the power and wealth to do so. our capitalistic society has a global effect.
i know that no system is perfect but capitalism is far from it. its not that they system is wrong its the way we conduct ourselves under it.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblez@z.com
Libertarian
Registered: 10/13/02
Posts: 2,876
Loc: ATL
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3781951 - 02/15/05 03:25 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
oh. first [to whats in bold] ideally that would be true. but it also opens up the oportunity for ppl to expoit the system for their needs. the needs of percentage few rich, those who have the power and wealth to do so. our capitalistic society has a global effect.
i know that no system is perfect but capitalism is far from it. its not that they system is wrong its the way we conduct ourselves under it.



You have yet to back up a single argument with anything besides rhetoric. Please feel free to do so at any time.


--------------------
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." - C.S. Lewis

"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniencies attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3781961 - 02/15/05 03:30 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

here are some anti sweatshop links. i'll post [or start a new post] for anti globalism, etc links...
Anti sweatshop activists and info



United students against sweatshops national site.
http://www.studentsagainstsweatshops.org/

sweatshop watch
http://www.sweatshopwatch.org/

Global exchange.
http://www.globalexchange.org/
Global Exchange is an international human rights organization dedicated to
promoting environmental, political and social justice. Since our founding
in 1988, we have increased the US public's global awareness while building
partnerships worldwide.

National Mobilization Against Sweatshops
<http://www.nmass.org/nmass/fight.html>

Coop Americas campaign to end sweatshops, some good info.
http://www.sweatshops.org/

United States Labor Education In the Americas project
<http://www.usleap.org/>

National Labor Committee
http://www.nlcnet.org/
Kathy Lee Gifford look out!

International Labor Organization
http://www.ilo.org/
a department of the united nations which deals with international labor
standards and works to make globalization fair for the 3rd world.

Slap (student labor action project)
http://www.jwj.org/SLAP/slap.htm

jobs with justice
http://www.jwj.org/

Western new York sweatshop awareness project
http://www.wnysap.org/
good bunch of folks.

Labor Religion Coalition./ Coalition for economic justice.
http://www.labor-religion.org/local_cej_bar.htm
Runs a sweat free schools campaign.

No Sweat
http://www.nosweat.org.uk/
the UK's version of usas. (really just a bunch of drunken soccer fans)

http://www.campusactivism.org/
a nation wide network of about 635 groups which allows them to network on a
wide range of issues.

National colation for occupational safty and health
http://www.coshnetwork.org

Amnesty International
http://www.amnesty.org/
considers the right to organize as a fundamental human right, also works to
free jailed labor leaders around the world.

Human Rights Watch
http://www.hrw.org/
Has a program focusing on the plight of migrant workers.

Coalition for Justice in the Maquiladoras
<http://www.coalitionforjustice.net/>
fighting nafta and helping to improve the living conditions for people in
the maquilidora region of northern Mexico.It is led by both workers in
mexico, and a tri national coalition of labor, environmental, Latino,
women's rights and religious organizations.

The United States Stuednt Association
http://www.usstudents.org/main.asp
one of the largest student voices in washington, runs the grass roots
organizing weekend (grow) training's.

Stop Nike Sweatshops
<http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/sweatshops/nike/>
from the company that everyone loves to hate.

a quick fact sheet on wal-mart
<http://www.ufcw.org/press_room/fact_sheets_and_backgrounder/walmart/sweat_
shops.cfm>
many think that they are the worst company in the world when it comes to
this issue. their "always lower prices, always" come off the backs of a lot
of people all around the world.
"In October 10, 2002, the National Organization for Women (NOW) reported
that the Maine Department of Labor ordered Wal-Mart to pay the largest fine
in state history for violating child labor laws. The Department of Labor
discovered 1,436 child labor law infractions at 20 Wal-Mart chains in the
state."

The Harvard Living Wage Campaign
<http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~pslm/livingwage/portal.html>
Info on an awesome successful campaign at Harvard which ended with the
occupation of the presidents office for 2 weeks.

Unions,

The Unite Union (formerly the Union of Needle Trades, Textiles and
Industrial Employees)
http://www.unitehere.org/

Afl-Cio
http://www.aflcio.org/
the nations largest grouping of unions.

Communication workers of America
http://www.cwa-union.org/
(these guys represented the new era workers)

CSEA
http://www.csealocal1000.org/

SEIU
http://www.seiu.org
run the justice for janitors campaign

The united food and commercial workers
http://www.ufcw.org

The United Farm Workers
http://www.ufw.org/
Cezar Chaves's union.

The Coalition of Black Trade Unionists.
<http://www.cbtu.org>

The National Labor Relations Board
<http://www.nlrb.gov/nlrb/home/default.asp>

Monitoring boards.

The Worker Rights Consortium (WRC)
http://www.workersrights.org/
The Worker Rights Consortium (WRC) is a non-profit organization created by
college and university administrations, students and labor rights experts.
The WRC's purpose is to assist in the enforcement of manufacturing Codes of
Conduct adopted by colleges and universities; these Codes are designed to
ensure that factories producing clothing and other goods bearing college
and university names respect the basic rights of workers. There are more
than 100 colleges and universities affiliated with the WRC.

Fair Labor Association  (run by industry leaders, non independent)
http://www.fairlabor.org/
"our mission: The Fair Labor Association (FLA) is a non-profit organization
combining the efforts of industry, non-governmental organizations (NGOs),
colleges and universities to promote adherence to international labor
standards and improve working conditions worldwide."

The Collegiate Licensing Company
www.clc.com
I'm not sure what they do, but I think it pertains to us.

News.

The nation
www.thenation.com
good read, one of the leading left magazines in America, have mentioned
usas many times.

www.indymedia.org
good anti corporate event coverage.

international labor news, not sure how good it is.
http://www.labourstart.org/

the British broadcasting service.
www.bbc.co.uk/news
one of the best global sources of news and information, free from corporate
or political bias.

The United States Government's bureau of labor statistics.
<http://stats.bls.gov/>

Globalization stuff.(if your into this sort of thing, but its all
connected.)

world trade organization
www.wto.org
(we don't like em)

International monetary fund.
www.imf.org
(we dont like em either)

The International Forum on Globalization  (smart folks)
http://www.ifg.org/
Representing over 60 organizations in 25 countries, the International Forum
on Globalization associates come together out of a shared concern that the
world's corporate and political leadership is undertaking a restructuring
of global politics and economics that may prove as historically significant
as any event since the Industrial Revolution. This restructuring is
happening at tremendous speed, with little public disclosure of the
profound consequences affecting democracy, human welfare, local economies,
and the natural world.

Economic Policy Institute. (more smart folks)
<http://www.epinet.org/>

World Social Forum.
http://www.wsfindia.org/
The World Social Forum is not an organization, not a united front
platform, but "?an open meeting place for reflective thinking, democratic
debate of ideas, formulation of proposals, free exchange of experiences and
inter-linking for effective action, by groups and movements of civil
society that are opposed to neo- liberalism and to domination of the world
by capital and any form of imperialism, and are committed to building a
society centred on the human person". (From the WSF Charter of Principles).
     

CorpWatch
<http://corpwatch.org/>
Holding corporations accountable when they mess up.

The Center For Economic and Policy Research. (even more smart folks)
<http://www.cepr.net/>

Fair Trade Stuff.

http://www.oxfam.org.uk/
Oxfam works with others to overcome poverty and suffering. They are famous
for their "make trade fair" campaign.

http://www.transfairusa.org/
works to certify consumer goods as fairly traded.

equal exchange
www.equalexchange.com
one of the nations largest providers of fairly traded coffee

coop America
http://www.coopamerica.org/

Music, tatical media, and other fun stuff.

The Billboard Liberation Front
<http://www.billboardliberation.com/>
liberating billboards from crass commercial lies since 1973

The Yes Men.
http://www.theyesmen.org/
pretending to be people they are not, to keep those people honest. have a
feature film coming to a theater near you.

The Corporation
<http://www.thecorporation.com/>
a documentary on corporate crime and influence in our daily lives, chilling
stuff.

Sweatshop Union
http://www.sweatshopunion.com/
Canadian political hiphop. I kid you not.


adbusters.
www.adbusters.org
a magazine which is highly critical of commercial culture.

The reverend Billy and the church of stop shopping.
http://www.revbilly.com/
um....hard to describe....but interesting, check it out.

Big Noise Films,
http://www.bignoisefilms.com/home.htm
awesome film makers.

The Tactical Media Network.
<http://www.waag.org/tmn/>
Methods and theory on how activists with out a lot of resources can get
their messages to a wider audience by utilizing advanced technology.

Anti sweatshop clothing

American Apparel
http://www.americanapparel.net/
the worlds largest label selling only sweatshop free clothing, (caution,
staunchly anti union)

No Sweat!
http://nosweatapparel.com/
good stuff

Ethical Threads,
http://www.ethicalthreads.co.uk/
all their clothing is made by worker owned coops in Latin America, its cool
stuff.

Polartec
http://www.polartec.com/
High tech outterwhere made by Malden Mills? in eastern Massachusetts. They
make some awesome stuff, and these are the clothes they take to mount
Everest.

Patagonia
http://www.patagonia.com/
these guys have the reputation of being a rather ethical manufacturer, im
not sure about their labor record though, buyer beware. they are part of
the FLA.

Sweat X
<http://www.sweatx.net/>
i think they may have gone out of business. :frown:


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: z@z.com]
    #3781965 - 02/15/05 03:31 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

z@z.com said:
Quote:

juende said:
oh. first [to whats in bold] ideally that would be true. but it also opens up the oportunity for ppl to expoit the system for their needs. the needs of percentage few rich, those who have the power and wealth to do so. our capitalistic society has a global effect.
i know that no system is perfect but capitalism is far from it. its not that they system is wrong its the way we conduct ourselves under it.



You have yet to back up a single argument with anything besides rhetoric. Please feel free to do so at any time.


and you have??


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinerelativexistance
"beads, bees!?!?beads ....BEADS!!!"
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/08/04
Posts: 1,778
Last seen: 10 months, 28 days
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3781977 - 02/15/05 03:35 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
a aweatshop. i'm srry i throw around words and such. i am use to being around ppl who would know what that is [and i don't mean that in a bad way]
a sweatshop is a factory usually, but not always, overseas where the people working there are not getting the basic rights of their counrty. like getting paid 18 cents an hour. forced overtime, no benefits at all. blacklisting of ppl who try to start a union, womyn being fired for being pregenat [or losing their jobs because of it] unsafe machinery, and the list goes on. and i sgree it is for them to decided and this is not what they want. i work with a group called USAS [united student against sweatshops] and currently on getting my school to be on the list of over 150 other schools that have the WRC [thats the workers rights consortium] i'll post a bunch of links afterwards. and these conditions happen becasue these factories either are located in free trade zones or the corporations like nike, gap, new era etc have made agreement with the country.

as for capitalism and rape. its is all about power. and control.
i brought up slavery because that was one whole big forcing ppl to do something against there will.

and i guess it is my responsibilty to make sure the ppl i talk to know my backround and foundation for my thining. like if i was to pput things like NFTAA, WTF anarcho-feminism, seatshops, etc would everyone know what i'm talking about.
and i am not trying to be condescending i am just talking for granted what ppl do and do not know.




alright well see you are not dicussing capitalism regarding the sweatshops. capitalist nations take advantage, but that is not the fault of the capitalist. the capitalist seeks to maximize ones own profit that is it. they capitalize on the lower costs. they didnt cause the low wage. it was a result of the workers desire to supply work. if anything its not capitalisms fault it is the fault of the other government where skill is not rewarded and is not capitalist. these oppressive economies. capitalism is not oppressive i just wish to clarify. i believe you are doing good work and i truely appreciate that, but i just want to clarify what the real evil is. not capitalism, it works in a logical equal way. what causes such injustices are governments that dont function in the same way. capitalists just maximize on the evil already done, they have not created the evil. this is why we need to equalize globally and i think all of us would agree unless we are evil in our own nature.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinerelativexistance
"beads, bees!?!?beads ....BEADS!!!"
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/08/04
Posts: 1,778
Last seen: 10 months, 28 days
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3781984 - 02/15/05 03:38 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

the existance of sweatshops is not caused by capitalism. it is caused by oppressive socio-economic systems. capitalism promotes maximizing one owns profit from their own skills/abilities. it has nothing to do with oppression. oppression is government related.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: relativexistance]
    #3781994 - 02/15/05 03:48 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

but it is all related. capitlism is not one thing. but it is part of something... or sweatshops and oppressive socio... are apart of it. you cannot have capitlism stand alone without looking at how it is connected with everything else.
it is a lot. i have spent the last five years or so absorbing as much as i can and i am still learning.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3782010 - 02/15/05 04:01 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
a aweatshop. i'm srry i throw around words and such. i am use to being around ppl who would know what that is [and i don't mean that in a bad way]



Everyone who uses that word seems to think they know what it means, but often it's simply used as a derogatory word for a Third World factory.

Quote:

a sweatshop is a factory usually, but not always, overseas where the people working there are not getting the basic rights of their counrty. like getting paid 18 cents an hour. forced overtime, no benefits at all. blacklisting of ppl who try to start a union, womyn being fired for being pregenat [or losing their jobs because of it] unsafe machinery, and the list goes on.



Again, if a company decides that their labor is worth 18 cents an hour, and the people decide they are willing to work for that much, who is being forced? Sure, they could theoretically be paid 20 cents or $2 or $100 an hour, but the company has decided that 18 cents an hour is what it is willing to invest in labor, and the workers have decided that they are willing to work for that much. It may not be an ideal arrangement, but since when are we guaranteed an ideal choice? Like anyone else, these workers have limited choices, and 18 cents and hour the best option they have. If they didn't have that choice available to them, they would be worse off.

As for blacklisting unions and firing pregnant women, since when do people have a right to be employed against the employer's will? I would think that those who use their money to pay people's wages should have a say in who they employ. Now, there are some factories that engage in more violent means of coercion, such as raping women and getting police to beat protestors and union organizers, and I am in no way condoning these actions, but you must understand that such practices are in no way inherent nor unique to capitalism.

As for unsafe machinery, the fact is that some jobs are more dangerous than others, and some people are willing to take that extra risk. You don't see people complaining about how unsafe police work of firefighting is, because we all know that those people choose to take those risks. As for forced overtime, it may suck, but is in no way unique to sweatshops. My friend got forced overtime frequently when he worked at Walmart, which is part of the reason why he quit and found work elsewhere. And as for benefits, the most employee benefits I've ever gotten was half price on all food in the snack shop.

Quote:

and i sgree it is for them to decided and this is not what they want.



I didn't want to be losing sleep trying to finish my schoolwork and pass all my classes, but I've decided I want a college degree, and thus have decided that it is the best option available for me. Getting what you want is a utopian fantasy that will never come to fruition under any system. Taking what limited options you have and choosing the best one available, however, is easily attainable under capitalism.

Quote:

i work with a group called USAS [united student against sweatshops] and currently on getting my school to be on the list of over 150 other schools that have the WRC [thats the workers rights consortium] i'll post a bunch of links afterwards. and these conditions happen becasue these factories either are located in free trade zones or the corporations like nike, gap, new era etc have made agreement with the country.



These agreements are examples of government intervening on behalf of these companies. This goes directly against free market capitalism. This is one of this biggest misunderstandings people have about capitalism. Sweetheart deals made between governments and businesses are not what capitalism is about. In a free market, the government is neutral to all economic agents.

Quote:

as for capitalism and rape. its is all about power. and control.



Yes, rape is all about power and control, but what does that have to do with capitalism? How is non-intervention in voluntary market transactions about power and control?

Quote:

i brought up slavery because that was one whole big forcing ppl to do something against there will.



Again, what does this have to do with capitalism?

Quote:

and i guess it is my responsibilty to make sure the ppl i talk to know my backround and foundation for my thining. like if i was to pput things like NFTAA, WTF anarcho-feminism, seatshops, etc would everyone know what i'm talking about.
and i am not trying to be condescending i am just talking for granted what ppl do and do not know.



You are not just taking for granted what people do and do not know, but you are also taking for granted the fact that some people might know more about the subject than you do, and that things you consider to be obvious are, in fact, dead wrong.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinemethikist
Mushroom Pirate.

Registered: 03/16/04
Posts: 138
Loc: PNW
Last seen: 8 years, 1 month
Re: capitalism [Re: BrAiN]
    #3782159 - 02/15/05 05:26 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

The problem is greater, it encompasses capitalism. The problem is appointing individuals to create policy. It doesn't work. Any specialized group of people put in a position to make decisions will design decisions in their best interest. Capitalism, Communism, Fascism, the entire US polyarchy, any form of government in time corrupts. A system needs to be developed that can counter this one pivotal and crucial flaw.. I have an idea:
No system at all; meaning no appointed or otherwise 'elected' officials to design policy. Everyone either participates or no decisions get made.


I also think Anarchosyndicalism is worth a shot.


--------------------
Oh cmon, I'm a fun guy.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleCJay
Stranger

Registered: 02/02/04
Posts: 923
Loc: riding tha bass
Re: capitalism [Re: BrAiN]
    #3782277 - 02/15/05 07:21 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

capitalism = darwinism.... survival of the fittest

problem is... fredom means freedom to be an asshole and freedom to be greedy

capitalism = the course of nature as it has always been... the stronger lions of the pack surviving over the weaker.... the plants with stronger roots living because they can take in mor nutrients, etc etc etc etc...





