

Welcome to the Shroomery Message Board! You are experiencing a small sample of what the site has to offer. Please login or register to post messages and view our exclusive members-only content. You'll gain access to additional forums, file attachments, board customizations, encrypted private messages, and much more!
|
Icelander
The Minstrel in the Gallery



Registered: 03/15/05
Posts: 80,498
Loc: underbelly
|
The living dream. 2
#15363500 - 11/13/11 08:01 AM (1 year, 7 months ago) |
|
|
I'm reading a book on Lucid dreaming and one of the ideas they put forth is that we are also dreaming our waking state, basically because we are taught the dream by culture and all past generations and by our collective expectations. Now is some ways this idea is attractive and I'm willing to entertain it as a possibility but I have one sticking point. If all this is true then where did the dream come from initially? Why and where did we first get these expectations and begin this cultural program?
Help me out there. Any ideas?
---------------------
-------------------- "People convince themselves of their own lies, becoming victims of their own inventions as they begin to direct their lives by standards of behavior, ideas, feelings, or instincts which do not correspond to their inner reality. What is truly serious in this matter is that the individual loses all points of reference regarding what comprises truth, and what comprises lies. He becomes used to considering as true only that which is convenient for his personal interests; everything that is in opposition to his self-esteem or in conflict with already established prejudices, he considers false."
- John Baines
|
EAPoe
Ghost
Registered: 06/08/11
Posts: 1,050
Last seen: 8 months, 14 days
|
Re: The living dream. [Re: Icelander]
#15364021 - 11/13/11 12:22 PM (1 year, 7 months ago) |
|
|
i like to entertain the idea that our advanced culture was taught to us by extraterrestrials
|
Icelander
The Minstrel in the Gallery



Registered: 03/15/05
Posts: 80,498
Loc: underbelly
|
Re: The living dream. [Re: EAPoe]
#15364085 - 11/13/11 12:40 PM (1 year, 7 months ago) |
|
|
That just pushes the question back a step.
-------------------- "People convince themselves of their own lies, becoming victims of their own inventions as they begin to direct their lives by standards of behavior, ideas, feelings, or instincts which do not correspond to their inner reality. What is truly serious in this matter is that the individual loses all points of reference regarding what comprises truth, and what comprises lies. He becomes used to considering as true only that which is convenient for his personal interests; everything that is in opposition to his self-esteem or in conflict with already established prejudices, he considers false."
- John Baines
|
White Beard



Registered: 08/13/11
Posts: 5,212
Loc:
Last seen: 57 minutes, 18 seconds
|
Re: The living dream. [Re: Icelander]
#15364185 - 11/13/11 01:15 PM (1 year, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Icelander said: I'm reading a book on Lucid dreaming and one of the ideas they put forth is that we are also dreaming our waking state, basically because we are taught the dream by culture and all past generations and by our collective expectations. Now is some ways this idea is attractive and I'm willing to entertain it as a possibility but I have one sticking point. If all this is true then where did the dream come from initially? Why and where did we first get these expectations and begin this cultural program?
Help me out there. Any ideas?
Well, I'd have to say once our brains were developed enough to think symbolically and with language. Why did people first start culture? Perhaps survival benefit. People stuck together and then projected their expectations on one another, roles were divided from chief to beggar, and thus culture was formed. Now my question: Is there anyway to wake up out of this dream?
--------------------
|
Ped
Circumspect