Nature isn't all tooth and claw though - there is this wonderful thing that is often undertaken by nature. It's called symbiosis.

Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against capitalism, like you I think it is the greed inherent in mankind that is the problem, and that that is what will destropy any political ideal. I certainly feel that capitalism offers a great model, but that its rapacious side needs to be tempered. That requires humanity to reach a more conscious level, for politics to hybridise and capitalism take on wider values, for people to find strength in themselves to listen to their souls and not just their desires.

I don't think most people 'single out' capitalism for criticism, it is just that capitalism is the prevailing paradigm, and it seems to be failing us as a species and a planet. Therefore many become bitter, and yes become 'anti'. Most though look at the paradigm and perhaps find reasons to criticise. This is really an attempt to see beyond into a future possibility.

If only humanity could look into its soul and then nothing will change, yet everything will change. Something so subtle, yet all enveloping.

I suppose we are well on track, and at least some of us and a few other lifeforms will get off this rock if it all goes wrong - if it goes right, well then there is already basic form there, now it just needs injection of spirit to make it whole. :sun:


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleCJay
Stranger

Registered: 02/02/04
Posts: 923
Loc: riding tha bass
Re: capitalism [Re: CJay]
    #3782297 - 02/15/05 07:40 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Eventually we can hopefully hit the intelligent anarchy we could be capable of if we become conscious enough as a species.

Might take a few hundred thousand years though.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: CJay]
    #3782616 - 02/15/05 10:29 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

CJay said:
Nature isn't all tooth and claw though - there is this wonderful thing that is often undertaken by nature. It's called symbiosis.



Agreed. And despite popular belief, capitalism also is not all about survival of the fittest. There is plenty of room for compassion and cooperation, provided there's a big enough market for it(I use the term "market" loosely here). The thing about the free market is that the producers and consumers ultimately decide through supply and demand what direction capitalism will take. Capitalism in itself is morally neutral. Depending on the consumer's wants and needs, and the producer's willingness to fulfill those wants and needs, capitalism can be used for either good or evil.

Quote:

Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against capitalism, like you I think it is the greed inherent in mankind that is the problem, and that that is what will destropy any political ideal. I certainly feel that capitalism offers a great model, but that its rapacious side needs to be tempered. That requires humanity to reach a more conscious level, for politics to hybridise and capitalism take on wider values, for people to find strength in themselves to listen to their souls and not just their desires.



I think one of the main adjustments I'd make to capitalism is True Cost Economics, where a product's true cost to society--environmental, medical, social, etc.--would be added onto its regular price by means of a consumption tax. Even here, though, I'm worried that an item's "true cost" might be a little too subjective for me to trust politicians to decide it. If marijuana were legalized, I could see politicians taxing it well beyond its true societal cost.

Another problem I have with modern capitalism is it doesn't make the proper distinction between landed property(owning land) and other forms of private property. The Earth belongs to all people in common, and we should act as stewards, not owners, of that land. This is where I might normally go off on a tangent about Georgism, but I'll spare you the long lecture.

Quote:

I don't think most people 'single out' capitalism for criticism, it is just that capitalism is the prevailing paradigm, and it seems to be failing us as a species and a planet. Therefore many become bitter, and yes become 'anti'. Most though look at the paradigm and perhaps find reasons to criticise. This is really an attempt to see beyond into a future possibility.



Yes, that occured to me too. If socialism were the prevailing norm, I'm sure that would be the target of all this criticism. I've come to the conclusion that capitalism probably needs some reform, primarily on environmental issues, but definitely should not be done away with.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: Silversoul]
    #3782648 - 02/15/05 10:39 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Paradigm said:
Quote:

juende said:
a aweatshop. i'm srry i throw around words and such. i am use to being around ppl who would know what that is [and i don't mean that in a bad way]



Everyone who uses that word seems to think they know what it means, but often it's simply used as a derogatory word for a Third World factory.

Quote:

a sweatshop is a factory usually, but not always, overseas where the people working there are not getting the basic rights of their counrty. like getting paid 18 cents an hour. forced overtime, no benefits at all. blacklisting of ppl who try to start a union, womyn being fired for being pregenat [or losing their jobs because of it] unsafe machinery, and the list goes on.



Again, if a company decides that their labor is worth 18 cents an hour, and the people decide they are willing to work for that much, who is being forced? Sure, they could theoretically be paid 20 cents or $2 or $100 an hour, but the company has decided that 18 cents an hour is what it is willing to invest in labor, and the workers have decided that they are willing to work for that much. It may not be an ideal arrangement, but since when are we guaranteed an ideal choice? Like anyone else, these workers have limited choices, and 18 cents and hour the best option they have. If they didn't have that choice available to them, they would be worse off.

As for blacklisting unions and firing pregnant women, since when do people have a right to be employed against the employer's will? I would think that those who use their money to pay people's wages should have a say in who they employ. Now, there are some factories that engage in more violent means of coercion, such as raping women and getting police to beat protestors and union organizers, and I am in no way condoning these actions, but you must understand that such practices are in no way inherent nor unique to capitalism.

As for unsafe machinery, the fact is that some jobs are more dangerous than others, and some people are willing to take that extra risk. You don't see people complaining about how unsafe police work of firefighting is, because we all know that those people choose to take those risks. As for forced overtime, it may suck, but is in no way unique to sweatshops. My friend got forced overtime frequently when he worked at Walmart, which is part of the reason why he quit and found work elsewhere. And as for benefits, the most employee benefits I've ever gotten was half price on all food in the snack shop.

Quote:

and i sgree it is for them to decided and this is not what they want.



I didn't want to be losing sleep trying to finish my schoolwork and pass all my classes, but I've decided I want a college degree, and thus have decided that it is the best option available for me. Getting what you want is a utopian fantasy that will never come to fruition under any system. Taking what limited options you have and choosing the best one available, however, is easily attainable under capitalism.

Quote:

i work with a group called USAS [united student against sweatshops] and currently on getting my school to be on the list of over 150 other schools that have the WRC [thats the workers rights consortium] i'll post a bunch of links afterwards. and these conditions happen becasue these factories either are located in free trade zones or the corporations like nike, gap, new era etc have made agreement with the country.



These agreements are examples of government intervening on behalf of these companies. This goes directly against free market capitalism. This is one of this biggest misunderstandings people have about capitalism. Sweetheart deals made between governments and businesses are not what capitalism is about. In a free market, the government is neutral to all economic agents.

Quote:

as for capitalism and rape. its is all about power. and control.



Yes, rape is all about power and control, but what does that have to do with capitalism? How is non-intervention in voluntary market transactions about power and control?

Quote:

i brought up slavery because that was one whole big forcing ppl to do something against there will.



Again, what does this have to do with capitalism?

Quote:

and i guess it is my responsibilty to make sure the ppl i talk to know my backround and foundation for my thining. like if i was to pput things like NFTAA, WTF anarcho-feminism, seatshops, etc would everyone know what i'm talking about.
and i am not trying to be condescending i am just talking for granted what ppl do and do not know.



You are not just taking for granted what people do and do not know, but you are also taking for granted the fact that some people might know more about the subject than you do, and that things you consider to be obvious are, in fact, dead wrong.




wtf are you pulling out here. i don't know what a shweatshop is?!?!? HA talk to a colombian coke cola worker who's fellow union organizers have been killed for speaking out. i have met ppl first hand. say what yer saying here to someone who has risked their life to speak out. "third world factory". i'm not speaking on theory. i have seen this shit first hand, so do not come and tell me that i am dead wrong.

and you obviously do not understand. if you have a family to feed, and a company/factory come to town with these conditions. it is your only choice in a sitiuation like this. if you are black listed that means other companies will not hire you. so sorry its not as easy as your buddy get another min wage job somewhere.
just because you talk alot doesn't mean that you are right. give me proof or first hand experience to back your claims.
it is not up to the company to decided what their labour is worth. would you work in a job that paid below 5 dollars an hour.
so you are saying that these american companies have the right to pay 18 cents an hours and the other conditions because that is what 3rd world is. its ok to go angainst their countries law and the US's. and trust me sweatshops are not limited to overseas. look at new era cap and their factory in derby ny... yes New York of the good u s of a.
never once did i say utopian. if having the basic liberities and rights of your own country is utopian then i thnk you need to have another look.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: CJay]
    #3782653 - 02/15/05 10:41 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

CJay said:
Eventually we can hopefully hit the intelligent anarchy we could be capable of if we become conscious enough as a species.

Might take a few hundred thousand years though.



agreed


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3782750 - 02/15/05 11:32 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

wtf are you pulling out here. i don't know what a shweatshop is?!?!? HA talk to a colombian coke cola worker who's fellow union organizers have been killed for speaking out. i have met ppl first hand. say what yer saying here to someone who has risked their life to speak out. "third world factory". i'm not speaking on theory. i have seen this shit first hand, so do not come and tell me that i am dead wrong.

Whoa, calm the fuck down!  I never said you don't know what a sweatshop is.  Only that the word tends to get thrown around a lot.

and you obviously do not understand. if you have a family to feed, and a company/factory come to town with these conditions. it is your only choice in a sitiuation like this.

I have said all along that people choose the best option available to them.  If the choice is between 18 cents an hour or no money at all, they'll choose 18 cents an hour.

if you are black listed that means other companies will not hire you. so sorry its not as easy as your buddy get another min wage job somewhere.

I'm sure it's not easy, and I never said it was.  But that still doesn't obligate a company to hire you.  It's their money.  They decide who to spend it on.

just because you talk alot doesn't mean that you are right.

I never claimed I was right(though if I didn't think I was, I wouldn't be arguing).  I simply was getting tired of you so arrogantly assuming that your ideas were so obviously right that any other ideas could be brushed aside as nonsense.

give me proof or first hand experience to back your claims.

Ask and ye shall recieve.  Which specific claims would you like me to back up?

it is not up to the company to decided what their labour is worth.

Their money, their decision.  Sorry. :shrug:

would you work in a job that paid below 5 dollars an hour.

Well, that would depend on a few factors:
1.  How badly I need the money
2.  What kind of work it entails
3.  What other options are available

In short, yes, I could easily see situations where I would work for less than $5 an hour.  Hell, my dad's paid me less than that to mow both lawns and trim the ivy.  But even if I wasn't willing to work for that amount, I guarantee you there's plenty of people who would.  Who are you to deny them that opportunity?

so you are saying that these american companies have the right to pay 18 cents an hours and the other conditions because that is what 3rd world is.

No, they have a right to pay 18 cents an hour because it's their money and they choose what to do with it.  They're under no obligation to hire anyone, so why is it that when they do, they are suddenly obligated to pay however much you think they should be paying?

its ok to go angainst their countries law and the US's.  and trust me sweatshops are not limited to overseas. look at new era cap and their factory in derby ny... yes New York of the good u s of a.

Oh, I wouldn't be surprised.  You see, some poor people don't have time to wait around for some minimum wage job to open up, so they're willing to work for less.  They do it because it's worth it to them, and it's not for you to decide what's best for them.

never once did i say utopian. if having the basic liberities and rights of your own country is utopian then i thnk you need to have another look.

It is utopian to think that people deserve to get what they want.  Life just doesn't work that way.  You are given a certain range of options, and you decide which of those options, whether they're great or really shitty, is the most beneficial for you.  It's the same for these people working in sweatshops.  Sure, it'd be great for them if they were making $10 an hour, but the world just doesn't work that way.  People choose the best option they can get.  If a company is offering work for 18 cents an hour and someone is willing to work for 18 cents an hour, then that's a good deal for both parties.  Sure, the company may be getting the better deal out of it, but the workers are better of too, or else they wouldn't have taken the job.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineBanJankri
FreefallerUpwards

Registered: 07/27/04
Posts: 1,392
Last seen: 5 years, 1 month
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3783049 - 02/15/05 01:02 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

I would like to agree with some of the points made regarding capitalism. it was indeed with good intentions by the makers, but the carriers out(humans) distorted it. but this does not mean we cannot critisize it.

capitalism doesnt need adjustments in the environemntal area. Paradigm your insisting on there being a choice to make. it may seem that capitalism is offering a choice, and that ind's are free to choose, sitting in western rich nations. the choice they make there is to die, lose their family, or work in the worst conditions you can think of. hmm not a very nice choice.

you may again say how can we blame capitalism for this. well for it to be unable to prevents things like this happening. for actually encouriging the big firms to maximize their profits, by going finding the lowest labor cost, and thereby legitimizing the current system of exploiting that goes on.

it is generally argued that capitalism offers states, ind that are weak, poor potential to become rich and powerful. although this may be the case in theory, in the reality, it only makes the powerful
stay in power and accumulate more capital, thereby forming powerful corporations that are able to distord measures and use their powers to stay as powerful and not let competition to be pursued in an efficient and fair manner.

therefore I believe capitalism dosnt only lack some env standarts. it lacks a concept of justice. you may still go on that this isnt the job of capitalism. well, I am critical against a system that lacks a undertanding of justice, therefore creating the things we attribute to the negative sides of capitalism.

we must try to see the broader picture. if as john rawls suggests we go back to the point of constructing societies, we must make the decisions dropping the identities we have. we may become an african american, we may be a person living in africa, someone that is part of the image of weak and poor. if we simply say that in capitalism, there is always the possibility of development, people are really blind to what is actually going on. we must build a new system that can create an opportunity in a fair and just way. capitalism obviously has become a tool for the powerful and rich. we must construct a new system that would take into consideration all the faults achieved in various systems whether it be capitalism, communism or anything else.

thats my view anyways.


--------------------
Just let everything flow, just flow right to the center of everything. You gotta turn off your mind and relax, and then just float downstream...


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinecb9fl
Senior ChildMolestationExpert
Registered: 06/12/03
Posts: 3,104
Loc: florida
Last seen: 3 years, 8 months
Re: capitalism [Re: BanJankri]
    #3783071 - 02/15/05 01:06 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

it lacks a concept of justice. you may still go on that this isnt the job of capitalism. well, I am critical against a system that lacks a undertanding of justice

Whose justice?


--------------------
It is better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not. -Andre Gide

"Generosity is nothing else than a craze to possess. All which I abandon, all which I give, I enjoy in a higher manner through the fact that I give it away. To give is to enjoy possessively the object which one gives."


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineBanJankri
FreefallerUpwards

Registered: 07/27/04
Posts: 1,392
Last seen: 5 years, 1 month
Re: capitalism [Re: cb9fl]
    #3783418 - 02/15/05 02:50 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

well cb9fl I think on this issue, as I said, the solution proposed by john rawls is quite good. it is his conception of of veil of ignorance or the Original position. He proposes an original state in which actors are asked to select a social order into which they will be born while lacking foreknowledge of the human capital that they will bring to their station. From this position, they eventually arrive at a reflective equilibrium and agree to universal ethical principles.

so yes, there is different conceptions of justice for different groups and so on, but I believe in the time we have come, there can be articulated universal principles. of course not regarding everything, but I believe there is much to be articulated regarding the points I mentioned in my previous post.


--------------------
Just let everything flow, just flow right to the center of everything. You gotta turn off your mind and relax, and then just float downstream...


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: BanJankri]
    #3783627 - 02/15/05 03:30 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

BanJankri writes:

"it was indeed with good intentions by the makers, but the carriers out(humans) distorted it."

Nobody "made" Capitalism. Capitalism is nothing more than people being allowed to do what they please so long as they don't forcibly prevent others doing what they please. It's not a system so much as it is a lack of system.

"the choice they make there is to die, lose their family, or work in the worst conditions you can think of. hmm not a very nice choice."

Yet without Capitalists, there are just two choices -- die or lose their family. No, to be fair, there is a third choice -- seize by force (either directly or through agents) the belongings of others.

"although this may be the case in theory, in the reality, it only makes the powerful stay in power and accumulate more capital, thereby forming powerful corporations that are able to distord measures and use their powers to stay as powerful and not let competition to be pursued in an efficient and fair manner."

You are not referring to Capitalism. You are referring to government-supported Corporatism. Not the same thing at all. Under Capitalism, the only "power" one has -- no matter how successful -- is the power to attempt to persuade others to trade with you.

"you may still go on that this isnt the job of capitalism. well, I am critical against a system that lacks a undertanding of justice, therefore creating the things we attribute to the negative sides of capitalism. "

What is more just than being left free to trade with others? How is it "justice" to be forced to trade with someone you don't wish to trade with? How is it "justice" to be forcibly prevented from trading with someone who wishes to trade with you? Explain, please.

"capitalism obviously has become a tool for the powerful and rich."

And this makes it different from Socialism, Communism, Fascism, etc. how, exactly? Note that Capitalism is the only system that cannot be subverted by those with guns. The instant you introduce forced transactions into the equation it is no longer Capitalism.

"we must construct a new system that would take into consideration all the faults achieved in various systems whether it be capitalism, communism or anything else."

There is no such system. The only "fault" in Capitalism is the fact that humans vary in their abilities and cannot choose the environment into which they are born. All they can do is to move elsewhere once they have the stamina to do so. That is not the fault of Capitalism, but of the nature of reality.



Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: BanJankri]
    #3783726 - 02/15/05 03:50 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

I would like to agree with some of the points made regarding capitalism. it was indeed with good intentions by the makers, but the carriers out(humans) distorted it. but this does not mean we cannot critisize it.

Criticize all you want. I'll be right here with my rebuttal.

capitalism doesnt need adjustments in the environemntal area. Paradigm your insisting on there being a choice to make. it may seem that capitalism is offering a choice, and that ind's are free to choose, sitting in western rich nations. the choice they make there is to die, lose their family, or work in the worst conditions you can think of. hmm not a very nice choice.

No one said every choice is going to be a nice one. If something is the best choice that is available to someone, they'll take it, no matter how awful that choice seems to us.

you may again say how can we blame capitalism for this. well for it to be unable to prevents things like this happening. for actually encouriging the big firms to maximize their profits, by going finding the lowest labor cost, and thereby legitimizing the current system of exploiting that goes on.

There is no law requiring a business to maximize profits, unless they are a corporation, which, iterestingly enough, is a product of government intervention in the economy. You see, the government issues charters to a company so it can become a corporation, and this charter requires them to maximize the returns for stockholders. If you have a problem with this, tell the government to stop issuing charters.

it is generally argued that capitalism offers states, ind that are weak, poor potential to become rich and powerful.
As was the case for one Andrew Carnegie. A rags to riches story if there ever was one, and all thanks to capitalism.

although this may be the case in theory, in the reality, it only makes the powerful
stay in power and accumulate more capital, thereby forming powerful corporations that are able to distord measures and use their powers to stay as powerful and not let competition to be pursued in an efficient and fair manner.


One reason you don't see many Andrew Carnegies today is because business regulations have made it damn near impossible for the poor to start up their own businesses the way Carnegie did. As far as monopolies go, they can come about and be maintained in two ways:
1. They make the best product/service for the best price at the best quality(or if you're cynical, replace "best" with "most popular")
2. They enlist the government to intervene on their behalf.

The first method benefits society, and the minute it ceases to do so, it falls prey to competition. The second goes completely against what capitalism is about.

therefore I believe capitalism dosnt only lack some env standarts. it lacks a concept of justice. you may still go on that this isnt the job of capitalism. well, I am critical against a system that lacks a undertanding of justice, therefore creating the things we attribute to the negative sides of capitalism.

Correction: it lacks your understanding of justice, whatever that might be.

we must try to see the broader picture. if as john rawls suggests we go back to the point of constructing societies, we must make the decisions dropping the identities we have. we may become an african american, we may be a person living in africa, someone that is part of the image of weak and poor.

Just because some people are more poor than us doesn't make them as unhappy as we might be in their shoes. And even if they are unhappy, I don't see why it is the fault of those who provide employment opportunities--the best option available to them, even if it is far below our standards.

if we simply say that in capitalism, there is always the possibility of development, people are really blind to what is actually going on.

What's actually going on in Hong Kong is Britain turned the place with little going for it into an economic powerhouse essentially by butting out of the economy. The whole country became better off, and the gap between rich and poor shrank.

we must build a new system that can create an opportunity in a fair and just way.

I'm assuming you mean your definition of fair and just, which I don't believe you've clarified yet.

capitalism obviously has become a tool for the powerful and rich.

No. Corporatism--the unholy alliance of corporation and state--has become a tool for the rich and powerful. Capitalism--true capitalism--is an effective means of pulling a nation out of poverty. In the short term, that may mean more of these sweatshops you people so despise, but as they provide employment for more and more people, and attract investors to the country, the economy will grow, and the country as a whole can become more prosperous. Now, it's more likely that the net gain will benefit the poor if there's some sort of land reform, but that's whole other thread.

we must construct a new system that would take into consideration all the faults achieved in various systems whether it be capitalism, communism or anything else.

Capitalism's main fault is the absense of economic incentives for conservation and certain other causes. I have no problem tweaking it a little to correct this problem, but no major overhaul is necessary.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineBanJankri
FreefallerUpwards

Registered: 07/27/04
Posts: 1,392
Last seen: 5 years, 1 month
Re: capitalism [Re: Phred]
    #3783804 - 02/15/05 04:10 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

free trade does not mean fair trade. I want and support fair trade.

when someone uses rich getting rich at the expense of the poor, they are most likely referring to marx's critique of law of concentration, which holds that capitalism tends to produce increasing inequality in the distribution of wealth and income. as the bourgeoisie continue to exploit the proletariat and weaker capitalists are swallowed by the stronger, bigger ones, therefore wekath and ownership of capital becoming concentrated in fewer and fewer hands.


also I did not say socialism was good or in fact better. communism is also a nice utopia, but obviously, there must be other things tried to get to such a point.
capitalism has failed also regarding the current state the world is in(and yes I do believe this is a product of capitalism). yes you are right about gov supported corparations I'm talkin about. but still it doesnt refute the point that there is nothing to prevent this from happening.



--------------------
Just let everything flow, just flow right to the center of everything. You gotta turn off your mind and relax, and then just float downstream...


Edited by BanJankri (02/15/05 04:47 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinecb9fl
Senior ChildMolestationExpert
Registered: 06/12/03
Posts: 3,104
Loc: florida
Last seen: 3 years, 8 months
Re: capitalism [Re: BanJankri]
    #3783843 - 02/15/05 04:22 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Does laissez faire capitalism provide for corporations or are they seen as government intervention?

Also how would laissez faire capitalism deal with patents and IP rights?


--------------------
It is better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not. -Andre Gide

"Generosity is nothing else than a craze to possess. All which I abandon, all which I give, I enjoy in a higher manner through the fact that I give it away. To give is to enjoy possessively the object which one gives."


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: BanJankri]
    #3784165 - 02/15/05 05:42 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

BanJankri writes:

"I want and support fair trade."

Explain the difference between the Capitalist concept of free trade and BanJankri's concept of fair trade, please.

"they are most likely referring to marx's critique of law of concentration, which holds that capitalism tends to produce increasing inequality in the distribution of wealth and income."

Under Capitalism, the hardworking competent tend to end up with more capital than lazy incompetents, yes. If you weave and sell ten beautiful baskets a day and the guy across the street from you only weaves and sells six ugly baskets a day, then inevitably as time progresses the gap between the amount of wealth you possess and the amount he possesses will widen. Why should it not?

"as the bourgeoisie continue to exploit the proletariat and weaker capitalists are swallowed by the stronger, bigger ones, therefore wekath and ownership of capital becoming concentrated in fewer and fewer hands."

And this is just one of the many flaws in Marx's fevered imaginings. Wealth and capital are not in fact concentrated in the hands of fewer and fewer, but the reverse. Under Capitalism, almost everyone's wealth increases. The fact that some have more than others doesn't mean that what they have was taken from those others. It wasn't.

"capitalism has failed also regarding the current state the world is in..."

Seeing as how there is no Capitalist state in the world today, and in fact even the closest states to being Capitalist (Hong Kong and the US) get less and less Capitalist by the day, your statement is indefensible on the face of it. However, we can observe a trend. Nations closest to Capitalism do well. They have no problems in comparison to the nations which are the furthest from Capitalism. Totalitarian and chaotic states are the ones which have problems. That is so readily observable a fact I am surprised to see you attempt to argue otherwise.


Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinecb9fl
Senior ChildMolestationExpert
Registered: 06/12/03
Posts: 3,104
Loc: florida
Last seen: 3 years, 8 months
Re: capitalism [Re: Phred]
    #3784206 - 02/15/05 05:51 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

From this chart it would appear many countries that lean towards Socialism do very well.


--------------------
It is better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not. -Andre Gide

"Generosity is nothing else than a craze to possess. All which I abandon, all which I give, I enjoy in a higher manner through the fact that I give it away. To give is to enjoy possessively the object which one gives."


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineBanJankri
FreefallerUpwards

Registered: 07/27/04
Posts: 1,392
Last seen: 5 years, 1 month
Re: capitalism [Re: cb9fl]
    #3784366 - 02/15/05 06:24 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

my consept of fair trade is making possible that the producers who produce in 3rd world countries get a fair deal, while making sure its doesnt come from a sweat shop, encouraged by free trade.
it is obvious that the developed states have no intention in assisting these poor regions. they are only resources and they are not willing to give their technical expertise so to enable the weaker regions, firms, ind's to compete in a more just basis.

and what does the capitalist institutions do about this? not make trade freerer. they want the states facing financial crises to open up as much as possible, while the trade giants get to have all sorts of trade barriers.


--------------------
Just let everything flow, just flow right to the center of everything. You gotta turn off your mind and relax, and then just float downstream...


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: BanJankri]
    #3784510 - 02/15/05 06:48 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

BanJankri writes:

"my consept of fair trade is making possible that the producers who produce in 3rd world countries get a fair deal..."

What makes you think they are not currently getting a fair deal?

"... while making sure its doesnt come from a sweat shop..."

What is your definition of a sweatshop?

"... encouraged by free trade."

Free trade means people trading with whom they want, when they want, at mutually agreed upon prices. How can trade be "free" if people are not allowed to deal with sweatshops?

"it is obvious that the developed states have no intention in assisting these poor regions."

It is actually far from obvious, considering the amount of foreign aid given to these regions by the developed states. But since foreign aid isn't a part of Capitalism, let's move on.

"they are only resources and they are not willing to give their technical expertise so to enable the weaker regions, firms, ind's to compete in a more just basis."

"Give"? You are correct in saying most companies don't want to give all that much of their technical expertise away. They are however willing to trade for it.

As for "just", I cannot help but note you have yet to define your idea of what is "just". Is it not just that when someone offers to sell them a ton of cocoa for X dollars they agree to exchange the dollars for the cocoa? What more is required of the buyer in order for him to meet your definition of "just"?

"they want the states facing financial crises to open up as much as possible, while the trade giants get to have all sorts of trade barriers."

Again, what you are condemning is not Capitalism but government intereference. Capitalism by definition doesn't allow government intervention in transactions between buyer and seller. Government has no say in the economy whatsoever.


Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: Silversoul]
    #3784596 - 02/15/05 07:02 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

when you say its up to a company to decied how much to pay their workers, be it 18 cents or 10 dollars...

here you are saying that they are above the law of their and the country that they are set up in. the US is not the only place that has min wage or unions. and a company has to follow those laws. yes they can decied to pay how much they want ABOVE the min wage. they do not have the right to pay below. by law. but with free trade and other loop holes in this capitalistuc state it occurs.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3784620 - 02/15/05 07:09 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

What type of government operates in the countries where companies (foreign-based or indigenous) get away with paying less than the minimum wage as set out by the government of that country?

I'm guessing it's not a Capitalist government.


Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3784643 - 02/15/05 07:12 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

paradigm said
Oh, I wouldn't be surprised. You see, some poor people don't have time to wait around for some minimum wage job to open up, so they're willing to work for less. They do it because it's worth it to them, and it's not for you to decide what's best for them.

i agree that when you are in need in money for your family, for survival you take what you can.
but this is where the whole promblem lies. a company goes to colombia for example and sets up a factory in a poor area, the ppl go there because they need the money. agreed?
is it right for the corporations to pay the least amount becasue of these ppl's situations? do they not have the same rights as someone who is already better off?
what if that would to happen here. lets just say you are working at the local SHroomery, the shroomery corporation open factories and stores knowing ppl need money but only pay $1 an hour with no benefits. some one will take that job. and there will be no other options because this big super store has run out/or bought out other businesses because it can have lower prices due to the huge profit margin of paying low wages. but as banjakri said it leads to legitimizing the current system of exploiting that goes on.
so if they can get away with it because some ppl have reach the level of despresation doesn't make it fair, right or legal.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: Phred]
    #3784694 - 02/15/05 07:21 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Phred said:
What type of government operates in the countries where companies (foreign-based or indigenous) get away with paying less than the minimum wage as set out by the government of that country?

I'm guessing it's not a Capitalist government.


Phred




not always. these are countries that are most often 3rd owrld or struggling, so in search for aid go the place like the world bank or the imf... or an agreement is made with company A. company A says that they'll bring jobs to the country only if they can set it up in free trade zones [areas of land where the coutries laws do not apply] or are given money but can only use it for lets say roads to the factory or the building of the factory. not for schools or education etc.. progrmas the country needs. so it looks like these companies are bring money and labour to these countries but it turns out that it ends up screwing the country in the end. because the only way to survive is in these sweatshop factories... and the company knows this. so they can pay 18 cent wages and get away with it......


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3784725 - 02/15/05 07:26 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

phred said:

But since foreign aid isn't a part of Capitalism, let's move on.

how is is not apart of it???

Government has no say in the economy whatsoever.

yes capitlism by DEFINITION doesn't allow gov't intervention... but i mean, look at our president's track list, i'll bet you'll find a lot of [publically know] interactions....


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3784726 - 02/15/05 07:26 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

So you're saying the government of these countries interferes with the economy of the countries in question? I am aware of no country in which the free trade zones run with no government interference whatsoever -- for example without minimum wage laws. Perhaps you could provide a source naming such a country.


Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3784746 - 02/15/05 07:30 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

This thread isn't about how the mixed economies of the various governments in the world operate, it's about Capitalism. Foreign aid is not a part of Capitalism. Under Capitalism, the separation of economy and state is absolute.

When you start bringing up the track record of the current president of the United States, you are dodging the issue. The US is not currently Capitalist, hasn't been for a very long time (many argue it never was), and is becoming less Capitalist with each passing year.

If you want to address perceived shortcomings of Capitalism, do so. Stop bringing up straw man arguments.



Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: Phred]
    #3784754 - 02/15/05 07:30 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

but that is part of the defintion of free trade....
hold on i'm looking up some sites,
i'm not gonna do all your research for you. it is up to you to educate yourself. do not take anything at face value and challenge everything.. even the ideas that you believe in.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3784773 - 02/15/05 07:33 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Sorry, but that's the way it works. If you make an assertion that there are countries out there which allow companies to pay less than the government mandated minimum wage in some parts of the country but not in others, it's up to you to back up that assertion, not up to me to disprove it.


Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3784790 - 02/15/05 07:36 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

http://www.escapeartist.com/ftz/ftz_index.html

this site lists all the free trade zones.. i have a better one somewhere cuz this one is marketed to companies and doesn't give much informarion.. i'm just posting this to show a list

and here is one definition of it.

http://www.answers.com/free+trade+zones&r=67


Edited by juende (02/15/05 07:37 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: Phred]
    #3784809 - 02/15/05 07:39 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

i'm not saying that its up to you to prove my facts, but is up to you to know both sides of what you are talking about.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3784814 - 02/15/05 07:40 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Neither link provides a statement that any of the zones listed allow companies to pay less than the government-mandated minimum wage for the country in question. Perhaps you may find a different link which does. Take your time.


Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3784825 - 02/15/05 07:43 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
http://www.escapeartist.com/ftz/ftz_index.html

this site lists all the free trade zones.. i have a better one somewhere cuz this one is marketed to companies and doesn't give much informarion.. i'm just posting this to show a list

and here is one definition of it.

http://www.answers.com/free+trade+zones&r=67




Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3784836 - 02/15/05 07:44 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

I do know both sides of what I'm talking about. I live in a third world country which has free zones -- the Dominican Republic. I've lived here over seventeen years. I know people who work in the free zones.


Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3784854 - 02/15/05 07:48 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
here are some anti sweatshop links. i'll post [or start a new post] for anti globalism, etc links...
Anti sweatshop activists and info



United students against sweatshops national site.
http://www.studentsagainstsweatshops.org/

sweatshop watch
http://www.sweatshopwatch.org/

Global exchange.
http://www.globalexchange.org/
Global Exchange is an international human rights organization dedicated to
promoting environmental, political and social justice. Since our founding
in 1988, we have increased the US public's global awareness while building
partnerships worldwide.

National Mobilization Against Sweatshops
<http://www.nmass.org/nmass/fight.html>

Coop Americas campaign to end sweatshops, some good info.
http://www.sweatshops.org/

United States Labor Education In the Americas project
<http://www.usleap.org/>

National Labor Committee
http://www.nlcnet.org/
Kathy Lee Gifford look out!

International Labor Organization
http://www.ilo.org/
a department of the united nations which deals with international labor
standards and works to make globalization fair for the 3rd world.

Slap (student labor action project)
http://www.jwj.org/SLAP/slap.htm

jobs with justice
http://www.jwj.org/

Western new York sweatshop awareness project
http://www.wnysap.org/
good bunch of folks.

Labor Religion Coalition./ Coalition for economic justice.
http://www.labor-religion.org/local_cej_bar.htm
Runs a sweat free schools campaign.

No Sweat
http://www.nosweat.org.uk/
the UK's version of usas. (really just a bunch of drunken soccer fans)

http://www.campusactivism.org/
a nation wide network of about 635 groups which allows them to network on a
wide range of issues.

National colation for occupational safty and health
http://www.coshnetwork.org

Amnesty International
http://www.amnesty.org/
considers the right to organize as a fundamental human right, also works to
free jailed labor leaders around the world.

Human Rights Watch
http://www.hrw.org/
Has a program focusing on the plight of migrant workers.