Registered: 08/31/99
Posts: 2,398
Loc: Canada
Last seen: 2 minutes, 38 seconds
|
Re: The living dream. [Re: Icelander] 1
#15364273 - 11/13/11 01:40 PM (1 year, 7 months ago) |
|
|
>> If all this is true then where did the dream come from initially? Why and where did we first get these expectations and begin this cultural program?
I suppose the answer to this question hinges on how it is to be approached. If you want to look at it from an ontological starting point, then the dream must necessarily run much deeper than the mere topographies of cultural memes. All that is within our field of experience, including colours, shapes, sounds, smells, feelings, knowledge, abstraction, memories, hopes, can probably be reasonably defined as having a dream like quality. I suppose we would attempt understand the origins of such a dream in exactly the same way we'd attempt to understand the origins of a conventional night-time dream: by scrutinizing the contents, attempting to tease out what buried truth they might reveal about ourselves.
It is telling, I think, that we live in a world which seems to be trying to alert us of the dream like quality of our experience. Ever since we were children, we heard the song Row Row Row Your Boat, which is a simple tune conveying profound spiritual advice: to relax, be gentle, and to regard life as 'but a dream'. We can find a similar theme in movies like Hook, where a grown-up Peter Pan awakens to a world of imagination and possibilities that he'd previously forgotten, or The Truman Show, where the protagonist discovers that his entire world has been a contrivance, or The Matrix Trilogy, where Neo awakens to the many layers of matrices which constitute reality. We can even reference the Bible, wherein Adam and Eve eat from the "Tree of Knowledge", and immediately their sense of Eden evaporates, a cruel world of suffering and toil taking its place. If we regard our experience as dream like, then we can point to thematic phenomenal appearances like these and conclude that they have something to tell us about ourselves, our nature, and the nature of being.
So that would be the ontological approach. Another approach might be a purist-pragmatic one, which would regard culture as an emergent property of a kind of group mind. Picture a school of fish moving together in unison, manifesting the appearance one large supra-form which moves about almost as though it had a singular consciousness of its own. Culture is like this. It is a phenomenon with no definable locality in space or time, and it has its own fluid dynamic. Very dream like. It might be helpful to look at things this way, as this dislodges us from the hypnosis of culture and places us in an observational mode. Then again, depending on your disposition this might constitute a kind of fall from grace, like Adam & Eve falling out of Eden.
Just a couple vectors for you to consider.
--------------------
|
LunarEclipse
Mr. Dogma Free

Registered: 10/31/04
Posts: 11,026
Loc: The Hand
|
Re: The living dream. [Re: Ped]
#15364384 - 11/13/11 02:04 PM (1 year, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Ped said: >> If all this is true then where did the dream come from initially? Why and where did we first get these expectations and begin this cultural program?
I suppose the answer to this question hinges on how it is to be approached. If you want to look at it from an ontological starting point, then the dream must necessarily run much deeper than the mere topographies of cultural memes. All that is within our field of experience, including colours, shapes, sounds, smells, feelings, knowledge, abstraction, memories, hopes, can probably be reasonably defined as having a dream like quality. I suppose we would attempt understand the origins of such a dream in exactly the same way we'd attempt to understand the origins of a conventional night-time dream: by scrutinizing the contents, attempting to tease out what buried truth they might reveal about ourselves.
It is telling, I think, that we live in a world which seems to be trying to alert us of the dream like quality of our experience. Ever since we were children, we heard the song Row Row Row Your Boat, which is a simple tune conveying profound spiritual advice: to relax, be gentle, and to regard life as 'but a dream'. We can find a similar theme in movies like Hook, where a grown-up Peter Pan awakens to a world of imagination and possibilities that he'd previously forgotten, or The Truman Show, where the protagonist discovers that his entire world has been a contrivance, or The Matrix Trilogy, where Neo awakens to the many layers of matrices which constitute reality. We can even reference the Bible, wherein Adam and Eve eat from the "Tree of Knowledge", and immediately their sense of Eden evaporates, a cruel world of suffering and toil taking its place. If we regard our experience as dream like, then we can point to thematic phenomenal appearances like these and conclude that they have something to tell us about ourselves, our nature, and the nature of being.
So that would be the ontological approach. Another approach might be a purist-pragmatic one, which would regard culture as an emergent property of a kind of group mind. Picture a school of fish moving together in unison, manifesting the appearance one large supra-form which moves about almost as though it had a singular consciousness of its own. Culture is like this. It is a phenomenon with no definable locality in space or time, and it has its own fluid dynamic. Very dream like. It might be helpful to look at things this way, as this dislodges us from the hypnosis of culture and places us in an observational mode. Then again, depending on your disposition this might constitute a kind of fall from grace, like Adam & Eve falling out of Eden.
Just a couple vectors for you to consider.
Sure happy controlled subjects are the dream of the elite. The talk now is to add lithium to drinking water to reduce suicides. Dead people aren't happy people. Their utopia is our prison. We may be happy dreaming it isn't but the chain gang is us.
-------------------- Don't submit to dogma.
|
Icelander
The Minstrel in the Gallery