Coalition for Justice in the Maquiladoras
<http://www.coalitionforjustice.net/>
fighting nafta and helping to improve the living conditions for people in
the maquilidora region of northern Mexico.It is led by both workers in
mexico, and a tri national coalition of labor, environmental, Latino,
women's rights and religious organizations.

The United States Stuednt Association
http://www.usstudents.org/main.asp
one of the largest student voices in washington, runs the grass roots
organizing weekend (grow) training's.

Stop Nike Sweatshops
<http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/sweatshops/nike/>
from the company that everyone loves to hate.

a quick fact sheet on wal-mart
<http://www.ufcw.org/press_room/fact_sheets_and_backgrounder/walmart/sweat_
shops.cfm>
many think that they are the worst company in the world when it comes to
this issue. their "always lower prices, always" come off the backs of a lot
of people all around the world.
"In October 10, 2002, the National Organization for Women (NOW) reported
that the Maine Department of Labor ordered Wal-Mart to pay the largest fine
in state history for violating child labor laws. The Department of Labor
discovered 1,436 child labor law infractions at 20 Wal-Mart chains in the
state."

The Harvard Living Wage Campaign
<http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~pslm/livingwage/portal.html>
Info on an awesome successful campaign at Harvard which ended with the
occupation of the presidents office for 2 weeks.

Unions,

The Unite Union (formerly the Union of Needle Trades, Textiles and
Industrial Employees)
http://www.unitehere.org/

Afl-Cio
http://www.aflcio.org/
the nations largest grouping of unions.

Communication workers of America
http://www.cwa-union.org/
(these guys represented the new era workers)

CSEA
http://www.csealocal1000.org/

SEIU
http://www.seiu.org
run the justice for janitors campaign

The united food and commercial workers
http://www.ufcw.org

The United Farm Workers
http://www.ufw.org/
Cezar Chaves's union.

The Coalition of Black Trade Unionists.
<http://www.cbtu.org>

The National Labor Relations Board
<http://www.nlrb.gov/nlrb/home/default.asp>

Monitoring boards.

The Worker Rights Consortium (WRC)
http://www.workersrights.org/
The Worker Rights Consortium (WRC) is a non-profit organization created by
college and university administrations, students and labor rights experts.
The WRC's purpose is to assist in the enforcement of manufacturing Codes of
Conduct adopted by colleges and universities; these Codes are designed to
ensure that factories producing clothing and other goods bearing college
and university names respect the basic rights of workers. There are more
than 100 colleges and universities affiliated with the WRC.

Fair Labor Association  (run by industry leaders, non independent)
http://www.fairlabor.org/
"our mission: The Fair Labor Association (FLA) is a non-profit organization
combining the efforts of industry, non-governmental organizations (NGOs),
colleges and universities to promote adherence to international labor
standards and improve working conditions worldwide."

The Collegiate Licensing Company
www.clc.com
I'm not sure what they do, but I think it pertains to us.

News.

The nation
www.thenation.com
good read, one of the leading left magazines in America, have mentioned
usas many times.

www.indymedia.org
good anti corporate event coverage.

international labor news, not sure how good it is.
http://www.labourstart.org/

the British broadcasting service.
www.bbc.co.uk/news
one of the best global sources of news and information, free from corporate
or political bias.

The United States Government's bureau of labor statistics.
<http://stats.bls.gov/>

Globalization stuff.(if your into this sort of thing, but its all
connected.)

world trade organization
www.wto.org
(we don't like em)

International monetary fund.
www.imf.org
(we dont like em either)

The International Forum on Globalization  (smart folks)
http://www.ifg.org/
Representing over 60 organizations in 25 countries, the International Forum
on Globalization associates come together out of a shared concern that the
world's corporate and political leadership is undertaking a restructuring
of global politics and economics that may prove as historically significant
as any event since the Industrial Revolution. This restructuring is
happening at tremendous speed, with little public disclosure of the
profound consequences affecting democracy, human welfare, local economies,
and the natural world.

Economic Policy Institute. (more smart folks)
<http://www.epinet.org/>

World Social Forum.
http://www.wsfindia.org/
The World Social Forum is not an organization, not a united front
platform, but "?an open meeting place for reflective thinking, democratic
debate of ideas, formulation of proposals, free exchange of experiences and
inter-linking for effective action, by groups and movements of civil
society that are opposed to neo- liberalism and to domination of the world
by capital and any form of imperialism, and are committed to building a
society centred on the human person". (From the WSF Charter of Principles).
     

CorpWatch
<http://corpwatch.org/>
Holding corporations accountable when they mess up.

The Center For Economic and Policy Research. (even more smart folks)
<http://www.cepr.net/>

Fair Trade Stuff.

http://www.oxfam.org.uk/
Oxfam works with others to overcome poverty and suffering. They are famous
for their "make trade fair" campaign.

http://www.transfairusa.org/
works to certify consumer goods as fairly traded.

equal exchange
www.equalexchange.com
one of the nations largest providers of fairly traded coffee

coop America
http://www.coopamerica.org/

Music, tatical media, and other fun stuff.

The Billboard Liberation Front
<http://www.billboardliberation.com/>
liberating billboards from crass commercial lies since 1973

The Yes Men.
http://www.theyesmen.org/
pretending to be people they are not, to keep those people honest. have a
feature film coming to a theater near you.

The Corporation
<http://www.thecorporation.com/>
a documentary on corporate crime and influence in our daily lives, chilling
stuff.

Sweatshop Union
http://www.sweatshopunion.com/
Canadian political hiphop. I kid you not.


adbusters.
www.adbusters.org
a magazine which is highly critical of commercial culture.

The reverend Billy and the church of stop shopping.
http://www.revbilly.com/
um....hard to describe....but interesting, check it out.

Big Noise Films,
http://www.bignoisefilms.com/home.htm
awesome film makers.

The Tactical Media Network.
<http://www.waag.org/tmn/>
Methods and theory on how activists with out a lot of resources can get
their messages to a wider audience by utilizing advanced technology.

Anti sweatshop clothing

American Apparel
http://www.americanapparel.net/
the worlds largest label selling only sweatshop free clothing, (caution,
staunchly anti union)

No Sweat!
http://nosweatapparel.com/
good stuff

Ethical Threads,
http://www.ethicalthreads.co.uk/
all their clothing is made by worker owned coops in Latin America, its cool
stuff.

Polartec
http://www.polartec.com/
High tech outterwhere made by Malden Mills? in eastern Massachusetts. They
make some awesome stuff, and these are the clothes they take to mount
Everest.

Patagonia
http://www.patagonia.com/
these guys have the reputation of being a rather ethical manufacturer, im
not sure about their labor record though, buyer beware. they are part of
the FLA.

Sweat X
<http://www.sweatx.net/>
i think they may have gone out of business. :frown:





here in case you've missed this.
and i have a ton more. i think you should take some time to better formulate your argument. because right not you are talking about the idea of capitalism and not how it actual works.  if you want to talk theory, ok. but here, in real time. capitalism doesn't work that way. it is not idependant of governments or personal intersts and it has major global influences and consequences.. both good and bad.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: Phred]
    #3784866 - 02/15/05 07:51 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Phred said:
I do know both sides of what I'm talking about. I live in a third world country which has free zones -- the Dominican Republic. I've lived here over seventeen years. I know people who work in the free zones.


Phred




if so, do you see any connections to capitlism, sweatshops and globalization?


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineProsgeopax
Jaded, yethopeful?

Registered: 01/28/05
Posts: 1,258
Loc: Appearing at a mall near ...
Last seen: 7 years, 4 months
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3784882 - 02/15/05 07:55 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
but that is part of the defintion of free trade....



Foreign aid is not part of free trade. It's foreign aid.

Government subsidies are not part of free trade. They're favoritism.

Unequal or punitive tariffs are not part of free trade. They're favoritism.

Government promotions (or advertisement) of favored businesses is not part of free trade. They're favoritism.

In short, government involvement other than what is necessary against theft, fraud, force, adjudicating disputes (such as seeing that parties honor contracts) is not free trade.

To point to government interferences and then declare that their effects are the result of free trade is dishonest.


--------------------
Money doesn't grow on trees, but deficits do grow under Bushes.

You can accept, reject, or examine and test any new idea that comes to you. The wise man chooses the third way.
- Tom Willhite

Disclaimer: I reserve the right to change my opinions should I become aware of additional facts, the falsification of information or different perspectives. Articles written by others which I post may not necessarily reflect my opinions in part or in whole, my opinions may be in direct opposition, the topic may be one on which I have yet to formulate an opinion or have doubts about, an article may be posted solely with the intent to stimulate discussion or contemplation.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinecb9fl
Senior ChildMolestationExpert
Registered: 06/12/03
Posts: 3,104
Loc: florida
Last seen: 3 years, 8 months
Re: capitalism [Re: Prosgeopax]
    #3784915 - 02/15/05 08:01 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Is Phred pinky?


--------------------
It is better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not. -Andre Gide

"Generosity is nothing else than a craze to possess. All which I abandon, all which I give, I enjoy in a higher manner through the fact that I give it away. To give is to enjoy possessively the object which one gives."


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3784921 - 02/15/05 08:02 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

juende writes:

"here in case you've missed this.
and i have a ton more."


And since you've taken the time to formulate your argument, and presumably thoroughly read the information at those links, you should have no difficulty linking one with a cut and paste of the section where it names a country where companies in the free zones of that country are allowed to pay less than the government-mandated minimum wage.

"i think you should take some time to better formulate your argument. because right not you are talking about the idea of capitalism and not how it actual works."

I suggest you re-read the opening post by the initiator of the thread. He isn't talking about the US, he's talking about Capitalism.

If you want to complain about how the governments of mixed-economy nations interfere in free trade, be my guest. I'll even join in with you. But don't call that interference Capitalism, because it isn't.

"capitalism doesn't work that way. it is not idependant of governments or personal intersts and it has major global influences and consequences.. both good and bad."

By definition, Capitalism is independent of government -- but not of personal interests, obviously.

I suggest you re-read this thread from the beginning. You're attacking the wrong thing. We're on the same side here -- we both abhor government interference in transactions between consenting traders. People should be left free to conduct their business transactions as they see fit. Capitalism is the only socio-economic political framework under which this can occur.


Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3784942 - 02/15/05 08:07 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

juende asks:

"f so, do you see any connections to capitlism, sweatshops and globalization?"

Please be specific.

The transactions which occur in the Zona Francas here are interfered with to a smaller degree than those which take place elsewhere on the island, so in that sense the Zona Francas are closer to Capitalist than the rest of the island.

As for "globalization", most (but by no means all) of what is produced in the zones is exported, so in that sense it effects other parts of the globe.

As for "sweatshops", I will tell you truly that whenever a new factory opens here there is jubilation and long lineups of people hoping to score a job. Whenever one closes there is lamentation. In a country where the average daytime temperature is 90 degrees or higher for over half the year, pretty much every job involves sweat.


Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: Prosgeopax]
    #3784954 - 02/15/05 08:09 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

To point to government interferences and then declare that their effects are the result of free trade is dishonest.

uh, thats not what i said. not sure what you're getting at.

but all that happens under free trade.. not the other way around.

i can agree with alot of what ppl are saying here about "the government shouldn't have any involvement... etc" but that is not how it really is. and then to ask me to prove it. i'm not going to find it in one article or one book. or give you a link to one site that will justify everything i'm saying here. no one came up to me saying "hey this this and that" and i said.. ok. i had my own doubts and researched and learned as much as i could [and can]
i wish it were easy as look at this graph or chart.
i mean do you not have any doubts that things are not all on the by and by when it comes down to capitlism? for a select few to be so rich and so powerful and so many to be in poverty.. something has to be off... its not just life and well might as well take it. its things that we can change becasue we have the power to.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineProsgeopax
Jaded, yethopeful?

Registered: 01/28/05
Posts: 1,258
Loc: Appearing at a mall near ...
Last seen: 7 years, 4 months
Re: capitalism [Re: cb9fl]
    #3784956 - 02/15/05 08:10 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

cb9fl said:
Is Phred pinky?



No, I think he's closer to being The Brain. NARF!!


--------------------
Money doesn't grow on trees, but deficits do grow under Bushes.

You can accept, reject, or examine and test any new idea that comes to you. The wise man chooses the third way.
- Tom Willhite

Disclaimer: I reserve the right to change my opinions should I become aware of additional facts, the falsification of information or different perspectives. Articles written by others which I post may not necessarily reflect my opinions in part or in whole, my opinions may be in direct opposition, the topic may be one on which I have yet to formulate an opinion or have doubts about, an article may be posted solely with the intent to stimulate discussion or contemplation.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineProsgeopax
Jaded, yethopeful?

Registered: 01/28/05
Posts: 1,258
Loc: Appearing at a mall near ...
Last seen: 7 years, 4 months
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3784970 - 02/15/05 08:13 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
but all that happens under free trade.. not the other way around.



No, all that happens as GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE, impinging upon free trade.


--------------------
Money doesn't grow on trees, but deficits do grow under Bushes.

You can accept, reject, or examine and test any new idea that comes to you. The wise man chooses the third way.
- Tom Willhite

Disclaimer: I reserve the right to change my opinions should I become aware of additional facts, the falsification of information or different perspectives. Articles written by others which I post may not necessarily reflect my opinions in part or in whole, my opinions may be in direct opposition, the topic may be one on which I have yet to formulate an opinion or have doubts about, an article may be posted solely with the intent to stimulate discussion or contemplation.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3784987 - 02/15/05 08:18 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

In a country where the average daytime temperature is 90 degrees or higher for over half the year, pretty much every job involves sweat.

ha ha ha.. yeah i got "Sweat"shop.

i think you are in a very unique position. you are experienceing this first hand. and i am not trying to be funny but do you know what a sweatshop is or the effects of globalization??
how is the econmy where you live? do you think that these factoies are improving life? how much of the laws do you know?
i couldn't tell you everything about the US gov'tment or the laws but i would like to say that i know more than the general public that only reads the local/nationsl newspaers or watch the news on tv.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: Prosgeopax]
    #3784996 - 02/15/05 08:20 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Prosgeopax said:
Quote:

juende said:
but all that happens under free trade.. not the other way around.



No, all that happens as GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE, impinging upon free trade.



i can say that they are interchangable.. on does not happen without the other on some level


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3785025 - 02/15/05 08:28 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
i agree that when you are in need in money for your family, for survival you take what you can.
but this is where the whole promblem lies. a company goes to colombia for example and sets up a factory in a poor area, the ppl go there because they need the money. agreed?



Agreed.

Quote:

is it right for the corporations to pay the least amount becasue of these ppl's situations? do they not have the same rights as someone who is already better off?



The corporations usually pay competitive prices similar to what local factories pay(sometimes better). 18 cents an hour is not the "least amount." If they were going for the least amount, they'd go for 1 cent, or even less, since the country's currency is likely to be weaker than the US Dollar. If a corporation pays 18 cents an hour, then that is most likely similar to what locally owned factories pay. If the corporation offered its employees $5 an hour, people would whack their own mother to try and get that job, but it would also mean they wouldn't be able to hire nearly as many people, so while a priviledged few would recieve $5 an hour(which would be downright luxurious in some of these countries), many more would be left unemployed. And yes, the poor have the same rights as anyone else: the right to life, liberty, and property. Like anyone else, they have a right to do anything which does not involve initiating force against others.

Quote:

what if that would to happen here. lets just say you are working at the local SHroomery, the shroomery corporation open factories and stores knowing ppl need money but only pay $1 an hour with no benefits. some one will take that job. and there will be no other options because this big super store has run out/or bought out other businesses because it can have lower prices due to the huge profit margin of paying low wages. but as banjakri said it leads to legitimizing the current system of exploiting that goes on.
so if they can get away with it because some ppl have reach the level of despresation doesn't make it fair, right or legal.



I think you're misrepresenting the situation here. As I said, corporate-owned sweatshops usually pay wages which are competitive with those of locally owned factories, so if this Super Store had an edge in the market, it wouldn't be because of their wages. Even given this scenario, the fact is that this corporation is providing employment for those who have no other opportunities. Call it exploitation all you want, but the desparation of those workers doesn't alter the fact that they are better off for having taken the job. Besides, paying low wages doesn't just generate more profit--it also frees up money to hire more workers, thus helping even more people out of desparate situations.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3785037 - 02/15/05 08:31 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
Quote:

Prosgeopax said:
Quote:

juende said:
but all that happens under free trade.. not the other way around.



No, all that happens as GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE, impinging upon free trade.



i can say that they are interchangable.. on does not happen without the other on some level



:oogle:

Is this a Zen koan or something?  Free trade and government intervention are POLAR OPPOSITES.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3785055 - 02/15/05 08:33 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

juende writes:

"but all that happens under free trade.. not the other way around. "

All what happens under free trade?

"i can agree with alot of what ppl are saying here about "the government shouldn't have any involvement... etc" but that is not how it really is."

Indeed, that is not how it really is. But we proponents of Capitalism say that is how it should be. That's why we're Capitalists.