Registered: 03/15/05
Posts: 80,498
Loc: underbelly
|
Re: The living dream. [Re: Ped]
#15364497 - 11/13/11 02:29 PM (1 year, 7 months ago) |
|
|
So that would be the ontological approach. Another approach might be a purist-pragmatic one, which would regard culture as an emergent property of a kind of group mind. Picture a school of fish moving together in unison, manifesting the appearance one large supra-form which moves about almost as though it had a singular consciousness of its own. Culture is like this. It is a phenomenon with no definable locality in space or time, and it has its own fluid dynamic. Very dream like. It might be helpful to look at things this way, as this dislodges us from the hypnosis of culture and places us in an observational mode. Then again, depending on your disposition this might constitute a kind of fall from grace, like Adam & Eve falling out of Eden.
This makes some sense to me.
-------------------- "People convince themselves of their own lies, becoming victims of their own inventions as they begin to direct their lives by standards of behavior, ideas, feelings, or instincts which do not correspond to their inner reality. What is truly serious in this matter is that the individual loses all points of reference regarding what comprises truth, and what comprises lies. He becomes used to considering as true only that which is convenient for his personal interests; everything that is in opposition to his self-esteem or in conflict with already established prejudices, he considers false."
- John Baines
|
King Klick
That Guy Everyone Knows


Registered: 11/13/11
Posts: 4,216
Last seen: 1 day, 7 hours
|
Re: The living dream. [Re: Icelander]
#15364517 - 11/13/11 02:33 PM (1 year, 7 months ago) |
|
|
an emergent property of a kind of group mind As in mass hysteria? An idea that we all share the same reality that doesn't even exist. Thats just what i got out of your post and i'm not sure if my take on it was relevant.
-------------------- Your god is dead, and i killed him.
The moment you refuse the human rights for just a few, what happens when that view includes you?-Chuck D.
The X I got won't find you treasure, it'll leave you rollin so hard you leave in a stretcher-Chris Webby
|
LunarEclipse
Mr. Dogma Free

Registered: 10/31/04
Posts: 11,026
Loc: The Hand
|
Re: The living dream. [Re: Icelander]
#15364524 - 11/13/11 02:35 PM (1 year, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Icelander said: So that would be the ontological approach. Another approach might be a purist-pragmatic one, which would regard culture as an emergent property of a kind of group mind. Picture a school of fish moving together in unison, manifesting the appearance one large supra-form which moves about almost as though it had a singular consciousness of its own. Culture is like this. It is a phenomenon with no definable locality in space or time, and it has its own fluid dynamic. Very dream like. It might be helpful to look at things this way, as this dislodges us from the hypnosis of culture and places us in an observational mode. Then again, depending on your disposition this might constitute a kind of fall from grace, like Adam & Eve falling out of Eden.
This makes some sense to me.
You've been watching too many movies is why.
-------------------- Don't submit to dogma.
|
circastes
Being too serious


Registered: 01/14/10
Posts: 5,738
Loc:
Last seen: 6 minutes, 31 seconds
|
|
If it is a dream, then all sorts of weird shit could have happened to bring the present state about. It would never have began... dreams never do, you are always in the midst of them.
Certainly time and causality are cultural programs. Does anything have to begin, or is that just culture talking through you?
It's a good question you ask.
Something Robert Adams said about life being a dream was, how do you know the dream hasn't just begun? I guess he was pretty aware of his programs and that made more sense to him. But I guess when you think about it the past is only a creation of your mind...
Interesting stuff.
-------------------- "Your salvation may lie in a rational apprehension of the present moment."
-Terence McKenna
"There never was any forgetfulness for Self."
-Ramana Maharshi
|
Kickle
A Dying Hope