"and then to ask me to prove it. i'm not going to find it in one article or one book. or give you a link to one site that will justify everything i'm saying here. no one came up to me saying "hey this this and that" and i said.. ok. i had my own doubts and researched and learned as much as i could [and can]
i wish it were easy as look at this graph or chart. "


Well, at some point you must have come across a credible source claiming that in some countries companies are allowed to get away with paying less than the government-mandated minimum wage or you would not have made the claim, right? Otherwise you wouldn't have repeated that assertion. I'm not saying you pulled it out of your ass, I honestly believe you read that somewhere and researched it in order to verify it was the truth rather than some Loopy Leftie just blathering on about exploitation and bourgeosie and all that. It's just that I've spent over three decades of my adult life looking into claims like that and I've never found an instance of it actually occurring, so I am naturally interested in checking out the same sources you found convincing. As I said, take your time.

"i mean do you not have any doubts that things are not all on the by and by when it comes down to capitlism?"

Not any longer. When I was your age I was a Lefty too. I was a shop steward in a Canadian government union dominated by a union leadership largely composed of members of the Canadian Marxist-Leninist Party, fa cryin' out loud. I shit you not.

"for a select few to be so rich and so powerful and so many to be in poverty.. something has to be off... "

Actually, that turns out not to be the case. But you must remember that the vast majority of those "select few" didn't get to where they were without the aid of government interference. It's not free enterprise which is to blame here, but government's fucking around in it.

"its not just life and well might as well take it. its things that we can change becasue we have the power to."

I agree, which is why I spend so much of my time in this forum trying to show people how to change. Get the government out of your life. Out of all our lives.



Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineProsgeopax
Jaded, yethopeful?

Registered: 01/28/05
Posts: 1,258
Loc: Appearing at a mall near ...
Last seen: 7 years, 4 months
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3785072 - 02/15/05 08:36 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
i can say that they are interchangable.. on does not happen without the other on some level



What? I suppose then a woman could be both not pregnant and pregnant at the same time, a man could be in jail and be out of jail at the same time, a door can be both opened and closed at the same time?

True free trade is just that, FREE - unencumbered by government interference. It can not be stated any more simply. Now, if you believe what politicians tell you...


--------------------
Money doesn't grow on trees, but deficits do grow under Bushes.

You can accept, reject, or examine and test any new idea that comes to you. The wise man chooses the third way.
- Tom Willhite

Disclaimer: I reserve the right to change my opinions should I become aware of additional facts, the falsification of information or different perspectives. Articles written by others which I post may not necessarily reflect my opinions in part or in whole, my opinions may be in direct opposition, the topic may be one on which I have yet to formulate an opinion or have doubts about, an article may be posted solely with the intent to stimulate discussion or contemplation.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinedeafpanda
Stranger
Registered: 05/07/04
Posts: 984
Loc: Inguland
Last seen: 1 year, 6 months
Re: capitalism [Re: BrAiN]
    #3785163 - 02/15/05 08:55 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Just wondering whether any people who believe in unhampered free trade would agree with laws to stop predatory pricing or abuse of monopoly power?

I think they're essential...


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinecb9fl
Senior ChildMolestationExpert
Registered: 06/12/03
Posts: 3,104
Loc: florida
Last seen: 3 years, 8 months
Re: capitalism [Re: deafpanda]
    #3785191 - 02/15/05 09:00 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

I think many of the sweatshop conditions and monopolistic practices would not exist without government involvement. Think of things like trade sanctions the US government has imposed on Cuba and their negative affect.


--------------------
It is better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not. -Andre Gide

"Generosity is nothing else than a craze to possess. All which I abandon, all which I give, I enjoy in a higher manner through the fact that I give it away. To give is to enjoy possessively the object which one gives."


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinedeafpanda
Stranger
Registered: 05/07/04
Posts: 984
Loc: Inguland
Last seen: 1 year, 6 months
Re: capitalism [Re: cb9fl]
    #3785226 - 02/15/05 09:06 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Yeah, but monopolies are bound to arise in any free-market situation, so what do you do about it when they start pursuing policies to hamper competition or jacking the prices up artificially high?


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinecb9fl
Senior ChildMolestationExpert
Registered: 06/12/03
Posts: 3,104
Loc: florida
Last seen: 3 years, 8 months
Re: capitalism [Re: deafpanda]
    #3785244 - 02/15/05 09:09 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Um don't allow the government the authority to grant them special policies?

If there was no government involvement and government didn't have the authority to grant or enforce rediculously long patents do you think many monopolistic practices might fade away?


--------------------
It is better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not. -Andre Gide

"Generosity is nothing else than a craze to possess. All which I abandon, all which I give, I enjoy in a higher manner through the fact that I give it away. To give is to enjoy possessively the object which one gives."


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinedeafpanda
Stranger
Registered: 05/07/04
Posts: 984
Loc: Inguland
Last seen: 1 year, 6 months
Re: capitalism [Re: cb9fl]
    #3785272 - 02/15/05 09:14 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

But in a truly free market the government would have no power to stop them abusing their monopoly power.

"If there was no government involvement and government didn't have the authority to grant or enforce rediculously long patents do you think many monopolistic practices might fade away?"

There will always be monopolies in a free market. The barriers to entry to some markets are so high (rail travel, for instance) that the first big firm to be established in that market is likely to be able to hold a monopoly position. Once they are a monopoly they can price potential competitors out of the market (predatory pricing) or if there are no competitors, they can raise the prices ridiculously high (if the good/service they are producing is demanded). Without government intervention there is no way to uproot monopolies, or stop them abusing their position.

Edit - added quote marks.


Edited by deafpanda (02/15/05 09:18 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinedeafpanda
Stranger
Registered: 05/07/04
Posts: 984
Loc: Inguland
Last seen: 1 year, 6 months
Re: capitalism [Re: deafpanda]
    #3785306 - 02/15/05 09:22 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

With totally free trade, in any market with a few large firms, there is nothing to stop them merging and forming a monopoly either. In fact, this would be to their advantage as they could raise the prices far beyond true market levels. This would obviously be to the detriment of competition, which is what free-trade attmpts to promote.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: deafpanda]
    #3785365 - 02/15/05 09:32 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

first i didn't say that there is some place where theres information proving that it is ok for companies to pay below min wage. i'm saying that it happens.

as for the gov'tment inerference. i think that has been taken to far, i was responding to somene about one thing. i'm saying that there is gov't interference in some form or another not that it is the main focus of my argument.

and we all have gooten off with our arguments. crazy reply buttons...


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: deafpanda]
    #3785366 - 02/15/05 09:33 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

deafpanda said:
Just wondering whether any people who believe in unhampered free trade would agree with laws to stop predatory pricing or abuse of monopoly power?



First off, what's predatory pricing? Last I checked, companies could charge whatever they consider a reasonable price, and customers can decide whether or not they're willing to pay it. And what do you mean by abuse of monopoly power? A monopoly can come about either by offering a product at good enough a price and quality that no one can compete or by government intervention. In the first case, the company can only maintain its monopoly so long as it continues to offer their product at the best price and quality. The minute they start slipping, competition quickly steps up. Thus, its monopoly power is entirely dependent on its ability to keep customers satisfied, and once it starts abusing its monopoly power, it has already started digging its own grave. In the second case, the only law needed is one which forbids government from practicing favoritism in the marketplace.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: deafpanda]
    #3785404 - 02/15/05 09:38 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

deafpanda said:
With totally free trade, in any market with a few large firms, there is nothing to stop them merging and forming a monopoly either. In fact, this would be to their advantage as they could raise the prices far beyond true market levels. This would obviously be to the detriment of competition, which is what free-trade attmpts to promote.



*sigh* When they start raising prices beyond true market levels, some other company will step up and make millions offering the product at market levels. The only thing that would prevent this from happening is government intervention on behalf of the monopoly.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinedeafpanda
Stranger
Registered: 05/07/04
Posts: 984
Loc: Inguland
Last seen: 1 year, 6 months
Re: capitalism [Re: Silversoul]
    #3785415 - 02/15/05 09:40 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

A monopoly can come about either by offering a product at good enough a price and quality that no one can compete or by government intervention. In the first case, the company can only maintain its monopoly so long as it continues to offer their product at the best price and quality. The minute they start slipping, competition quickly steps up.




Predatory pricing is setting prices (usually in the short-term) below "true" prices (those that would exist in perfect competition) so that new competitors are forced out of the market.

Do you think that it is possible for a firm to raise prices way above "true" market prices (those that would exist in perfect competition) once it has established it's dominance and taken measures to stop new firms entering the market?

Or do you not believe that they can successfully take measures to stop new firms entering the market?


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: Silversoul]
    #3785429 - 02/15/05 09:42 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Paradigm said:
Quote:

juende said:
i agree that when you are in need in money for your family, for survival you take what you can.
but this is where the whole promblem lies. a company goes to colombia for example and sets up a factory in a poor area, the ppl go there because they need the money. agreed?



Agreed.

Quote:

is it right for the corporations to pay the least amount becasue of these ppl's situations? do they not have the same rights as someone who is already better off?



The corporations usually pay competitive prices similar to what local factories pay(sometimes better). 18 cents an hour is not the "least amount." If they were going for the least amount, they'd go for 1 cent, or even less, since the country's currency is likely to be weaker than the US Dollar. If a corporation pays 18 cents an hour, then that is most likely similar to what locally owned factories pay. If the corporation offered its employees $5 an hour, people would whack their own mother to try and get that job, but it would also mean they wouldn't be able to hire nearly as many people, so while a priviledged few would recieve $5 an hour(which would be downright luxurious in some of these countries), many more would be left unemployed. And yes, the poor have the same rights as anyone else: the right to life, liberty, and property. Like anyone else, they have a right to do anything which does not involve initiating force against others.

you are wrong here. true 1 cent would be the lowests. but its not as if 18cents in china or indonesia equals $5.15 US dollars. the min wage in a nother country [and i'll get a site for the facts on this] like indoneisa would be 2.30 american due to the counrtoies currency. so when they are paid 18 cents or even $1.20 an hour it is still not equal. you get on me when i don't have facts but you say things like "most likely" i deman the same proof and facts that you do to back up claims.



Quote:

what if that would to happen here. lets just say you are working at the local SHroomery, the shroomery corporation open factories and stores knowing ppl need money but only pay $1 an hour with no benefits. some one will take that job. and there will be no other options because this big super store has run out/or bought out other businesses because it can have lower prices due to the huge profit margin of paying low wages. but as banjakri said it leads to legitimizing the current system of exploiting that goes on.
so if they can get away with it because some ppl have reach the level of despresation doesn't make it fair, right or legal.



I think you're misrepresenting the situation here. As I said, corporate-owned sweatshops usually pay wages which are competitive with those of locally owned factories, so if this Super Store had an edge in the market, it wouldn't be because of their wages. Even given this scenario, the fact is that this corporation is providing employment for those who have no other opportunities. Call it exploitation all you want, but the desparation of those workers doesn't alter the fact that they are better off for having taken the job. Besides, paying low wages doesn't just generate more profit--it also frees up money to hire more workers, thus helping even more people out of desparate situations.




their edge is not going to be on how much they pay their workers. do you go into a store and say "gee they pay thismuch to there workers i'll shop here" or do you look at there prices?? the couple hundred ppl working at the made up company pale in comparison to the thousands of ppl who shop at the store everyday.

i put my response in bold...


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: deafpanda]
    #3785454 - 02/15/05 09:47 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

deafpanda said:
Predatory pricing is setting prices (usually in the short-term) below "true" prices (those that would exist in perfect competition) so that new competitors are forced out of the market.



Good for them. However, if they want to continue to outcompete new competitors, they'd better find a way to keep prices low. The minute prices are raised, it's an opportunity for a new competitor.

Quote:

Do you think that it is possible for a firm to raise prices way above "true" market prices (those that would exist in perfect competition) once it has established it's dominance and taken measures to stop new firms entering the market?



The only way it can stop new competitors indefinitely is with government intervention. So again, the answer is for the government to mind its own business.

Quote:

Or do you not believe that they can successfully take measures to stop new firms entering the market?



As I said, they either have to satisfy their customers or enlist the help of government.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinecb9fl
Senior ChildMolestationExpert
Registered: 06/12/03
Posts: 3,104
Loc: florida
Last seen: 3 years, 8 months
Re: capitalism [Re: Silversoul]
    #3785462 - 02/15/05 09:48 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

I'm sure not everyone does but I actually do not shop at stores I know to take advantage of employees misfortune or pay employees less than what I think is fair.

Only question about monopolistic practices I have is about something like a basic neccessity say water. If a company were to over time buy all the water processing plants and supply lines in a large area there is no market to set prices. The company can extort as much as it can from the people is supplies. Those people would then not be able to go elsewhere so they would in a sence be forced to use a particular company. How does free market capitalism deal with such a situation?


--------------------
It is better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not. -Andre Gide

"Generosity is nothing else than a craze to possess. All which I abandon, all which I give, I enjoy in a higher manner through the fact that I give it away. To give is to enjoy possessively the object which one gives."


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: Silversoul]
    #3785474 - 02/15/05 09:50 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Paradigm said:
Quote:

deafpanda said:
Just wondering whether any people who believe in unhampered free trade would agree with laws to stop predatory pricing or abuse of monopoly power?



First off, what's predatory pricing? Last I checked, companies could charge whatever they consider a reasonable price, and customers can decide whether or not they're willing to pay it. And what do you mean by abuse of monopoly power? A monopoly can come about either by offering a product at good enough a price and quality that no one can compete or by government intervention. In the first case, the company can only maintain its monopoly so long as it continues to offer their product at the best price and quality. The minute they start slipping, competition quickly steps up. Thus, its monopoly power is entirely dependent on its ability to keep customers satisfied, and once it starts abusing its monopoly power, it has already started digging its own grave. In the second case, the only law needed is one which forbids government from practicing favoritism in the marketplace.




do you really think that nike sneakers cost 100 something to make. try below 10 dollars. or a new era cap 20 something [more like a dollar something] do you think that mark up by the companies is fair? and ppl will decied to buy or not. well if you have to buy diapers or clothes for your kids how many options do you have when priceing is nearly the same cross the board. [anywhere you go sneakers will be about this much or food another] if it were a true free capitalistic market then yeah i could go to one company say i didn't like the prices or whatever and find another,


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: cb9fl]
    #3785501 - 02/15/05 09:56 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

cb9fl said:
I'm sure not everyone does but I actually do not shop at stores I know to take advantage of employees misfortune or pay employees less than what I think is fair.

Only question about monopolistic practices I have is about something like a basic neccessity say water. If a company were to over time buy all the water processing plants and supply lines in a large area there is no market to set prices. The company can extort as much as it can from the people is supplies. Those people would then not be able to go elsewhere so they would in a sence be forced to use a particular company. How does free market capitalism deal with such a situation?




it doesen't in a way that i can see. the arguments that ppl have been bringing up are that gov't shoudn't intervine and companies set prices at what they view as "resonable"
and you can add on almost all utilities for the home with the water.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinecb9fl
Senior ChildMolestationExpert
Registered: 06/12/03
Posts: 3,104
Loc: florida
Last seen: 3 years, 8 months
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3785502 - 02/15/05 09:56 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

[anywhere you go sneakers will be about this much or food another] if it were a true free capitalistic market then yeah i could go to one
company say i didn't like the prices or whatever and find another,


Where do you live? I can go to Payless shoes or many other places and buy shoes for $10/pair if I want. I just came from the grocery store and they had literaly 10 or more carts filled with close-out food items all for $.50. I bought a bag of some pretty good beef jerky because beef jerky is awesome.


--------------------
It is better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not. -Andre Gide

"Generosity is nothing else than a craze to possess. All which I abandon, all which I give, I enjoy in a higher manner through the fact that I give it away. To give is to enjoy possessively the object which one gives."


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: cb9fl]
    #3785555 - 02/15/05 10:05 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

cb9fl said:
[anywhere you go sneakers will be about this much or food another] if it were a true free capitalistic market then yeah i could go to one
company say i didn't like the prices or whatever and find another,


Where do you live? I can go to Payless shoes or many other places and buy shoes for $10/pair if I want. I just came from the grocery store and they had literaly 10 or more carts filled with close-out food items all for $.50. I bought a bag of some pretty good beef jerky because beef jerky is awesome.



i was just saying for arguments sake...for the companies that do have sweatshops or whatecer... that there is not a wide range of options. i am the thrift store queen. and i know how to get food on barely nothing. but not everyone want to shop second hand or dumpster dive. yep i shop the same as you. i love the manager's special in the grocery store.. sales!

but then again. i am vegan and i try to eat well and all, but for me it is really difficult to live this privllaged lifestlye being a broke student. i cannot buy everything organic or from local stores. i try when i can. it is more expensive. that is because of big super markets and chain stores that can have low prices [due to a number of reasons.. be it sweatshops or whatever]. i'd rather pay the extra for organic and natural anyway for health and political reasons because i know the extra cost is because it s based on how much it cost to make. there is not as big as a market for it.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3785588 - 02/15/05 10:11 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

you are wrong here.  true 1 cent would be the lowests. but its not as if 18cents in china or indonesia equals $5.15 US dollars. the min wage in a nother country [and i'll get a site for the facts on this] like indoneisa would be 2.30 american due to the counrtoies currency. so when they are paid 18 cents or even $1.20 an hour it is still not equal. you get on me when i don't have facts but you say things like "most likely" i deman the same proof and facts that you do to back up claims.