Registered: 12/16/06
Posts: 13,175
Last seen: 8 hours, 40 minutes
|
Re: The living dream. [Re: Icelander]
#15367022 - 11/13/11 11:55 PM (1 year, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Icelander said: So that would be the ontological approach. Another approach might be a purist-pragmatic one, which would regard culture as an emergent property of a kind of group mind. Picture a school of fish moving together in unison, manifesting the appearance one large supra-form which moves about almost as though it had a singular consciousness of its own. Culture is like this. It is a phenomenon with no definable locality in space or time, and it has its own fluid dynamic. Very dream like. It might be helpful to look at things this way, as this dislodges us from the hypnosis of culture and places us in an observational mode. Then again, depending on your disposition this might constitute a kind of fall from grace, like Adam & Eve falling out of Eden.
This makes some sense to me.
trippy
|
hatsom_gotem
Stranger
Registered: 10/16/11
Posts: 111
Last seen: 1 year, 4 months
|
Re: The living dream. [Re: circastes]
#15367937 - 11/14/11 05:17 AM (1 year, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
circastes said: If it is a dream, then all sorts of weird shit could have happened to bring the present state about. It would never have began... dreams never do, you are always in the midst of them.
Certainly time and causality are cultural programs. Does anything have to begin, or is that just culture talking through you?
It's a good question you ask.
Something Robert Adams said about life being a dream was, how do you know the dream hasn't just begun? I guess he was pretty aware of his programs and that made more sense to him. But I guess when you think about it the past is only a creation of your mind...
Interesting stuff.
if weird shit was happening, we would be well aware of the fact it was a dream. in order to maintain the dream, it must remain unknown that it is in fact a dream. otherwise we begin to question the entire experience.
we're dreaming this together. when the majority understands this, when all understand that weird is possible, then it shall be. we shall dream it, then we shall be it.
then again i'm just a dreamer dreaming. sometimes i have good dreams and sometimes i have nightmares. but most people call those good days and bad days. i'm unconsciously conscious.
let's do the time warp again. let's question everything and nothing all at once. let's get lost with directions and find our way without them. i venture onwards into the darkness. welcome death.
|
The Chronic

Registered: 05/08/04
Posts: 12,022
Loc:
|
Re: The living dream. [Re: Icelander]
#15368001 - 11/14/11 06:12 AM (1 year, 7 months ago) |
|
|
I don't think you can make this theory work without bringing reincarnation into it, as then predispositions/cultural programmings can be considered an inbuilt part of creation/death/recreation, then its like one continous dream but the bodies are being re-cylcled.
The only reason i consider this waking state dreamlike is because i have dreams that are indistinguishable from this reality
|
hatsom_gotem
Stranger
Registered: 10/16/11
Posts: 111
Last seen: 1 year, 4 months
|
|
if it's universal consciousness, say the idea it's consciousness shared through different physical bodies, group mind. then there is no need for reincarnation because it is all the same mind still. different members of the group are still part of the group. let alone that this idea of a shared dream requires a shared un/conscious.
new approaches towards experience (new lives) help towards the greater goal of accumulating information in order to piece the puzzle together.
i only consider this state dreamlike, because i know nothing of its true nature. i know no truth other than the truth that i know nothing for certain. at least that is my belief at this point in what we call time.
do you have a reality that is sometimes indistinguishable from dreams? making a point is all. all in perspective.
something i will say though, i've had dreams of my psychedelic experiences before i ever took psychedelics. i know for certain what i dreamt is exactly what i experienced. i know because i talked about these dreams with friends, i discussed the things i saw, the people in them, the situations i was in. then fastforward a year later and BAM! i'm in my dream, except this time it's my reality and i feel stuck in a loop. yesterday i remembered it all before it happened, i predicted things down to the smallest detail, everything was as i remembered. locked inside my mind, and i've thrown away the key. this is the key, the key to eternity.
i know nothing, yes, but in that nothing, i know a little something and that is that I've experienced this before. or maybe i was peaking into the future, i know that i knew the experience before experiencing. people call it deja vu, but this is different. i think.
time warp. lets waltz through wormholes.
you all are really swell and i enjoy not knowing much about such with all of you.
|
The Chronic