I never claimed that 18 cents was equivalent to $5.75.  My point was that it is similar to the wages that local factories pay.  I say this mainly based on what Phred(a resident of the Dominican Republic) has mentioned about the economic climate in his country.  Don't worry.  I'm in the process of looking for a source, but when you consider how much popular demand there is for these jobs in the Third World, it makes sense that their wages would be competitive against those of other companies.

their edge is not going to be on how much they pay their workers. do you go into a store and say "gee they pay thismuch to there workers i'll shop here" or do you look at there prices?? the couple hundred ppl working at the made up company pale in comparison to the thousands of ppl who shop at the store everyday.

Oh, for fuck's sake! :shake:

Quote:

You said:
and there will be no other options because this big super store has run out/or bought out other businesses because it can have lower prices due to the huge profit margin of paying low wages.




If you're going to say things like that, don't ridicule me for repeating them right back to you.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3785648 - 02/15/05 10:22 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
do you really think that nike sneakers cost 100 something to make. try below 10 dollars. or a new era cap 20 something [more like a dollar something]



There's more that goes into the price of a product than just what it costs to make. There's promotion, shipping, etc. Of course, even this doesn't all account for the $100 that someone pays for a new pair of Nikes. The reason they can charge that much is because people like Nikes enough that they're willing to pay that much for them. So long as Nikes are considered popular and cool, they will continue to be able to charge $100 for them. When people start deciding that they're not worth $100, then Nike will have to lower the price or else suffer economic backlash.

Quote:

do you think that mark up by the companies is fair?



Not for me to decide. I personally wouldn't pay half that price for a pair of Nike's but if someone else is willing to pay that much, more power to them.

Quote:

and ppl will decied to buy or not. well if you have to buy diapers or clothes for your kids how many options do you have when priceing is nearly the same cross the board. [anywhere you go sneakers will be about this much or food another]



I haven't paid that much for shoes in years. If you forget about the popular shoes and just look for a decent pair that will last long enough, you can save a bundle.

Quote:

if it were a true free capitalistic market then yeah i could go to one company say i didn't like the prices or whatever and find another,



And I do just that.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: Silversoul]
    #3785680 - 02/15/05 10:27 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

uh.. not sure what we're talking about anymore. but i know that it can be connected back to the topic at hand of capitalism. i ask you how does sweatshops play a role in an active capitalistic society/state?

also why is there such a great deman for these jobs in third world countries?


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3785733 - 02/15/05 10:33 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

There's more that goes into the price of a product than just what it costs to make. There's promotion, shipping, etc. Of course, even this doesn't all account for the $100 that someone pays for a new pair of Nikes. The reason they can charge that much is because people like Nikes enough that they're willing to pay that much for them. So long as Nikes are considered popular and cool, they will continue to be able to charge $100 for them. When people start deciding that they're not worth $100, then Nike will have to lower the price or else suffer economic backlash.

agreed.

i can sorta agree with your last reponse. i guess the only difference between us is what we feel should be done about it. i believe that this sysytem has way too many faults [or more so, it is very corrupted is its design >> leaves too much space for greed and power to be held] and [correct me if i'm wrong] you think that its is up to the ppl to decided if they want something or not and them not wanting it alone will naturally change the
market.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinecb9fl
Senior ChildMolestationExpert
Registered: 06/12/03
Posts: 3,104
Loc: florida
Last seen: 3 years, 8 months
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3785887 - 02/15/05 10:51 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

you think that its is up to the ppl to decided if they want something or not and them not wanting it alone will naturally change the
market.


Or another company will arise to provide the product at a cheaper price.

Like I said before one area I don't see how there can be a free market or free choice to affect are certain public utilities. Most notably water.


--------------------
It is better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not. -Andre Gide

"Generosity is nothing else than a craze to possess. All which I abandon, all which I give, I enjoy in a higher manner through the fact that I give it away. To give is to enjoy possessively the object which one gives."


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblez@z.com
Libertarian
Registered: 10/13/02
Posts: 2,876
Loc: ATL
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3785943 - 02/15/05 10:57 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
also why is there such a great deman for these jobs in third world countries?



Because there are no other opportunities. Do you think the people who work in these factories are better off or worse off than they were before? If they are worse off then why exactly did they choose* to work there?


*I am referring to places of employment that do not force people to work so don't try that diversion please.


--------------------
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." - C.S. Lewis

"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniencies attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: z@z.com]
    #3786115 - 02/15/05 11:21 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

if you go for a job you expect that you 'll be better off. getting a constant wage and what not. but if you are forced to work overtime and work on out of date machinery. i thinkits 90 percent of women who work in the factories. ppl are locked in the factories over night forced to work 20 hour shiftes sleep under their stations and then start working the next day. one bathroom for all the workers.and i haven't even gone into to children working in the factories. women getting raped on their way home etc.. there is one story about this factory that burned down and the ppl were locked inside of it. there a documentary out about it. i doubt that ppl knew what wa really instore for them.. if you have to live like that i'd say you're worse off


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3786126 - 02/15/05 11:22 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
uh.. not sure what we're talking about anymore. but i know that it can be connected back to the topic at hand of capitalism. i ask you how does sweatshops play a role in an active capitalistic society/state?



Well, let's look at what most sweatshops are. Essentially, they are low-income manufacturing jobs. The people who work there have nothing to offer except cheap labor, so they will sell that service to these companies. The company gets cheap labor, the laborer gets a regular income(even if it's puny by our standards).

Quote:

also why is there such a great deman for these jobs in third world countries?



Simple. They are the best employment opportunities available to them.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3786152 - 02/15/05 11:27 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
if you have to live like that i'd say you're worse off



Worse off than what? You? Of course. But worse off than they would be without the job? I doubt it. When these factories close down or move elsewhere, many of those girls turn to prostitution to support themselves.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: Silversoul]
    #3786245 - 02/15/05 11:38 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

the main point i'm trying to get across about sweatshops is that these ppl who go to these companies looking to better themselves end up getting bum fucked by their own countries standards, by their own standards. they are looking to improve themselves not stay as cheap labour. monitoring boards like the WRC only act if workers from the factories have spoken up and said we don't want this, we want better.
its not that we want these factories to shuit down and leave. asking nothing more than to have the basic rights that they deserve. none of the companies who have horrible condtions will be put out of business if the factory conditions were to be improved


its not that a company goes to a country where is is legal to do so, they go where it is easier to get away with it. there have been many victories for the workers going against the factory/companies. yes there are risks that the company will close and pull out [yes once getting a income prostitution often happens] but that where to pressure of outside is helpful.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Invisiblez@z.com
Libertarian
Registered: 10/13/02
Posts: 2,876
Loc: ATL
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3786329 - 02/15/05 11:50 PM (8 years, 3 months ago)

As I posted earlier. Nice try at a diversion anyway.
Quote:

z@z.com said:
*I am referring to places of employment that do not force people to work so don't try that diversion please.




--------------------
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." - C.S. Lewis

"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniencies attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." - Thomas Jefferson


Edited by z@z.com (02/15/05 11:51 PM)


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3786415 - 02/16/05 12:04 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
the main point i'm trying to get across about sweatshops is that these ppl who go to these companies looking to better themselves end up getting bum fucked by their own countries standards, by their own standards. they are looking to improve themselves not stay as cheap labour. monitoring boards like the WRC only act if workers from the factories have spoken up and said we don't want this, we want better.



If they were getting a shit deal by their own country's standards, then they could find work at a better company, no? If they're being fucked over as bad as you say they are, even by their own contry's standards, why don't they just leave? Is it, or is it not, the best option available to them? And if not, what is?

Quote:

its not that we want these factories to shuit down and leave. asking nothing more than to have the basic rights that they deserve.



Basic human rights: life, liberty, and property. Hmm...I can sort of see how locking them in overnight would be depriving them of liberty. I would not consider cheap wages to be any sort of violation of their rights, so long as all parties agree to it.

Quote:

none of the companies who have horrible condtions will be put out of business if the factory conditions were to be improved



Put out of business? No. Violate their corporate charter? Possibly. Unfortunately, corporations are bound by law to look out for the interests of their stockholders. Thus, even if a CEO is a kind, generous person, the law requires him to maximize profit for the stockholders.

Quote:

its not that a company goes to a country where is is legal to do so, they go where it is easier to get away with it.



They go where they can get the best cheap labor they can get. Making them raise wages would remove all incentive they have for setting up shop in these countries, and the people who might have been gainfully employed by them are instead left unemployed.

Quote:

there have been many victories for the workers going against the factory/companies. yes there are risks that the company will close and pull out [yes once getting a income prostitution often happens] but that where to pressure of outside is helpful.



I'm all for putting pressure on these companies, so long as it's consumer pressure and not government involvement.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinerelativexistance
"beads, bees!?!?beads ....BEADS!!!"
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/08/04
Posts: 1,778
Last seen: 10 months, 28 days
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3786458 - 02/16/05 12:12 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Capitalism is meant to maximize net profit for the producer, which would ideally be 0. As well as maximize the happiness for the consumer at the same time. It provides a very efficient and logical economy. It provides the best interests for everyone. Government intervention such as minimum wage merely establish what can occur in a nation. It is not the fault of another nation that one nation doesn't have minimum wage. The capitalist will seek to use this resource as a means to reduce marginal productivity cost. It is not the fault of the capitalist economy but of the weak governmental economy that allows non-minimum wage. I say the fault is in the laws of the government, not the tactics of economics.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: relativexistance]
    #3786557 - 02/16/05 12:32 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

relativexistance said:
Capitalism is meant to maximize net profit for the producer, which would ideally be 0. As well as maximize the happiness for the consumer at the same time. It provides a very efficient and logical economy. It provides the best interests for everyone. Government intervention such as minimum wage merely establish what can occur in a nation. It is not the fault of another nation that one nation doesn't have minimum wage. The capitalist will seek to use this resource as a means to reduce marginal productivity cost. It is not the fault of the capitalist economy but of the weak governmental economy that allows non-minimum wage. I say the fault is in the laws of the government, not the tactics of economics.




yes but these majority of these countries do have gov't laws about min wage etc.
its still cheaper to produce overseas if the companies abided by the countries laws/wages etc.. so why have these sweatshop conditions? why not take the better deal and not expoit the people?


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleRandalFlagg
Stranger
Registered: 06/15/02
Posts: 15,608
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3786602 - 02/16/05 12:38 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Hey guys, let's all take a break from this fascinating discussion to ogle a hot chick.



Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: Silversoul]
    #3786655 - 02/16/05 12:47 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

Paradigm said:
Quote:

juende said:
the main point i'm trying to get across about sweatshops is that these ppl who go to these companies looking to better themselves end up getting bum fucked by their own countries standards, by their own standards. they are looking to improve themselves not stay as cheap labour. monitoring boards like the WRC only act if workers from the factories have spoken up and said we don't want this, we want better.



If they were getting a shit deal by their own country's standards, then they could find work at a better company, no? If they're being fucked over as bad as you say they are, even by their own contry's standards, why don't they just leave? Is it, or is it not, the best option available to them? And if not, what is?i

ts not that easy for anyone just pick up and leave. that take money they don't have resources they need and don't have. and if the option was there don't you think they would take it. or why would they just abandon their country and their home.

Quote:

its not that we want these factories to shuit down and leave. asking nothing more than to have the basic rights that they deserve.



Basic human rights: life, liberty, and property. Hmm...I can sort of see how locking them in overnight would be depriving them of liberty. I would not consider cheap wages to be any sort of violation of their rights, so long as all parties agree to it.

if they can't but foods or provide shleter on their wages... then that IS apart of their basic right. not just "human rights" but their rights to survive.

Quote:

none of the companies who have horrible condtions will be put out of business if the factory conditions were to be improved



Put out of business? No. Violate their corporate charter? Possibly. Unfortunately, corporations are bound by law to look out for the interests of their stockholders. Thus, even if a CEO is a kind, generous person, the law requires him to maximize profit for the stockholders.

what?

Quote:

its not that a company goes to a country where is is legal to do so, they go where it is easier to get away with it.



They go where they can get the best cheap labor they can get. Making them raise wages would remove all incentive they have for setting up shop in these countries, and the people who might have been gainfully employed by them are instead left unemployed.

once again not raise wages, but alteast meeting the min of what the law demands. it is still cheaper to pay 2 dollars than 5. would the extra couple of dollars make any difference in the pockets of the company, multi billion dollar companies?
left unemployed, only because the factories know that they could easily move and get other ppl to work for cheaper. greed, greed and greed. that is the only reason why one would hold the level of the labourer so low.



Quote:

there have been many victories for the workers going against the factory/companies. yes there are risks that the company will close and pull out [yes once getting a income prostitution often happens] but that where to pressure of outside is helpful.



I'm all for putting pressure on these companies, so long as it's consumer pressure and not government involvement.




yes agreed. and with the work i do, it is all based on the wants of the ppl in the factory. if the ppl fear that a consumer boycott would result in a closing in the factory.. it doesn't happen. and vice versa.
but do mean gov't involvment to be a set min wage or labour laws?? then those should be respected.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinerelativexistance
"beads, bees!?!?beads ....BEADS!!!"
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/08/04
Posts: 1,778
Last seen: 10 months, 28 days
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3786659 - 02/16/05 12:47 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
yes but these majority of these countries do have gov't laws about min wage etc.
its still cheaper to produce overseas if the companies abided by the countries laws/wages etc.. so why have these sweatshop conditions? why not take the better deal and not expoit the people?




i really dont understand what you are trying to argue here. a capitalist entity deals with the factors it can control. it deals with what it resources it owns and how to invest them. its not exploiting anyone, the governement of that country that allows such occurances to be allowed is what is really exploiting it's own people. this is often for benefits of the few that retain influence in that country. i see nothing wrong with someone trying to make the best out of a situation that already exists. its not as if the corporations created these weak governments, which in-turn caused the low wages or whatever so called "exploits."


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: RandalFlagg]
    #3786671 - 02/16/05 12:50 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Quote:

RandalFlagg said:
Hey guys, let's all take a break from this fascinating discussion to ogle a hot chick.




iam always down for a hott chick but the blonde hair supermodel type just doen't do it for me. i tend to like real women.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinerelativexistance
"beads, bees!?!?beads ....BEADS!!!"
 User Gallery

Registered: 01/08/04
Posts: 1,778
Last seen: 10 months, 28 days
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3786717 - 02/16/05 12:58 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

dude woman like women = :thumbup: :grin:! either way this thread was intriguing. i really think we argue not over one value/idea, but we are differing in what we are talking about, mearly a miscommunication.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: relativexistance]
    #3786747 - 02/16/05 01:02 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

yeah... that happens alot. nice random tangents. start talking/arguning on one thing and end up on completely different levels of what we're talking about. its good to get ideas out and things started.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3786845 - 02/16/05 01:15 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

ts not that easy for anyone just pick up and leave. that take money they don't have resources they need and don't have. and if the option was there don't you think they would take it. or why would they just abandon their country and their home.

Of course they'd leave if there was a better option for them. The point is there isn't. It's best possible option for them. However, if the pay and working conditions are bad by their own country's standards, that would mean that there are better jobs available to them. Clearly, that's not the case.

if they can't but foods or provide shleter on their wages... then that IS apart of their basic right. not just "human rights" but their rights to survive.

While they may get paid very little, I find it hard to believe that they are unable to buy food. How would they get by without it? The food may be limited to rice, but it's food nonetheless. I'm not clear on how their right to survive is being violated. Forgive my ignorance, but I haven't heard of these workers dying off in any significant numbers.

what?

Corporations are legally required by their charter to put the interests of their stockholders first.

once again not raise wages, but alteast meeting the min of what the law demands. it is still cheaper to pay 2 dollars than 5. would the extra couple of dollars make any difference in the pockets of the company, multi billion dollar companies?
left unemployed, only because the factories know that they could easily move and get other ppl to work for cheaper. greed, greed and greed. that is the only reason why one would hold the level of the labourer so low.


Greed is a facet of human nature. You can wish for people to be more altruistic all you want, but no system is going to change the fact that people seek out what's best for them. However, even as greedy as these corporations might be, they are still providing employment to people who might otherwise starve. Sure, it wouldn't kill them to raise their wages, but with wages being what they are, they're still providing opportunity for their workers.

You keep bringing up corporations violating the law, but the only example you've given is a vague remark about sweatshops in America. Do you have any more specific examples?

yes agreed. and with the work i do, it is all based on the wants of the ppl in the factory. if the ppl fear that a consumer boycott would result in a closing in the factory.. it doesn't happen. and vice versa.
but do mean gov't involvment to be a set min wage or labour laws?? then those should be respected.


I have no problem with foreign governments having such laws. I was referring to any attempt to get our own government involved.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3787931 - 02/16/05 04:28 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

juende writes:

"first i didn't say that there is some place where theres information proving that it is ok for companies to pay below min wage. i'm saying that it happens. "

So you were making an unsubstantiated assertion in an attempt to further your argument? Looks like I may have given you too much credit for intellectual honesty, then. We can now discard all the parts of your argument which depend on your self-admittedly arbitrary and unsupportable assertion that governments in some third world countries allow companies to pay their employees less than the government-mandated minimum wage in certain zones of those countries.


Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3787971 - 02/16/05 04:41 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

juende writes:

"and i am not trying to be funny but do you know what a sweatshop is..."

Yes I do. Do you? I realize you are new here, but this topic is one which is discussed here every few months for the four-plus years I have been posting in this forum. Do a forum search on "sweatshop". Then go to the archives (see the sticky post at the top of the first page titled "How to find old posts") and do another search.

"...or the effects of globalization??"

The effect of globalization is that people in developing nations have acess to ways of supporting themselves and their families they wouldn't have absent globalization.

"how is the econmy where you live?"

Until 2000 when the astonishingly incompetent government of Hippolito Mejia won the elections, the Dominican Republic had the fastest growing economy in Latin America by a long shot. Mejia undid all that in less than four years through his meddling in the economy. He was voted out last May and the previous president, Leonel Fernandez, was gratefully voted back in by a landslide. The economy is starting to turn around, but he's got an enormous amount of damage to undo. I think it'll be another year or two before we're out of the woods. Perhaps even longer than that.

" do you think that these factoies are improving life?"

I know they are.

" how much of the laws do you know?"

Pretty much all the ones that pertain to running a business here.


Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: deafpanda]
    #3788026 - 02/16/05 05:00 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

deafpanda writes:

"But in a truly free market the government would have no power to stop them abusing their monopoly power."

What "power"? And define "abuse".

The only power one has in a free economy is the power of persuasion. Companies attempt to persuade buyers to buy what they have to offer as opposed to what other companies have to offer. How is that "abuse"?

"There will always be monopolies in a free market."

No there won't.

"The barriers to entry to some markets are so high (rail travel, for instance) that the first big firm to be established in that market is likely to be able to hold a monopoly position."

Interesting how the only examples of "monopolies" ever offered in this forum are ones which cannot arise absent government intervention. The reason rail companies, power companies, water companies, phone companies, cable companies etc. attain positions of monopoly power are directly due to government intervention in the economy. All of the above examples are dependent on infrastructure the government controls. Governments grant rail line right of ways. Same with water mains, phone lines, power lines, etc.

If a company made insanely great toothpicks at an insanely great price, they would tend to sell more than others marketing inferior toothpicks at a higher price. At some point it might even progress to the point that 99% of the toothpicks sold were made by that company. If so, who cares? Who has been harmed? How are the consumers of toothpicks being ripped off?

You claim that the first big firm to be established in a market is likely to hold a monopoly position. Give me a specific example. I can think of many, MANY cases where that is not the case. In retailing -- Woolworth's, K Mart, Sears Roebuck. In the burger industry, A&W. In the soft drink market, Coca Cola. In the specialty sport shoe market, Adidas. In the computer industry, IBM. In the home video recording market, the Sony Beta VCR. In the automobile market, Ford. I could keep going.



Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3788045 - 02/16/05 05:10 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

juende writes:

"its still cheaper to produce overseas if the companies abided by the countries laws/wages etc.."

Actually, this turns out not to be the case in every situation. There comes a point at which it is not cheaper to produce overseas. This can easily be verified by observing the fact that there is still plenty of domestic production occurring in (for example) the US -- despite the fact that US corporate taxes are the highest in the world.

"so why have these sweatshop conditions? why not take the better deal and not expoit the people?"

Again with the "exploit" word. Giving someone the opportunity to accept employment in your company is not "exploiting" them.


Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineBanJankri
FreefallerUpwards

Registered: 07/27/04
Posts: 1,392
Last seen: 5 years, 1 month
Re: capitalism [Re: Phred]
    #3788308 - 02/16/05 08:51 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

you keep on mentioning the gov intervention seperate from the capitalism debate. but if the current international financial institutions that run according to development of capotalism, therefore applying the washington consensus to "open up" the economies who have entered a problematic situation. these institutions run on the principle that "if they want loans from us, they must apply our criteria". so I dont think it really matters if in theory, this thing is supposed to be free of gov intervention.

if you pay these people the so called min wage, and we all must acknowledge this isnt quite as close to the min wage standarts in the western world, and if you are making them work in conditions which are in direct contrast to the basic human rights. people working for 12-16 hours a day in conditions that are far from healthy. I would recommend the book no logo by naomi klein if you havent read already. she clearly gives a sense of what its like in those places, therefore after you read, maybe you can agree with the exploiting part.

"The effect of globalization is that people in developing nations have acess to ways of supporting themselves and their families they wouldn't have absent globalization."

this is a very oversimplified statement and I hope you are aware of this. it indeed can offer a faction development opportunities but it cannot explain the huge gap of economic development and wealth between the developed and the 3rd world.

the transformation of the 3rd world to market capitalism has indeed produced a worse off situation for a number of states. the states in africa, l.america has seen deterioration.


--------------------
Just let everything flow, just flow right to the center of everything. You gotta turn off your mind and relax, and then just float downstream...


Edited by BanJankri (02/16/05 08:54 AM)


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: BanJankri]
    #3788469 - 02/16/05 10:34 AM (8 years, 3 months ago)

Banjankri writes:

"you keep on mentioning the gov intervention seperate from the capitalism debate."

That's because people in this thread -- and in every other thread I've ever read on the subject -- keep blaming Capitalism for the ills that are caused by deviation from Capitalist principle. If you can't see that there's no point carrying this discussion further.

"these institutions run on the principle that 'if they want loans from us, they must apply our criteria' ".

Of course they do. That is the case everywhere. If you want the loan, you agree to the conditions of the loan contract. How could it possibly be otherwise?

"if you pay these people the so called min wage, and we all must acknowledge this isnt quite as close to the min wage standarts in the western world, and if you are making them work in conditions which are in direct contrast to the basic human rights."

You still don't grasp the essential nature of what is being discussed here -- Capitalism. No one is "making" anyone do anything. The workers in sweatshops are free to quit at any time they decide that the conditions they put up with aren't justified by the wages they receive. They are free at any time to return to supporting themselves in the same manner they were before they accepted employment at the company in question.

"I would recommend the book no logo by naomi klein if you havent read already. she clearly gives a sense of what its like in those places, therefore after you read, maybe you can agree with the exploiting part. "

I have read Naomi Klein. She's an idiot. What Klein and others of her ilk ignore is the obvious fact that unpleasant as conditions in some of these factories may be, the alternative is worse. From everything I've read about the Industrial Revolution in England and elsewhere, conditions in Eighteenth Century factories were little different.

"this is a very oversimplified statement and I hope you are aware of this."

Can you dispute its truth?

it indeed can offer a faction development opportunities but it cannot explain the huge gap of economic development and wealth between the developed and the 3rd world.

Remember that I live in one of those developing nations. I see first hand the effects of globalization on my country. It's a net positive.

As for the "huge gap".... my country today is vastly more developed than late Eighteenth Century England was. It takes time to increase wealth. To compare the economies of countries such as the US to the economies of countries such as mine which were colonial possessions for over ninety per cent of their five century existence is ridiculous. Of course there is a gap, duh! How could it be otherwise?

"the transformation of the 3rd world to market capitalism has indeed produced a worse off situation for a number of states. the states in africa, l.america has seen deterioration."

And yet again you blame Capitalism for the damage done by policies which are the complete antithesis of Capitalism. Let's set Africa aside for the moment, since that poor benighted continent (with the exception of South Africa) will probably be fucked for centuries to come. For you to say that Latin America is deteriorating economically due to the introduction of market capitalism is to display ignorance of the most staggering kind. To begin with, the introduction of even a modicum of Capitalist principle on that continent is a very recent development. As recently as the Seventies almost the entire continent was run by a collection of tinpot dictators seizing power from one another in coup after coup. Even today you've got nutbars like Chavez doing their damndest to drag their countries back to the halcyon days of Communism.

When you're ready to start discussing Capitalism rather than the stifling thereof, get back to me.


Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineBanJankri
FreefallerUpwards

Registered: 07/27/04
Posts: 1,392
Last seen: 5 years, 1 month
Re: capitalism [Re: Phred]
    #3788651 - 02/16/05 11:46 AM (8 years, 2 months ago)

well I am trying to point out that the loan contract is indeed unfair. the institutions gain power to dictate on the domestic gov the criteria. the criteria it makes like privitization and such should be considered in a more broad context. the solutions given is obviously not working and the countries in debt cannot accumulate enough wealth to pay off their debts, and it keeps on inc, thereby putting the heavily indepted poor countries in a worse off situation. I am trying to point out that there needs a radical change in this regard.

well yes the people may be free to quit but what you seem not to understand or see is the broader picture here. can they quit and join a local firm which will meet their basic survival needs with the adequte human right standars? no they cant because those sorta places are forced out of competition with the MNC's. this system is not creating development strategies for the underdeveloped, its only helping the developed accumulate wealth more.
so yes, they can quit, but I believe that capitalism has created such a system that this opportunity is not a choice.

yes I agree it has enables some countries to develop, and yes there may be a gap and its normal, but the point is, there is a gap and its widening. capitalism is not contributing to reducing the gap.

nutbarz like chavez are making policies to give poor guarenteed meals, introduced urban and rural land reform, set up a universal health care system.
he many not have improved unemployment or the econ, but he is trying to stand up to some powers in the region. things like these need lots of work and may not have direct positive effects but the effort is more than to call him a nutbar.


--------------------
Just let everything flow, just flow right to the center of everything. You gotta turn off your mind and relax, and then just float downstream...


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: BanJankri]
    #3788757 - 02/16/05 12:23 PM (8 years, 2 months ago)

BanJankri writes:

"the solutions given is obviously not working and the countries in debt cannot accumulate enough wealth to pay off their debts, and it keeps on inc, thereby putting the heavily indepted poor countries in a worse off situation."

Then they should stop borrowing money, no? And of course there have been many MANY cases in the past of countries simply defaulting on their loans. There is diddly doo the lender can do about it except to not loan them more in future.

There is no way you can rationally blame the lender for the problems which result from countries taking out unwise loans.

"can they quit and join a local firm which will meet their basic survival needs with the adequte human right standars?"

In some cases yes, in some cases no. What's your point?

"no they cant because those sorta places are forced out of competition with the MNC's."

Incorrect. The companies operating in the Free Zones do not compete with indigenous corporations. For example, here in the DR, it is against the law for goods produced within the Free Zones to be resold within the country. They must be exported. Most other countries have similar regulations. Whether or not they should is another question, of course. As a Capitalist I hold that they shouldn't.

"this system is not creating development strategies for the underdeveloped, its only helping the developed accumulate wealth more."

Incorrect. The employees of the companies in question accumulate more wealth -- in most cases far more wealth -- than they otherwise could.

"so yes, they can quit, but I believe that capitalism has created such a system that this opportunity is not a choice."

What was their choice before the company opened its doors? What would be their choices if the company had never set up shop there -- if no foreign investment were ever allowed?

"yes I agree it has enables some countries to develop, and yes there may be a gap and its normal, but the point is, there is a gap and its widening."

What point? There will always be a gap, by the very nature of human ability. And that gap will always widen, again by the very nature of human ability. In a marathon, the front runners open a gap between themselves and the back runners, and as the marathon continues that gap widens. At the start of the marathon they are minutes ahead of the back runners. By the end they can be hours ahead. The only way to narrow the gap is to cripple the front runners, a la Marxism.

"nutbarz like chavez are making policies to give poor guarenteed meals, introduced urban and rural land reform, set up a universal health care system. "

Chavez is following in the footsteps of Castro, North Korea's series of loony lefty Presidents for Life, etc. That country is being fucked over big time and will continue to be fucked over till Chavez is assassinated.

"he many not have improved unemployment or the econ, but he is trying to stand up to some powers in the region."

What "powers"? Name a country poised to invade Venezuela.

"things like these need lots of work and may not have direct positive effects..."

There will be no positive effects, direct or otherwise. Venezuela will slide back into poverty.

"...but the effort is more than to call him a nutbar."

He is properly to be called a nutbar because he is following the same irrational course that has led every single nation which has ever tried it to ruin. The definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over while expecting different results. Hence, Chavez is insane, or in the vernacular, a nutbar.


Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: Phred]
    #3788846 - 02/16/05 12:52 PM (8 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

Phred said:
juende writes:

"first i didn't say that there is some place where theres information proving that it is ok for companies to pay below min wage. i'm saying that it happens. "

So you were making an unsubstantiated assertion in an attempt to further your argument? Looks like I may have given you too much credit for intellectual honesty, then. We can now discard all the parts of your argument which depend on your self-admittedly arbitrary and unsupportable assertion that governments in some third world countries allow companies to pay their employees less than the government-mandated minimum wage in certain zones of those countries.


Phred



don't take what i say out of context and try to belittle my argument. thats low,


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinejuende
feministpresence

Registered: 02/20/04
Posts: 729
Last seen: 9 months, 29 days
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3788867 - 02/16/05 01:02 PM (8 years, 2 months ago)

and just because i'm new here to the boards does not limit what i know. my knowledge of this situation did not begin at the registration date at the shroomery. do not look at, my age in a way to undermind what i am writing and trying to get across. how much credit does it give you that you talked on an onlince community for four years. well good for you. that is weak. i've worked with seatshop awarness groups and factory workers and unions for the past four /five years. who do you think has a better hold on whats going on. someone sitting in front of their computer or someone being actively involved.

i have to work and go to class, but i'll be sure to respond to everyone questions/responses when i get back.

jue


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3788954 - 02/16/05 01:25 PM (8 years, 2 months ago)

Juende writes:

"don't take what i say out of context and try to belittle my argument. thats low,"

First you claim that these practices go on. Now you say there is no source you can cite which backs up this assertion. The logical question for me to ask is -- why should any of us believe your assertion?

I'm taking nothing out of context. You made a claim. Back it up or admit you pulled it out of nowhere and move on.



Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3789178 - 02/16/05 02:22 PM (8 years, 2 months ago)

juende writes:

"and just because i'm new here to the boards does not limit what i know. my knowledge of this situation did not begin at the registration date at the shroomery."

Nor did mine.

I merely pointed out that this has been thrashed out here countless times, with people like yourself making the same unsupported claims, appealing to emotion, never answering when asked to back up an assertion, or instead "answering" with an immense laundry list of links -- none of which actually even address the point being challenged. I can't tell you how many times I've had someone incapable of defending their point fall back on the excuse of shoving links to some turgid prose in front of my face: "Here, dewd! Read this guyz awesome work and it'll show I'm right!" I then waste twenty minutes or so of my time plowing through it all only to find -- surprise, surprise! -- that it in fact doesn't even address the point being discussed.

There is nothing you have raised here which hasn't been rebutted dozens of times -- by myself and others -- in the last year alone, let alone in the last four years.

"do not look at, my age in a way to undermind what i am writing and trying to get across."

You yourself say you have been interested in sweatshops for just five years and that you are still learning. I've been living in a country for over seventeen years where the opening of another "sweatshop" is greeted with joy, and I've been examining all aspects of socio-politico systems such as Capitalism for over thirty years. It's my passion. It's one of the reasons I allowed myself to be roped into moderating this forum.

Do you not believe that twenty-five years from now your knowledge of this field will be greater than it is today? Of course you do. Why then do you belittle my three decades of experience? Real world experience at that.

I don't "undermine" what you are writing because you are younger than I am. I dispute it because you are apparently incapable of presenting your case rationally, instead depending on condescension, accusations that those who disagree with you are blind or not open-minded or less informed on the subject than you are, and hiding behind a laundry list of undeniably biased sources with their own agendas. If you were seventy years old I'd call you on exactly all the same flaws, count on it.

"how much credit does it give you that you talked on an onlince community for four years. well good for you. that is weak."

You miss the point entirely. My participation in an online forum neither strengthens nor detracts from my arguments, it merely shows that none of what you present is new either to me or to the regular readers of this forum. And none of what you have presented so far is an indictment of Capitalism, by the way.

"i've worked with seatshop awarness groups and factory workers and unions for the past four /five years."

And I was a shop steward in a Marxist union for five years. You can dig up archives from a national CBC television news interview with me denouncing the greedy management trying to stifle the rights of the workers. You can search the archives of both the Ottawa Citizen and the Ottawa Journal (well... I guess not the Ottawa Journal anymore. They went out of business twenty years ago) for a full color front page picture of me holding one end of a street-wide banner of the Canadian Marxist-Leninist Party in a march on Parliament Hill during a nationwide strike.

Besides which, I've lived here for over seventeen years, run three businesses providing employment -- good employment -- for Dominicans who would otherwise have been selling coconuts to each other.

So forgive me when I respond in kind after reading comments directed towards me such as --

Quote:

1) -- " it is up to you to educate yourself. do not take anything at face value and challenge everything.. even the ideas that you believe in. "

2) -- " i'm not saying that its up to you to prove my facts, but is up to you to know both sides of what you are talking about. "

3)-- " i think you should take some time to better formulate your argument. "





In response to 1), I suggest you educate yourself and not take at face value everything the anti-Capitalists spoonfeed you.

In response to 2), clearly it isn't me who doesn't know both sides of what they are talking about.

In response to 3), the irony is staggering.

And that's not even quoting some of the considerably more aggressive comments you have made to other posters in this thread.