Registered: 05/08/04
Posts: 12,022
Loc:
|
|
Quote:
hatsom_gotem said: if it's universal consciousness, say the idea it's consciousness shared through different physical bodies, group mind. then there is no need for reincarnation because it is all the same mind still.
Going by yogic philosophy it's the mind that continues & reincarnates through different bodies, so if the mind is continuing & taking form again then it is reincarnation happening, group mind or individual mind, its all mind taking form as body
|
c0sm0nautt


Registered: 05/19/08
Posts: 10,034
Loc: NY
|
Re: The living dream. [Re: Icelander]
#15368187 - 11/14/11 09:19 AM (1 year, 7 months ago) |
|
|
The dream began when life was seeded on this planet by much "greater" consciousnesses.
-------------------- The intuitive mind is a sacred gift, and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant, and has forgotten the gift. - Albert Einstein
   
|
Icelander
The Minstrel in the Gallery



Registered: 03/15/05
Posts: 80,498
Loc: underbelly
|
|
How do you know?
And who seeded their consciousness?
-------------------- "People convince themselves of their own lies, becoming victims of their own inventions as they begin to direct their lives by standards of behavior, ideas, feelings, or instincts which do not correspond to their inner reality. What is truly serious in this matter is that the individual loses all points of reference regarding what comprises truth, and what comprises lies. He becomes used to considering as true only that which is convenient for his personal interests; everything that is in opposition to his self-esteem or in conflict with already established prejudices, he considers false."
- John Baines
|
EAPoe
Ghost
Registered: 06/08/11
Posts: 1,050
Last seen: 8 months, 14 days
|
Re: The living dream. [Re: Icelander]
#15368434 - 11/14/11 11:21 AM (1 year, 7 months ago) |
|
|
me with the help of my extraterrestrial guides
|
c0sm0nautt


Registered: 05/19/08
Posts: 10,034
Loc: NY
|
Re: The living dream. [Re: Icelander]
#15370118 - 11/14/11 07:17 PM (1 year, 7 months ago) |
|
|
Quote:
Icelander said: How do you know?
And who seeded their consciousness?
This is a common theme I have found throughout metaphysical literature (a lot of it comes through via regression hypnosis). I cannot know for sure, but it is one of the best theories I have heard. Perhaps a even more powerful creator created them.
-------------------- The intuitive mind is a sacred gift, and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant, and has forgotten the gift. - Albert Einstein
   
|
Icelander
The Minstrel in the Gallery



Registered: 03/15/05
Posts: 80,498
Loc: underbelly
|
|
And is it more powerful creators all the way down?
-------------------- "People convince themselves of their own lies, becoming victims of their own inventions as they begin to direct their lives by standards of behavior, ideas, feelings, or instincts which do not correspond to their inner reality. What is truly serious in this matter is that the individual loses all points of reference regarding what comprises truth, and what comprises lies. He becomes used to considering as true only that which is convenient for his personal interests; everything that is in opposition to his self-esteem or in conflict with already established prejudices, he considers false."
- John Baines
| |
|
|
You cannot start new topics / You cannot reply to topics HTML is disabled / BBCode is enabled
Moderator: Rev. Morton, Az0th, Diploid, Kickle, c0sm0nautt 546 topic views. 4 members, 10 guests and 0 web crawlers are browsing this forum.
[ Toggle Favorite | Print Topic ]
| | |
|
|
|