This is a political discussion forum. This isn't one of your organizations where everyone agrees with each other and constantly reinforces each others misperceptions of how things are out there in "the real world". If you are going to participate in discussion here, be prepared to support your arguments. And no, throwing a hissy fit when someone disagrees with your point of view isn't supporting an argument.

You claim to want to look at this from both sides yet your posts so far in this thread make it appear as if no one so far in your education has ever been able to get you to grasp what Capitalism really is. It wouldn't surprise me if this were the first time you've actually had a debate with people who do grasp what it is, let alone have the capacity to defend it.

You'd be better served to actually back up your points than to whine that we're being mean to you.

You are of course free to ignore that advice, but don't be surprised when readers of the thread then choose to not take your arguments seriously.

Up to you.

"who do you think has a better hold on whats going on. someone sitting in front of their computer or someone being actively involved."

How many people have you hired in your life? How many Third World countries have you lived in? How many businesses have you run? How much tax have you paid?

Forget the ad hominems -- they make you look petty. Address the topic of the thread or move on.


Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: juende]
    #3789612 - 02/16/05 04:23 PM (8 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

juende said:
and just because i'm new here to the boards does not limit what i know. my knowledge of this situation did not begin at the registration date at the shroomery. do not look at, my age in a way to undermind what i am writing and trying to get across. how much credit does it give you that you talked on an onlince community for four years. well good for you. that is weak. i've worked with seatshop awarness groups and factory workers and unions for the past four /five years. who do you think has a better hold on whats going on. someone sitting in front of their computer or someone being actively involved.



I think that actually living in one of those Third World countries, as Phred does, would give him a lot more expertise than just sitting in front of a computer. I wouldn't be surprised if he personally knew quite a few sweatshop workers.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: Silversoul]
    #3792087 - 02/17/05 08:51 AM (8 years, 2 months ago)

As it happens, I do know a few. I know relatives of quite a few more.

My major beef with this whole "sweatshop" sub-discussion -- apart from the fact that it's been discussed to death countless times here -- is that the aspects of "sweatshop" labor used most often by people trying to discredit Capitalism are the aspects which have nothing whatsoever to do with Capitalism. What does getting raped while walking home from work have to do with Capitalism? What does cheating on owed overtime wages, brutality against union organizers, or physical abuse of workers have to do with Capitalism?

Nothing.

Take out all the non-Capitalist issues mentioned and what are we left with? The wages are lower than opponents would like them to be, the hours are longer than opponents would like them to be, the environmental conditions in some factories (temperature, dust, etc.) are more unpleasant than opponents would like them to be. I will concede that hours are long, wages are low, and conditions unpleasant and perhaps in some cases worse than merely unpleasant. That doesn't change the unalterable core fact about these types of jobs -- they are assumed voluntarily and can be left voluntarily.

It also doesn't change the other core fact that -- bad as these jobs may appear to many of us -- the alternatives facing the people who work at those jobs are worse. That isn't the fault of the workers, of course.

But neither is it the fault of the companies offering an alternative to the workers.


Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinedeafpanda
Stranger
Registered: 05/07/04
Posts: 984
Loc: Inguland
Last seen: 1 year, 6 months
Re: capitalism [Re: Phred]
    #3806376 - 02/20/05 12:57 PM (8 years, 2 months ago)

Sorry about the hit-and-run posting, I went on holiday :smile:

Take the rail travel example.  A firm builds the infrastructure for railways in a country mwhich previously had no railways.  They own the tracks.  For another firm to enter the market they would have to make their own infrastructure or lease it from the dominant firm.  This makes it very difficult for new firms to enter the market.  A monopoly is likely in situations like this.

Once a monopoly is established they can keep competitors out of the market using tactics like selling goods at below cost price.  They can charge artificially high prices if there are no competitors.

Even if the free market compensates for this in the long-term (I am not convinced it does), in the short-term there will certainly be monopolies and thus artificially high prices.  The market is not doing it's job in this case.

And how would you stop cartels with no government intervention whatsoever?  If a market is dominated by a few big firms, they all stand to gain by agreeing on artificially high prices.  This, therefore, will happen.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: deafpanda]
    #3806546 - 02/20/05 02:02 PM (8 years, 2 months ago)

deafpanda writes:

Take the rail travel example. A firm builds the infrastructure for railways in a country mwhich previously had no railways. They own the tracks.

Exactly so. It is the government which secures the right of way for them to build the tracks on -- in some cases expropriating the land of those citizens unwilling to move. This also happens in the case of highways and electrical lines, by the way. The company to which the government awarded the right of way clearly has an advantage over subsequent entrants into the rail business. Again, it is government action which has allowed the rise of the monopoly.

If a market is dominated by a few big firms, they all stand to gain by agreeing on artificially high prices. This, therefore, will happen.

No cartel has ever lasted long. One member always breaks ranks. This happens in every industry from gasoline retailers to soft drink manufacturers to computer sellers to OPEC nations.



Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinecb9fl
Senior ChildMolestationExpert
Registered: 06/12/03
Posts: 3,104
Loc: florida
Last seen: 3 years, 8 months
Re: capitalism [Re: Phred]
    #3806657 - 02/20/05 02:43 PM (8 years, 2 months ago)

I was actually going to bring up early film companies. They formed a monopoly owning not only production houses and retailers but also having a contract with Kodak where only companies within the monopoly could obtain film stock.

Eventually another company emerged that was not part of the monopoly and was able to eventually push prices lower.


--------------------
It is better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not. -Andre Gide

"Generosity is nothing else than a craze to possess. All which I abandon, all which I give, I enjoy in a higher manner through the fact that I give it away. To give is to enjoy possessively the object which one gives."


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineProsgeopax
Jaded, yethopeful?

Registered: 01/28/05
Posts: 1,258
Loc: Appearing at a mall near ...
Last seen: 7 years, 4 months
Re: capitalism [Re: Phred]
    #3820134 - 02/23/05 12:55 AM (8 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

Phred said:
It is the government which secures the right of way for them to build the tracks on -- in some cases expropriating the land of those citizens unwilling to move. This also happens in the case of highways and electrical lines, by the way. The company to which the government awarded the right of way clearly has an advantage over subsequent entrants into the rail business. Again, it is government action which has allowed the rise of the monopoly.




Somebody gets it! :thumbup:


--------------------
Money doesn't grow on trees, but deficits do grow under Bushes.

You can accept, reject, or examine and test any new idea that comes to you. The wise man chooses the third way.
- Tom Willhite

Disclaimer: I reserve the right to change my opinions should I become aware of additional facts, the falsification of information or different perspectives. Articles written by others which I post may not necessarily reflect my opinions in part or in whole, my opinions may be in direct opposition, the topic may be one on which I have yet to formulate an opinion or have doubts about, an article may be posted solely with the intent to stimulate discussion or contemplation.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
InvisibleSilversoul
Holon
Male User Gallery

Registered: 01/01/05
Posts: 22,562
Loc: Mostly harmless
Re: capitalism [Re: Prosgeopax]
    #3820178 - 02/23/05 01:02 AM (8 years, 2 months ago)

I'm wondering--are there other ways of building a railroad that don't involve a government-sanctioned monopoly? Seems to me that a railroad requires a monopoly of sorts.


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineProsgeopax
Jaded, yethopeful?

Registered: 01/28/05
Posts: 1,258
Loc: Appearing at a mall near ...
Last seen: 7 years, 4 months
Re: capitalism [Re: Silversoul]
    #3820311 - 02/23/05 01:27 AM (8 years, 2 months ago)

I'm sure many American Indians would say, "So the fuck what? Genocide requires a monopoly (on legal violence) as well."

Perhaps we should contemplate the different course things might have taken if some were not given special privileges and favors by governments. Would we have less pollution, a lower use of fossil fuels, less military involvement in the mid-east and a more agrarian and self-sufficient society if government had kept their hands out of building highways?


--------------------
Money doesn't grow on trees, but deficits do grow under Bushes.

You can accept, reject, or examine and test any new idea that comes to you. The wise man chooses the third way.
- Tom Willhite

Disclaimer: I reserve the right to change my opinions should I become aware of additional facts, the falsification of information or different perspectives. Articles written by others which I post may not necessarily reflect my opinions in part or in whole, my opinions may be in direct opposition, the topic may be one on which I have yet to formulate an opinion or have doubts about, an article may be posted solely with the intent to stimulate discussion or contemplation.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinedeafpanda
Stranger
Registered: 05/07/04
Posts: 984
Loc: Inguland
Last seen: 1 year, 6 months
Re: capitalism [Re: Silversoul]
    #3820979 - 02/23/05 06:13 AM (8 years, 2 months ago)

That's what I'm saying - railways are a natural monopoly. It makes most sense and is fairly likely that one firm will operate them. Monopolies tend to make super-normal profits. There is a lot of inneficiency due to lack of competition.

I think that there should be safeguards to ensure competition in the free-market as there are constitutions to ensure rights in a democracy.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: deafpanda]
    #3821021 - 02/23/05 07:24 AM (8 years, 2 months ago)

The point being made here is that every example of monopoly you have presented involves businesses operating in areas requiring infrastructure spanning an entire country -- cable, water, rail, phone lines, electrical lines etc. In every case, the rights to build that infrastructure are preferentially granted to those businesses who successfully suck up to the government. That is why in every case it is government who sets the pricing.

You cannot use the very antithesis of Capitalism -- government intervention in the free market -- to discredit Capitalism.

Give us a single example of a monopoly not involving government-granted infrastructure arising in even a quasi-capitalist economy which has lasted longer than the length of a patent and you might have an argument.


Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinedeafpanda
Stranger
Registered: 05/07/04
Posts: 984
Loc: Inguland
Last seen: 1 year, 6 months
Re: capitalism [Re: Phred]
    #3821240 - 02/23/05 10:01 AM (8 years, 2 months ago)

I assumed that in a libertarian society anyone who had the ability and willingness to could set up such things as a railway. Was this correct?

I'm not entirely sure what you're saying - are you saying that the only reason monopolies exist in such industries is that the government grants exclusive rights to the infrastructure to a firm?

I was saying that without any government intervention, monopolies in such industries (characterised by high barriers to entry) are likely enough to happen sometimes.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineCyber
Ash
Male User Gallery Arcade Champion: Yeti Sports

Registered: 06/14/04
Posts: 1,446
Loc: Dearborn Michigan
Last seen: 6 months, 20 days
Re: capitalism [Re: Phred]
    #3821280 - 02/23/05 10:22 AM (8 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

Phred said:
Give us a single example of a monopoly not involving government-granted infrastructure arising in even a quasi-capitalist economy which has lasted longer than the length of a patent and you might have an argument.




Microsoft!

But that one is based on government issued copyright which is now valid for 170 years


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineProsgeopax
Jaded, yethopeful?

Registered: 01/28/05
Posts: 1,258
Loc: Appearing at a mall near ...
Last seen: 7 years, 4 months
Re: capitalism [Re: Cyber]
    #3821347 - 02/23/05 10:52 AM (8 years, 2 months ago)

Microsoft is not a monopoly. Most people are too lazy to try other operating systems, I have used both Linux and Unix on PC's, there is also the Be operating system and a few others. I remember a few years ago my dad was complaining about Microsoft and I told him that I had Linux on my computer and it crashed a lot less. His response was that he didn't want to try and learn something new! This is typical of those who complain about windows - no one is stopping them from using something different but themselves.

I do however agree that a copyright of 170 years is excessive, but it would be pretty sad if people were using the same crappy operating system in 170 years.


--------------------
Money doesn't grow on trees, but deficits do grow under Bushes.

You can accept, reject, or examine and test any new idea that comes to you. The wise man chooses the third way.
- Tom Willhite

Disclaimer: I reserve the right to change my opinions should I become aware of additional facts, the falsification of information or different perspectives. Articles written by others which I post may not necessarily reflect my opinions in part or in whole, my opinions may be in direct opposition, the topic may be one on which I have yet to formulate an opinion or have doubts about, an article may be posted solely with the intent to stimulate discussion or contemplation.


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflinePhredM
Fred's son
Male

Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 12,646
Loc: Dominican Republic
Last seen: 14 hours, 46 minutes
Re: capitalism [Re: deafpanda]
    #3821863 - 02/23/05 01:16 PM (8 years, 2 months ago)

deafpanda writes:

I assumed that in a libertarian society anyone who had the ability and willingness to could set up such things as a railway.

Correct.

are you saying that the only reason monopolies exist in such industries is that the government grants exclusive rights to the infrastructure to a firm?

Correct.

I was saying that without any government intervention, monopolies in such industries (characterised by high barriers to entry) are likely enough to happen sometimes.

Based on what supposition?


Phred


--------------------


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
OfflineAncalagon
AgnosticLibertarian

Registered: 07/30/02
Posts: 1,364
Last seen: 4 years, 3 months
Re: capitalism [Re: Phred]
    #3826947 - 02/24/05 12:43 PM (8 years, 2 months ago)

Quote:

I was saying that without any government intervention, monopolies in such industries (characterised by high barriers to entry) are likely enough to happen sometimes.



I think there's a chance you're not looking at the big picture here. You're thinking of this specific industry, the railroad industry, functioning as it has with the favor of government. In a capitalist United States, it would certainly not have occurred like such. I am as far as one can be from an expert on the technicalities of this topic, so I'll stick to generalities -- with regard to a transcontinental railway system, if it was possible (and moreover, plausible) to be built by a single firm, than it was possible to be built by many firms. Granting that, if the profit motive was there, competition would certainly have existed. A transcontinental railroad, however, seems an absurd thing for private enterprise to have invested in -- more like than not there would have been innumerable companies securing property rights and building local or pseudo-local railroads. It is not difficult to see that local railroads (say from Boston to NYC, or New Orleans to Atlanta) would leave many more investors with the capital needed to enter the business if they deemed it worthy.

Another thing you have to realize: railroads are only a microcosm of what has to be looked here -- TRANSPORTATION (either freight or passenger) is the big picture. Even if (big if) there was somehow a monopoly, oligopoly, cartel, what have you, in the railway industry, the other means of transportation would act as a huge check and balance on it. How many ways are there to transport things today?

ps. Please excuse the awful prose -- need to get back into the groove, heh.


--------------------
?When Alexander the Great visted the philosopher Diogenes and asked whether he could do anything for him, Diogenes is said to have replied: 'Yes, stand a little less between me and the sun.' It is what every citizen is entitled to ask of his government.?
-Henry Hazlitt in 'Economics in One Lesson'


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Offlinecb9fl
Senior ChildMolestationExpert
Registered: 06/12/03
Posts: 3,104
Loc: florida
Last seen: 3 years, 8 months
Re: capitalism [Re: Ancalagon]
    #3827202 - 02/24/05 01:50 PM (8 years, 2 months ago)

I understand what you're saying and agree when it comes to transportation.

My question earlier in this thread and in other threads has been about water supply. It simply does not make sense that water wouldn't be a monopoly. Sure there could be multiple companies in a state or even within a city but they would be providing to a specific region. I find it very hard to believe that multiple water companies would exist in the same region. Not only because of the cost but because people wouldn't allow multiple companies to go around digging up their backyard to lay new water pipes. It seems that at least in that particular industry a monopoly is not only inevitable but beneficial as it is the most efficient system. So if a water company has a monopoly with no government intervention their prices could soar. On the other hand if the government and thus, at least in theory, the citizens are able to control the water price a more beneficial arrangement could be procured.


--------------------
It is better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not. -Andre Gide

"Generosity is nothing else than a craze to possess. All which I abandon, all which I give, I enjoy in a higher manner through the fact that I give it away. To give is to enjoy possessively the object which one gives."


Post Extras: Print Post  Remind Me! Notify Moderator
Jump to top. Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8  [ show all ]

Amazon Shop for: Beef Jerky

General Interest >> Political Discussion

Similar ThreadsPosterViewsRepliesLast post
* Sweatshops and Globalization
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 all )
ekomstop 3,105 133 09/28/04 08:29 AM
by Tao
* Why Does Capitalism Get Such A Bum Rap? JesusChrist 631 19 05/15/05 02:59 PM
by Annapurna1
* Is worldwide Capitalism impossible?
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
PhredM 1,449 80 07/15/03 06:18 AM
by hongomon
* Capitalism or Communism? Which is better?
( 1 2 3 4 5 all )
HagbardCeline 1,602 95 06/27/03 02:28 AM
by downforpot
* Natural Capitalism Silversoul 431 11 04/07/05 10:53 AM
by Silversoul
* Capitalism=Theft
( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 all )
silversoul7 2,327 153 11/10/05 03:04 AM
by Microcosmatrix
* Who Really Feels Capitalism Works?
( 1 2 3 4 all )
MisterKite 1,427 75 12/13/04 05:52 PM
by SoopaX
* Obama: Huge Capital Gains Tax Increase Needed
( 1 2 3 all )
lonestar2004 1,424 53 04/23/08 05:08 AM
by johnm214

Extra information
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Phred, Prisoner#1
6,604 topic views. 1 members, 1 guests and 0 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic ]
Search this thread:
Myco Supply
Please support our sponsors.

Copyright 1997-2013 Mind Media. Some rights reserved.

Generated in 0.922 seconds spending 0.006 seconds on 17 queries.